Day 446: Playing chess every day until I reach a 2000 rating 

Hi Patrick....can I suggest switching back on the arrows during analysis showing the best move possible? Exen if you play a "good" move, it's useful to see the best move and I think you skate over this.....I think this would help both of us get more out of your analysis.

22:26 bro got jumpscared by the queen 💀

You had a great position. When they haven’t castled you need to focus all your attention on breaking up the cente before they can get the king safe.

On move 6: "I know I'm breaking my own rule, but I think it's gonna be OK," and then moves Bishop three times in a row to become behind in development.

I would keep harping on about asking "what is my opponent's NEXT move" especially if you attack him, but seeming as you STILL haven't grasped the constant reminders of everyone and even yourself to ALWAYS develop, what's the point?? It wasn't just the three light squared Bishop moves. It was moving your Queen around until it was forked whilst leaving your 2nd Rook on a1. You just don't seem to get it. You are more than a year in now and people keep telling you this again and again and you just can't seem to help yourself.

I'm just here for the entertainment value. And it's getting delivered every single game one way or the other :D

Yeah Patrick. Not sure why you are not sticking to the first rule you made today by keep developing.

8.30 Patrick .. same mistake AGAIN .. I move my queen here because it attacks the knight I can win a pawn BUT Zero consideration of your opponent because he is a idiot, except his not he sees what you are doing as you would and does what you did NOT he calculates moving the knight and thus finds what you should have easily seen if you calculated HIS next move, don’t leave a calculation on your own move always yr opponents .. knight g3 forking rook and queen

My tip for the day, which probably will not be taken seriously, is to learn how to analyze your games. Example: today you, with all the powers of engine analysis, are unable to discover that you blundered a knight... good job sort-of developing though

This should've been a win Patrick, but losing an advantage during the middlegame happens to the most of us. I'm not as high rated as you(only a 1200) but I think applying the Checks, Captures, and Threats method in your games will help you a lot since the the fork threat happened in this game. And always remember when the king's not castled and is in the center, you open up the center (there are exceptions though). As always good luck next time!

I'm confused as to why you decided to trade a knight and bishop for a bishop and two pawns at 25:08. Was the idea that you would eventually be able to win the knight also, or did you just miscount the material?

im just enjoying the journey with you all and with patrick, gains will come im sure!

This was horrible play lol Peak chess content. Love it

The anaylsis at this point is secondary. Your glaring flaw is time. The stats on how many games you've lost due to time, either having to rush or just losing because of it must be very high.

You had a winning position. But with 50 seconds left there is no way you could capitalize it. I said multiple times, you can not reach 2000 in your life time playing 10 minute games, you need at least 15'10"

with this speed you will never get 2000. Let's be honest. Why don't you see seconds? You should see timer all the time.

Develop light squared Bishop. Move light squared Bishop. Take knight with light squared Bishop and give opponent Bishop pair and big pawn centre. Are you addicted to losing?

At this point I’m convinced the games are thrown despite Patrick saying to the contrary 😂

You might want to try classical chess....thats how i got to 2000 otb. Gives you a better understanding of the game

Don't take this the wrong way but its juicier when you lose :D. Good for your youtube channel lol. BRING BACK THE DOGGY PLEASE. Just lie him on the bed like last time lol

Higher rated opponent, understandable loss.

Dont know why you would feel its ok to move your strong white bishop twice , and even a third time exchanging with his knight. About 95 % of the time its the wrong move , so maybe stop doing it , if you agree. I watch every now and then . Seems to me exactly this has been pointed out again and again. Gl reaching 1450 , and move on from there.👍

Maybe Patrick could try playing the game without narrating while playing? Then talk about the game after, when you review it. I find it hard to concentrate if I have to answer a phone call, a question, etc, ... let alone explain my possible and not possible moves while playing. I'm only a mid-600 ELO, but I feel Patrick might be getting distracted talking and playing.

Instead of blundering pieces by moving twice in the opening you should have developed the other rook to the center

I think missing the fork was the worst part of the game; the rest was mostly responding to the position you got in there. 5:30 was when you were evaluating this. When you move a pawn near your king (especially when you only have 2), you really need to understand the weaknesses that it exposes. I never saw you look at what the pawn was protecting and I don’t think you saw that the knight could jump in until it did.

Played like a 1100, something is obviously wrong on the process, good luck

I think you would benefit from playing the same opening every single game. That way you can learn the theory and play the first 10-15 moves fast. Right now you are way too slow.

The comments are almost as entertaining....Difficult game to understand today - seems like your opponent let you back in the game only to win it back. I find it hard to save a lost position and play the best moves when you're already feeling like you're behind. You'll get them next time

talking to yourself.."STOP IT PATRICK...:".......slight signs of schizophrenia? :-)

Are you blind? That was awful You moved the bishop twice ant the queen three times just to drop the exchange. Brilliant. Your opponent made a number of horrible moves and you still lost. Who cares what you were thinking when it was just bad. You lost on time, oh brother. You were dead then you do an analysis whereas you check with your queen to a square it can be taken on and have black move his king. He just takes your queen with his queen; can you see that? At 35:05.

I stopped watching when you moved you bishop again to pin the knight. Truly you need to quit chess. You know that’s a bad move, you said literally right before to focus on development, then right after you aren’t supposed to do it, you are well aware, but you insist on playing bad moves. You can not get better if you make the same mistakes again and again and again and again.

Think your opponent underestimated you after the fork, assuming he was playing a 1380 bozo who misses a lot of tactics...oh wait...

Are you playing slow on purpose?

Your opponent beat you three times there, the first two they left you off seemingly on purpose and just let you run out of time for the lols, like a cat playing with a mouse. That, or they are really bad and didn't understand they had you mated twice