Тёмный

DDR 

Judging FtW
Подписаться 24 тыс.
Просмотров 6 тыс.
50% 1

(3*) Is Darksteel Plate indestructible? What about the equipped creature?
Support Judging FtW on Patreon at / judgingftw
Suggest a question: forms.gle/YTK2qrQqTL18rRsJ9
A: No; yes
Bonus: Darksteel Axe and Shield of Kaldra interactions with Shadowspear

Игры

Опубликовано:

 

23 июн 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 50   
@isaz2425
@isaz2425 15 дней назад
really interesting interaction, especially with the shield of kaldra.
@enricobrasil
@enricobrasil 15 дней назад
I really like how you always come up with questions I didn't even think could be possible. I learn so much with your channel!
@jyrinx
@jyrinx 15 дней назад
So the obvious alternative would be for the timestamp to be a property of the _effect_ rather than the source, right? So that equipping would give a new timestamp to the “equipped creature” ability (since it didn't apply before) but not other continuous abilities? Definitely seems like a reasonable call for WotC to go with source-level timestamps rather than effect-level timestamps, given that tracking different timestamps for different effects could be a serious pain.
@dwpetrak
@dwpetrak 15 дней назад
Sometimes I need t comment just to comment for Dave's benefit
@Vex-MTG
@Vex-MTG 14 дней назад
My judge hat: yes, this seems like a reasonable set of interpretations. My coach hat: okay, but why would you activate shadowspear during your opponent's main phase, rather than at a time when you're both limited to instant effects?
@MrThewooter
@MrThewooter 13 дней назад
Cool! I have a friend that loves aldra and was super bummed when effects like shadow spear got printed, knowing this will make his day way better.
@Typhoon860
@Typhoon860 12 дней назад
Just found this channel. Amazing info, I love knowledged discussions!
@evandurham8908
@evandurham8908 14 дней назад
I realized it might be helpful for other people if there was an explanation of Empyrial Archangel and anything to make it indestructible, that isn't coming in the moment of it being done mid-game. In case this doesn't get made, if through whatever trickery you manage to get indestructible onto Emyprial Archangel, you can no longer take damage, including infect. The Archangel sees the damage and redirects it to itself, and since damage now doesn't kill it, it stays around after. Important to note is that you losing life isn't damage, so something like a Sorin's Thirst will still be a concern, snd the Archangel can still die if it gets reduced to 0 toughness by other means, such as redirecting infect damage to itself and receiving the -1/-1 counters.
@SpitefulAZ
@SpitefulAZ 14 дней назад
great 3 star question.
@SimKill
@SimKill 9 дней назад
Thank you for your incredibly useful videos
@RibusPQR
@RibusPQR 15 дней назад
Gotta tell Tomer his favorite shield has another upside.
@amisanthropicman
@amisanthropicman 14 дней назад
Isn't it true that the set of objects affected by shadowspear's ability is determined at the time that ability resolves? As such, I think it's worth mentioning that any of these equipment played after that ability resolves would not be affected.
@anywhereroam9698
@anywhereroam9698 5 дней назад
That’s true and normal. Should be well known and expected. The whole equipment/aura/artifact getting a new timestamp and thus its continuous effects being reset (the time order changing) is not well known and what makes this DDR interesting
@anywhereroam9698
@anywhereroam9698 5 дней назад
So darksteel plate despite getting a new timestamp won’t regain indestructible itself. Because its keyword isn’t a continuous effect. But Shield of Kaldra will because it’s a continuous effect. Pretty gnarly.
@Goatknyght
@Goatknyght 14 дней назад
Hii! Great video. I have a question, but potential video idea. If my opponent controls Nadu, Winged Wisdom and then I enchant it with Frongify, will Nadu still give other creatures the target-trigger ability? My logic is that the characteristic defining ability of Nadu applies first, since it entered first, and all of my opponent's Grizzly Bears get the new ability from Nadu, and then the characteristic defining ability of Frongify applies, but it would only remove the abilities from Nadu, not the Grizzly Bears. Am I understanding this right? Or may I be missing something?
@marimi46
@marimi46 14 дней назад
If Nadu gets nullified, the creatures controlled by that player lose the twice per turn trigger as Nadu is the source of those creatures having the ability
@seandun7083
@seandun7083 12 дней назад
Both Nadu's Ability granting effect and Frogify's ability removing affect apply in layer 6. 613.1f: Layer 6: *Ability-adding effects*, keyword counters, *ability-removing effects*, and effects that say an object can't have an ability are applied. While effects that apply in the same order normally use timestamps to determine the order in which they apply, in this case one of the effects is dependent on the other which overrides that. 613.8: Within a layer or sublayer, determining which order effects are applied in is sometimes done using a dependency system. If a dependency exists, *it will override the timestamp system*. 613.8a: An effect is said to "depend on" another if (a) it's applied in the same layer (and, if applicable, sublayer) as the other effect; (b) *applying the other would change the text or the existence of the first effect*, what it applies to, or what it does to any of the things it applies to; and (c) neither effect is from a characteristic-defining ability or both effects are from characteristic-defining abilities. Otherwise, the effect is considered to be independent of the other effect. Since Frogify's ability affects the existence of Nadu's, it will apply first and remove Nadu's before it can be applied. 613.8b: *An effect dependent on one or more other effects waits to apply until just after all of those effects have been applied*. If multiple dependent effects would apply simultaneously in this way, they're applied in timestamp order relative to each other. If several dependent effects form a dependency loop, then this rule is ignored and the effects in the dependency loop are applied in timestamp order. TLDR: Nadu won't be able to grant abilities to things if it's own abilities have been removed regardless of timestamps.
@anywhereroam9698
@anywhereroam9698 5 дней назад
That’s weird to me. I expected shadowspear to remove indestructible from Shield of Kaldra, and when SoK is equiped after SS is activated, that the equiped creature becomes indestructible. Giving a new timestamp to the whole equipment when it didn’t leave the battlefield and resetting it’s continuous effects seems wrong to me.
@anywhereroam9698
@anywhereroam9698 5 дней назад
I did not expect 613.7e where auras, equipment, and fortifications get new timestamps when attached.
@victorianchan8638
@victorianchan8638 15 дней назад
Edit: Clarification for rule 701.3d, in the case of Bronzeplate Boar and Phyrexian Splicer for example, would be nice. (sorry for bad example, because I think you've answered this specific case). Thanks; have a nice day.
@seakingit
@seakingit 15 дней назад
I was playing Omo and had this come up, the judges also had different answers. What happens with endless evil and cultivator colossus? Are they still 1/1 or is that overwritten by it's ability?
@WhiteWizard42
@WhiteWizard42 13 дней назад
if you make a copy of a creature with CDA-defined P/T, but the copy effect specifies a different P/T, it doesn't copy the CDA and instead just has the new P/T. Interestingly, this means that if you Endless Evil a Tarmogoyf, the resulting token is a vanilla creature, and would for example get buffed by Muraganda Petroglyphs.
@changemankind
@changemankind 15 дней назад
This is all assuming you can somehow equip as an instant by some other effect? Otherwise is is never possible to equip as a reaction to the mana ability of shadowspear in order to get a timestamp later than shadowspears ability, or am i missing something?
@Noirevert
@Noirevert 14 дней назад
This is why the question assumes Shadowspear is activated during the active player’s main phase, even though that isn’t a common event.
@TransformersBoss
@TransformersBoss 15 дней назад
Shadowspear is so busted. 1 mana to take away 2 of the best keywords is nuts, especially since it typically costs a lot to give those keywords! Sure, there are 1-mana Instants that grant both Indestructible and Hexproof, but I can just pay 1 more mana, and you just wasted a card from hand. Heck, in the SAME SET that introduced Shadowspear, we got Bronzehide Lion, who requires 2 colored mana to become Indestructible until end of turn! It’s crazy! Plus it’s basically a much better Loxodon Warhammer: 1 to play (as opposed to 3), 2 to equip (as opposed to 3), same abilities and +1/+1 instead of +3/+0
@chaosredefined3834
@chaosredefined3834 15 дней назад
Why does the shield's own indestructibility get a new timestamp? It didn't stop being called shield of kaldra, then gain the name again, or anything like that.
@GM_Alexandria
@GM_Alexandria 15 дней назад
It's a continuous effect, not an activated/triggered ability, so the ability doesn't get its own timestamp - it uses the shield's timestamp. The shield gets a new timestamp when equipped, because all equipment does that, so the continuous effect now operates at the new timestamp. The reason it doesn't work that way for the axe is that 'indestrutible' all on its own isn't a continuous effect, but a property/keyword.
@TorchesUponStars
@TorchesUponStars 15 дней назад
Consider, too, how much any given property is innate to the card. For instance, if an effect somehow allowed you to search your library, graveyard, or other zone for artifact cards with indestructible, that effect could not let you search for Shield of Kaldra, because Shield of Kaldra's ability (as far as I'm aware, someone correct me if I'm wrong) only applies indestructible to permanents matching certain qualities so long as Shield of Kaldra is itself on the battlefield. Shield of Kaldra is not indestructible, yet it quickly establishes a situation where it does become indestructible. (Narrativize that however you must to make it make sense to you. It's a legendary shield conjured by a magic spell, in the fiction, right?)
@SpitefulAZ
@SpitefulAZ 14 дней назад
talk about how if a 1/1 blocks kaldra complete, it goes to the graveyard instead of exile.
@JudgingFtW
@JudgingFtW 14 дней назад
I talked about that in DDR#690 if anyone is interested: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-xRMztBN4jGc.html
@SpitefulAZ
@SpitefulAZ 14 дней назад
@@JudgingFtW I forgot!
@mondoeamon360
@mondoeamon360 15 дней назад
Does shadow spear work with indestructible counters?
@arcbinder
@arcbinder 15 дней назад
Yes, same way as with equipment that grant abilities through continuous effects (e.g. Darksteel Plate in the video), as keyword counters operate as continuous effects. If the indestructible counter has an earlier timestamp, shadowspear removes indestructible, if the counter has a later timestamp the object keeps indestructible. CR 613 deals with continuous effects. CR 613.7c deals with timestamps for counters specifically.
@GFreeGamer
@GFreeGamer 15 дней назад
Yes, the counters have a timestamp of when they were put on a permanent. So activating Shadowspear after will remove the effect of those Indestructible counters, but new indestructible counters applied after the ability resolves will still grant indestructible until the Shadowspear to activated again.
@Deteuso
@Deteuso 15 дней назад
@JudgingFtW if i have 2 [Karak's Thumb]s in play and cast a [Fiery Gambit], how many of these coins will it count, and how many should you toss?
@GFreeGamer
@GFreeGamer 15 дней назад
You would flip one coin. First Thumb applies wanting to make it (flip two coins and only count one). Second Thumb applies wanting to make it (flip two coins and only count one), (flip two coins and only count one) and only count one. So you'd flip two coins, choose one result, then flip another two coins and choose one result, and then choose only one result from the two.
@danielfrazier5586
@danielfrazier5586 15 дней назад
(If an effect tells you to flip more than one coin at once, this replace each individual coin flip. For example, if an effect tells you to flip two coins, you don't flip four coins and ignore any two; you flip two coins, flip two coins, and then ignore one flip from each pair of flips. You will know the results of all simultaneous flips before choosing which to ignore. So you would start with 1 from the Gambit, first thumb says make that two, then the second thumb sees those and says, for each of those flips, make it two. So you would flip 2 coins, ignore 1. Flip 2 coins, ignore 1. Then ignore one of the flips again.) - From the Gatherer ruling To break it down further. Karaks Thumb replaces [Flip a coin] with [Flip 2 coins, ignore one] having a 2nd one would make it [(Flip 2 coins, ignore one) (Flip 2 coins, ignore one) ignore one] All of that, Gambit only sees 1 flip. Edit for brackets
@Deteuso
@Deteuso 14 дней назад
@@GFreeGamer thank you, i was looking at the rules and they said something like that, but i couldn't understand whether you double your coins in the end or not.
@Deteuso
@Deteuso 14 дней назад
@@danielfrazier5586 that "ignore one]" at the end really had me thinking i could double my coins! thank you for the clarification
@danielfrazier5586
@danielfrazier5586 14 дней назад
@@Deteuso no worries. Yeah I think some players get a misunderstanding as there are lots of effects that gives you additional counters and tokens and triggers and such. But so far nothing actually gives you more coins, you just get more chances. Which in the end makes sense as the coin flip is suppose to be a binary thing. Either you win or lose. If you had 2 coins and you had to use both you could run into a win and lose and that would a bit of a break.
@laytonjr6601
@laytonjr6601 15 дней назад
Keywords aren't continuous effects (for some reason) "This permanent can't be destroyed" is a continuous effect but not "indestructible"
@williamdrum9899
@williamdrum9899 15 дней назад
For what it's worth "CARDNAME is indestructible" has been errata'd to just be the keyword now
@spiffinn_music_lists
@spiffinn_music_lists 15 дней назад
This is incorrect. Many keywords create continuous effects. The key point to this video is that effects that change characteristics, including the adding of abilities, are treated differently from those same abilities.
@spiffinn_music_lists
@spiffinn_music_lists 15 дней назад
Other notes: effects and abilities are different. Menace is an example of a static ability (it happens to be a keyword) that creates a continuous effect. See rule 611.3
@spiffinn_music_lists
@spiffinn_music_lists 15 дней назад
To clarify, "This permanent can't be destroyed" is worded like it is text on a card, so it is an ability, not a continuous effect. It would create a continuous effect, but so does the keyword Indestructible.
@JudgingFtW
@JudgingFtW 14 дней назад
I talked about this distinction in DDR#567 if anyone wants more details: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-UbKbC1VLcTo.html
@FlakManiak
@FlakManiak 15 дней назад
...Darksteel Axe?
@Eyeclops_
@Eyeclops_ 15 дней назад
He talks about plate at the end.
@seanhardner5842
@seanhardner5842 15 дней назад
Time stamps are one of the many reasons it is nearly impossible to teach a new player this game. You end up just explaining it to them whenever it comes up…
@charleswu830
@charleswu830 15 дней назад
25 seconds ago and 0 views? Mans fell off
Далее
DDR#783 - Copying a Modal X Spell
3:15
Просмотров 4,5 тыс.
ДВЕ МЕДИЦИНЫ В ОДНОЙ СТРАНЕ
43:03
Top 10 Cards with Weird Specific Costs in MTG
15:10
Просмотров 126 тыс.
Cheating in Trading Card Games
4:14
Просмотров 8 тыс.
I Said Nadu Was the Hogaak of MH3, but I Was Wrong...
8:23
Stop Turning your Commander into a Combo Piece
10:06
Просмотров 71 тыс.
These Decks Never Run Out of Gas
13:24
Просмотров 36 тыс.
The Nadu Problem
12:06
Просмотров 72 тыс.
DDR#90 - Double Strike + Trample + Indestructible
2:19