Creality Scan Raptor Vs Otter - High Detail Object

Подписаться 311

Просмотров 2,3 тыс.

50% 1

Scanning high detail object, metallic surface without spray.
Raptor gives 3 times more point cloud density than the Otter.
Here's the link for marker target. (Sketchfab)
skfb.ly/oUKzC
Marker 30 deg
skfb.ly/oUNEO
Marker 60 deg
skfb.ly/oUNFx
Maker long distance target
skfb.ly/oURvQ
#creality #3dscanning #blender #coludcompare
Music by www.bensound.com
License code: N95HZPXUFSFCL92M

Опубликовано:

16 май 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 22

@alexandershinkarenko3725 День назад

Niiiiice. Thanks. Raptor is amazing :)

@MA-qx6rn 16 дней назад

The laser scanning mode and tracking on the Raptor looks very easy to use, the results for something so shiny are great, even if it wasn't shiny, very good.

@android4cg 15 дней назад

Amazing good comparision video! Would like to see more such videos! :-)

@stevesloan6775 13 дней назад

When you look at the ring end of the spanner, the raptor looks incredibly good, compared to the Otter. I would like to scan the inlet/outlet ports on engine cylinder heads. I’d love to see you scan the internal space on something tubular, to see how deep down the tube the laser can scan. Food for thought 😑 🇦🇺🤜🏼🤛🏼😎🍀☮️ Thanks again

@Payo-TensileCreator 12 дней назад

It can scan the bottom and some siding of 6mm wide 10mm deep groove. The edge of the holes will block the light path.

@user-he3ql2sz4m 11 дней назад

can you tell us about the processing step and specially about the markers, how you remove them there is any command for this or automatically removes them ?also with laser scan mode is necessary for the markers or without them there is no tracking point. thanks a lot

@Payo-TensileCreator 11 дней назад

Raptor in Blue laser will only work if it sees markers (> 4 points) but it this video, I didn't apply markers directly on the object. I put targets around the object instead. What I did is I manually select and delete the surrounded target.

@AndreyBulgakov 16 дней назад

Thank you for your video. Don't you think that if the shiny wrench was coated with a matte spray, the Otter scan quality would be better?

@volcomx14 15 дней назад

Probably but cost money 💰 think long term in this economy.

@Payo-TensileCreator 15 дней назад

Yes, you're right. When I scan white remote control. Otter gives more point cloud than Raptor in the same resolution setting (0.1mm). But spraying (I usually use Magnaflux SKD-S2) will thicken and cover the emboss text. I can try and put that in a video.

@k3nny674 13 дней назад

Where can I buy the tags you use in the video?

@Payo-TensileCreator 13 дней назад

You mean the reflective marker sticker?

@k3nny674 13 дней назад

@@Payo-TensileCreator pyramids with markers on them

@Payo-TensileCreator 13 дней назад

@@k3nny674 Pyramids are 3D printed, STL links are in the description

@fredmols8428 16 дней назад

Very good videos. Thank you for pc comparison also. For otter fps. It has given best possible overview of these two scanners. Could you scan something that has cavities. For example my einstar had problems with bolt holes under 5mm diameter. Also it did not have great depth. Meaning that when the object had lets say 50mm cavities inside or has like very landscaped shape then it had problems to see into lower parts. Giving me a model with lost data in cavities. That would be interesting video to see. Also you should compare otter with texture mode to raptor with marker mode. It seems to me that otter has little bit problems seeing markers.

@Payo-TensileCreator 16 дней назад

Otter in Small/Medium mode, you can't adjust marker brightness and object surface color will have effect on marker. But in Large mode, you can adjust brightness of marker and object separately. That's why Otter doesn't do well in small/medium - marker mode.

@gregbarnhouse8923 15 дней назад

Please scan something at 0.02 mm and show the scan quality at that level for the Raptor.

@Payo-TensileCreator 15 дней назад

0.02 mm is advertised accuracy for position of point cloud in space. 0.1mm resolution gives best detail this scanner can give as I have tested it many times. In 1x1 mm there will be maximum 100 points (depend on surface difficulty) calculated from structure light. It's not direct measurement as in LiDAR scanner. If I set it to 0.05 resolution there will be maximum 400 points in one sq.mm and those points are interpolated and not measured by scanner, and this will put more load to software that it's being export to.