Demons - Part 1 by Fyodor Dostoevsky - Book Summary, Analysis, Review (Devils or The Possessed)

Подписаться 41 тыс.

Просмотров 10 тыс.

50% 1

Welcome to the CodeX Cantina where our mission is to get more people talking about books! Was there a theme or meaning you wanted us to talk about further? Let us know in the comments below! Today we discuss Part 1 of "Demons" by Fyodor Dostoevsky. We have to talk about the Superfluous Man, Belonging as a Currency with Currenization, Narration Techniques, and more! Join us for an in-depth discussion!
Demons In-Depth: • Before you Read Demons...
Our copies were translated by Pevear and Volokhonsky and Michael R. Katz.
✨Do you have a Short Story or Novel you'd think we'd like or would want to see us cover? Join our Patreon to pick our reads.
📖 Join our PATREON!: / thecodexcantina
☕️ Buy Us a Coffee/Support my Channel!: ko-fi.com/thecodexcantina
🖥️ Talk to us on our Discord Server: / discord
🐤 Twitter: / thecodexcantina
📸 Instagram: / thecodexcantina
💻 The Literary Discourse Discord: / discord
📹 Subscribe to RU-vid Channel: / @thecodexcantina
==================================
Channels Mentioned in this Video:
O. G. Rose: ‪@O.G.Rose.Michelle.and.Daniel‬ • Currenization by O.G. ...
‪@beautifulminutiae‬
‪@TheLiteraryApothecary‬
‪@msrichardsreads‬
‪@ChristyLuisDostoevskyinSpace‬
‪@amusicalbookworm‬
==================================
#fyodordostoyevsky
#demons
======License and Copyright Info======
Song: CodeX Cantina Intro
Artist: CodeX Cantina

Опубликовано:

26 апр 2023

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 48

@TheCodeXCantina 7 месяцев назад

It's been pointed out to us that via several translations the "slap" is clearly meant to be interpreted more as a punch. Our fault as we describe it and analyze it as a slap in this video. We'll leave the video up even with mistakes as I think it's worth still understanding and discussing it in the context of the era. Apologies for the mistake and I hope you still love this book as much as we did!

@attention5638 Год назад

"His Russian is great if you love French." 😅 Oh boy. Despite a lot of people having a lot in common with Dostoyevsky, I think few people would actually get along with him haha I could definitely use a prescription slap every now and then haha😅

@TheCodeXCantina Год назад

Prescription slaps are the cheapest form of medical treatment

@henridib7222 7 месяцев назад

I speak and read both english and French and i hated every second Stepan went into a fit speaking French 😂

@juanse12k 7 месяцев назад

i read this book last out of the big 4 of dostoevsky and, although it wasnt the one i liked the least, i can say that i had a very hard time understanding it. it seemed to me that it was the one novel that you had to know the most about the historic and literary context to be able to understand. being that this books main idea has to do a lot with what i believe as far as my own convictions go i decided to pick it up and read a few pages again and i was hooked. ended up reading the whole thing again. this book became my favorite book of all time. it is definitely worth taking the time to study it and understand everything that surrounds it. the enigma of Stavrogin still lives in my head rent free. pyotr stepanovich is my favorite villain of all time.

@kalergakis9003 Год назад

I've recently came across your channel and i wonder why dont you guys have more subs! Your content is amazing! Kepp it up!

@TheCodeXCantina Год назад

Thanks for the kind words. We work hard on our content so I’m glad you enjoy it! We’re happy to interact with anyone who stops by.

@tic1515 6 месяцев назад

These talks are so educative and validating, it's great to hear that I'm not the only one confused about Part 1.:D This helped me very much in my reading, gave me some new interesting perspectives.

@LittleOrla Год назад

New subscriber. I love that you jump right in to the conversation without a 3- minute intro. 👍

@TheCodeXCantina Год назад

Thanks! I do try to be mindful of jumping in so I’m glad it works for some!

@foodforthesoul4011 Год назад

Brilliant analysis of Part I. I just finished Demons this morning. I needed this. Thanks so much. Looking forward to listening to the rest of the series.

@TheCodeXCantina Год назад

Thanks for the kind words! I hope you enjoy the rest as well

@maznsalih Год назад

Man you are a legend! I love all your content about dostoevsky I really need these explanations keep up the good work

@TheCodeXCantina Год назад

Thanks for the kind words. Glad you enjoy them

@jonathanmarcelthome Год назад

Great video. Love your work!

@TheCodeXCantina Год назад

Thanks for the kind words!

@uglytuco3829 9 месяцев назад

I'm just over 100 pages in and I wa beginning to think this book was out of my league. It's challenging to keep track of who's talking as more characters are introduced. I decided to just focus on the relationships for now until the plot begins to tie together.

@TheCodeXCantina 9 месяцев назад

👍

@monkymonky 4 месяца назад

Thank you for this !

@vukasinjosic9719 2 месяца назад

Hi! Love your analysis, just wanted to point out, I don't think Shatov turned down Lisa's idea on principle, he even realised it would be a nice enterprise, and was glad about it. The reason he turned her down is because she said she had heard from Peter Verkhovensky that Shatov had a printing press, which was hidden, and illegal, and Shatov suspected her good intentions. Lise was oblivious to the secrecy of the printing press, but Shatov didn't know it, and he thought she might have ulterior motives for bringing it up, and that her enterprise was just a cover story to lure him in

@cch312 Год назад

Thanks for this session, it helps a lot on my reading journey.

@TheCodeXCantina Год назад

Glad it was helpful!

@chickencharlie1992 Год назад

This is perfect! I have been trying to read and understand the novel. It is definitely confusing for an anglo. Stuck processing is the perfect way to put it. There's so much coming at the reader so quickly. Calling it a book of secrets makes a ton of sense.

@TheCodeXCantina Год назад

I hope you enjoy

@chickencharlie1992 Год назад

@@TheCodeXCantina I shall

@audreykadis6829 6 месяцев назад

I have been surprised by the ironic humor that for me permeates Book I and you have barely mentioned. Did I miss something or have you skipped this for a reason?

@NigelMcClatchey Год назад

Can you guys perhaps do an introductory discussion on Thomas Mann's "Joseph and His Brothers" later in the year? I'm thinking of taking this on for my big winter read this year.

@safuvanmohammed2978 7 месяцев назад

"I still think you guys have a lot more common than you think" made me lol. True

@claytonallen9874 11 месяцев назад

I just finished part 1 of Demons last night. Appreciate your discussion and analysis without spoilers! I will definitely be watching after I read each part. Dostoevsky is quickly becoming my author since I started to read his books this year.

@TheCodeXCantina 11 месяцев назад

Thanks for the kind words. 🙏 Hope you enjoy

@mic982 26 дней назад

I had such a hard time trying to figure out where Dostoevsky was going with this story (perhaps Dostoevsky himself wasn't yet sure) at the end of Part I. I suspect FD was still developing the story idea in his own head as he developed the plot from the 'idea'. I think he knew very well where he wanted to go with the story - but not entirely certain how he was going to get there. Until Part II. Just my own opinion.

@Jannette-mw7fg Год назад

Thanks! The narrator's explanation was good! I think you make the "mistake" a lot of people make when they read Dostojewsky by jumping to the conclusion that he regrets former liberal thinking and that he is "just" an orthodox believer......Dostojewsky always shows the two way road, the dualism in every thought, for example Stavrogin's saying "If the truth excluded Christ, I would rather stay with Christ" this means, that Dostojewsky wants Christ, and longs for him, and he knows we need him in order to live without al hell breaking loose, but he does challenges the realness of Christ...it is both true....But this wil be a point of ongoing discussions....

@mahdibinho 10 месяцев назад

Hi, good job! I am just about to finish part one and want to answer the last question. At this stage, demons may be all the internal conflicts represented in part one between ideas, generations, social groups, and one's self... but of course, part 1 yet...

@TheCodeXCantina 10 месяцев назад

Thanks for sharing

@reginaldcampos5762 Месяц назад

12:28 "leading him by the nose" careful, Stavrogin might be in the room

@veronikavart9651 Год назад

спасибо за видео.

@TheCodeXCantina Год назад

👍❤️

@joeyfajardo8738 19 дней назад

I just read the first part. It's challenging for sure, 200 pages but I also feel like not much has happened. Maybe I'm just reading it wrong

@TheCodeXCantina 19 дней назад

I get that feeling. On my second reading of the chapter after reading the book I had a lot of “a ha” moments when I reread the chapter.

@Alex-wm2hk 11 месяцев назад

Hahahha having read the book the idea at 45:02 is hilarious. No hate ofc, and the end of part 1 that's as likely as everything else but in hindsight it is very funny 😂

@veronikavart9651 Год назад

комментарий в поддержку продвижения ролика.

@henridib7222 7 месяцев назад

"It was not a slap with the palm of his hand, but a blow with the whole fist, and it was a big, heavy, bony fist covered with red hairs and freckles." I don't understand why you keep referring to it as a slap and talked about it for a few minute, when dostoevsky specifically said it was a punch. Anyway, it's a great video i appreciate you guys' analysis and insights.

@kyrilldijkstra3341 7 месяцев назад

I might be mistaken but I thought Shatov's 'slap' was a full on punch with his knuckles. At least that's how it was translated in the Dutch translation

@TheCodeXCantina 7 месяцев назад

Gotcha. I’m reading the English translations. Not sure what original Russian word used was but perhaps someone fluent will share with us…

@demotsit1290 6 месяцев назад

Знаехте ли, че думата *нищо* не е само като значение (Нито един (предмет, явление, изказване, ситуация и др.). В стаята нямаше нищо. Нищо не разбирам. Нищо не ме интересува.), то във винителния падеж означава; "аз съм виновен, но и вие сте виновни, проклети да сте ако няма справедливост". В Престъпление и наказание има един пасаж; -- "Господ и така е длъжен да ми прости... Сам знае как съм страдала!... А ако не ми прости -- нищо!" Тук автора говори във винителен падеж -- проклети да сте, не е моя само вината в мен , но и вие имате отговорност; отговорност за общото от което зависи благоденствието на обществото. Та се чудя дали преводачите на Достоевски се съобразяват с винителния падеж и дали правилно го адаптират на английски.