@Senior Billy Bull Most of those judges were Republican Trump appointed judges. What excuse do you make for that? You people on the right see only one side. Republicans don’t get to bend the rules just because they don’t like the results. There was no evidence presented to these Trump appointed judges for them to waste more tax payers money to “find fraud” that they deemed didn’t exist. the law doesn’t work that way! You provide the evidence first! I think anyone with half a brain knows that! Keep putting it on the left, you look stupid!
John Singlet The problem is that an audit would not solve what is the real issue. Each state counted, recounted and verified its results according to their respective state constitutions. This had to be complete before December,I think, so the States could then send their findings to the Congress by January. Each of these steps are intended to certify the election at the local, state and federal levels. Any issues, (such as fraud or voting irregularities), that may impact the out come of the elections are dealt with before the results can be passed on to the next level. This was done, for the first time in my 65 year old memory), with the international news media watching every step. Note: While this process is traditional it has never before been a big deal and always considered formality...until Trump. What’s happening here is that politicians like Paul and others want to use the lie of a “stolen election” for their own political Benifits buy suggesting that their constituents deserves answers concerning voting irregularities and fraud. Be aware that Paul, Ted Cruz and others are not contesting suspected irregularities in THEIR states or districts but in the States and Districts of mostly African-American districts in Democratic states. If you know enough about America to ask such a logical question, I’m willing to bet i don’t need to explain this dynamic any further, lol. So that’s why more comprehensive audits won’t solve the problem. Paul and others are looking to scoop up some of trumps supporters by making them believe he’s fighting for THEM. He’s not. He’s dreaming of 2024! Hope this helps.
They do not want one because it will show widespread voter fraud by the Democrats. The deep state does not like Trump and will use the media and Democrats to instal a President of hey can control.
@Senior Billy Bull You're wrong. Did you listen to Trump's phone call with the Georgia Secretary of State? It was investigated. Nothing was found. You're all about law and order, until the court gives you a decision you don't like.
@@hghwaymanrebel5913 Since you like taking quotes out of context. Here is one for you "We’re like a third-world country" - Donald Trump. I thought he was suppose to make us great again? Not a third world country. What happened?
Wasn't there an old saying in journalism that says "There's three sides to every story. Your side, their side, and the Truth." We strayed way too far from that.
There was another old rule in journalism as well that went like, "If you can tell who a journalist is going to vote for then he's a propagandist, not a journalist!
@@kingofkings69nerjr90 next you’re going to say where is the evidence that we don’t have reptilian overlords. Its up to those who are claiming that the election was stolen to present evidence. There is a reason trump lost 80 court cases, there isn’t any evidence because it didn’t happen.
Your statement assumes they were mailed in to begin with by people. When they bring up the missing address thing, it is because those are not mail-ins. they were created/forged and they come from nowhere. That is why the cases were brought up
@@Tomoppify We all assume that is the case, we're just dismantling the statement "voters forgot their own address" piece by piece by pointing out how a "mistake" of such a large proportion couldn't simply be a product of a collective forgetfulness of one's personal information.
imagine any other crime being treated like this. no investigation, hundreds of witnesses (none interviewed), video of what is likely evidence of the crime being destroyed, video of the crime, video of people blocking normal access to the area where the crime is taking place at the time it was being committed and when people complain about a lack of investigation the police say there's no evidence and you have to agree that no crime took place.
It's sad and scary that this actually happened. It's disgusting. On January 6th (forgetting about the violence), I was really angry with the dems for putting their politics over truth and justice. Not "break-into-the-Captiol" angry, but still angry. I get where Rand is coming from regarding Congress's role in the process. Semantically, neither Congress nor the VP certify the election. I think that instead, the VP COUNTS the electoral votes with Congress as a witness to make sure that no funny business takes place by the VP. Back before we became so connected regarding communication, I think it was at this counting that people actually found out the results of the election.
"Imagine any other crime . . . " We don't have to. We have one. It is called Jan 6. And this Thursday night, Democrats have hired a professional producer from ABC to produce a pack of lies and turn it into something that looks real.
"The secret of freedom is educating the people, whereas the secret of tyranny is keeping them ignorant." - Robespierre May I also remind you the fact that our Native American population in our motherland, the Continent of America before the European Colonizers arrived, was around 15 millions, while the European population in their motherland, the Continent of Europe was around 25 millions. Today, Native American population is 15 million, while the European population, in the Continents of America + Europe, is a staggering TWO BILLION! A shocking sad truth. 😔 In my humble opinion, it's about time to decolonize the Colonized lands, and return it to rightful owners Native American people. Notorious global cardinal crimes the Christian West has committed, and benefited a great deals, such as Slavery & Colonialism had long been over, why on earth is notorious Colonization still lingering on, may I ask? 😔
@@garettanderson6772 it sure is why trump and the GOP are anti science anti education. He flat out said he loves the uneducated... but sure the dems who want to send your kids to college without putting them in lifelong debt are the bad guys... Whatever you gotta tell yourself to sleep at night.
Such a partisan hack, Rand gets credits for pointing out Biden CLEARLY could not have won this election without the ENTIRE "liberal machine" behind him, which includes TOOLS like George and his media pals. Disgusting bias.
No one is hiding anything. This “stolen” election conspiracy is the most blatant propaganda lie by a political party in US history and you people are falling for it
They need to stop telling Biden what the plans are, because he tells you, and you to your face and you still don't believe him. He won this election in the same way he writes his speeches. He cheats. "We have organized the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in history" -Joe Biden
@@cloudrouju526 Scientists are just like any other group of people. They have polarized opinions and often 99% of them can be wrong about something and the 1 % dissenters will be ostracized. This happens all the time. If you had a theory that modern people had 4 % Neanderthal genes , you would not get any grant money at all. That is until 2010 when they proved the opposite. Only last year , a few months ago they discovered that the oceans are absorbing twice the CO2 they had previously thought and second, cold air rises. These things just discovered last year. They are pretty basic mechanisms , but no one knew. caes.ucdavis.edu/news/cold-air-rises-what-means-earths-climate www.intelligentliving.co/oceans-twice-as-effective-absorbing-co2/ The startling thing is that these mechanisms are so easy to check and no one did until last year. So what else are they missing ??? The consensus in science takes many years to form and then it can still be wrong. In the meantime it looks like Global warming is happening and we should be acting on it but don't be surprised if we find out in a few years that it is wrong. And just because 99% of scientists agree on something is not a scientific method to judge something as right or wrong. Scientists are very biased and money driven, grant driven. Scientists will read a paper written about global warming and then talk to his fellow scientists and so on, so you have a group of 100 scientists who have opinions based on word of mouth from one paper. They are parroting.
There aren't two sides, there's truth and fiction. When one side is spreading misinformation and can't provide any proof of their lies, there aren't two sides to the story.
Jeff Guarino absolutely! I will hold on to my strongly convicted personally revelation that the Earth is flat! I’m convinced that all those so call scientists who made up those so call evidence are in cohorts only to try to trick me! But I’m not so dumb to be tricked! They need to work way harder than that!
Rand Paul is correct on every count , especially the part when he said, "George, you've forgotten who you are." All mainstream media journalists (so called) have forgotten what it means to actually BE journalists.
Why because he called Paul out? Like he’s such a perfect senator😂😂😂 “He’s correct on every count” - spoken like a true MAGA sheep lol. Just cause you agree with him doesn’t make him right.
@@Bhubnipz - You're right.....the fascist "giant corporations," who are determined to stop free speech, have too much power over us. They must be controlled through anti-trust and other legislation. It's supposed to be _a government of, by and for the people_ .....that's what we need to get back to, if we ever had it in the first place.
@@faustus5481 So you think censorship is a website letting you make posts about how they are censoring you? You’re so delusional that you will think you’re censored by RU-vid and you’ll say that on a RU-vid comment section. Just because other people tell you you’re censored
@@Bhubnipz yeah nothing Orwellian about disclaimers, scrubbing comments, disallowing views pushing ideas deemed as “wrong think”. Nothing Orwellian about changing the definitions of words to support your political beliefs. 😂
@@jerrygil1965 Since when does the result of a "legitimate" election require the presence of 25K National Guard? If we had real leaders, they would be addressing the fact that the populace doesn't trust that the election was conducted honestly. We are now a fascist authoritarian police state. Never forget how our elected officials congress kicked us in the a$$.
@@bbrowne9855 yeah i was thinking that too. If the people elected you, why would you need to fear the people then? 25k troops is not to deal with a couple people who broke some windows at the Capitol.
@@ginxxxxx France allows voting by proxy. In France it's pretty much mandatory to wear a mask in public and their cases of coronavirus are nowhere near the amounts in the United States even when you account for the variance of population. Japan also wears masks during flu season and hasn't needed a mandate to wear them during coronavirus. They also have not seen the numbers the United States has and pretty much every other country has been able to attain at least some sort of normalcy while fighting the virus this past year. I agree with you and the former president wholeheartedly that we should definitely be emulating other countries. Especially France and Japan when it comes to wearing masks since our past year history has proven that we suck at containing the virus that was a major concern for many Americans during the voting period. I'm so grateful that my bout with CoVid wasn't severe enough to keep me from voting in person but please explain to me how you would propose for me to have been able to vote if I was still under quarantine. Republicans had months to come up with a solution to a pretty important election year taking place in a pandemic and the best they could offer was go in person and heighten the chance of spreading the virus even more. It's a little late to complain about how it was ran and it being unfair now.
@@bridgetmoriarty7243 We already have, that's why you pussies had to censor all of us off of the internet and now you're pretending that WE'RE the ones who have been burning cities to the ground for the last year.
He never said he thought Trump won. He only said he wants it investigated. It's totally believable that enough people in the country hated Trump to vote him out. But an investigation should be done every election. Last election dems claimed it was stoled. We need voter ID and 100% confidence so that whoever wins if it's your party or not you can believe it's legit.
All one has to do is listen to the first 7 seconds of this video, in order to realize what a certain part of the "official media" is doing these days. Telling people what to think, that is. Totally unacceptable, in my opinion.
@@tertongnat2815 So do the Clintons, so does Biden, so do most of the politicians and businessmen. Trump, being a businessman turned into a (not so good) politician, is no exception. ABC, on the other hand, presents itself as a "news channel" and should have a professional conduct as such. But if what you are trying to say is that ABC, instead of being a news channel, is in fact a propaganda trumpet for the democratic party, I totally agree with you.
This is childish. It’s glaringly obvious there is no fraud, and you cowards hide behind “wanting to ask questions.” If you can’t act like an adult, you don’t get to talk. Have fun with your increasingly insane party.
@@tpmgx6 Many of us who feel this way about the media have been life long democrats, so making this a dem vs. rep issue is what is insane. The media is supposed to remain neutral and only report the facts from both sides of the issue (unless it is clearly stated as an opinion piece). They are not currently doing this. They omit many facts and twist others, including the fact that the actual evidence of fraud was never presented in the court cases. The cases were dismissed on standing - not on the evidence being presented or heard. A fact that it seems the current msm apparently would never want you to know. They've worked everyone up into such a tizzy that no-one can think straight, and this all started long before Trump! There is evidence of election fraud on both sides of the aisle since before the Gore election, and they've also never told you that. The bigger question is - Why? Election fraud evidence from previous years HAS been heard in the lower courts, and is available on RU-vid (if it hasn't been censored lately, which should also tell you something. Any good democrat knows how dangerous any kind of censorship/"book burning" is - or we used to anyway). If it's not obvious to you what is happening, then I'm assuming you only rely on what the msm is telling you. It's hard not to because they are all pervasive, and you really have to want to find out the truth to search further to find reliable sources. Start with Glenn Greenwald. He was at The New York Times for years, and should be a comfortable and reliable place to start. Stop listening to the twists and omissions from the msm - look beyond them to see the truth.
George is just a concrete dunderhead. When he was in govt, they called him George "Step=on=all=of=us". Now the tide has turned. You've been stumped, by Rand Paul, George.
@@lauriejo5810 "they" didn't look... There were never any reports explaining the anomalies in various elections... Everyone is expected to just"trust them". After 4 years of Russia Russia Russia all shown to be completely made up and false why would anybody want to believe them? The only people that believe are Biden supporters and it's because they got what they wanted not because data actually shows he won. I agree 100% with Rand Paul there's enough evidence out there to at least look deeper. No one at the government level wants to do that.
Biden won fairly, just because you didn't get the results you wanted doesn't mean that is fraud...Fraud is Trump trying to ask people to find "more votes " just one more then is needed. To try and appoint a new DOJ so they can try and overturn the results. Trump wanted to stay in power so much as he is in so much debt. He is the worst president this country has had, If you don't agree thats your choice but don't sit there chatting nonsense ...Trump doesn't care about anyone but himself! So sad to see certain people are so brainwashed by this cult that there intellect abandons them 😔
@@markbuckeye I know, they expect us to believe these officials when government officials never uphold their promises, lie and are so self interested. Why should we? We can see the corruption plane as day, why should we validate their conclusion if they can’t even fully investigate the situation or just slap a sticker on saying they did with no prof? Unbelievable how stupid these people think we are. We’re not stupid, but they’re SO out of touch. This interview from George Stephanarcissist.
You’re right there are always two sides but that doesn’t mean that one side isn’t demonstrably false. One side could claim the Earth is round while the other side claims its flat. Two sides and one is completely and irrefutably wrong. Just like Paul.
Once recounts happened, once judges rejected the crackpot “evidence”, and once states certified their elections, there were no more wild stories to tell about election fraud. That’s the point George was making. Americans are done with this BS story, even if we hear it from presidential wanna-be Rand Paul. You should be too.
I think there are three sides to every story...the left, the right & the truth!!! The truth about this issue is there is no way Biden/Harris won the election. The evidence was never seen/heard in court.
People who don’t believe random morons on the internet who actually comment on the news reported by these networks. You can say that reporting is biased, but you can’t deny the things they report happened.
@@537monster Event that happened: The American people were told we cannot audit Dominion's software, because it's "proprietary." At that point the conversation is over. We don't even have to get into the fact they would not allow signatures to be verified in Fulton County, or anywhere the Trump campaign made the request. They can take their proprietary software, and shove it where the sun don't shine - sideways.
@@icouce possibly because you don’t place your signature on a ballot. You go into a ballot box, vote, that ballot has an identification number. That’s the way it works. They can tie the vote to an address but not a specific person. That’s the way it has worked since America started using secret ballots. So when you say “they would not allow signatures to be verified” that literally makes no sense since there were no signatures to be verified except for on mail-in ballots. If you are wondering why GOP observers weren’t allowed to verify those signatures themselves, it’s because not only is that impossible, it would be a massive violation of the secret ballot act. Only election officials are given permission to see that information. Also finally, in Georgia, Trump actually frequently won heavily in counties where Dominion was used. Meaning, they weren’t flipping votes.
He ceased to be a journalist a long time ago, the first 5 seconds, when he asks such disrespectful question "do you accpet that fact?", just proves it.
Rand Paul seems to be appreciate the role of Judges in our legal system. He's part of the legislative branch. If he want's to practice law, he chose the wrong job.
That may be true up to a point, but if you steal 5 cents or $5,000.00 the penalties are different. Your crimes are scaled according to the damage done, so I think your reasoning is faulty.
@@fitzgeraldanthony9333 Do your homework. The Democrats were the party of slavery. They still use the black community to do their bidding. The Republican party was founded in 1854 as an anti-slavery party. The democrat donkey was a symbol of slaves working in the fields. Popularized by Thomas Nast in the 1870's. Both parties are corrupt imho but facts still matter!
@@jwonders1304 Here's the facts. That was over 200 years ago. Those Democrats are now your republican party thanks to the good old Southern strategy that ignorant bigots like Ted Cruz, The recently evicted fraud from the Whitehouse, your Rand Paul, the honorary kkk grand Wizard McConnell, Lindsey Graham et..the list goes on, use in one form or another to scare old conservative white ladies and other dye in the wool "patriots" to vote for them. So spare me your ignorant deflection garbage about what happened over 200 years ago because the irrelevant and regurgitated, to be frank stupid non argument is old now. The republican party is now a chaotic cult that caters to a certain demographic ( no mystery which one) that happens to still unabashedly support the bigot who provoked a seditionists attack on the Nations Capital. Oh and by the way thanks to Democrats we have social security, Universal health care, civil rights legislation just to name a few things. Meanwhile The Republicans of today were looking to eradicate Universal Healthcare in the midst of a severe pandemic and also a good majority of them happily go along with the evicted amoral frauds lie that the pandemic was merely a hoax and of course refuse to accept the election was legitimate. Now run along and take your "history" lesson to that demographic that thinks like you.
@@fitzgeraldanthony9333 but here you are spewing hate. Don't you find that ironic? 200 years ago? Does that mean there is a statute of limitations on racism? I can go on for days ripping you down but that doesn't help are situation. We are all in this together as a nation for the people, by the people but I don't think you will understand this because you are too fucking ignorant!
@@fitzgeraldanthony9333 Google: images of Hillary Clinton kissing her friend & mentor, Senator Robert Byrd, the KKK Grand Pooba. She's old but I don't think 200 yrs old! Black Lives Matter & Antifa are the puppets of the Democrat Party & I can prove it. Just Google: antifa.com who pops up? Yep, that's Joe Biden! Who shot Seth Rich, The DNC staffer? Weren't those 2 Antifa assassins then murdered? The majority of the 'goodies' you listed are big government programs to entice you to become dependent upon the GOVERNMENT. As for your personal attack, you don't know me. I don't represent any party. In my opinion they are both corrupt but that does not change history.
proud of what? proud of how he helped con millions of americans into believing there was voter fraud because they are too weak and pathetic to accept that trump lost. Like a debate is going to matter...what debate...everything ever said is disproven and it doesn't matter to the trump heads so having a debate doesn't matter. Are we now going to debate that the world is flat also? Lets do that one. And trump was right about Rand Paul...he doesn't look like a nutjob with that ridiculous hair (trumps words not mine but i agree)
@@megshafer3961 And George was a Clinton apologist who perpetuated Bill’s lies and Hillary’s attempt to cover up “the vast right wing conspiracy”.He is an unapologetic, biased media mouthpiece.
Rand is taking to these round earth media types. The evidence is overwhelming the election is fraudulent and that a spherical earth is part of the liberal agenda.
@@jonr2557 Well, Jon - you seem to be “The Man in the Know”! How about enlightening us about those very lies with YOUR evidence? Go to sydneypowell.com and read her filing to the court - that the court was too afraid to take on - and they TOLD her that! They said that the DEMOCRAT THUG GROUPS: BLM AND ANTIFA were threatening the Court officers so they tossed the case up to the Feds. The FED COURT SAID THEY WOULD NOT REVERSE THE ELECTION RESULTS - THAT IT WAS NOW IN THE HANDS OF THE MILITARY! So- Jon - go to Sidney Powell’s site and read the evidence for JUST ONE STATE! The ones for Arizona are Public Record and because of Gov Ducey, the Courts kept kicking out the review of over 30,000 illegal alien votes! Enough to turn Arizona back Red again and to kick Mick Kelly out of the Senate! Same with Martha MacSally from the 2008 election! We are NOT STOPPING until Communist China, Iran and Venezuela can no longer be hired by the Democrap Party to create a fraudulent vote! We have an illegitimate Pres and VP in office right now and at least 8 State Senators!
Stand firm Senator 👍👍 good for you!! Nice to see a real Man is serving our country who has the balls and integrity not to be cowed by the propagandists and the authoritarians.
The number of dislikes compared to likes on all these lying mainstream media platforms can tell you what the American people think and who they chose for President. These lying false propaganda arms are psychologically oppressing people. If you watch these stations, stop. My father does and is completely brainwashed. He can't think for himself anymore. Thank God only a small percentage of the nation is like this. That is why Trump won and overwhelming evidence of this crooked steal (media endorsed) will come to the surface again.
Trump cried election fraud way before the 2020 election, and yet you still couldn't do anything about it. It's always "wait and see" or "stay tuned." Either there was no evidence of widespread voter fraud, or you guys are so incompetent that, despite having all this "evidence," you still couldn't prove it and stop China Joe from winning.
Go Rand!!! George was highly unprofessional and looked incompetent continually interrupting when he didn't like the answer. This is embarrassing for George. Used to respect him, but this was disgusting behavior.
Indeed their was fraud, several instances of republicans voting for Trump under the names of dead people. Don't like that fact so much do ya. int.nyt.com/data/documenttools/press-release-on-criminal-charges-against-bruce-bartman/00763f9543d066ea/full.pdf. Straight from the DA so you cant even complain about the media. Your argument is like saying water is tainted because there is one molecule of cyanide in 10^12 H2O molecules.
Was fraud involved? Absolutely. The problem with people saying that the courts found no evidence is not true. They refused to hear the cases. Evidence whether true or false is heard in court.
Perhaps the number of cases of fraud in each and every state that oversaw their election was so minimal and/or non-existent that the legal teams for Trump had nothing to present to the courts, and that is why they specifically stated in court cases that widespread fraud was not being argued because such an extraneous assertion without anything substantive to back it up in court has real legal consequences. This is evident by the fact that Trump and his goons became so desparate that they actually pressed for the Georgia Secretary of State to COMMIT FRAUD by "revising" Georgia's popular vote results even after three recounts and various debunked conspiracy theories about the state's vote counting process.
@@jacc9061 G lane clearly doesn't know how the court system works. Guarantee he/she doesn't care about the 2016 election where there was actual evidence of foreign governments interfering...
Actually you’re missing a vital part. First the courts grant you a hearing. What that does is open the door for discovery so the evidence can be gathered at that point. The process of discovery is very important because it grants subpoena powers. That then gives you the ability to gather the evidence if any does exist. In a civil suit you don’t need evidence per say what you needs is is enough to show that fraud did indeed occur. The media relies on people not knowing how our system works. So technically when the media claims there is no “evidence” they are telling the truth. The media doesn’t necessarily lie so much as omit facts. This is why they have tried so hard to remove any pushback and as many of commented here already the censorship began when they started removing comment section on just about everything they say to you.
There's fraud every election albeit minor. This one was no different. However, even Republican judges, Republican Secretaries of State, Republican Governors etc..... shot down all of Trump's false claims. You need to realize you were conned by a con man.
@@chrisbogart7345 But you need a valid reason to conduct discovery. You don’t get to just sue someone and force them to entertain your claim for no valid reason. How about I sue you for whatever I make up, you’re going to think it’s okay for you to deal with that process just because I decide I want to make you deal with it?
The simple truth of the matter is that if there wasn't any fraud, they would have welcomed an investigation because it would have proved them right and legitimized their viewpoint.
The courts proved you wrong, in over 60 jurisdictions including adjudication from Trump appointed judges. Also, the burden of proof is on the plaintiff in this country.
Paul has absolutely no problem with any result in his favor. That should say all about this great investigator of election fraud on behalf of "the people". Paul gives a flying f**k about the people, he spends his days golfing with Trump, he's the definition of corrupt rich elites.
Only a person of weak constitution wouldnt want to lay this out and actually look at it. A "neo-" gutless, self serving, spineless FOP. and George is that if nothing.
I mean that's what they did and they knew that. Just take the large cities in the swing stares where there's a ton of dems and fudge the numbers and boom you have yourself a won election.
This is a perfect encapsulation of the election debate. One side wants a proper inquiry, and the other side wants you to accept their conclusion without one. Which one would you say best reflects a democratic society?
@@andraewilson8252 that’s cute. Meanwhile lefties did it in every swing state. I do hope they investigate it all though. Anything wrong should be fixed for the next go around ... when it’s a red wave. Biden already breaking half his campaign promises!
Objecting to the outcome of an election or wanting to investigate fraud are NOT insurrection against the government. They just aren't. Doing something that is provided for by law is not an insurrection just because it makes Democrats uncomfortable. _I am a Libertarian and no fan of Trump but since John Brennan decided to call Libertarians terrorist screw the Democrats_ .
@@HontasFarmer80 ignoring that theres no proof of large scale fraud, the objection of the election results isnt the issue it's how it was done and the length people went to about it
I was waiting for Paul to say somthing like that, but I'm glad he didn't because it would've thrown the interview in chaos, besides Paul knew he was destroying George
Over 30 people of his administration (trump) was indicted and proven guilty in court. The report even goes on to say "the evidence brought forth does not exonerate the president, although no charges can be brought against a sitting president without senate approval..."
Officials in Pennsylvania have been charged and paid fines . It is free to see online . I Support Senator Paul ! Thank You for Standing Tall Senator Paul !!! God Bless America !
@@sanoichiro 40% of the people in every state is irrelevant? Let's say, _somehow_ that's true. There's still the list of illegal actions, Paul just listed, those the chairman of the Federal election commission, Trey Trainor made public about Houston, Harris co. Texas, along with other states, Video, sworn affidavits, and the raw statistic that Biden won 509 U.S. counties, the lowest by any person to be inaugurated as the Pres. combined with the 3rd grade level lie of getting the most votes by anybody who ever ran for president. Versus Trump winning 2547 U.S. counties in 2020 and supposedly losing with 76million votes to a nonexistent campaign buy a guy who has a tough time making coherent statements if he's able to stay awake during the interview. Guilty of using his position to enrich his personal finances, blackmail, collusion, various federal US.Code violations, accepting emoluments from foreign leaders, and activity amounting to the possibility of treason, which it's a fairly good possibility treason was committed by Shanghai-Biden, Son and friends.
Democrats lie to themselves every single day! BLM lies to everyone about their cause every day (and gets away with it making people think they're an organization for the good of black America.) They aren't even close to being good other than their slogan
That’s exactly what Trump does routinely. I think he creates whatever reality he needs (like I always win) and just weaves his stories to fit. I thought most GOP knew better but Rand Paul sounds like he drank the kool-aid. Many say they know better but won’t say so publicly.
@@theresa4863 Rand Paul is full of bs because South and North Carolina changed their election laws aswell tho republicans never challenged those states🤔🤔🤔
@@theresa4863 What exactly did he say was true exactly it was all lies this whole crusade is not about election ingrety its about limiting and making it hard for people to vote and they will target minority areas🤔🤔🤔
@@Inspiredbychrist1 Rand Paul is full of bs because South and North Carolina changed their election laws aswell tho republicans never challenged those states because they won Rand Paul like alot of you Trumpnuts are a bunch of liars and sore losers🤔🤔🤔
THANK YOU...YES! It is a proven psychological tactic!! The more you hear something the more you believe it even when it is 100% a lie. If marketing didn't work, there wouldn't be a billion dollar industry created to study how color, music, voice, images influence people's decisions....and HOW OFTEN and WHEN those messages are SEEN! BE AWARE AMERICA...make your OWN decision and not that one that has been decided FOR YOU by the media and Hollywood!
Exactly these republicans are still stuck in their stupid dimension of thinking that there is still evidence out there which proves otherwise over two months later. #SMH 😡🇺🇸
Let me preface that I am left leaning. This election was unprecedented. I do believe that there is legitimacy to questioning the validity to how each state ran their elections because we never have experienced such a volume of mail-in ballots before. The Republicans party has their tail between their legs right now. Few are advocating for any course of action which would put Trump back in power after he has shown his true colors. That doesn't mean we should shut down any effort to understand where any fraud might have occurred.
Well, that cleared it all up! What Stephanopoulos ALSO said is that there is no longer any legal avenue for redress of grievances in our government. Think about THAT for a minute. That hammer can hit more than one nail.
@@therozrodriguez77 Rand Paul is full of bs because South and North Carolina changed their election laws aswell tho republicans never challenged those states🤔🤔🤔
There was a time when TV news programs would bring on Senators from both sides of the issue to allow them to debate, make their case, but now the Democrat politician is not needed because the media personality represents their side for them.
The time when both sides was represented was called the fairness doctrine. Republicans got rid of the fairness doctrine to make way for lying ass conservative radio and media like Rush Limbaugh. All George did was repeat the facts we already know. He had no obligation to let Ran Paul lie, refuse to answer the question, or change the subject, unchallenged.
I followed many courtcases about the assumed election fraude and as someone living in The Netherlands, which is a democratic country with a long history of clear and honest rules on what is what is not allowed concerning casting a vote and promoting the candidates in advance of the election, I was stupified and also terrified by the many existing possibilities in the USA for committing election fraud and parallel the misuse of power by the local governments/private persons, media and BigTech to support their candidate. So many of us outside of the USA and who are familiar with the traditional decency around the election rules still wonder who really won this election in the USA. And as long in the USA courtcases about what really happened before, during and after (counting the illegal ballots) this election are not dealt with in a proper way the answer to that question cannot be given. What annoys me the most is that the Democrates are totally not interested in a broadscale research on this hugely important subject, because if they as a party want Biden to get the presidential respect as president within the USA and worldwide, like they think he deserves, they should be in full support of such a research. And they are not, which makes them look even more suspicious of being a participant in the assumed fraude. This interview might look good in the eyes of some Democrates but to us it supports the idea that the true sense of democracy is totally lost in the USA. Sad, truly deeply sad.
It's incredible. Stephanopoulos asked if the election was correct. Paul went off on a tangent about fraud. Again "was the election fair?" There goes Paul again. That's why people are confused their elected representatives are straight up lying and won't just say Biden won fair and square.
@@rhodeslash you gotta watch the movie Irresistible with Steve Carrel and Rose Byrne. Theres a great scene where Rose Byrne's character blatantly lies on television about her hometown in an effective attempt to get more votes in the rural town.
Here's what I'd like them to answer: Do they even understand how logistically impossible it would be to create or insert fake ballots into a national election in any meaningful numbers, i.e. MILLIONS of ballots? 50 states with 50 different systems, 50 different types of ballots - different ink, different paper, different sizes, different rules, regulations, dates of submission, etc. Within those states, thousands of different counties and municipalities with totally different down-ballots, Propositions, local ballot issues, etc. Totally different voter roles, different addresses, and they are all BAR CODED! How do you somehow account for all of that, successfully manufacture fake ballots, get them to the proper states, counties, municipalities AND proper voting centers and infiltrated into the ballot stream at counting centers - by the MILLIONS - without somebody noticing??? YOU DON'T. IT'S NUTS~!
No. George is aware of Rand Paul's past statements. He asked in order make RP declare himself so that discussion could proceed. RP weaseled out with "Have to investigate , 2 sides to every question". The state officials who ran the elections investigated, then certified the results. If RP and Team Trump want to investigate further, they can. Trump and the RNC raised $250M after the election, so money's not a problem. Their problem is that they have no facts to show the steal. Everything points the other way, as Rudy found out 63 times. RP pulls the same tired trick all Trump backers do - he shifts from "Not enough fraud to swing (steal) the election" to "No fraud at all'. There's going to be SOME fraud in 155M votes, or in 155M of anything. He does it b/c he doesn't want to deal with the facts as they are known. He prefers alternative facts that are out there, somewhere ... maybe.
Rand couldn't say it was a fraudulent election because the next question would obviously be, "Why did you vote to certify the election if you knew it was fraudulent?" Rand has no moral high ground from which to argue that this was a fraudulent election. The states with two slates of electors should have been returned to the states and decided in their courts no matter how long it took. Otherwise, this is a banana republic where political issues are resolved by fraud and violence.
@@Liberty4Ever The Democrats have turned elections into a Banana Republic. Statistically speaking there was no way for Biden to win. However, if it was so fair and free, then moron like you should have NO problem with an investigation just like the whole Russian Collusion lie; remember that???
@@saintjames8018 - I think you're mistaking me for someone else. I want a thorough investigation of all of the blatantly obvious election fraud in the 2020 election. The Russiagate hoax based on nothing but a fake dossier from the political hacks in the FBI cost American taxpayers over $40 million and produced nothing, yet we're not allowed to even discuss the possibility of election fraud online without the social media censors clamping down with bans, shadow bans, fake news fact checking and disclaimers, etc.
@@Liberty4Ever Sorry Liberty.... I must have clicked too quick. Your are 100% correct, of course. However, somehow the fake news shamelessly lies and flips the narrative? It sure is frustrating that their seems to be NO consequences for their propaganda; and worse yet, I actually think a guy like Stephanopoulos really does not see his own bias.
He says they were all "lack of standing," so the evidence was never heard. I just looked at the entire list of cases related to the election on the ABA site. Yes, there were some that were dismissed due to lack of standing, a few due to incorrect venue, and some that are still pending. But a vast majority were dismissed due to poor or lack of evidence, and none of those dismissals were reversed on appeal. What those results really show is the overall low quality of legal help the Republicans had to use, if they couldn't, as Sen. Paul says, even select the right defendant or venue for their lawsuits, even in the few cases they might have won.
Voting Election Realist Check: What about the numerous voting ballots pulled from under the table in Georgia, or other state? What about the numerous poll watchers who were intimidated from making any observations of the ballots? What about the Dominion Voting Software that was not ever thoroughly investigated for issues of integrity and supposed features of switching votes? What about the numerous affidavits of witnesses who saw numerous violations of ethics and odd things like shipping of prepared ballots being sent over state lines? Can the US Citizens get a full investigation of the USA 2020 Election like was done for almost four years for the supposed Russia Influence of USA 2016 Election? Is there going to be a double standard by not having an investigation for the 2020, but having one for the 2016?
@@kekfreedomheritage5633 There was no secret ballots pulled from under tablez, poll watchers were intimidating counters, there were hand recounts and the numbers were still very very closely the same by like 10 votes, eye witness testimony is the weakest evidence especially when politically motivated And despite all oc that, I'm down for an investigation but the problem is no matter how many times they find you to be wrong, you'll always believe you're right because you'll always accuse them of lying until they tell you what you think the truth is
@@kekfreedomheritage5633 So much more than what you mentioned including evidence caught on video with inadvertent admissions of cheating from the cheaters themselves. Then of course those damn voting machines.
Its been studied. Courts dont want to overturn elections and throw out votes. Which is why they refused to hear the cases. Even if Governors and judges illegally change voting laws right before an election. Only a legislature can legally change voting law.
The issue at stake is not if there's evidence of electoral fraud (clearly there is no evidence). The issue at stake is if there is evidence of probable cause scenario of electoral fraud. The level required to prove a probable cause is much lower than the crime itself. If there is probable cause there should be an audit of the elections at PEN, WIN, and MICH, even though such audit would not change the outcome of the election. Justice starts with the thruth.
There was quite significant evidence of election tampering in 5 or 6 states. Many people came forward. A good bill in Congress is to award all employees, employers, self employed, government employees and military personnel between $500,000 and $3 million in a lump sum after 110 months of full time work, part time included in the total, regardless of the number of employers worked for, for the citizen or perminant residents business start - up or already existing business, and trade or technical school costs including pilot training. The dollar amount issued is determined by the size and scope of the business, work experience and education. This is earned and is a Grant, not a loan. The citizen must spend at least 65% of funds issued on their business or business related items. The printing and issuance of money is validated by any legitimate labor and production for society. Another bill for Congress is to mandate U.S. Banks to pay their depositers at least 85% of all interest collected, according to each account balance per - month, because it was the depositers money that got loaned out to begin with. Contact your U.S Congressman or Senator for an exceptional bill in Congress including any tax reductions.
@@maxwaters1461 Rand Paul is full of bs because South and North Carolina changed their election laws aswell tho republicans never challenged those states🤔🤔🤔
@@MrJonas0319 Like the judges said why didnt they complain before the election rather than wait till after the election was settled when the republicans in the states agreed to the changes seems like a bunch of sore losers to me🤔🤔🤔
It is the truth. You can disagree, but it's over. You had over 2 months, countless lawsuits, 2 dead voters voted for Trump, and Dominion is suing Rudy for over a billion dollars for over 50 lies he told about them after the election. Move on. You lost.
@@gorey4more837 In fact, you were deceived~ The court didn’t accept the case~ It just refused to accept the case technically~ It didn’t even deliberate at all. I didn’t even look at the evidence. I didn’t even start the trial. I also want to see how Dominion sued Rudy. But what can be proved is that the Democratic Party misled its supporters ~ let them think that the lawsuit is over and the Republican Party has lost ~ It only takes 2 months for such a big lawsuit to be completed? It is a joke ~ because it refuses to accept it at all ~ there is no court review and judgment
@@gorey4more837 You support the Democratic Party and I accept it~ But I think we should speak according to the facts~The court did not accept the case at all. If the Democratic Party speaks in a misleading way, then the Democratic Party is very wrong.
@@user-to9vq8uq5w I support people with a regard for humankind. I do not align myself by party but by policy. And everyone associated with politics speaks in a misleading way. It is the very nature of politics to speak out of both sides of their mouths - to confuse, misrepresent, and LIE to achieve their agenda. That is what you are ultimately talking about. I have many, many conservative values, but I will not support people who care about their purse strings more than their hungry, needy, and poor. It is disgusting.
Isn’t the greater point that journalists are now editorialists for their party affiliation rather than investigators?! We can’t seem to get past left/right and find the real story.
In his 1997 memoir, All Too Human, Stephanopoulos openly told about his own liberal ideology and how he was frustrated whenever President Clinton would choose a more moderate approach. So you expect a self proclaimed far leftist to not be biased. He does not even hide it. If you have nothing to hide you would welcome an investigation.
Always enjoy when someone puts a media talking head on their place. The job of GS on this show should be to host two different view points, not be one of the points himself. Good on RP to let him know. I hope there's someone with enough stones to torch the press secretary like they did with trump's. I can all but guarantee they won't be as poised and strong as KM
@@toddcoen7822 Rand Paul is full of bs because South and North Carolina changed their election laws aswell tho republicans never challenged those states🤔🤔🤔
