Dehancer VS FilmConvert Film Emulation versus

Подписаться 226

Просмотров 11 тыс.

50% 1

These videos are only to show the Film Emulation of these two OFX When I use Dehancer the dafault setting work very well, but there will be some overflow in the saturation of the dark and black pint The default setting of FilmConvert is very high contrast and you need manual setting, but the satutation control in the dark and black point is better than Dehancer
BTW:FilmConvert works better on Gen5 color than4,but Dehancer only supports Gen4 color,so I didn't make a comparison
Bmpcc4K Prores & Braw Gen4 color
DaVinci Resolve Studio 17
Dehancer pro 4.1.0
FilmConvert Nitrate 3.06

Кино

Опубликовано:

22 июл 2021

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 32

@brandonmurray3629 2 года назад

This illustrates all the issues I have with FilmConvert in that it doesn't look like film!! The contrast is always super crunchy and the colors just seem off. I've shot film for about a decade and Dehancer is looking really nice

@WEHAVETHISDREAM 2 года назад

Did you select the camera type, Rec. 709 (or whatever you used etc.)?

@flipnap2112 Год назад

yeah I would look into the colorspace issue. Resolve timeline and profile matches have to be correct. I had the same thing with loading LUTS and not being in Cineon color space. once I figured that out everything looked amazing.

@jayclas4023 8 месяцев назад

This looks exactly like film, but I had the over processed issue with Film Convert at first but now you can blind the film look to taste leaving your shadows and highlights intact. Once I watched Safe House again with Denzel, Washington and Ryan Reynolds, I then knew my mission😂 All the highlights were blown out and the shadows were completely crushed. I now love FC Nitrate!

@WEHAVETHISDREAM 2 года назад

DeHancer is so overpriced, for what it actually can do... 400 Dollars, come on, man... I can manually GET the look from any of these plugins, doing it myself, but don't want to waste hours on that. So, Filmconvert is like 99 Dollars, this month (special deal), does the same thing. All the best and thanks for the video VS! Opened my eyes, haha.

@WEHAVETHISDREAM Год назад

@@joaocorreiamedia The other one is also free for life, from what I understood. Well, as long as it gets you the job done, every tool is a good tool... in the right hands :). Greets.

@brettalexander.studio Год назад

@ojoaoefixe not really, you have all the same tools in the traditional color editing tabs. The only thing it can't do is add filmgrain emulations which I think is the point he's making.

@dorothyparkour435 2 года назад

This is great - Which controls in FilmConvert did you use, to change the contrast?

@enkaphalin1111 2 года назад

same question here. I havent been messing around with filmconvert for long, but the way it render's colours has always been way too crunchy for me. However, in this vid when corrected, it looks amazing

@dorothyparkour435 2 года назад

@@enkaphalin1111 In the controls, use the cineon to print film slider to take the edge off. I have started taking it down 20% or more.

@flipnap2112 Год назад

@@enkaphalin1111 sounds like a timeline colorspace issue. resolve isnt a plug n play type of thing with colorspace issues, with LUTS and OFX plugins.

@sondp 2 года назад

What are the manual settings you did?

@jimveybe7689 Год назад

Nitrate is good for leading your eye only to highlights, and eliminating shadows. Outside of artsy and exaggerated effects though, I don't use Nitrate for anything dramatic or musical.

@brettalexander.studio Год назад

There are so many setting for tweaking. Your really missing out. I find putting it on an adjustment layer and adjusting the opacity to liking is really nice for subtle grain and color richness.

@jimveybe7689 Год назад

@@brettalexander.studio Thanks for the reply. I prefer the 70s 16mm look to digital grain. That’s why I use Dehancer in Resolve Studio.

@istominmusic 2 года назад

Cool, but side by side?)))

@fabimesizae 2 года назад

I prefer FilmConvert, it is more film like

@brettalexander.studio Год назад

It's gorgeous, even when crushed the richness is insane

@jayclas4023 8 месяцев назад

I love it too, the price is right and it’s not heavy on my CPU.

@igedebagusjayendra 2 года назад

sometimes, the filmconvert looks like really nice with their over contrast image, back to the context of the screening production.

@TheodoreW 2 года назад

Yes, if you want a real cinematic look, filmconvert will give you the effect you need, but as I've shown, each tool has its own production environment that works best for you, for projects that aren't strictly filmed, I think a dehancer would be a good fit for someone

@strengerKontrapunkt 2 года назад

FilmConvert doesn't look like film...

@WEHAVETHISDREAM 2 года назад

Yeah, well none of these two look like ACTUAL film... But, I ain't paying 400 USD for a fricking plugin... Filmconvert or my two hands can do the job.

@colorist-idealist Год назад

FilmConvert better, more profiles for cameras, fewer films, but everything is more thoughtful, of course, you don’t have to think that you can put a plug-in and it will be like a film, you need to see the color and know how the film looks, with FilmConvert I have more like film and faster. Dehancer is too confusing with additional features and I don't like the result.