As a retired meteorologist, I can assure you that this is the most thinly rationalized crock of crap I`ve ever heard. She`s weaving every known woke concept into one unrecognizable tapestry that most meteorologists would laugh at. This might have made an amusing topic for an obscure PhD thesis, but this nonsense has no right passing itself off as science. Just more academic double-talk.
@@trevorlies1774 That’s a reasonable request. My short critique is this. She seems obsessed with power (over other people), and yet completely ignores the production of power (energy). A billion people in the world have little to no access to electricity, living god-awful lives. Billions more have access, but not reliable energy. Feminist epistemology and critical theory won’t help them build a coal, hydro, or nuclear plant. But her focus and positions will certainly prevent them from doing so. Her focus on power and equity muscles out discussion of how impoverished people can create wealth and flourish. That she calls that a moral position, a position keeping billions impoverished and commanding the lives of even more to her political will, is what prompted my comment. I get that you probably won’t agree with my assessment. Not looking to argue. Just stating my criticism (as asked).
