DAVID GRAEBER on People's Fear of Freedom 

I think there's also a more active role of ideology here, especially in the minds of people. I mean, most already fear any systematic change, and they tend to vent the hatred towards those who promote those changes. So they learn their positive conservatist counterproposal which is mostly a myth about how the current system is unbeatable and every other possible alternative has already failed. But they don't want to see that conditions for a change are already present in their own system so change could be mostly organic in nature.

Just look around you and see. No need to speculate :)

Then we all die.

You’ll find out soon

@@DinoCismas we are

@@iprentovskiyeah excactly look at how grossly misused internet is with integration of mone this means of control whilst bringing to fruition in normal world with this spawning up around it has more envolvment of competition compettion envolvment competative oreinted or run basd off of standard structure or i was starting from premise that just naturally everybody would share but because of false perenio of fragile fluke circumstances as ever increasingly advancive research crep encroaches up upon them they become even more fragile what they actually mean by competitoin if you want to frame it like that lets make sure its not innacurately misrepresente d i was working from or was undr impression asjust implicitlyeveryone sharding in profits of AI logical trajectory like oh yeah profits get shared with everybody not just schemey manipulatively infiltratively imposers of endless spiral of loopholes making way for new influx openings up of loopholes for more compilement and more after compilement after compilement etc

Hunter gatherers had more leisure time than modern day westerners

Graeber thought on very long time scales. His point is that we can change our social relations which means defacto shifting wealth distribution and finding ways to put all the great knowledge and advancements we have to use in a way that benefits people and the planet.

I don't think Graeber believes this will be inevitable or even easy - he's just suggesting imo that there's no reason, capital pressure aside, it shouldn't be possible.

Everybody already has part of the wealth, but it's being taken away by a few.

I mean if you think he's saying "they will" as opposed to saying "they should" you are the naive one. Obviously he's talking about how this wealth could be distributed in some sort of socialist society. The guy is an anarchist. If he believed what you implied he believed he would be an ardent capitalist.

yeah logical trajectification logically trajectified reality if not if we dont adhere to do we D1e ?

Rich people can't share equally, if they would they wouldn't be rich any longer. They are necessarily unethical and everyone knows they are. They could feed and house people for generations to come and what do they do? They let them die on the streets everyday. Left to their own in a world that was created by the extremely greedy.