Dahua IPC EBW81200 12M Ultra HD Vandal proof IR Fisheye Camera

Подписаться 1,4 тыс.

Просмотров 121 тыс.

50% 1

IPC EBW81200 12M Ultra HD Vandal proof IR Fisheye Camera
- 1/2.3” 12M progressive scan CMOS
- H.264 &MJPEG dual-stream encoding
- Max 15fps@12M(4000x3000), 25/30fps@3M(2048x1536)
- Multiple Correct Mode:Original ,Panoramic, Double Panoramic,1+3,Eptz,4 pictures
- DWDR, Day/Night(ICR), 3DNR,ROI, AWB, AGC, BLC
- Multiple network monitoring: Web viewer, CMS(DSS/PSS) & DMSS
- Max.IR LEDs Length 10m
- 1/1 Audio in/out(Built in Mic)
- Micro SD memery, IP67, IK10, PoE

Наука

Опубликовано:

14 ноя 2015

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 9

@muzaffar999 Год назад

very nice and full details about camera

@muzaffar999 Год назад

can we use it with NVR or DVR with same functiones

@captshadab 2 года назад

Does it support dewrapping in playback mode

@PanagiotisKaragiannisChannel 2 года назад

Of course it does. There is no point in keeping records of distorted video. Recording is always in 360° spherical view. You can then choose the type of dewarping that suits your needs. 2x2, panorama, etc. This applies to all 180° & 360° cameras.

@captshadab 2 года назад

@@PanagiotisKaragiannisChannel I assume dewrapping in play back mode is only on certain nvr. Is that the case.

@PanagiotisKaragiannisChannel 2 года назад

@@captshadab Well yes. Local NVR can always dewarp captured data, but this is not the limit. For example you can have exported footage and use a software like SmartPSS for dewarping. I thing Dahua also has another one (a bit old). Same goes for a local SD card. You can use the software to load video and dewarp it. So an NVR is not necessary.

@CustomVideoSecurity 4 года назад

Next time, drop the mounting height by half. The top half of the image is completely useless, as it is only looking at the sky.

@vayoran 2 года назад

If you lower the camera, only the wall in front will be visible. And it would be more useless.

@CustomVideoSecurity 2 года назад

@@vayoran It needs to be lowered. Not all the way to the ground to where it will be useless (obviously), but just above the top of the front wall would be ideal to eliminate the top half of sky.