Crushing People on Lichess - Grandmaster Chess 

Naroditsky: King.. “difficult to win if you don’t have one” 😂

@@RaptureReady2025 unless you play the grubbage rules the king can't be captured😒

Propose

Hey dude you could simply open through lichess..since you do not have twitch it will open through website

@MrBeaks yeah I know.I meant you may watch through the twitch website itself.There is no need to download the app.

He's probably burn out from " playing too much chess" lol

Or maybe it was the jet lag 🙄

And Kasparov too. 'How Life Imitates Chess'.

Also Bruce Pandolfini “Every Move Has a Purpose”

True

Probably lag. He moved at 9 seconds but the timer on the client side continued. When the move got registered the server updated the clock with the correct time.

Well send him a cheque mate!!

Lol :) don't discourage him! Content is great!

I quite like his incessant talk. It's witty sometimes and has kindof punk rhythm to it.

Yeah

The Jobava London system

Actually, the check just makes the king go to his desired square which imo is not a good use of a tempo so i do think you’re wrong about Qc5+ since it’s in white’s best interests to invest in a move for King safety rather than Black pulling the trigger and white will have to eventually respect this check threat.

@@faznaz7455 I checked it today, plug the position into lichess engine, stockfish NNUE agrees

@@faznaz7455 Of course this opinion can later be refuted, a neural network is a poor imitation of an actual human brain. They church those engines up for sponsorships and cash, for right now though my initial estimation seems viable

@@drewmckinney7843 Really? If that’s true then the reasoning behind provoking the king to h1 being more optimal is beyond me. As we say in chess, the threat is greater than the execution. Which means that there is no reason to provoke the king to a supposedly ideal square. But apparently there is something concrete that’s good for black. I’m sure a lot of titled players like Simon would also reserve giving the check.

@@faznaz7455 Engine takes knight with queen after check, opting for an exchange and a better king position for endgame, I would take with knight for more piece play. I would say engine's logic is more sound this time, all strategies should be based in endgame absolutes instead of capitalizing on human error

And after that i think bishop b3 or a2 is a defense trying to reroute the bishop to defend g6 and h7

Agreed 👍

Teaching people not to resign cos they lose a piece is okay imo, you can still create threats with material on the board, but when you're down 5 queens and opponent has 6 different ways to mate you, that's when people should realize it's time

Yeah not resigning if you have any practical chances to draw is totally fair. I've seen strong GMs like Naroditsky and Robson struggle to mate with K and R against K under time pressure, not to mention all the stalemates Eric Rosen has pulled off when opponents are under time pressure. The only time it's inappropriate to play on IMO is if you're dead lost with no ways to complicate the position and where your opponent has plenty of time left. If you then purposely run your clock out to try to get your opponent to disconnect or walk away from the computer and miss your next move, sure that's against the spirit of the game. But playing on if you think you have a chance is part of the game. Edit: Also people taking a streamer's advice on resigning are probably at a low enough rating level that the eval is expected to swing throughout the game, so they really shouldn't be resigning.

@@dsrguru sure if you u have a chances of legit winning you can fight. im talking about cases when opp is dead lost, just hopping ridiculous moves in hope of blunder. i know its allowed by rules but i have no respect for such players. winning any way possible is not the point of a game. and Aman never said only never resign if you lowrated. he just keep on saying "never resign" every time he has a chance. its ruining a good game spirit. which is already became just a useless chase of rating points. what about enjoying a beauty of it, and playing for a great game, not necessary won game? we all are losers to an engines anyway, no human can really play chess well. its a proven fact. WE ALL SUX from 900 player to magnus carlsen. why dont we just try and play beautiful games then, respecting each other, like it used to be)