sir mene M.A kia h most of the help of u and least help from model tqq so much sir i got 68% marks in 1st year tq sooo much sir and m totally depend on u for my second year 🙏🙏😊😊😊
You really awesome... The way you describe everything was mind blowing... Me and my friends watch your from 1st semester and now we are in 5th semester... 😊🥰
You explained this with so much ease ... And being a teacher myself I can relate to your hard work behind this 🙌🏻..thank you so much for explaining ...all the best for your life
Aapne sahi kahaa end me samjh aagya... Sab jud bhi gya Derrida mante the ki kisi word ka fix mean nhi h bas ek word dusre ki taraf dusra teesre ki taraf teesra chauthe ki taraf ese hi leke jata h jab tak ham ye aasume na karle ki ha hame samjh aagya or ye asume karna bhi ek illusion h.......sab ku6 traces k neeche h or supremacy kisi ki bhi Establish nhi karni h qki jisko supreme nhi bataa rhe h uski bhi koi quality h.....wonderful explanation
Best explanation sir. I always watch your videos and it helped me A lot. I got 95 % in fifth semester and 89%in six semester .now I have my exams for seventh semester and this topic was causing trouble.but you solved it thank you so much.
You have solved my big problem to provide us this video if I suppose to learn it myself by book it takes too much time and attention thanku so much sir❤❤❤
Superb way to explain ❤ Finally i am able to find my Differance 😉 of post structuralism I think traces could be identified as context of understanding which doesn't exist by itself but appears to be existing to the one who is viewing it, the contextual observer. About derrida not calling himself post structuralist also makes sense as "post structuralism is a critique and opposition to structuralism" which contradicts the concept of deconstruction of binary opposition.
I have to appear un improvement exams starting from next week. I am very nervous. No preparation because i am working women. This concept is so vague and complicated. Got some idea from your video.