Debunking ‘the coming collapse of China’ with John Ross 

Gordon Chang on CNN or Rupert Murdoch's Fox News reminds you of a performing monkey dancing to a music box in the street for peanuts!

Peter Zeihan is the new Gordon Chang.

Up to now, Chang is still interviewed by Fox as a "China expert". Anyone saying that China is collapsing is a "China expert".

Gordon and Peter these big boys no brains, they just lies for money and fame. But their comments were worthless. Look at their characters explain it

He's the biggest joke. Can't believe people actually believe the crap that comes out of his mouth

and to expand on your sentence, it was Kennedy who asked Khrushchev to not make public the first part so as the Americans could look peaceful and righteous. All along, it's the American Imperialists creating problems first (i.e. putting nuclear tipped missiles in Turkey) and the Soviets reacting to the provocation (putting missiles in Cuba). America is just a continuation of the British Empire. Britain has always been known as "Perfidious Albion" (refer to acts of diplomatic slights, duplicity, treachery and hence infidelity with respect to perceived promises made to or alliances formed with other nation states).

All whites are like that, not a single one Britain, France, Germany, America etc etc are any different. Go check opium war, group of 8 . All whites are the same.

I hope you like fallout 4 ☢️

We like little-D-boi's like you. Just like we love Gordon Chang 🤡

@@TacticalMayo I hope your democracy works in Afghanistan

@@alianpedia sure didn't work out for the USSR I know that 🤣

@@TacticalMayo Didn't work out for you guys in Vietnam did it. Leaving with your tails between you legs like in Afghanistan $1T later. You must have paid a lot of taxes to support those fiascos. Poor you.

Look beautiful and classic, the western fashion is design as Sex object showing ass, big tits, and stupidity.

Jon hits all issues that China has done. Living standard, wages, NATO, etc. The US jealousy and insecurity fails.

This is Western social media 🤣

Lmfao, why are Americans so sadistic. You can’t watch people having food on the table with a good future?

Nothing to do with scam-center tr0lls like you

@@TacticalMayo NOT really funny. This is NOT mainstream Western media. And YOU know it.

Each of us can do our part spreading the video to our circles.

Japan, South Korea, and later China are all economies funded by American money.

Where did you get this bizarre idea that china can handle any situation? Of course they can do anything by suppressing their population. Have u any idea as to how their blue collar workers r being treated right now.?

And also Professor Jeffrey Sachs.

@@bopian8913 Yes, totally forgot him. My bad.

you keep forgetting the whole West is against him.

Predicting China's economic doom is a cottage industry. The predictions have proven 100% wrong since 1949. Some examples: 1990. China's economy has come to a halt. The Economist 1996. China's economy will face a hard landing. The Economist 1998. China's economy’s dangerous period of sluggish growth. The Economist 1999. Likelihood of a hard landing for the Chinese economy. Bank of Canada 2000. China currency move nails hard landing risk coffin. Chicago Tribune 2001. A hard landing in China. Wilbanks, Smith & Thomas 2002. China Seeks a Soft Economic Landing. Westchester University 2003. Banking crisis imperils China. New York Times 2004. The great fall of China? The Economist 2005. The Risk of a Hard Landing in China. Nouriel Roubini 2006. Can China Achieve a Soft Landing? International Economy 2007. Can China avoid a hard landing? TIME 2008. Hard Landing In China? Forbes 2009. China's hard landing. China must find a way to recover. Fortune 2010: Hard landing coming in China. Nouriel Roubini 2011: Chinese Hard Landing Closer Than You Think. Business Insider 2012: Economic News from China: Hard Landing. American Interest 2013: A Hard Landing In China. Zero Hedge 2014. A hard landing in China. CNBC 2015. Congratulations, You Got Yourself A Chinese Hard Landing. Forbes 2016. Hard landing looms for China. The Economist 2017. Is China's Economy Going To Crash? National Interest 2018. China's Coming Financial Meltdown. The Daily Reckoning. 2019 China's Economic Slowdown: How worried should we be? BBC2020. Coronavirus Could End China's Decades-Long Economic Growth Streak. NY Times 2021 Chinese economy risks deeper slowdown than markets realize. Bloomberg 2022. China Surprise Data Could Spell R-e-c-e-s-s-i-o-n. Bloomberg. 2023. No word should be off-limits to describe China's faltering economy. Bloomberg

It's cute how many Chinese think gross GDP is the 'exam score' and its the real fight to see who 'beats the other' and is the number one big face lol

@@topsuperseven7910 Many chinese economist were educated in the West or worship the West (due to propaganda) without realizing American gross GDP is a false measure (i.e. prostitution services and house flipping profits are considered GDP). All this talk about Chinese being smart (more hard working and obedient) you would think Ukraine/Russia events the last 2+ years has taught them something about Western GDP figures and it's accuracy in predicting "real" economic strength.

@@yellowsheeps lol "and worship the west (due to propaganda). There is no 'The West' and your 1960s soviet-brain is cute. No American 'brainwashed' the victim Chinese (who are like children?) into pretending gross GDP is the way you see who's the Gaokao Big Face and who is shamed by being a smaller score. What American and 'Thewest' economists have told them is they aren't so dumb they think GDP bloating means 'China is numba one strong!". Instead, GDP Bloating is a kind of temporary boost if done right for some desperate time IF you can get real value together. China didn't' do that and kept bloating gross GDP with 'bridges to nowhere' and now Chinese are learning a very hard lesson: Now they eat 3 yuan meat sticks for dinner, sell their car for 1000 yuan and hope the eBike keeps working and post more elaborate fake narratives on the internet to 'shame Thewest' so they feel bigger face somehow. Its sad.

⁠@@topsuperseven7910there are other supplementals such as ASPI report that china is leading in 37 out of 44 critical tech

I won’t use the word greedy but just said they made illegal claims. If they had been clear and diss used it nicely with China then things would have been a lot different.

The Philippines didn’t become a country until 1946 when the US allowed the various Filipino tribes to form their own country! Before that the Phillipines were just several thousand islands spread across the South China Sea that the US occupied and made into a colony! There were over 7600 islands that made up the Philippines but less than 10% of the islands actually had people living on them since the Philippines was very sparsely populated at that time by tribal Asian people who spoke different languages from one another and had different cultures as well. At the same time that these islands were inhabited by small groups of tribal people there were hundreds of other nearby islands that were inhabited by Chinese people who made a living in the sea that surrounded these islands and many other islands that later on the US government turned into its Philippines colony. The islands that were part of China, such as the Spratly Islands, were part of China for many centuries before the arrivals of the US and Spain. The US never even claimed them to being a part of its Phillipines colony until it gave the Filipino tribal people their independence from the US empire and the US only did so because it wanted to use the Philippines as a proxy to start tensions with China as well as military bases to keep an eye on China and to interfere with China’s internal affairs as a way to weaken China since the US empire already had aspirations to being a global hegemon at that point in time and it felt by weakening China it could keep a powerful country like China down so that the US would be the only powerful country left standing on Earth so that the US would become the #1 country in the world in every aspect that mattered - militarily, economically, technologically, prestige. etc. That’s why when the US gave the Philippines its independence it pushed the Philippines to claim all of those islands that were a part of China as being a part of the Philippines! At that point China was a greatly weakened country that was being invaded and destroyed by the US’s, Japan’s, and Europe’s invasions so there wasn’t much China could do to protect its islands and other territories, which is why it lost Hong Kong, northern Manchuria, and other territories to the UK, Russia, Portugal, etc. The Filipino people knew they had no rights to claim those islands as being a part of their country, but with the US’s urging and backing they were compelled to claim those islands as being a part of their country since, at the end of the day, why would they turn down an opportunity to steal islands from China if the US was willing to help them get them? That was how the Philippines managed to lay down claims on the Spratly Islands and many other islands that belonged to China for many hundreds of years! This was also how the British was able to carve out large sections of China to give to India back when the British ruled over India and large parts of China! China suffered mightily when the Japanese, Americans, and the Europeans conquered it and carved out different sections of China for themselves! That’s what allowed newly created countries like the Phillipines and India to steal different parts of China and claimed them for themselves!

This silly Philippines claim is solely instigated and pushed on by its Master

@@grandwonder5858 Whilst I will not disagree with the history of what you say, there is a huge problem with ownership of land and territories that you highlight in your last sentence "That’s what allowed newly created countries like the Phillipines and India to steal different parts of China and claimed them for themselves!". If a country can be newly created then is not the "The Peoples Republic of China" or "The Republic of China" a newly created country? They can be considered "newly created" too. It is not correct to assume China has not changed in thousands of years but everyone else has and so they are all not deserving of their own area's. Historical claims are destabilising. The generations that follow whomever "took over" a land do not like what happened either. It all resorts to terrible mass violence one way or another. And I am in no way excusing the USA, China, or even my own country. They have all done bad things. Respect, not domination is the only way forwards.

@@dashman13 If according to your logic, past invaders and colonisers are justified in stealing territories from a weak country then by the same logic as the original owner becomes stronger it is entitled to recover all its stolen territories from the past thieves ! The Crimes Act of any country allows recovery of any stolen property.

In China, the real estate bubble burst was intentional and long overdue. In China, housing is for living and NOT speculation.

Belt and Road took a sharp turn north for China, lol.

Doesn't it seem strange you'd have one of the most massive housing bubble collapses ever seen, a series of new sanctions and tariffs, a 3rd official year of declining population, more foreign capital leaving than entering (a first) and a number of major factories moving (Foxconn). Yet, amazingly, the govt of China reported a 5.3% GDP growth. Doesn't that seem baffling to you?

@@topsuperseven7910 look at EV production and sales in China. Look at China ramping up integrated circuit chip production and sales. Look at 7% growth in military spending. Look at the accelerated rate of infrastructure projects. Look at the massive increase in consumer spending like tourism. Look at China’s rate of rocket launches and multiple start up companies. Look at mass production beginning of passenger airplane C919. There are 1000 imported manufacturing components under threat of sanctions that China is now working hard to replace with domestic suppliers. I take the CCP official line with a grain of salt but there are many pieces of China’s economy expanding so 5.3% is plausible. What’s not plausible is our own government’s official reports on unemployment, on cost of living, on inflation.

@@magnaviator look at China’s car exports to Thailand. That’s just one example of China now dominating new sales. Belt Road is not meeting all the planned developments on schedule but overall it is still expanding trade rapidly.

It erroneous to think that all real estate companies in China failed as only a few of the 100,000 real estate developers went bankrupt so the effect on Chinese GDP was tiny. The West would like one to believe otherwise. The companies that failed had high foreign investment so those foreign investors lost the majority of the money.

​@@bobsmith3983 Yes indeed. But even before Evergrande, China already has plans to move away from real estate because they are already having excess capacity, and that urbanization is slowly down as they have already achieve more than 60% urbanization. They simply don't need that much anymore. Furthermore, as a Marxist Leninist country, they have strong state capital control and the last thing they want is home grown petty bourgeois challenging the socialist revolution. Evergrande, Country Garden are two companies that exemplified the recklessness of bourgeois behavior of risky over expansion, over leverage that often create bubbles and economic crisis. The real estate is there to make sure people are housed, not to allow rent seeking, and transference of social capital built up over the years, into the hands of the few through speculation and overleveraged expansion. The bubble has to be pop and it was pop ON CHINA'S TERMS. Evergrande and Country Garden also need to be make an example of. No bail outs of these companies and certainly no bailing out of foreign speculators who bought these companies' bonds. Save the people, save the suppliers, save the contractors and let these petty bourgeois sink. Seeing Blackrock losing hundreds of millions in an attempt to steal Chinese people hard earned capital and taxpayers money is just cherry on top.

Lol

USA as been the destroyer of the 3rd world. China's going to be the builder of the 3rd world.

USA 🇺🇲 USA 🇺🇲 USA 🇺🇲

D-boi's numba-1

USA 🇺🇲 USA 🇺🇲 USA 🇺🇲

The British-Raj

LOL!!!!🤣

Little-D-boi's country numba-1?

LOL!!! 🤣

350.000.000 illiterate citizens. 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂 Little-D-boi's country

@@TacticalMayo Caveman Mayo here again.

i guess you haven't heard of "lying flat" and "let it rot!"...

Explains why we hear criticism of over production

USA 🇺🇲 USA 🇺🇲 USA 🇺🇲

Little-D-boi's?

That is Terrorism due to religion and not Cia doing.

Please do not misspell 'Huawei'; quite annoying.

​@@user-fx6kh7ux1mHua Wei is correct spelling 😅

Chinese are replacing LEAP turbofan engines made by France on the C919 with the CJ1000A made by Chinese firm AECC.

Nope

Tell us about the caste-system

RU-vid is a United States app

And little-D-boi is a 5 rupy-rupy tr0ll

Yep! Gordon Change comes to mind! All they need for that position is being able to lie with a straight face and pretend what they say is true!

More like a cheap stake commie shill.

More like a cheap stake commie shill.

In fact, it has reached 1000 km p/h.

30 years.. Western exceptionalism again.

It will mean that all the countries in the world will manufacture most of their requirements as there will be no major labor cost advantage in other countries. There will still be trade and some countries will still have trade surpluses due to the efficiency of their supply chains and labor or in their possession of raw materials.

Sure, and when it doesn't happen, you are gonna pull another Gordon Chang and revise to the next following decade.

Gold is moving East, and China is the biggest buyer and producer. FIFY.

YR Medical Dynostic is Check YRSELF into Mental Asylum please....

Women in Hanfu greatly outnumber men in Hanfu. He is a male so naturally he notices the women more. Most noted on the annual China decline is Gordon G. Chang.

@@bobsmith3983 Certainly agreed that Chang gets most of the press. I'm talking mainly in academic circles, where the underlying data/views that support the collapse of China nearly always come from Pettis. As Ross is also an academic, he should be able to refute Pettis. It would be nice to see him given an opportunity to do so.

Please spell it the standard way: Xinjiang

Gordon Chang is Trash

He's hiding from the public due to embarrassment.

China should have never reached for the crown 👑

There won't be a nuclear war as the 1% in the West like to live above ground.

LOL! Correction! It’s not the Chinese refusing to build Vietnam HS train, but Vietnam Chose Japan over China to build their HS train, which Failed miserably

LOL! Correction! Vietnam Chose J4pan to build their HS train which F4iled Miserably

Ask little-India😂😂😂😂

Not shortsighted, but flawed.

Not just short-sighted and flawed but also very stupid.

What do you mean?

Highly paid clown under the sponsorship of the CIA.

You can't be an expert on everything and yes the man made climate change theory is nonsense. Climate has always been changing because the Earth and the Sun are aging. Human activity has a negligible effect on the Earth and natural forces is what shapes our climate and environment.