Custom Sprayer Trailer and Water Truck 

Youngone1534 Young cjomc

Gentleman Hooligan. Last longer run better biggset reason.

Briggs and Stratton abbreviated- B.S.

That’s what you got out of this video?

350 is plenty. Saves fuel and still completes the job. 450 is better, but really not required.

What the fuck happened in this thread?

It’s a Pete that’s why!

NamiKaze 55g isn't bad considering the cost of the sprayer. Google it, you will never become a farmer lol. Combines are expensive too. What would you like to buy, this nice house in the country, or this combine.

teller of truth... so you are saying it would be more efficient to have a sprayer spending half of the day driving up and down the road between the field and a water source instead of spraying? Not to mention the other jobs they use the truck and tanker for which the sprayer cannot do.

teller of truth... it may not fill any useful purpose in your operation but that does not mean it does not work for these people. But #1 Just because the sprayer can drive up and down the road does not mean it is efficient to do so regarding time and tyre/machine/transmission wear. #2 Obiviously the fact that they transport the sprayer means they cover a large area (I am betting you don't have personal knowledge of their operation) #3 it is actually impossible to (even allowing the water source is close by which we don't know it could be 10 miles away, they may also use water from a treated/ softened source to increase the efficiency of their chemicals if they work in a hard water area... again we don't know) get down the road and fill the sprayer and get back as you suggest in the same time it takes to fill it in the field. #4 if you have a second person on the tanker they can have the next fill pre mixed and ready to go while the sprayer is doing it's job in the field, the same holds for collecting more water. #5 The sprayer has a very limited capacity for carry chemical concentrate around #6 As for being a keyboard warrior you are the one that posted a derogatory comment (twice in reply to two separate posts) calling the machine owner a fool for using equipment when you know nothing about their operation, nor do you know anything of my experience/ knowledge of the industry... so yeah probably best to pull your head in on that one. It is amazing to me that people are so arrogant that they feel they know more about someone else's business operation than they do.

teller of truth... lol, ok just to humour and educate you... it is a hydrostatic tranmission... ie great for infinitely variable speeds in field work but hugely inefficient for road or transport operations. You must work with some out of this world machinery if they don't use transmissions for converting engine power to movement.

teller of truth... you are just embarrassing yourself now man. We'll leave it there as you obviously are exactly what you are accusing me of being and as such there is no point in discussing the subject with you.

It said they had over 8000 acres they farmed. Traveling on roads public roads is how you get from one field to the next. If it is a perfect square and all connected you are looking at 12.5 miles from one side to the next. I doubt it is a perfect square if it is even all connected. Public roads would be the fastest way to travel.

Wesley Jackson Not that bright are we?

Mikhail Angel yep there's one in Southern Alberta that farms 114,000 acres

Farming Guy that's more than most people even dream about

Farmer Ted till everything becomes resistant, what then lol

Don't wanna get sued

Noah Gullion crops only become resistant to chemicals if they are used very light over a period of time

Charlie Raemisch but what in higher concentration they don't?

Noah Gullion no because there concentration is higher so it should kill the weeds

Lol I was recommended it too. However the truck and trailer combo is pretty bad ass though.

*2782*

francksix seems we all ended up here radomly.

francksix I fuck with it tho lol

try 35000 views now