No video :(

Depth of Field 2018 | Sal Cincotta - Master the Light

Подписаться 960 тыс.

Просмотров 59 тыс.

50% 1

Photographer Sal Cincotta joins B&H at Depth of Field 2018 to share his professional insights into wedding photography - particularly regarding lighting and equipment - as well as the philosophies that have helped him succeed as a professional photographer.

Опубликовано:

27 авг 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 58

@InfinitelyFocused 5 лет назад

55 minutes of pure gold. Sal is a great photog slash businessman slash teacher slash life coach etc. I wonder what it would be like to work with him? he seems like he always switched on and has the creative juices flowing.

@justinzaff 6 лет назад

Sal is the man , i gave this a thumbs up before even watching it . I never do that but this guy is a gun .

@donharrington576 6 лет назад

Great presentation Sal, I love your energy , passion and confident style of education. Thank you.

@lowedean77 5 лет назад

Awesome- the first 12 minutes is my teaching philosophy since...forever!

@saritnavon6750 6 лет назад

Beautiful work. There is always something to learn from Sal

@sherrielisa1415 5 лет назад

So inspiring! Thank you Sal and B&H for sharing!

@jkspinalchoice 5 лет назад

Hi Sal, Thank you for the high energy, and solid infotmation you always provide!

@shayhardison2820 6 лет назад

This was great! I learned so much in 1 hour. I speak/ think things into existence so I look forward to meeting you Sal.

@jonathanrascol 2 года назад

Bravo! Beautiful! Homages! ✨✨✨ JAR

@NH4Ukraine2 4 года назад

You had me at, “same crappy photos”. I was hooked after that.

@jerrypadgett3192 6 лет назад

The Vince Vaughn of Photography. Nice job.

@canturgan 4 года назад

Photography is light control, be it natural or artificial.

@Duphe 4 года назад

thank you so much for your video, great work! :)

@jasperfredrickson4420 6 лет назад

Sal Cincotta, master at rigging a contest and winning his own prizes.

@felixbelanger2659 6 лет назад

That was a pretty dumb thing to do... Yet he does give good advice and that doesn't make him any less of a good photographer

@amadarichards2159 6 лет назад

No, but makes him unethical and untrustworthy

@nahumpaul85 6 лет назад

15:57 in my opinion is when the presentation starts...

@aalexandromoreno 6 лет назад

I disagree. The first 15 minutes have good content too.

@beaconstructs 5 лет назад

For real, wannabe ted talk

@MoncoField 3 года назад

Yeah this free high educational content is such a drag... lol

@omnesilere 6 лет назад

Was there any mention of high speed sync? I feel like that's a powerful part of this style.

@paulgero 6 лет назад

Great job Sal!!!

@reuvenansh5231 6 лет назад

Great presentation Sal, thx! I see you love you A1's, they are amazing flashes. There are many other reasons to use them over speed lights that you didn't mention... but I don't know why it takes your speed lights 5 seconds to recharge. My Canon 600's take only 3 seconds at full power with RECHARGABLE PowerX 2700 batteries. Maybe you tested with alkalines and if so why?

@SalCincotta1 6 лет назад

yes - i can agree with you there... i tested with reg AA. Personally - i hate the rechargeable... at least in my experience... in the beginning they work great... but within a few dozen recycles... they dont seem to work as well or as long. so i stopped using them and went back to alkaline, but obviously not an issue for me at the moment. and i wasnt getting the same amount of shots fired at full power as the A1 gives. today - i have 6 A1s in the bag.

@jkspinalchoice 5 лет назад

Any recommendation for editors for portrait photography?

@salaxigr 5 лет назад

Nice presentation , how you avoiding light splitting

@firlefansel8496 2 года назад

right!

@epgui 6 лет назад

Can anyone enlighten (ha) me on something? In many of these photos (for eg.: there's the one at 30:40, the one at 39:25, the one at 48:30) the subject seems to be dramatically overexposed compared to the setting, which I find rather excellent... But it looks very weird, because little to none of the added light appears to spill into the environment. Anyone else notice how the subjects often don't appear to cast shadows onto the ground (see examples), and how the ground is not illuminated yet the feet are very much so? Is there a deliberate effort to remove these shadows in post to make it look like a composite?

@felixbelanger2659 6 лет назад

I'm only an amateur photographer so don't take my word for it, but if you have your light close enough to your subject, you can get some very strong light fall off between your subject and background. So I don't think that it involves that much editing. EDIT: one thing that I have just realized is that he often shoots two shots, one with the light and one without (so he can remove the assistant or stand easily) So it would be very easy to remove any light spill as well

@omnesilere 6 лет назад

I'm almost certain he's using high speed sync, where he can use really fast shutter speeds that close down the ambient light which really makes his subjects that are lit up with really powerful lights stand out. What in impressed with is the utter lack of spill, 51:56 for example, but I'm assuming they dodge that down in editing in a bit.

@britiney_hall 6 лет назад

Great Great Video!!!!!

@stephenpolwart2094 6 лет назад

Good info...nice images..ruined it by pushing the Profoto brand.

@SalCincotta1 6 лет назад

stephen polwart can’t apologize. It’s what I use. All the time.

@skoulgeorge 6 лет назад

begin so nice, you talked about education and experimenting and in the end you gave me the feeling that you were an employee of profoto company even if you do not advertise that company, you make it look like that..

@MoncoField 3 года назад

@@SalCincotta1 people on RU-vid can be pretty irritating lol. Theyll find something "negative" even in the best content out there lol ungrateful

@SalCincotta1 3 года назад

Monco Field exactly. :) they have a choice... stop watching.

@MoncoField 3 года назад

@@SalCincotta1 it just blows my mind because 15- 20 years ago people had to PAY for educational content and it could be pretty expensive lol. Now we get all this unbelievable free content and people have the audacity to complain about one thing they don't like...

@juanriver2719 3 года назад

I am master.

@kenawaken6894 5 лет назад

he got to say A1 in the last example

@faze1er 6 лет назад

Wait, so you can't use a 70-200 at 85mm to get the same look of a 85mm prime? You can't put the lens to 85mm and use your feet to move forward or backwards? Interesting !

@SalCincotta1 6 лет назад

Rafeal Jackson correct. A prime and a zoom have very different optics. And will never look the same. Rent them and test side by side. In addition primes have a much wider DoF and will also look different.

@reuvenansh5231 6 лет назад

Great presentation! I think you meant primes have a "shallower" DOF. And to get that look with a 70-200 f 2.8 you need to move back and zoom in, so the compression gives a different look, but another point to consider is that to achieve the same bokeh effect with the 70-200 2.8 it's harder to connect/communicate with the client at that further distance. Using the 85 keeps you in closer

@SalCincotta1 6 лет назад

Reuven Ansh correct sorry. Meant shallower. Point is. They look different. Very different. I use an 85 1.2 and a 70-200 2.8. I can stand same spot at 85mm and they will not look same. Primes are much better quality.

@faze1er 6 лет назад

Interesting, I must rent to see. From my experience the quality of modern day zooms aren't like they once were. Certain brands micro contrast and Bokeh render out of focus better. Also cameras make a slight difference as well, right? Does sensors matter or size of the sensor. What if I were using medium format? Am I just screwed if I don't have a 85 mm? Not trying to be a smart ass but I'm really curious and always open to thoughts or methods, etc...

@matrixmanify 6 лет назад

Reuven Ansh do you mean they look different because of the depth of field? Or do you mean even at 2.8 on both they look differently?

@akisasaki6661 5 лет назад

The first 20 minutes is useless.

@RayValdezPhotography 5 лет назад

Actually I am a salt and pepper chef and I am offended by this presentation.

@regiebautistaarts161 4 года назад

I thought your tim harris

@dannyklesh 5 лет назад

Go out and replicate when one of those lights cost 2k

@risbill1 5 лет назад

Lots of other options out there for allot less.

@MoncoField 3 года назад

Lol...profoto isnt the only company that sells flashes. You can literally spend half that amount or less and get the exact results. He obviously just has money so he bought the most expensive ones

@KimDungHo 5 лет назад

@GeraltOfRivia99 6 лет назад

who cares about photagraphy... no one

@SalCincotta1 6 лет назад

Linuxx excellent point.

@justinzaff 6 лет назад

Linuxx The people who dont have to work in a factory or dead end job that get paid to travel and take photographs care about photography.

@MR-kt1vx 4 года назад

Then why are you here

@GeraltOfRivia99 4 года назад

i didnt know you couldnt randomly watch youtube videos. i also didnt know that because some people say photography is pointless that it means you work a broke a job...