Deep Sky Astrophotography With CMOS Cameras by Dr Robin Glover

Подписаться 15 тыс.

Просмотров 149 тыс.

50% 1

How long should your subs be? How much should you cool? What gain should you use? How can you get the most out of your CMOS camera? Dr Robin Glover of SharpCap talks us through the science behind deep sky astrophotography using today's modern CMOS imaging cameras.
Missing Gain Section: • Choosing the right gai...
In this talk Dr Glover brings up differences between CCD and CMOS, noise in images, temperature, sub length and how to make the most of our imaging time to get the best images. Covering subjects such as 'how long do your exposures need to be?' and 'How much should I cool my camera?'. A very technical talk that might seem intimidating to new-comers, but still provides invaluable information. I'm sure you'll come away from this lecture having learned something!
There are a couple of transitions within the video whilst I had to stop and restart the camera (limited movie length!) but since the audio was still recording; nothing has been lost! I hope you do forgive me.
www.sharpcap.co.uk
The Practical Astronomy Show 2019 was an astronomy convention held in Kettering, Northamptonshire on the 9th March 2019. Vendors and accomplished individuals from the hobby were in attendance and talks were available from the likes of Paul Money (AstroSpace), Niels Haagh (TTS), Gary Palmer, Dr Robin Glover & Damian Peach. Suppliers such as Tring Astronomy, The Widescreen Centre, Rother Valley Optics, Altair Astro, 365 Astronomy and many more.
practicalastroshow.com/
The footage and audio was recorded by myself with permission from the organisers and the speakers. Damian Peach's talk on High Resolution Astrophotography was also recorded and is available to watch here • How To Do High Resolut...
Contact:
astrofarsography@gmail.com
www.astrofarsography.wordpress.com
/ astrofarsography
/ astroruz
=====================================
Current equipment:
Skywatcher HEQ5 Pro Belt Modded
QHYCCD Pole Master
Skywatcher Evostar 80ED Refractor
Skywatcher Explorer 150P-DS Reflector
Altair Astro Starwave 50mm Guide Scope
ToupTek ToupCam GCMOS Guide Camera
Bahtinov Masks
Astro-Modded Naked Sensor Canon 450D
Canon 760D
SkyTech CLS-CCD Clip-In Filter
=====================================

Наука

Опубликовано:

27 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 186

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

Missing Gain Section: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ub1HjvlCJ5Y.html

@joecooksey6948 3 года назад

I just learned MORE in 53 minutes than the HOURS/days looking into this topic! Thanks a million!

@billmurphypenguins3774 2 года назад

this geezer is clued up

@cdarw Год назад

I am a BIg +1 on that!

@melgigg 5 лет назад

Glad this was recorded, thanks and apologies for the shiny reflection of my head in the centre 😄

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

You and your reflection! 😄 Good to hear you're enjoying the recording!

@ohhellno8759 3 года назад

LOL

@wchphoto 9 месяцев назад

Great video! I was an astro-imager (we called ourselves astrophotographers), in the late 80s thru the mid-90s. I quickly realized that I had to have my own darkroom to process my film and print my images because even the pro-level camera stores had no idea what we were shooting and what we were trying to see in the prints. We typically used exposures of up to 90 minutes for deep-sky objects. Now there's a sub for you! Planetary imaging was a different monster Eventually, stacking negatives became the big thing, pioneered, at the amateur level, by Tony Hallas and a few others. And, as Dr. Glover points out, it was extremely challenging. However, once it was done (and I was only ever to successfully stack 3 negatives), the results were amazing compared to a single negative. Image contrast was increased and film grain was minimized...just what the doctor ordered! That's my two cents! Now, back to the rest of the video!

@surfboard32 2 года назад

Just saw this. He was able to explain exposures better than anyone else could. Thanks for uploading this.

@qwertyu2387 4 года назад

Best video in this subject I've seen so far

@montygiavelli8125 3 года назад

Fantastic video, answered many questions that I had as a beginner/Intermediate Astro Photographer. I started using shorter subs with just above unity gain to get the step effect. The only downside is the number of exposures - they take up a lot of space and PixInsight takes a long time to do all the processing to go from lights,darks,flats,bias all the way up to a stretched image. This hobby is not for the faint of heart, but I love it.

@wanderingbrummie 4 года назад

Very interesting, thanks for posting this. I’ve been learning AP using SharpCap Pro and a cmos camera, I find the documentation for the software excellent and it explains a lot of this in more detail. As a long-time user of scientific multichannel detectors for spectroscopy, I’ve never understood why people use really long exposures when this clearly won’t help decrease the dominant noise source. This confirms that short exposures are sensible in many situations. Thanks again, glad I saw this.

@DevilleJean 3 года назад

One of the most useful presentations I've seen for astrophotography so far. Thank you so much.

@Tihpem 4 года назад

Really glad you reccorded and shared this! Thank you so much for this.

@chrisstrobel3439 5 лет назад

In his history portion of this excellent lecture he left out film hypering .. that made a HUGE difference in the sensitivity of film in the 80/90's and was used by pretty much all serious pretty picture astrophotographers. Also stacking negatives was easy as long as you had a pin registration table and were using film larger than 35mm.

@garyrear 5 лет назад

Very informative, thanks for recording this. I have the trial version and will no doubt be purchasing Sharpcap.

@neilstewart4217 4 года назад

Fabulous talk. It was a privilege to drop in unannounced to such a well balanced & informative presentation.

@MrZizilis 3 года назад

Outstanding presentation!!! Thanks a million for all those detailed explanations!

@JimsShed 5 лет назад

Brilliant presentation. Thank you for recording and most importantly thanks to Robin for the talk.

@compubyte2010 2 года назад

Thanks for grabbing this info!! one of the best videos on the subject !!!

@Chris-xz4xw 4 года назад

Robin Glover is awesome, thanks for posting this

@FireCulex 3 года назад

New to Astrophotography and this was exactly what I've been trying to figure out. Thanks!

@gordonshorten722 5 лет назад

Didn't know that these were recorded. I missed out on this talk at the PAS 2019. Thank you so much for capturing the talk.

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

Yeah. It was only this one and Damian Peach's I got to record. You're welcome though I'm glad it's been a good thing for you that it was recorded :)

@davidthompson3876 5 лет назад

Excellent presentation, thanks for sharing.

@Diocrew 3 года назад

Thank you for recording and sharing this!

@spaceinyourface 2 года назад

Thanks you for posting this, my wife purchased sharp cap after our free trial with our Altair gpcam 290C ran out. Totally worth it. 👌 I've used it for planetary imaging on Venus, Mars, Jupiter,Saturn & the Moon 🌙 I've recently started remotely operating my setup using Astroberry with Kstars/Ekos through a tablet,,but I allways plug the gpcam into the lap top first & use sharpcap polar alignment,,it's so fast to get " excellent " ,,I just couldn't manage without it .

@kenmeyer100 5 лет назад

Thanks Ruzeen! Great value.

@donr6234 4 года назад

Thanks, Ruz, great info.

@abcaabca6364 3 года назад

Excellent discussion of the behavior of quantum light effects. This is useful in other optics discussions.

@qonos68 5 месяцев назад

Hello AstroFarsogaphy, and many many thanks (of course thanks to Dr. Glover too!) for posting this unvaluable scientific distillation of one of the most mythicized theme in astrophotography. This is a must-to-be-seen video for everyone who seriously want to face this journey.

@n-da-bunka2650 3 года назад

Now I know why the Pixel 4XL that I own does SUCH a great job in low light & I noticed how the time to capture was variable so it's pretty obvious that the phone itself also has the ability to determine how many pics it needs to stack based on an individual time/place where the picture is being taken. Pretty cool to now understand what it has been doing all this time, stacking.

@jackthecat6225 Год назад

It also dithers! Pretty darn amazing.

@TheGoKidd Год назад

Thanks a million, Ruzee! This is great info.

@das250250 3 года назад

An excellent tutorial which every astro person must know properly

@bofblog 5 лет назад

Thanks for this.. great talk and well recorded

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

You're welcome. Thanks for your comment as well :)

@JasperBlomme 4 года назад

This was extremely interesting!! Thank you. 🙏

@wcoastsands 2 года назад

This is brilliant! Thanks so much for sharing.

@neverfox 3 года назад

So the theme of this talk was effectively "Contrary to popular opinion, you don't need to be taking really long sub-exposures." Yet the formulas in this talk produce (at least with some of the newer CMOS cameras and the suggested C) what I would call...really long sub-exposure times. Consider the ASI533MC Pro (3.76mm pixel). At a gain of 100, which is just past the cliff in read noise and also happens to be unity gain where most people shoot, the read noise is 1.66e. Assume you have a 72mm f/4.8 refractor and can tolerate 5% noise increase (C = 10). That gives an exposure time of 68.6 seconds with an 80% QE. But now throw a 7nm Ha filter on there. The exposure time jumps to 979.5 seconds! But the QE isn't going to be 80%. It's going to be about 29%, using the color-weighted relative response at that wavelength for this camera. Now you're up to 2700 seconds or over 45 minutes per sub! Take it to a Bortle 2 site and it's 5126 seconds. If that's not a really long exposure, what is? My guess here is that I'm simply missing something or making a bad assumption somewhere or I should be a lot more tolerant with the % of acceptable noise increase until I get to something "reasonable" given the limits of my mount, risk of ruined frames, blown out targets etc. But if I was just going to guess at reasonable, why do the math in the first place instead of just saying "These modern CMOS cameras are getting so close to the ideal camera that they can shoot really long exposures in narrowband that are only really limited by practical concerns"? So am I missing something?

@stephane153 2 года назад

Take a look at ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-RzvmfNReMOM.html about narrowband

@v0ldy54 2 года назад

Well, the formula gives you the recomended exposure time, but ofc if the rest of the setup limits you then just go as long as the mount allows you to do safely.

@tomtayon9784 Год назад

Yeah, I live in Bortle 2, and I was looking at over 2 hour subs for narrowband...

@felipemacauliffe1528 4 года назад

Absolutely brilliant presentation !!! I will recommended this lecture to all my friends. Thanks a lot and all my best from Chile.

@roberthambleton6912 4 года назад

This lecture was excellent! I am waiting on delivery of a ZWO CMOS camera, and had heard discussion about the subexposures being treated differently between CCD and CMOS. I now clearly see the difference. The discussion of ideal subexposure length based on sky conditions was incredibly helpful; Robin presented this beautifully. I love the formulae! Also, until now, I’ve never had a comfortable grasp of shot noise and an understanding that light pollution is, in effect, a form of noise. Thank you for increasing my knowledge. And I've just order SharpCap Pro!

@AstroFarsography 4 года назад

I'm super glad this lecture helped you, Robert! Did you catch the missing gain section as well? Enjoy your camera and new software as well!

@richallison1938 Год назад

That was excellent information! Thank you

@raphaelboisard7228 Год назад

Thank you so much for this awesome lecture! It's really helpfull

@jefflucas_life 4 года назад

44:21 Is the most important part about getting the correct exposure.

@robyxsartori 4 года назад

Amazing cristal clear analysis. Now I really need to do measurements with Sharpcap :)

@pibyte 2 года назад

This is really really helpful. Thank you for sharing!

@vladimirmachek2524 3 года назад

Thank you very much, great video, very useful.

@alexandrumunteanu4076 2 года назад

Excellent!! Thank you for the video!

@lukesastro2380 3 года назад

Awesome video!! , thanks for sharing.

@svdaedalus 2 года назад

Great video! Thanks for sharing!

@calimark7448 10 месяцев назад

Thanks for the vid. Great info.

@agastrophotos 3 года назад

Thanks for sharing. This video helped me !

@AstroVagabond 2 года назад

Just found this. Thank you for posting. Much appreciated. 👍

@taurus7228 3 года назад

Awesome share..very valuable..thank you so much. 🙏

@aardvarklet 3 месяца назад

This was really interesting. I'd like to see a presentation with updated information with reference to some of the much more modern astrocams.

@AstroSoundscape 3 года назад

This was very useful although some of the maths was bit over me it's great to have these references to where to begin with exposure times.👍

@pingcheng2328 3 года назад

wonderful presentation

@benbirr8724 4 года назад

This is a fantastic video! Are the charts used available somewhere? I'd love some PDF's of them.

@pcbassy9404 6 месяцев назад

Thanks for sharing!

@olivierrethore9097 5 лет назад

Very interesting talk. Thanks for sharing. I am going to consider Sharpcap!

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

Glad you found it useful! It's very good. Did you find the missing gain section okay? It's in the description :)

@olivierrethore9097 5 лет назад

@@AstroFarsography Yes, thanks for the link!

@BrokenPik 5 лет назад

nice to him in real time ( video) after talking to him for a few years...

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

He's a really nice guy. Spoke with him a bit at his stall

@fusion-music 5 лет назад

Perfect recording. Sound is great, unlike many presentations.

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

Thanks very much! I was determined to get the audio nice and it's good feedback that it's good !

@fusion-music 5 лет назад

@@AstroFarsography Have you studied sound?

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

@@fusion-music no nah not exactly but I did study some videos about how to record audio nicely. Can't say I've exactly studied though. Do plan to study it more

@fusion-music 5 лет назад

@@AstroFarsography Well, my complements to you. Your limited study has paid off. I would definitely like someone like you to be helping me with sound / video. I've had college/Uni trained guys do work for me and mess it up big time.

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

@@fusion-music thank you that's incredibly flattering! I'll tell you about it later when I get the chance but thanks for your kind words- it means a lot to me :)

@KapilKumar-bj5kp 3 года назад

Awesome video. I have maybe a dumb question. Do the final single sub exposure time have any bearing on what is the mag value of the target? For example if I arrive at a number 45s subs, could that number be different for different targets - especially in terms of getting the details. For background noise, I totally understand the math and reasoning. Again - I am asking coz I don’t understand, not questioning the overall premise.

@JasonRobinsonidaho 2 года назад

Fantastic!!! By any chance, Did the Dr. Make his slide deck available?

@matthewbrown8679 Год назад

There actually is a good reason to go beyond recommended exposure time in light polluted skies. I really don't want to stack 8 hours worth of 12 second exposures.

@soupdragon2397 3 месяца назад

Sharpcap doesn't do sensor analysis at all, at least for me, initially tells me that my light panel isn't bright enough, then can't cope with any alternative brightness, gets stuck in a loop until I give up. So glad I paid for a licence . I use this light panel to take my flat frames, without complaint from NINA.

@makeamovie94 6 месяцев назад

Excellent presentation! Thank you very much. How does the formula change if I use a light pollution filter like an Optolong L-Pro? Do I still have to multiply by 3 or can/should I multiply by a higher number? I really learned a lot today, thanks again.

@DamianVines 3 года назад

This is great stuff! Thank you for sharing. On a side note... How do you take into account the target being imaged? Meaning, what changes might you make if you are photographing a faint nebula vs a bright galaxy?

@Astronurd 2 года назад

Galaxy’s aren’t bright!

@sharpcap4229 5 лет назад

The missing section on choosing the right gain can be found here - ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ub1HjvlCJ5Y.html

@jonathanshields2016 Год назад

Very interesting

@ryanmichaelhaley 2 года назад

I still think you need a go-to mount in many cases because there are many targets you can't even see with the naked eye. I've tried to get these targets manually with a Skyguider Pro single axis non-go-to equatorial mount and have had little to no success with that.

@redabdab 2 года назад

24:16 This is a real eye-opener! So my light pollution, scope and camera combo give 0.92 light pollution pixels, which means there is no point in cooling my ASI2600MC Pro at all!! 47:30 it also justifies my decision to never take longer subs than 35sec (as I don't bother with guiding) 🙂

@darkentity2444 2 года назад

Nice talk. Still a bit confused about it since i find that somewhat long exposures still is king. Sure if you want a low noise picture by all means do so, but i think its more fun to get more information and slapping on more subs doesnt always provide that imo. (I dont know why this is pretty much the oposit to whats explaind here) but i feel that there must be data there in the first place! Orion at my area with 20sec up to 120sec subs provides about what you can see here. While my 300sec subs are AMAZING in comparision! Doesnt matter how many subs id slap on the lower exposure it never reaches the same ammount of details. When my cmos arrives i might rethink things a bit tho.

@artyombeilis9075 Год назад

I so surprised that under light pollution quite short subs already give quite an optimal result. I calculated for Bortle 8, F/6.5, ASI ZWO 224mc with reasonable gain and with 5% extra noise I can work with 2s subs! That means I can use my mount in AZ mode without guiding etc. Even under Bortle 6 it is only about 2.6s... Fascinating!

4 года назад

This is an eye-opener! However, just to understand these exposure settings better, for example, I live in Bortle 9 skies my exposure should be 0.3*3(RGB Camera)=0.9 Seconds? At this exposure, I usually can't see anything. Another question would be, if I have 1 hour of shooting time, should I prioritize shooting 2 minutes * 30 exposures or 1 second * 3600 exposures? That sounds an awful lot of data to process and stack. Takes away the need of auto-guiding at all.

@benjiwhittle 2 года назад

This was a true eye opener. I never really thought of 5 or 10 min exposures as excessive but they are totally pointless it seems. Sounds like you take 5 hours worth of 10 minute exposures it’ll be no better that if you got 5 hours worth of 1 minute exposures - and you don’t have the risk of having to throw away bad subs that cost you a load of precious time. It’s the total integration time that matters and not so much how you got it. The data that gives you those finer details we see in the 10 min shots is still there once you stack the 1 min shots. The only benefit to the long subs as far as I can tell is that it takes less computer resources to store and stack. Have you come across any other pros/cons in the long vs short exposure argument?

@v0ldy54 2 года назад

Given the same total exposure time, more exposures = more read noise and quantization error. Ofc in the real world there are many more factors to take into account and that limites maximum exposure time, but in an ideal world longer exposures are better.

@goatsuukerhill 2 года назад

Thank you for sharing dr Glovers presentation. Why does he tell us that longer exposures are required from a dark site than a light polluted site to reduce noise? Seems like exposures could be shorter at dark sites. Warren

@Bakrybaso94 3 года назад

Got a bit confused with exposure time, I'm using the ASI533MC Pro (which has read noise of 1.0e) with L-eXtreme narrowband filter which is 7nm I believe, and WO Z61 (f/5). what should my exposure time be in Bortle 9? I should multiply 0.5 by ..... ?

@ASBOmarc 4 года назад

Excellent lecture, thansk for posting this.

@AstroFarsography 4 года назад

Not a problem. Hope you found it useful!

@ASBOmarc 4 года назад

@@AstroFarsography Very much so, it always surpises me firstly how counter intuative this hobby is, secondly how hard it is to find good information backed up up by the secientific theory. Clear Skies.

@AstroFarsography 4 года назад

@@ASBOmarc excellent glad to hear it. I'm in the process of testing this maths and claims as well. Hopefully will have some results soon :D clear skies to you too

@ASBOmarc 4 года назад

@@AstroFarsography So based upon the equations presented by Dr Glover my particular imaging setup and location(f5 trplet APO, ASI 071 cooled OSC, STC Duo narrowband filter, 19.53 SQM) my optimum sub exposure time is 420-425 seconds, with a gain of 110 (unity is 90). For reason best left to myself the number 420 resonates more with me, so I will be be testing 420 second sub exposures as soon as its clear, which will likely be never (thanks UK for the cloud cover, it means a lot...). Clear Skies.

@AstroFarsography 4 года назад

@@ASBOmarc been a couple clear nights. Have you managed to test yet? :) Clear skies to you too

@911Polini 5 лет назад

so in Bortle 5 sky f/5 i need 130 subs for L around (x3)=400 for RGB and (x25-50)=3500-6500sek for narrowband!! is my calculating right..

@tim_peaky 3 года назад

How do i figure out the shot noise of my asi6200MM?

@podcarste613 3 года назад

Hi! How can I focus my ccd camera in my telescope for deep sky objects? New on this and having a hard time... Planets are some how ok, but can't see deep sky objects

@2badger2 Год назад

I didn't see anything about exposure for a RGB camera with a light pollution filter. Did I miss it? I saw 25x for 12nm and 100x for 3nm filters. Does he mean to multiple 3x for colour sensor and 25x or 100x depending on which light pollution filter you have? Thanks

@therealalexmullins Год назад

One comment on ADU values. This is an averaged value and while it is applicable to most nebulae, galaxies and bright reflection nebula tend to cause that formula to break down. This is because the core will inflate the value leaving fainter parts of the image at or below the read noise. M81 is very bright but if you want to get Holmberg IX you're going to need longer exposures than what that formula suggests. If you want to get the IGF, then you need even longer exposures. It is better to rely on your eyes than theory. Are you clipping the white values or are stars bloating from saturating the cells? If not taking longer exposures are better. The one caveat is with broadband and light pollution because you start to lose SNR with longer exposures. I find 3min is the max with an 11" aperture using LRGB.

@projectnemesi5950 Год назад

Signal always goes up faster than noise, so stacking can still bring the signal out of the noise. The issue is when photons are not adding an ADU due to quantization problems while adding in the read noise. If your taking a sub, and an electron is added, it has to increase the pixel by at least 1 ADU in order for the signal to become apparent after stacking. It may be an absurd number of frames to make it stand out amongst the noise, so it still may not be practical, but at least its possible. This is usually a problem with older cameras or low gain settings. Also, this video is about the background signal of a photograph, not the targets. Longer exposures are usually worse for a multitude of reasons. The primary reason is guiding error. Another reason is environment and seeing.

@chadleader1531 4 года назад

So what if I’m using a OSC (asi294) and a duo band filter (optolong L-enHance)? After calculating the sky glow electron rate with the sharpcap tool and the recommended sub exposure length for broadband, is there a multiplier for the bandwidth of that filter (roughly 30nm)? Based on his slide that says multiply by 25 for 12nm and 100 for 3nm, I calculate to multiply by 10 for 30nm. But, I don’t know if this applies to OSC or if I still need to multiply by 3 for a OSC sensor in addition to 10 for the filter. Thoughts?

@AstroFarsography 4 года назад

Have you been to the tools.sharpcap website yet? There I would enter all the usual data, but then I would select 'monochrome' and input the total bandpass of the multi-pass filters (for eg 10nm Ha and 20nm OIII&Hb makes 30nm total) to get my sky electron rate. Then from there it's just adding that 'e' value into the formuale. Did that help?

@andremarquardt8687 Год назад

Would this mean, that with a colour camera in bortle 5 (3x17s=51s) i would get diminishing return after about 100sub a 51s. so after roughly 90min i can go home? versus in bortle 3 data improves in the first 6h?

@karli34 3 года назад

0:48 - start of Dr. Robin Glovers speech

@entropytango5348 10 месяцев назад

3 years of personal discovery covered in 50 minutes.

@przemekmajewski1 3 года назад

What I can't grasp is dimension and something was done imprecise here: sqrt(R^2+TxP) So P is in electrons per pixel per second, times seconds is ok. R is in electrons per pixel. How can U add them up this way? Some invisible constant should be there to correct for that as now dimensions are awry.

@TheRandomwraith Год назад

with R (in fact all noise) as e/pixel if you T as secs.e/px then all the equations presented are consistent. At least I convinced myself of this ... the internet is bound to say no of course ...

@Dennis-tf2cs 4 года назад

Great information.... I just wish he would have talked a little faster. Wow!! I felt that I was at an information auction :)

@michaels3003 3 года назад

He explained that he had a limited amount of time available.

@dadwhitsett 3 года назад

RU-vid Playback Speeds of 0.75, 0.5 and 0.25. are available.

@2te2 3 года назад

At t=45min in the video we have this equation:. Sqrt[n*R^2+T*P] . Is this a square root of a mixed unit quantity?

@TheRandomwraith Год назад

it would appear so, and elsewhere too, but I think it can be reconciled by expressing noise as e/pixel and the time quantities as seconds.e/pixel. At least I convinced myself this is so ...

@guillaumefo 4 года назад

This should deserve more than only 9k views... thank you ! I actually have a defiltered canon 80D and either shoots with my 300mm lens or my 750mm/150Ømm, pixel size is 3.7um, and I've been looking on the internet the values for electron per pixel per second but impossible to find for the 80D. I would love to know what is the best exposure time for my camera, but don't really know how to do it. Do you have a video for this or any tutorial please ? thank you !

@AstroFarsography 4 года назад

Hey there. So without knowing your bortle class I found the 80D seems to 3.33e/sec ( www.dpreview.com/forums/post/57468503 ) Following the formulae displayed on this video, and assuming a C value of 5% noise C=10 Read = 3.33 Light pollution= 3.7e/sec R^2 = 11.0889 11.0889/3.7 = 2.997 10*2.997 = theoretical optimum exposure of 29.97 seconds. But of course using the figures you can get from the website be links to will also give you a much better answer :)

@guillaumefo 4 года назад

@@AstroFarsography Thank you for that answer, and it was quick ! sorry I didn't precise, I am currently oscillating between bortle 4 and 3, ok for 5% I guess, as you said in the video, it's clearly acceptable. (btw the link on dpreview doesn't work for me, it's a 404 error). Pardon me my maybe stupid question, but if I take a picture with my lens, should I take the F/5.6 of maximum aperture it can get at 300mm ? And I also divide the P by 3 because my canon is a RGB sensor ? I tried to replot your values and found for bortle 3 at F/5.6, P=0.7 approx. so 75sec, and 40sec for bortle 4, 16sec for bortle 5. Am I correct ? =D (I did not divie P by 3 here) thanks !! excel sheet if you want : www.dropbox.com/s/n151wqfzid227xv/Optimum%20sub%20frame%20exp.xlsx?dl=0

@AstroFarsography 4 года назад

@@guillaumefo no problem. Okay so now I know your skies let's try this again For your f/5 newt, using an 80D's quantum efficiency of 54%, read noise of 3.33e/sec (@ISO800) and bortle 4 skies with a colour sensor Your skies, sensor and scope combination using the calculator at www.tools.sharpcap.co.uk comes to a light pollution rate of 0.44e/sec (3.33^2/0.44)=25.2 25.2*10 = 252s (4 mins 12 seconds) Your camera lens is actually 480mm and f/8.9 because of the crop factor (1.6x). That brings your light pollution to 0.14e/sec (3.33^2/0.14)=79.2 79.2*10 = 792s (13 minutes 12 seconds lol) Also I have amended the DP review link now :)

@guillaumefo 4 года назад

@@AstroFarsography wow ok thank you a lot Robin ! (my 80D is defiltered, does it change the quantum efficiency ?) I don't really understand how you got 0.14 e/sec but as the camera and the lens won't change, I'll just note it somewhere. Ok it will be impossible to make a 13min exposure hahah, my star adventurer astrotracker mini is not precise enough... however I'll try 4min12 exposures with my telescope, thank you again !

@AstroFarsography 4 года назад

@@guillaumefo ohhh I'm not Robin! Haha 😁 It would've got to 0.14e/sec due to the higher f ratio. Let's in less light for the same amount of time :) Hope it was helpful and good luck!

@panzerdivizzion 2 года назад

Do's this arm make my body look small?

@Pipe-organ-recordings 5 лет назад

Hey this was excellent. Do you use sequence generator and sharp cap?

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

Glad you enjoyed it. I personally use Astrophotography Tool to manage my session since it has mount control and platesolving in it and just feels nice to use.

@Pipe-organ-recordings 5 лет назад

AstroFarsography what is that? I use SPG.

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

@@Pipe-organ-recordings it's another control software. You can control the camera, set imaging plans (that also utilise different filters and exposures and binning per line on the exposure plan), can warm and cool the camera and can control the mount, playesolve, go-to/go-to++ and more

@Pipe-organ-recordings 5 лет назад

AstroFarsography how would you compare it to SPG and how is there support? Do they directly answer people who buy their software’s questions?

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

@@Pipe-organ-recordings unfortunately I can't give a proper comparison since I've never used SGP. I'll look it up and if it isn't too expensive I may buy a copy for review and comparison. I had an issue once with APT and I put it up on the forum and I had a response from the developer within 24 hours so my own short experience with APT support is positive.

@philippefenain4405 4 года назад

Thank you so much Robin. This is a great video! I still have some difficulties to understand all the concepts he is developing. Using an ASI294MC with a William Optics GT81 (F/4,7), under a Bortle 8 sky, the subs exposure should be around 3 seconds (G120). This is very short. To get 4 hours integration time, I would need nearly 5000 subs! Does this make sense?

@AstroFarsography 4 года назад

Yes makes sense. Though if you go to the tools site he mentioned you can get some better numbers. Example my 183m HyperCam has a QE of 84%, pixels of 2.4um, I live in Bortle 6, I use a 7nm narrowband filter and my read noise at the gain I use is 1.8, my sky electron rate from pollution is 0.13e/pixel/s R=1.8^2=3.24 P= 0.13 C=10 3.24/0.13= 24.92 24.92x10= theoretical optimum exposure of 249 seconds I'm not sure what effect light pollution filters have. I keep meaning to ask

@creeper360bill 4 года назад

@@AstroFarsography Wouldn't light pollution filters have the same effect as narrowband, but not to the same degree of course? There is a calculator out there for optimum subexposure lengths for the ASI183/ASI294, and you can input the bandpass of your filter, so if you just add the bandpasses up for your LP filter you can calculate a good exposure length.

@AstroFarsography 4 года назад

@@creeper360bill that makes sense. I use the calculator a lot to work out exposure lengths but yeah, that's probably exactly that needs to do. I'll have a look about that when I'm home for sure

@mohammadwong 2 года назад

@@AstroFarsography how do you get a p of 0.13 ?

@billleonard2015 4 года назад

Thank you for clear and informative video. I wonder about exceeding the recommended sub-exposure time (at 51:45 in the video). Although it doesn't reduce stack noise much further, it looks like it doesn't hurt. Can extending sub-exposure time be used to advantage in reducing the number of sub-frames? It seems to me that going to 2x the recommended sub-exposure can cut the number of sub-frames in half to achieve the desired integration time.

@stevenharper6394 4 года назад

Same question!

@donovanj35 3 года назад

You will get better integration with more subframes. Total time is one factor, but total number of subs is also a factor. I've seen another presentation where they show the curve for number of frames, and that doesn't start to tail off until the 100-200 subframe range, and there is still a few % improvement out to about 400-500 frames.

@Glofilter 2 года назад

I wish they could have let him have more time. Gain is important... The math doesn't work either for my camera- using his equation my ideal exposure time is 2 seconds. Is there any other video of this full presentation where he isn't rushed?

@projectnemesi5950 Год назад

What camera do you have? You have to do a lot of math to get the right result, and its easy to do it wrong.

@riccardofecchio8915 3 года назад

Good morning, there is something I cannot understand. The Optimum sub exposure length means time. Time is measured in seconds (s). HOw come you can get seconds in a formula where the C parameter is unitless, R (Read noise) is in electrons e- which is the squared (e-^2) and P (e-/px/s). If I make the division I don't get second but something related to e-/px/sec. Am I wrong ?

@rv3211 3 года назад

Assuming you're using the right figures, you should be seeing the optimum sub length in seconds depending on your percentage noise tolerance.

@RomanPearah 2 года назад

No one said C was unitless. In fact, since it's defined as inversely proportional to a certain acceptable increase in noise (e-), we can infer its unit is 1/e-.

@TheRandomwraith Год назад

I agree the units throughout, not just here, appear to be mixed. Given C is related to E, the additional noise we'll tolerate and is stated as a percentage (by construction % is dimensionless) hence so too must be C, which is also implied by the equation for C. There are other equations where the problem manifests itself more dangerously. e.g single frame total noise = sqrt(R^2 + S.P) which appears to add e^2 + e/px. The only way I can reconcile is to have the time variables T, S with units of seconds.e/px and read noise R units as e/px. To me the latter makes sense (R can't be noise of the whole sensor can it surely?) and seconds.e/px is probably fine since we don't care what e/px is, just that all pixels are exposed concurrently (i.e optimum exposure for one px is same as for all px). Doing this, single frame noise has units of sqrt(e^2/px^2 + e/px/secs . secs.e/px) = sqrt(e^2/px^2+e^2/px^2) = e/px. The other noise equations are then consistent too with units e/px. Optimum time has units [C] e^2/px^2 / (e/px/secs) = secs.e/px, the same dimension as T and S above, and C is dimensionless as required. Well, I've convinced myself it's all ok, but I'm sure the internet will have its own thoughts ...

@TheRandomwraith Год назад

@@RomanPearah by implication from the equation for C, it must be dimensionless ...

@natemandoo 5 лет назад

UGH?!? he glosses over the ONE thing I wanted most... the gain/offset values??!

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

He uploaded it separately. Can be found here ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ub1HjvlCJ5Y.html

@humbertolopez5631 3 года назад

hello.i have a Celestron - NexStar 8SE Telescope - Computerized Telescope .I've up date it with: ZWO ASIAIR PROWiFi controller;ZWO ASI183MC Pro 20.18 MP CMOS Color Astronomy Camera. I've tried to use it and learn how work it for a few week....and I'm not understood it...i can not get a focus.I have seen all the videos on youtube. but I cannot understand anything about the correct use of this camera in my telescope. until today I have not been able to achieve the focus of any planet...what do you think :ill do some thing wrong?or that I need additional in my telescope. I'll appreciate your help

@AstroFarsography 3 года назад

Hey Humberto. I'm not sure about the 8SE but make sure you rack focus in and out fully. Try finding the Moon when it's bright, if you can't reach focus at all at the extent of the focus tube but you can see a blob then you'll require extensions. Or you could try to get a reducer for the scope. For planets you might also want several focus extenders and a good quality Barlow

@humbertolopez5631 3 года назад

@@AstroFarsography thank you i'll do.i appreciate your help.

@pault5947 5 лет назад

Great lecture but I always skip through the first 5 mins or so. The speakers at these events must think we all read the list of chapters before we read a book lol. Thanks for taking the time to record it and post. :)

@AstroFarsography 5 лет назад

Haha. It was good. I missed on some of it cus I was focusing on the recordings but I'm happy with how it came out. I was so nervous about the sound 😂

@donovanj35 3 года назад

its an adult education template., you'll notice this format a lot in adult ed: Tell you what your going to learn. Teach. Tell you what you learned.

@hugbearsx4 3 года назад

17:15 I would have thought that "Full Well Depth" (or "filling the bucket") would be a con rather than a pro for long exposures. Am I wrong? Apart from this minor slip, excellent presentation and BRILLIANTLY documented. Many thanks for making it available to the public!!

@mostafametwally1 4 года назад

Thank you for sharing this. There is one thing I don’t get. He said that you don’t need a long exposure to get the best S/N ratio. But I still don’t know if I will get a better signal by going longer. In other words will I get the same signal from 60x1 min exposures as I will from a single 60 min exposure. Is longer still better regarding the final signal?

@AstroFarsography 4 года назад

I believe he mentions that the best you can ever do is 1x60m, but she to risks associated with that we break it down. 60x1m is the best compromise. Going longer than your "ideal sub length" adds diminishing returns. If you want a cleaner signal use a different C factor also in your calculations :)

@mostafametwally1 4 года назад

AstroFarsography thanks. It gives diminishing returns regarding noise reduction but does it give diminishing returns regarding gathering more photons fro dim areas? I also assume the formula gives the exposure time in seconds and not minutes? In other words is there a guide for how long we should go for our total exposure time? The reason I am asking is that using his formula, it seems that I should only be imaging for a few seconds which would be quite a radical change in my practice?

@adrianmorar2428 10 месяцев назад

Interesting lecture indeed, however the formulas presented by Dr Glover fail to take into consideration the amount of subexposure time needed to capture faint nebular details which leads me to believe that this is incomplete, at best

@bobuk5722 3 года назад

38 mins in. Negative noise? Anyone know what that is? Know, please, not guess! BobUK.

@felipeleon_astrofotos Год назад

Read noise for example. Read Noise is an error when measuring a value. Sometimes you might read a little more, and other times you read a little less. When you read less, you have a negative noise.

@cat-star5403 Год назад

The final results seem a bit counterintuitive-- they suggest you're better off imaging under light-polluted skies because you can use shorter exposures.

@projectnemesi5950 Год назад

No, the equation uses the percent INCREASE over the MINIMUM noise level. The minimum noise level is one long sub. The minimum noise level includes the light pollution factor, so the minimum noise level is much higher with high light pollution.