Тёмный

Deriving the Fourier Transform 

BK Teach
Подписаться 1,5 тыс.
Просмотров 26 тыс.
50% 1

A presentation by Mike Hanson from Augustana College in May 2015.

Опубликовано:

 

21 июл 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 41   
@alt-f4666
@alt-f4666 3 года назад
Your derivation of F.T. was amazing. Always glad to see the logic behind cold blooded formulas. GJ!!
@SirSweepsOfficial
@SirSweepsOfficial 2 месяца назад
thank god, an indepth proof, all the other videos I was watching were glossing over what was going on with creating the integral from the rieman sum, usually you get a definite integral and I didnt understand why we were getting an indefinite integral untill seeing the L to infinity and bounds of BOTH integrals like you have here, thank you much
@tribalpermaculturalist1377
@tribalpermaculturalist1377 3 года назад
Thank you, as someone studying mathematics I was curious how one would go about deriving the Fourier transform and you have done an excellent job explaining this.
@SalehGoodarzian
@SalehGoodarzian Год назад
Thanks a lot. Great explanation. I really appreciate your great work
@seansethi196
@seansethi196 5 лет назад
Could be used in many real world applications such as editing the noise out of this video. :)
@jahitrst2863
@jahitrst2863 4 года назад
Hehe. Big brain in math yet using stupid editors.
@buffnerd4207
@buffnerd4207 3 года назад
that one there was a violation
@mikevaldez7684
@mikevaldez7684 2 года назад
Sean Sethi, hahaha, very funny Negative Nancy, you shinning little whimp!
@tonymunene1592
@tonymunene1592 Год назад
Best vid on fourier transform on the internet derivation
@mannyjacobo8499
@mannyjacobo8499 Год назад
Amazing could not find this kind of help in hours of searching thank you
@alokmishra9243
@alokmishra9243 4 года назад
It's really the best one can get Thank you so much
@nindergardjason9271
@nindergardjason9271 3 года назад
very excellent explanation about Fourier Transform. Keep up the good work!
@NaveenShettyind
@NaveenShettyind 6 лет назад
good explanation, but signs of exponents are wrong i think, should have been positive for f(x) and negative for F(w). Correct me if I am wrong.
@shobhitkhajuria7464
@shobhitkhajuria7464 6 лет назад
The way omega is defined,if l goes to infinity,omega must go to zero unless n is large.is it so?
@nourmuhammad2425
@nourmuhammad2425 3 года назад
amazing, thank you so much sir can I ask you about the source's name of the proof? thank you
@gozer1234567
@gozer1234567 6 лет назад
Im confused, why does omega run from minus infinity to plus infinity. It is defined to be pie times n over l, and both n and l aproach some infinity. I am pretty sure that omega is supossed to be an undefined number.
@RealMcDudu
@RealMcDudu 3 года назад
Excellent explanation!
@NicolasSchmidMusic
@NicolasSchmidMusic 4 года назад
mhhh I learned that cn has a minus in the exponent... it feels like you switched the fourier transform with the inverse fourier transform
@surabee3398
@surabee3398 3 года назад
If a is inverse of b, b is inverse of a. The minus sign being here or there doesn't make a difference ig.
@Johannes_Seerup
@Johannes_Seerup Месяц назад
I dont understand 1/2pi survives when Delta omega goes to infinity. ??
@ozzyfromspace
@ozzyfromspace 6 лет назад
A few typographical errors here and there, but you also provided the clearest explanation of the Fourier transform I’ve probably ever come across. I really appreciate your decision to post this for the internet population to learn from. I should mention that your brief statement of the inverse Fourier transform hurt...it would have been wonderful for you to extend your analysis to that inverse transform. All things considered, I’m very happy with your work (not that you need my approval lol). I hope you keep up the awesome education. Best wishes from a new subscriber,-Float Circuit.
@somedude1666
@somedude1666 5 лет назад
That was really well explained.
@gamringzonechenal988
@gamringzonechenal988 6 лет назад
Great video that clear my concept
@NicolasSchmidMusic
@NicolasSchmidMusic 4 года назад
perfect, I finally got it!
@starkidrockermuse
@starkidrockermuse 7 лет назад
Hi, Really great video explaining the Fourier Transform. I'm just wondering how the F(omega) function went from having 1/2L to having 1/2pi when the integrating bounds changed from -L to L, to -infinity to infinity? Thanks
@mosshotep
@mosshotep 4 года назад
God damn my dude you are a hero
@federicaguidotti8918
@federicaguidotti8918 7 лет назад
Hi Brian. Could you help me to understand why at 4.30 n=-n please? What kind of operation has been carryed out?
@xiaoda4923
@xiaoda4923 6 лет назад
In the first summation, it does not make any sense the "e^(i*theta*x)" becomes "e^( - i*theta*x)" when he replace "n" by " - n". Would you explain it ? It is really unclear
@kelvinadimas8851
@kelvinadimas8851 Год назад
Because its the hermitian series, which have the symetrical property for complex conjugate, it falls under complex analysis category, TL;DR its the same as original series
@giorgitsintsadze9919
@giorgitsintsadze9919 2 года назад
marvellous
@borkundkanya7715
@borkundkanya7715 4 года назад
Hi Brian I didn't get from 4:25 to 5:30
@kelvinadimas8851
@kelvinadimas8851 Год назад
7:17 why omega is n pi/ L? Omega is 2 pi f lmao
@avethakur9198
@avethakur9198 2 года назад
Why did you put ∆w= 1...as ∆w->0?? 08:41
@pestmant
@pestmant 2 года назад
Becomes dw
@tushardesale3300
@tushardesale3300 4 года назад
Hi Brian I didn't get that As Cn is An-iBn/2 An+iBn/2 than at 5:36 he wrote that Cn =An+Bn/2 only
@marpin6162
@marpin6162 2 года назад
If you look to the definition of An and Bn and substitute n by -n, you see that A(-n) = A(n) (cos is an even function), and B(-n) = -B(n) ( sin is an odd function), hence you get A(-n) -iB(-n) = A(n) +iB(n). Then C(n) is just (A(n) + iB(n))/2
@captainkim7738
@captainkim7738 Год назад
@@marpin6162 I was thinking the same. Kudos
@shahmeelbhaishahmeelbhai4231
@shahmeelbhaishahmeelbhai4231 5 лет назад
I viewed many videos on Fourier transform and I found in some videos that there werer 1/√2π ,1/2π and in some videos there was nothing Its very confusing for me
@valor36az
@valor36az 4 года назад
Shahmeelbhai Shahmeelbhai although a year old and you may have figured it out 1/sq(2pi) is just an arbitrary normalization constant which makes the integral =1
@abdulbasith9465
@abdulbasith9465 2 года назад
My doubt is solved
@seyedmohammadnamimirmohamm7096
@seyedmohammadnamimirmohamm7096 3 года назад
sin x = (e^ix-e^-ix)/2i
Далее
A Short Introduction to Bayesian Statistics
12:34
The Revolutionary Genius Of Joseph Fourier
16:17
Просмотров 117 тыс.
Beautiful gymnastics 😍☺️
00:15
Просмотров 13 млн
Tom🍓Jerry 😂 #shorts #achayanarmyfamily
00:14
Просмотров 11 млн
The Discrete Fourier Transform (DFT)
17:36
Просмотров 334 тыс.
Intro to Fourier transforms: how to calculate them
22:07
Fourier Series
16:36
Просмотров 475 тыс.
Beautiful gymnastics 😍☺️
00:15
Просмотров 13 млн