Тёмный

Dassault Rafale VS Gripen - Which would win? 

Defence Learning
Подписаться 28 тыс.
Просмотров 78 тыс.
50% 1

Dassault Rafale VS Gripen - Which would win?
This video you will see a comparison between two fighter jet, one is Dassault Rafale and another one is Gripen. Dassault Rafale is made by France and Gripen is made by Sweden
#Rafale #Gripen #Fighter #Aircraft

Опубликовано:

 

28 янв 2021

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 399   
@dominationsrebellion6433
@dominationsrebellion6433 3 года назад
Gripen perfect for training Eurofighter perfect for flying Rafale perfect for Wars
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
Eurofighter perfect for flying?!!
@rokuonl2297
@rokuonl2297 3 года назад
just a fanboy ignore him
@bernardjugnet447
@bernardjugnet447 2 года назад
Well said
@dhruvkashyap16
@dhruvkashyap16 2 года назад
Well said ✌️
@paulofabianoverissimobraga3448
@paulofabianoverissimobraga3448 2 года назад
Nice video, just some details about Gripen are out of date. The data is only valid for Gripen C and D, Gripen NG (versions E and F) is very different from these versions.The Gripen's E General Electric’s (GE) F414G turbofan engine rated at 22,000lb (98kN), brings this plane to another level of performance with supercruise feature.The range of combat has dobled and new radar AESA has almost 200km of max range of detection.The max take-off weight raised to 16500Kg and now the Gripen E has 10 hardpoints.
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
Thank you so much
@johanlassen6448
@johanlassen6448 2 года назад
Gripen E cant supercruise. Not even Gripen NG could supercruise and it was 1 ton lighter with the same engine.
@paulofabianoverissimobraga3448
@paulofabianoverissimobraga3448 2 года назад
@@johanlassen6448 You are so wrong on both afirmatives. The F414G engine (Gripen E and F engine) can produce 20% greater thrust than the current RM12 engine (Gripen A,B and C engine), enabling the Gripen to supercruise (fly at supersonic speed without the use of afterburners) at a speed of Mach 1.1 while carrying an air-to-air combat payload. Gripen E and F (Biplace) and Gripen NG are the same plane. The E Gripen is Gripen NG! This info is from SAAB!
@johanlassen6448
@johanlassen6448 2 года назад
@@paulofabianoverissimobraga3448 No, because the Gripen E is far heavier than the Gripen C. Also the F414G was never designed for supercruise. Also supersonic speeds are speeds exceeding Mach 1.2 (so Mach 1.3+), Mach 1.1 is transsonic. Also supercruise is defined as being able to reach and maintain supersonic speeds without afterburner. The Gripen NG only reached Mach 1.1 with afterburner, then maintained it with milpower. That is *not* supercruise and that was the Gripen NG which was 1 ton lighter than the Gripen E. No, the Gripen E is not the Gripen NG. The Gripen NG is the 1 ton lighter prototype version. Sincerely, a Swede.
@paulofabianoverissimobraga3448
@paulofabianoverissimobraga3448 2 года назад
@@johanlassen6448please read Saab's Website, you are wrong! There many articles on web about this.(Including about Gripen E supercruise tests)
@Cheffy0130
@Cheffy0130 Год назад
Now I'm glad because my country Indonesia choose Rafale.
@LOLOVAL-os3pq
@LOLOVAL-os3pq 3 месяца назад
and you did well to choose the Rafale, all the pilots are happy to fly the Rafale!! the late English pilot Peter Collins, formerly of the RAF and the English air patrol the RED ARROWS, had tested the Rafale, for him, the Rafale is a brute, capable of breaking your spine, he said that it would not had never piloted a plane that responded with so much power and speed to the slightest of these requests, already just before flying on the Rafale, he had trained on the Mirage 2000, he had said that before the Rafale, The Mirage 2000 was his favorite plane, and he said about the Rafale, that if he had to choose a plane for any mission, his choice would be the Rafale! one thing, the Rafale is the only plane in the world that is capable of withstanding up to 11G! the others stop at 9G, which says a lot about the solidity of its all-composite structure!
@Cheffy0130
@Cheffy0130 3 месяца назад
@@LOLOVAL-os3pq thanks a lot for those information.
@LeonardoGuerreiro
@LeonardoGuerreiro 2 месяца назад
O Gripen-E é melhor do que o Rafale
@oscarontheroad
@oscarontheroad 2 месяца назад
@@LeonardoGuerreiroCertainement pas ….
@lemageelias7625
@lemageelias7625 3 года назад
with its new radar and his powerful meteor missile, the Rafale is able to shoot down every jet at a distance of 150 km. And remember in this modern area, speed doesn't matter: only radar, type of missile and agility matter.
@lemageelias7625
@lemageelias7625 3 года назад
The rafale is also capable of shooting a plane behind itself (with the help of another rafale which locks the target)
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
Yes, I have got fancy for this type of capable. Rafale is the best for its avionics,radar, capabilities,and Design..
@rodriguez3421
@rodriguez3421 3 года назад
Brazil also bought this beautiful Missel
@henriquemontalvao8492
@henriquemontalvao8492 3 года назад
I mean, there were some missiles that the f104 could outrun lol
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
@@lemageelias7625 well let's see Meteor missiles first operational on Gripen. Helmet targeting capabilities also on Gripen. IRIS T missiles for IR also on Gripen and definitely better than MICA IR . Gripen E is faster so it's Meteor missiles will have longer range. Gripen is definitely agile. Let's hope you are not on the Rafale sales team.
@992Arslan
@992Arslan Год назад
If I am poor Jas-39, if I am rich Rafale.
@TheYassersData
@TheYassersData 2 года назад
Gripen is cheaper and effective but Rafale is the best
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
👍👍❤️
@volt9903
@volt9903 3 года назад
RAFALE OF COURSE.
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
💪
@rokuonl2297
@rokuonl2297 3 года назад
no lol
@rokuonl2297
@rokuonl2297 3 года назад
@@ethanmakulit238 ye but not ofc
@rokuonl2297
@rokuonl2297 3 года назад
@@ethanmakulit238 they are pretty close
@wtGripen_enjoyer
@wtGripen_enjoyer 5 месяцев назад
cap
@legionariodemilbatallas_57-62
@legionariodemilbatallas_57-62 2 года назад
¿Cuál versión es la del Grippen? 🤔
@robertbabic80
@robertbabic80 2 года назад
Maybe data is mixed for old and new version of Gripen. I dont remember it could reach 2400km/h. Also on some other videos size of Gripen is same/similar to Rafale and I remember before that it was smaller plane.
@valentinloghin4004
@valentinloghin4004 2 года назад
Nice planes . The Rafalle is so slick looking .
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
Thanks
@MegaGronis
@MegaGronis 2 года назад
Sweden have 10 million inhabitants and France 67 millions . We have the best airplanes. J29 , A32 . J35 , SAAB 105 , AJ 37 and GRIPEN. Made in Sweden every airplane.
@johanlassen6448
@johanlassen6448 2 года назад
1. We do not have the best airplanes. 2. Gripen is made in Sweden now? The radar is Italian with licensed American technology. The IRST is Italian. The engine is American. The gun is German. The fuselage was copied from a British design. The missiles are either American or made by a European conglomerate in which Sweden was only a minor partner. What about it is "made in Sweden"?
@larejbr6388
@larejbr6388 Год назад
​@@johanlassen6448 😅
@johanlassen6448
@johanlassen6448 9 месяцев назад
@@larejbr6388 You keep inhaling that copium while you laugh.
@sonikUk
@sonikUk 5 месяцев назад
France has been manufacturing its own planes 100% for a century, not you. But we like your plane but be realistic its level is below that of the Rafale. The Americans killed your plane, they killed the little market it had. And yet you continue to hunker down and buy American equipment instead of making it yourself. Have pride
@MegaGronis
@MegaGronis 5 месяцев назад
We have made fighter ans attack aircrafts since the 40 s. Not bad for little Country.
@rodriguez3421
@rodriguez3421 3 года назад
I found this comparison a little strange, you just compared the size and strength of the fighters,In addition, it left Open which version of Gripen you are talking about.
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
Good points is it Gripen E Rafale block 4 ? Obviously poorly researched and clueless contribution
@icewallowcome_daily9802
@icewallowcome_daily9802 Год назад
try making a comparison with the Gripen E
@OmKaR-if2ek
@OmKaR-if2ek 3 года назад
Rafale❤ and Rafale is not multi role, its omnirole.😎
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
💪💪
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
Not much difference.
@demirg
@demirg 2 года назад
Trust/weight ratio, which is an important indicator for jet fighters, could be included in the video.
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
Ok
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
@@defencelearning2785 TTW is a good indicator but also having a LOW DRAG FUSELAGE is equally important F35 is a flying beer barrel but has good TTW but has its drag problems.
@johanlassen6448
@johanlassen6448 2 года назад
@@NATObait F-35 has less parasitic drag than Gripen or Rafale, not least due to its internal weapons bays. Regardless, the video is not about F-35.
@NATObait
@NATObait 3 месяца назад
​@@johanlassen6448F35 can have an advantage as it can fly clean so had no drag when all weapons are internal basically it can fly at Mach 1.6 with a good loadout while often weapons are g limited on 4th generation platforms.
@cvjanzen550
@cvjanzen550 Год назад
I would love to see these two go toe to toe. I'm not saying Gripen E would definitely win but I would put all my money on it.
@sorennilsson9742
@sorennilsson9742 2 года назад
Why compare Rafale to Jas 39 C. Compre it to Jas 39 E instead.
@AakeTraak
@AakeTraak 2 года назад
Country of origin? Looking at the flags already on screen. This will be exciting...
@kasugakyosuke6441
@kasugakyosuke6441 3 года назад
Nice video, just one little detail I'd changed, is the fact the Rafale is an omniroles fighter jet, since it can perform all the missions possible and known in military aviation. It's an all-in-one machine which is globally amazing in any aspects.
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
you r absolutely
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
I remember when F15 was described as 'An Interceptor' and then Israel got hold of them and showed the world it was capable of so much more. Likewise claiming Rafale is an omnirole or multi role doesn't mean Gripen is a one trick pony. Gripen can be replenished at the roadside configured for ship attack, air to air, ground attack, or surveillance. I think you will see it is capable. Also Gripen is cheaper to buy and operate and can be configured to accept many weapons quickly and easily.
@kasugakyosuke6441
@kasugakyosuke6441 2 года назад
@@NATObait Me I remember how the Mirage III became a legend in the 6 days wars, or how the Mirage 2000 sadly in the hands of not enough skilled arabian pilots, was chasing some USAF pilots like a prey, and more. I mean, everybody can point out amazing machines, that have been proven in real conflicts or wars. We all know France and USA are the best makers of military aircrafts. Gripen isn't a bad jet, but come on, gripen c/d never impressed anybody, and is a very light and limited fighter. It costs less, but it surely do much less too. Rafale plenty justified it superior cost, by a higher effectiveness, capabilities, and capacities. gripen e people are trying to glorify it, before it even really enter in service, and been produced. There's still only one gripen e ever produced, and it proved nothing at all for the moment, specially when it is not yet finished, and still under testings. Not even operational and missions ready. Btw, costs of gripen e will be significantly increasing compared to the old gripen c/d.
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
@@kasugakyosuke6441 yes and no. Gripen C/D is a light weight aircraft with less capabiles but Gripen E is a much improved package. 4 production aircraft are due to join Brazilian Airforce in 2021. Comparing a single engine against a 2 engine is pointless. If you had lots of money you would balance your airforce with a mixture as you don't need expensive jets doing unopposed bread and butter missions. Remember F22 ,F35, F15 , F16 , F 18 and Warthog all playing a roll not to mention the big boys B1, B2 and B52 not to mention B21 soon. Best aircraft would always have SU 27 on a shortlist as this is a base for so many cousins. AV8B/Harrier versatile close support etc
@christopherchristianvanlan1809
@christopherchristianvanlan1809 2 года назад
Raphale, F35 amd Gripen E have divided the world for jet Elite fighter sales
@naufalendram8063
@naufalendram8063 3 года назад
What about electronic warfare? I heard the Gripen has an impressive EW suite? Is it better than rafale.? I mean (Arexis vs Spectra)?
@ommsterlitz1805
@ommsterlitz1805 2 года назад
Gripen have a big let down the small swedish industry can't compete
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
Spectra provides cover for the host platform but Arexis is a unit to cover 4-5 aircraft around it. This means it probably needs a weapons officer dedicated to keeping the flight safe ( Gripen F )
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
@@ethanmakulit238 the Arexis system is more like the Super Hornet Growler package, it is able to classify radar signatures of ground or air threats then jam/attack or make false targets probably done by a weapons officer in Gripen F
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
@@ommsterlitz1805 Gripen is competitive and selling well and Sweden is proud of its global defense industry which is both effective and modern .
@ommsterlitz1805
@ommsterlitz1805 2 года назад
@@NATObait I don't think it's more modern as any developing country like China or even India so yes be proud of it but it's really meaningless to have such a thing for a country like Sweden that don't have any influence in the world either in politics and economically.
@markpacheco3950
@markpacheco3950 2 года назад
2 single engine griffin is more than 1 double engine rafale. Plus the economy on maintenance. In this case griffin needs to fight with a tanker nearby in order to extend fight radius.
@HanifMaulanaChanel
@HanifMaulanaChanel 2 года назад
I liked 2 jet figter, but Gripen very small, but never mine, the 2 have great teknologi, aesa radar and any more, speed march 2 very fast for jet 4.5 g is now. For single engine i'm keep Gripen and 2 engine i'm keep rafale.
@vovini
@vovini 2 года назад
Actuellement le Rafale est le meilleur avion de combat du monde .
@selimgokalp2805
@selimgokalp2805 2 года назад
non
@vovini
@vovini 2 года назад
@@selimgokalp2805 eh bien si je t’invite à aller te renseigner
@selimgokalp2805
@selimgokalp2805 2 года назад
@@vovini C’est un des meilleurs mais pas le meilleur
@vovini
@vovini 2 года назад
@@selimgokalp2805 si il est élu
@zakiulrifat6913
@zakiulrifat6913 2 года назад
@@vovini lol rafale is good but you cannot say that rafale is number one rafale is number 6
@LOLOVAL-os3pq
@LOLOVAL-os3pq 3 месяца назад
10300 kg = Rafale M , 9850 kg = Rafale C !! why take the weight of the Rafale M? while the Gripen does not have an aircraft carrier version?????? had to take version C!
@MubashirOfficial
@MubashirOfficial 2 года назад
I request you please make a video truth video j10c Pak vs Rafale
@MubashirOfficial
@MubashirOfficial 2 года назад
🥺😔 where is my he'art
@robertogainza1267
@robertogainza1267 2 года назад
Rafale...muchisimo más avion
@StoccTube
@StoccTube 6 дней назад
Personally I’d buy a fleet of F35 and Gripen for the UK. Gripen would be perfect in the Falklands
@leroiarouf1142
@leroiarouf1142 Год назад
The grippen is good only if u dont want go spend a lot. If u want to figth the best is a new gen rafale
@rockemsockemrusbot684
@rockemsockemrusbot684 2 года назад
The Rafale has a 30mm cannon. What does the Gripen have? The Gripen is faster, and smaller in every dimension but otherwise it’s inferior in most other aspects
@rockemsockemrusbot684
@rockemsockemrusbot684 2 года назад
Maybe I missed it. Such a boring video describing two exciting aircraft
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
Thanks bro.. I will try better next
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
A 27mm Mauser so definitely a suppository you won't want from behind!
@legionariodemilbatallas_57-62
@legionariodemilbatallas_57-62 2 года назад
Hagan la versión al español y empiecen a sumar miles de nuevos suscriptores 👍🏻
@Rundu1987
@Rundu1987 2 года назад
So the Gripen with one engine is quicker than the Rafale with 2?
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
It's not matter how many engine have
@Rundu1987
@Rundu1987 2 года назад
@@defencelearning2785 Rafale is 11000 lbs x 2 and the Gripen is 12000 lbs x 1. Rafale has almost double the thrust, so I guess much more power but not more speed.
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
Exactly
@zakiulrifat6913
@zakiulrifat6913 2 года назад
rafale engine(m88) is not that good only produce 75kn each that's why It's not that fast and it’s design was made to be carrier borne fighter
@HitoniixVII
@HitoniixVII 2 года назад
gripen est un belle appareil bien qu'il soit méconnu comparer au rafale mais celui-ci reste netement inferieur
@arunsubramanian7949
@arunsubramanian7949 2 года назад
Gripen is agile, cheaper, quicker turnaround, superior strike package and smaller footprint. Very suitable for India just like bofors gun was. But sweden was stupid to sell Saab awacs to pakistan which is adversary of India which was like killing the Golden goose customer called India. Plus too much meddling into Indian affairs through NGO's and half baked activists like greta thunberg for their environmental cause like shutting down nuclear power plants which are green, clean and cheap source of power for poor people of india killed swedish relationship with India. Sweden would not have the guts to meddle with China for human rights for Germany for burning lignite causing pollution or french nuclear reactors or norwegian oil industry exporting all the carbon emissions. France friendship with India is time tested, never imposed sanctions when India tested nuclear missiles, a veto power with larger diplomatic footprint and would not sell weapons to adversaries of India with symbiotic business partnerships, free transit for Indian passport holders. So it made sense for india to pay double the money for rafales. All these started way back in 1996, France has been getting deals for Scorpene subs as well and will keeping getting all the business deals with ethical India & African countries and all sweden will have is unethical pakistan & China.
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
👍 very good explained
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
And French and Indian politicians love each other and regularly meet up in Switzerland for a chat in the café by the Bank.
@arunsubramanian7949
@arunsubramanian7949 2 года назад
@@NATObaitthe previous iaf chief was not happy about sweden selling early air warning system to pakistan. They sold 6 of them and lost a customer who would've brought 126 gripens
@manavtalreja4324
@manavtalreja4324 2 года назад
@@arunsubramanian7949 lmao swedish are really not great when it comes to business
@whackydduck5960
@whackydduck5960 2 года назад
the same awacs were offered to india but india was stupid to not buy it.... also arun subrachutiyan dont forget that paf used french mirage for retaliatory strike in kashmir after balakot.... gripen is finest of what europe has to offer with ews and bvr second to none...gripen has lowest operational cost of modern jets.... with complete transfer of technology offered by saab it can be utilized for tottering tejas mk1,mk2 and amca projects..... no matter how many 4.5 gen fighter jets china sell to pak with gripen on iaf side we will fuck them up
@mikaeljohansson6518
@mikaeljohansson6518 Год назад
Gripen E period,
@ravenmamba6780
@ravenmamba6780 2 года назад
gripen e has 10 hardpoints
@azwris
@azwris 3 года назад
what about the electronics and the type of weapons? Rafale is better on both.
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
Yes Rafale is best. But I have got fancy for Gripen i love its design
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
Both use Meteor , Gripen uses IRIS T which is superior to MICA IR.
@johanlassen6448
@johanlassen6448 2 года назад
They are equivalent in terms of weapons and relatively equivalent in electronics as well.
@fabriceboel57
@fabriceboel57 Год назад
Il n'y a pas photo a partir du moment où les deux peuvent utiliser le meteor le rafale est supérieur et c'est normal le prix n'est pas le même,moi j'adore le grippen et je ne comprendrai jamais le choix Suisse pour moi le grippen était le meilleur choix avec rafale on a pas fini d'entendre parler du f35 et pas dans le sens souhaitez par le fabricant lol
@AmitKumar-vo1xv
@AmitKumar-vo1xv 2 года назад
To gripe. Ki jarurat ko kaise samjhe
@jorgeestrada5713
@jorgeestrada5713 2 месяца назад
Faltó sus precios y sus costos por hora de vuelo.
@sarabjitsinghsondhi5960
@sarabjitsinghsondhi5960 2 года назад
You can't compare rafale with grippen means you are comparing one eingen with two eingen both are best according to its capabilities
@drmukeshkumar7563
@drmukeshkumar7563 3 года назад
Rafale is much better
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
How come?
@wtGripen_enjoyer
@wtGripen_enjoyer 5 месяцев назад
no.
@airielaina8279
@airielaina8279 2 года назад
Country which have more war experience will created better fighter...no doubt...
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
Yes
@orgkampong
@orgkampong 2 года назад
It all depends which type Indonesian Airforce is using ? Coz according to them the Indonesian pilots are "out of this world" ace pilots ! They can even shoot down US F-22 ! So they claim ?
@irawanadinugraha452
@irawanadinugraha452 4 месяца назад
malonsia selalu menggonggong, buthurt sangat kau kera hitam semenanjung, yang lebih aneh adalah klaim kebanyakan species malonsia, lihat di youtube ataupun tiktok species malonsia selalu claim bahwa melayu yang akan bebaskan palestine, melayu yang akan hancurkan zionis israel, merdeka saja tak berani berperang lawak pula klaim bebaskan palestine dan hancurkan zionis, 90bl0k😂😂
@irawanadinugraha452
@irawanadinugraha452 4 месяца назад
There is no human species in this world that has more imagination than the Malaysian people, look at the Malaysian RU-vid which discusses Palestine and Israel, these comedians without thinking and shamelessly claim that it is their people who will liberate Palestine and Al Aqsa and they will be the ones who will liberate Palestine and Al Aqsa. destroyed the Israeli Jews, and they claim they were the ones who taught the US army jungle warfare, for a country that has no fighting experience, their ambitious/imaginary nonsense is a very funny joke for us, even against old people they didn't succeed, let alone destroying Israel😂😂
@irawanadinugraha452
@irawanadinugraha452 4 месяца назад
there is no one greater than a Malaysian pilot, 99% of fighter pilots eject themselves when their plane is hit or damaged in the air, but Malaysian Sukhoi fighter pilots eject on the ground when the plane is in the hangar, see the greatness and intelligence outside Malaysian pilots reason, I'm sure even aliens wouldn't dare attack Earth😂😂😂
@olivierrocat3932
@olivierrocat3932 3 года назад
On the last joint training, French Americans, on the 6 matches F22 Vs Rafale, it was, 5 draws, and 1 victory for the F22. Not bad for a multirole against a specialist in hunting. So who wins ... The one who has to prove himself in combat. => Rafale
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
thank u
@jaredkruger9750
@jaredkruger9750 3 года назад
Well at red flag in 2007 the gripen came second only beat by the f22 and it was also only by a few points. The gripen specialises in providing its own awacs support and has very advanced avionics, euro fighter pilots said that Swedish gripens were able to fly right up to them with out them seeing them due to their jamming systems.
@kasugakyosuke6441
@kasugakyosuke6441 3 года назад
@Olivier ROCAT : Weirdly enough, I read many times the opposite. I mean, often it is said the Rafale won vs f22, and the 1 victory you're talking about, belong to the Rafale. Even more, FAF uploaded on internet a video as proof of their victory, where USAF got nothing to show. This is why many experts/specialists and journalists were telling the Rafale was making people doubt and questioning about the f22 supremacy the USA was always claiming.
@kasugakyosuke6441
@kasugakyosuke6441 3 года назад
@@jaredkruger9750 Well, as Ayrton Senna told, being 2nd it's only being the 1st of the losers. People only remember the 1st sadly. The 1st to beat and won vs f22, was the Rafale in 2009 (any aviation enthusiast knows the video of 2009 ATLC). The new gripen as made some nice updates/upgrades, following the French way and touch of Dassault. Swedish went for something similar to the active stealth of Spectra and the Rafale's combat collaborative platform. In the world of serious and real war machines, the gripen still lack of serious arguments to enter this category. This is why India went for the Rafale.
@trabiscotte4366
@trabiscotte4366 3 года назад
It's not 5 draws but 5 victories
@Lionoftruth7
@Lionoftruth7 2 года назад
You can buy Saab Gripen for almost half the price of rafale😂
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
yes
@Ruri_Novel
@Ruri_Novel 2 месяца назад
about cost, gripen c × 3=rafale×1
@killingfields1424
@killingfields1424 3 года назад
Actually theres a new player that will gonna be a threath to these two. The HAL Tejas MKII
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
Can you explain?
@rahmaddoank8622
@rahmaddoank8622 3 года назад
Yeah for another 8 years
@asmartguycodename4721
@asmartguycodename4721 2 года назад
@@defencelearning2785 by 2023...
@amudhangv535
@amudhangv535 2 года назад
@@defencelearning2785 HAL Tejas Mark 2 is an indian fighter jet which is under production work
@arunkumartiwari4570
@arunkumartiwari4570 3 года назад
Rafle is good but I will wait for Tejas
@miguelvicentela5124
@miguelvicentela5124 Год назад
Gripen ng
@sahetilvucuh701
@sahetilvucuh701 2 года назад
Bu kiyaslamanin Türkçesi yok mu?
@fregilescalada463
@fregilescalada463 2 года назад
As a Filipino I dreamed that my country someday can buy Rafale fighter jets atleast 2 squadrons I am feel sad that because of corruption Philippines cannot buy this kind of defensive and offensive kind of MRF.
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
💪
@SamSung-od4rh
@SamSung-od4rh 2 года назад
Stop spreading lies. It is not corruption that stopped the PH from acquiring MRFs. It is the pandemic. During the peak of the pandemic, the government already made it clear that the modernization will be delayed for two years. The problem with people like you is the lack of understanding.
@jyotirmoyhandique9989
@jyotirmoyhandique9989 2 года назад
Lo
@jorgeestrada5713
@jorgeestrada5713 2 месяца назад
The Philippines will probably buy the Gripen NG. 12 units. They're on the deal.
@B3H3M0T
@B3H3M0T 7 месяцев назад
There only 3 best multirole fighter currently f15, rafale, and su 35.
@richardhoyau936
@richardhoyau936 6 месяцев назад
Sauf que le rafale est omnirole il est donc supérieur
@wtGripen_enjoyer
@wtGripen_enjoyer 5 месяцев назад
u forgot gripen
@jorgeestrada5713
@jorgeestrada5713 2 месяца назад
You forgot the Typhoon.
@t90tankrr31
@t90tankrr31 3 года назад
GRIPEN is Jas 39 Gripen or Jas 39 Gripen E ? Gripen E is 4.000km range, developing Sweden and Brazil.
@tonymax13
@tonymax13 2 года назад
1 300 km
@wtGripen_enjoyer
@wtGripen_enjoyer 5 месяцев назад
@@tonymax13 no its 4,000
@tonymax13
@tonymax13 5 месяцев назад
@@wtGripen_enjoyer The french wiki page is false then. fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saab_JAS_39_Gripen (it says 1 300 for Gripen E/F)
@ambathurmagesh7453
@ambathurmagesh7453 Год назад
Combat radius of grippen is very low below 1000kms ie approx 850kms which is not suitable for india
@jerrypalmer8580
@jerrypalmer8580 Год назад
Very good point. Gripen was built for the defense of Sweden, a much smaller country. In India, it would work for regional defense and combat better than long range duties.
@ambathurmagesh7453
@ambathurmagesh7453 Год назад
@@jerrypalmer8580 👍👍👍👍
@JohnWilson-ik4oz
@JohnWilson-ik4oz Год назад
No analysis, only some high level data, and ignoring key technologies, radar, maintenance, and costs
@user-ol1qm9ey7g
@user-ol1qm9ey7g 5 месяцев назад
ต่างหากคืออนาคต
@raouldhose3973
@raouldhose3973 3 года назад
8
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
8 means?
@koopalad4
@koopalad4 3 года назад
@@defencelearning2785 yes
@joseivan2428
@joseivan2428 Год назад
Quero ver um vidio de desse caca pra ver se se ele é bom ô Gripe já provol que é bom quader
@christopherchristianvanlan1809
Rafale won't fly long. They are dependent on parts from russia and rafale company is constantly asking for EU to change its political course. Gripen is basically not dependent on more than a few european countries and usa for parts.
@Arnalou83
@Arnalou83 Год назад
" parts from russia " what are you smoking ?
@naufalendram8063
@naufalendram8063 9 месяцев назад
What are you saying? On the contrary, Gripen uses too many parts from other countries, including the US and the UK, which can embargo you at any time if you don't comply with their regulations.
@richardhoyau936
@richardhoyau936 6 месяцев назад
Tu invente n' importe quoi le rafale est de conception française a plus de 90 % seul le siege éjectable est américain je crois
@ronaldreagan5535
@ronaldreagan5535 3 года назад
Rafale. Period.
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
But how come?
@ronaldreagan5535
@ronaldreagan5535 3 года назад
Ask Switzerland which is about to announce the choice of Rafale over all other competitors. Or Croatia, India, Egypt, Greece, Qatar....all chose the Rafale.
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
@@ronaldreagan5535 Sorry but 🇨🇭 choice is F35 because they want to sneak over the border undetected and drop lovely chocolates to the neighborhood.
@wtGripen_enjoyer
@wtGripen_enjoyer 5 месяцев назад
🤢🤢🤮@@ronaldreagan5535
@adr1uno638
@adr1uno638 2 года назад
The Gripen has a 4 cylinder afterburner Volvo engine He clearly has the high ground :/
@shivamm634
@shivamm634 2 года назад
Rafale Proven Beast 😌
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
👍👍
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
Name 1 victim that a Rafale shot down, just 1 and better not count target drones.!
@ugabugabagaga
@ugabugabagaga 2 года назад
@@NATObait f 22 raptor
@r_ic7
@r_ic7 8 месяцев назад
Gripen ang tunay na brand new fighter, mas mura pa. F 16 sugunda mano, refurbish pa, block 50 /60 at mahal $ 4 billion+
@r_ic7
@r_ic7 8 месяцев назад
Gripen depnde sa missile long range 250 km accuracy aesa radar
@tetauruhatitio840
@tetauruhatitio840 3 года назад
rafale OMNIROLE fighter not multirol lollll
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
What is deference Between omnirole and multirole?
@naufalendram8063
@naufalendram8063 3 года назад
@@defencelearning2785 Multi-role simply means capable for more than 1 function/role. Omni means all, thus trying to market their aircraft as capable of all types roles/functions that combat aircraft can perform(which isn’t entirely true). But as far as flexibility goes, some aircraft, like the Rafale, are as close to such “omni”role fighter, being capable of air-air, air-ground, air-sea missions as well as specialized missions like SEAD/DEAD , reconnaissance and electronic warfare, also Maritime fighter and Nuclear capable
@sigma_frenchie4075
@sigma_frenchie4075 3 года назад
@@defencelearning2785 to make it simple, multirole means you can do any kind of mission (bombing, air superiority etc) and omnirole means you can do all that in a single flight
@NATObait
@NATObait 2 года назад
Omnirole is just a phrase to grab attention and for people to realise that Rafale can perform many missions, so it is versatile. The F18 can of course perform a similar function but doesn't mention ' omnirole ' . Remember that we have yet to see Rafale land on water like a Catalina flying boat or hover and land like an AV8B Harrier . So Rafale is a versatile ' Multirole ' capable of performing many but not all tasks. Obviously as people keep mentioning the term then the praise should go to the marketing people who came up with the term. The ability to switch missions in flight is called swing role . But let's be honest it is only possible if you are carrying a mixed weapons/package and that is probably not going to include Exocet , Meteor, Hammer, SCALP, targeting pods, reconacence and fuel etc etc you might get to do a simple swap from SEAD mission to AA etc. The Raffle is a very capable package that can be used in multiple situations. Multi Purpose perhaps would be a more truefull description but it doesn't have the same cachet.
@diegoc.8518
@diegoc.8518 Год назад
​@@NATObait you take so much interest in trying to debunk every comment in favor of the Rafale, such a sore Gripen fanboy 🤡
@berry7178
@berry7178 2 года назад
Gripen have much better Combat range that is wery much comparable with Rafale
@legionariodemilbatallas_57-62
@legionariodemilbatallas_57-62 2 года назад
R.O.C.: Grippen para defender el único territorio que aún me queda y Rafale para un contragolpe en profundidad (2:04). R.P.Ch.: ¡Hey, qué te pasa! ¿Éstas loca?
@fszillner
@fszillner 3 года назад
Volvo or Peugeot? rs
@t90tankrr31
@t90tankrr31 3 года назад
Volvo 🇸🇪 🇧🇷
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
Gripen ❤️ the most beautiful bird
@zoulou1383
@zoulou1383 3 года назад
Peugeot
@t90tankrr31
@t90tankrr31 3 года назад
@@zoulou1383 kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkklkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk^kkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk Volvo Xc90 luxury vs Peugeot 208😂😂😂
@zoulou1383
@zoulou1383 3 года назад
@@t90tankrr31 a 208 GTI is more fun to drive than a xc90 🤮
@sasha5320
@sasha5320 2 года назад
Rafal
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
❤️
@rudalkontl5931
@rudalkontl5931 2 года назад
SAAB JAS - 39 GRIPEN E FIGHTER JET 🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪🇸🇪 💪🔥💪🔥
@fatihdertkan4742
@fatihdertkan4742 2 года назад
Ez for gripen
@maxhernandez9261
@maxhernandez9261 2 года назад
Ralafe win
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
💪
@diwattos
@diwattos Год назад
Rafale win easily.
@wtGripen_enjoyer
@wtGripen_enjoyer 5 месяцев назад
no.
@sachsgs2509
@sachsgs2509 2 года назад
Rafale👌👌👌
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 2 года назад
💪
@Jerem-dd3ym
@Jerem-dd3ym Год назад
Rafale ☝️😁👌👌👌
@thaprezidnt1
@thaprezidnt1 Год назад
The typhoon would win
@wtGripen_enjoyer
@wtGripen_enjoyer 5 месяцев назад
no.
@t90tankrr31
@t90tankrr31 3 года назад
G R I P E N ❤❤
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
Thanks
@Greekmilsim
@Greekmilsim Год назад
Rafale is better
@wtGripen_enjoyer
@wtGripen_enjoyer 5 месяцев назад
no.
@srxanmansuroglu5440
@srxanmansuroglu5440 11 месяцев назад
France win
@wtGripen_enjoyer
@wtGripen_enjoyer 5 месяцев назад
no.
@dimitrioslogothetis2153
@dimitrioslogothetis2153 Год назад
Rafale Useful tool for W A R !!!!
@jacov_776
@jacov_776 3 года назад
Rafael copy of gripen
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
If Rafale is copy from gripen? Then how rafale is superior than gripen?
@jacov_776
@jacov_776 3 года назад
@@defencelearning2785 how you know it's superior ,rafael it's junk ,jf17 more better then this
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
May be It's your won opinion.. But it will depends on pilot
@jacov_776
@jacov_776 3 года назад
@@defencelearning2785 not mine but of course depends on pilots but also depends if its outdated junk like rafael
@defencelearning2785
@defencelearning2785 3 года назад
But there is still a lot of demand for it in market
Далее
1 класс vs 11 класс  (игрушка)
00:30
Просмотров 1,4 млн
Watermelon Cat?! 🙀 #cat #cute #kitten
00:56
Просмотров 8 млн
Should Germany buy Gripen or Rafale?
30:08
Просмотров 308 тыс.
Mirage 2000
0:52
Просмотров 63 тыс.
F-16 vs Gripen E - Which would win?
9:49
Просмотров 1,1 млн
1 класс vs 11 класс  (игрушка)
00:30
Просмотров 1,4 млн