Desert Storm - The Air War, Day 1 - Animated 

After you finish up with Desert Storm, could you do some videos on some of the most famous WWII bombings, like the Bombing of Darwin, Operation Gomorrah, Operation Tigerfish, and Operation Meetinghouse?

Pls make a video on 1971 Indo Pak war

This was a fantastic video! I know a lot of people will ask you to cover other operations. I just want to let you know that I enjoyed the video shown right here. You did a great job. I'm not even thinking about what you'll do next because I'm still marveling at the outstanding quality of this one. Thank you for putting the effort into making this.

I right away know that for this video is needed ALOT of reaserch, so I apriciate that 👏👏👏👏👏👏👏

Very BIG effort !!! Wow.... Omg, this is amazing

*snorts a line of coke followed by banging head on table* says in a good ole boy accent, “let’s fuckin send bombers from the swamp over to Iraq”

As soon as he said "Barksdale" I said, "Holy shit, that's just down the street from my house! They flew all the way to Iraq from there?!?!?!"

@@DeliciousManX Dude my family lives in Doyline and Minden area

@@angelogandolfo4174 if that’s a British flag as your pfp, and you’re British, you’re talking as the BIGGEST hypocrite I’ve ever come across

@@angelogandolfo4174 The Bahgdad air defense was designed and built by the Russian's, as was the entire Iraqi air defense system in general, and in fact was manned by Russian "advisors" and still got stomped. I understand why your so triggered though. Go have a nice cry for yourself. Maybe treat yourself to that gender reaasignment surgery you've been putting off.

What, you don't like watching American Pickers or Ancient Aliens on the History channel? I miss the days when they showed legit history.

American pickers are nor bad tho

Shit this war was televised

I agree 100%

I hardly watch regular tv anymore! It’s all doo: and gloom or crappy dramas or stupid scripted comedy. You tube has all my favorite genres with no commercials 🤟🏻. Now if you tube could just stop censoring and demonetizing people that’d be great .

It was a piece of fucking art, par none.

It was just another war that the USA lost

And basically everything Russia is not capable of doing ^^

@@muba000 If you're asking me, it was an act of terror. Doesn't excuse the illegal actions the U.S undertook in the wake of it.

Americans have always mastered the art of destruction. I'll give them that. Maybe one day we will help their enemies the same way we have helped Ukraine.

I remember watching CNN live as they went off the air. It was surreal. The TAC was monitoring all of thew news stations but according to other accounts that I have read, the news stations were not being used for BDA (bomb damage assessment), more for seeing if any actionable intelligence could be gleaned and to monitor what was being said. Their primary BDA was coming from on ground intel in Baghdad including paid sources in the Iraqi military, plus satellite live feeds, plus tapped comms cables. Tom Clancy co-wrote a non-fiction book with Chuck Horner called Every Man a Tiger, I highly recommend it.

Newscasters were a perfect scout in the day. There's no way Saddam's forces would target them, and they have free access live feed 24/7 to the capital.

Air superiority was a confirmed deal from the start most of the iraqi fighter are old and absolutely dated

@@crackhead3511 this was a 20th century war. You don't know history. January 16th 1991. You're ignorant on this subject.

@@thememers_dude didn’t the Iraqis have mig-29’s which were fairly advanced at the time?

@@Myanmartiger921 wrong

@@Myanmartiger921 We fought China before, in Korea. Quantity does not destroy quality.

And he still left out the OV-1D/RV-1D Mohawks that gathered intel before and during the air war, and the following ground war. It was one of the sources that allowed us to collect and identify ground based missile systems, radar emplacements, photographic data, and individual troop movements in real time.

I was in WW Desert Storm II

@@fireboltaz those darn Iraqi Nazis!

It was the airforce that beat them and the army sweeped the rest up

Really shows the US air power, even on our own I can't name another country that can LITERALLY darken the skies with how many aircraft we can deploy st once

This wasn’t impressive. It was a damn masterpiece. This was more then an operation, this was art. And I’ve come to appreciate it even more now that I’ve seen how a major operation like this can fail by seeing the result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine.

meanwhile russia

We referred to it as a weekend exercise

3. Overmatch.

@@patchouliknowledge4455 Calm down with the hubris and the hyperbole. Iraq was a second-tier force, equipped with second-tier weapons. The coalition was a force designed to take on the entire Soviet Union and WarPac force and was precisely configured to do so. It also happened just as that combat model was about to be replaced and it was used against a military force which was configured along the lines of the 1970s Soviet model. In damn well should have worked. Furthermore, it’s a military axiom that we learn more from our defeats than we do from our victories and we are seeing the problems of some of the practices used in the 1991 war still getting in the way today. This level of tactical laziness has not gone unnoticed in the Pentagon and strategic advisors, some of whom cut their teeth in this exact campaign, are fighting to correct some of these bad habits to this day. It may end up being a case of winning the battle but losing the war.

russia is gonna need never before seen amounts of copium after this

Yea I just watched a video on part of 101st being deployed to Europe and all the comments were talking about how the USA would get destroyed against the battle hardened Russians

Ukraine has the backing of nato and Iraq was fighting against it. Wrong to compare the two

@@jacksonredman1110 RuSsIA iS FiGhTiNg aLl oF NATO!!!!!

Severely underestimating the Russians. Morale among the troops low and morale is everything in war.

Oh shi....

*bollocks.*

I would literally shit my pants.

*smacks lips* "Damn...That's tough.

@@1320fastback znamo.mi ne.

Love that

Wish we could cut CNN permanently!!

Thanks to that Tomahawk missile

@@zy2359 yup

U.S Air Force: so anyways I bomb Baghdad unharmed

i mean russians do have a point, look at the current ongoing war you can't tell me if this was some arab country fighting against ukraine with western support it would've held its grounds that long

In the Iran-Iraq war 1980-1988 you saw how the soviet vs America armament was playing out. Where Iran used US armament left over from the Shah and Iraq using both previous and current soviet armament as well as NATO weapons.

Both are true, the Iraqis engaging all of their radars and not preserving these systems is pure stupidity. Thr same thing did not happen in Kosovo for instance

@@user-ep1sw6od3uukraine has had a well trained army the entire time..they are receiving a mountain of support from the western allies..as for being racially inferior the mesopotamian people built the first civilisation on earth..didn’t the uncivilised bedouins conquer from iberia to pakistan?its plain irrationality on display..

@@user-ep1sw6od3u The Russians actually have no point because they are the exact same as Saddam - a rabble without the training or equipment to face the unchained killing power of a modernized military force, let alone a whole alliance of such. Yeah, they can shoot, and they can kill, and they can roughly do all the things an army is supposed to do, and they have numbers. The critical part is how it all compares to their adversaries. Iraq got bodied because, despite their own success against Iran and Kuwait, their new enemy, - the coalition force, particularly the US - was militarily superior in every way. Russia would fare just as badly, if Western support for Ukraine wasn't so sickeningly half-hearted and if actual Western military forces got involved. And unlike what some limp-dick racists might try to spin, the reason is not in an idiotic fantasy of imagined ethnic superiority, no. It's a reason of policy and economics. Russia and Saddam's Iraq are the same in the sense that they're circus armies that flex to the world with their bullying of lesser neighbors, staged "training" and parade displays, because they hold no real substance in a modern peer conflict beyond WMDs. Why? Because their rulers are pragmatic cowards. The army of a dictatorship must be kept weak and inept or it will have the power to overthrow its own government. You can use them for some "peace keeping", or propaganda, or internal security, or for invading weaker neighbors (Ukraine, Georgia, Kuwait). You can't use them for fighting the major powers of the world, because you'll be crushed. Russia is a particularly fun case because their government is nothing but a pack of criminals, scammers and liars who only know how to steal and murder, without concern for efficient governance. And so all the money that could go to building a good military goes somewhere else. There was a piece written on this in the 90s called something like "Why do Arab kingdoms lose wars", and the reason remains the same: A capable military would topple its own dictatorship, and autocrats can't have that. Money laundering, embezzling, base level distrust, stupid fucking honor codes, outdated hierarchies, it all remains the same. And then the Russians decided to spice it up with prison rape and mafia politics! The only reason they've gotten as far as they have, and are still holding on, is because they inherited the USSR's massive stockpiles of ammunition and hardware, and because Ukraine is still fighting the war alone, despite foreign volunteers and relatively pitiful material support.

Something people forget is the U.S. military isnt the most powerful *just* because it has powerful stoof and lots of it, but because it can support all of it anywhere on the planet with the space to put it The Royal Navy is similar, being the only other nation that isn’t america that can be anywhere, because of its massive logistics

@@looinrims > The Royal Navy is similar, being the only other nation that isn’t america that can be anywhere, because of its massive logistics It isn't the 90's anymore. In the last 20 years, only France (Mali) have done truly solo military deployment far from it's border. The UK army biggest spending is on maintenance of outdated equipement past their lifetime and retired soldiers pay, not actual military capacities.

@@Bill31400 it’s not ‘deployment far away’ it’s ‘can you deploy your entire navy far away?’ The sealift fleets of the US and RN are unmatched, hence their ability to do all that

@@looinrims Once again, you are still living in the 90's. There is a VERY worrying downscaling of the UK military power over the past two decades. Current UK military would LOSE the falkland war. I'm saying this as a UK resident.

@@Bill31400 being a resident doesn’t do anything to support your argument, all it does for me is telegraph that you’re insecure about your argument and need an appeal to authority to make it sound better Even if you mean the Uk today Vs the Argentina of back then, the Argies would still lose, regardless of the ‘downscaling’ (which I find interesting without supporting information considering the expansion of the carrier fleet)

@@YY-mk4ti 1. The fact that the US can rally a force of 1 million to attack a country halfway around the world, whereas Russia struggles to muster 200k to attack a country it *borders* only proves my point. 2. Iraq at this time had a much more impressive air defense network than Ukraine, which more than compensates for Ukraine’s somewhat larger size. Also, again, some of the US forces were attacking from halfway around the world, so that’s hardly an excuse.

@@YY-mk4ti 1. Allies are a part of warfare, the fact that the US can rally 35 countries to its cause but Russia can't is a major geopolitical weakness on the part of Russia. Furthermore, 700,000 of the coalition troops were from the US alone, and the US did the lionshare of the work during the initial air campaign. 2. Your original point, was that Ukraine was harder to airstrike due to its geography. I countered by saying that the geographical advantage was balanced by the fact that Iraq had far superior air defense. In other words, geography doesn't work as an excuse for Russia. 3. If you think that moving hundreds of thousands of tons of war material across an ocean, even in the "modern age" is a trivial matter then you have *much* to learn about logistics. What's more, this point directly contradicts your original point that Ukraine's larger size relative to Iraq made it harder to invade. If, as you say, attacking a country from across the world is "pretty easy" in the modern day, that just makes running out of gas 100 miles away from your own country all the more embarassing of a logistical failure.

@@YY-mk4ti Oh man, the Iraqi forces that entered Kuwait are from the elite of the Republican Guard, made up of 7 legions, each corps is 80,000 soldiers, in addition to 3 armored divisions and 5 tank battalions. A state and it lasted for 8 months so that they were able to liberate Kuwait, so the war of Kuwait and Ukraine is not comparable

Russia honestly should've just copied the Desert Storm day 1 playbook. The invasion would be going a lot better.

@@bobtank6318 that's assuming that Russia even had half the amount and quality of the assets the US used in Iraq

Luke half of America's casualties during the war in Iraq and Afghanistan were due to friendly fire and accidents.

Historically speaking more aircraft are lost in accidents then in combat against the enemy. When you are constantly putting a complicated fighter jet and it’s pilot/crew though constant usage, something is eventually going to give

I actually think it makes sense. The US had covered every option. I can imagine that Iraqi strategists and control rooms were absolute pandemonium.

Especially an air operations if you don’t practice then you don’t survive

As was mentioned once during this video, there were at minimum hundreds of coalition aircraft in the sky at any given time. They don't have perfect knowledge of where their allies were. There were many radar contacts at any given time. They had to as quickly and accurately determine which radar contacts were friendly aircraft vs which were enemies. There were so many ally aircraft in every direction it was often difficult to quickly determine where the enemy was exactly. That's one of the drawbacks of outnumbering your enemy so badly in the air.

Right! I love the theocratic Islamic dictatorship of Kuwait ❤️ and I’d be willing to lay my life on the line for them anytime! Clearly most Americans feel the same way given you were all willing to die to preserve their rule. What is it exactly about the Sabah family that made you guys so passionate about them? Was it their system of governance? Their commitment to Islam? Or was it your hatred for the secularism coming from the Baathist in Iraq?

​@@Ruder6163Is this some strange form of coping for the fact Iraq lost?

@@ELGG1894 No, I’m asking why Americans were motivated to defend the authoritarian Islamic theocracy? This has nothing to do with Iraq. I like to watch the cognitive dissonance take place in the Caucasian American mind.

​@@Ruder6163Because it threatened to upend the entire world economy due to Iraq threatening Saudi Arabia after annexing Kuwait, which would've no doubt led to Iraq keeping all the oil in those countries for itself, or selling it at extremely unmarked prices, plus Kuwait is a US ally so they were obligated to defend them

@@Ruder6163 I think multiple motivations were at play, but central was the fear of Sadaam disrupting our oil supply, particularly in Saudi Arabia. Would he have attacked Saudi Arabia if the US led coalition never existed? We'll never know. The power in charge don't poll the public on those decisions, they do what they want and then try to sell the public on why it is justified or prudent. This video really doesn't address the political rationale of the US in depth, it focuses on the tactical military actions. There are other videos that address the political aspect. This video does a great job, and in general I think US citizens can take pride in the skill with which our forces fought. Whether they should have fought in the first place is a debate for another place I think.

They could've launched the strike from the UK, but they must've launched from the US for propaganda purposes.

@Edd Fsd It's not supposed to be an insult, but rather to send a message to everyone what range the US has and what its abilities are, just in case anyone else ever thinks about trying it on. And no, I'm not American, but rather I'm saying what their intent is.

@Edd Fsd I think you're confusing this with the Iraq Invasion of 2003, which ended up creating terrorists like ISIS. And it was Al-Qaeda who caused 9/11, not the Taliban. Also, like I said before, I'm NOT American, nor a supporter of the 2003 invasion. I'm just saying why those B-52s flew all the way from the US instead of a base in the UK during Desert Storm.

@@white-dragon4424 Well said White Dragon. I am an American and clearly understood you the first time. I agree with the 2003 Invasion. I did not support it.

@Edd Fsd huh 700? There 193 countries in the world

Thank you!

Indeed. More. But don't leave out those that often get missed, simply because they didn't specialize like the Wild Weasles (which I worked from 1981-1989). Here is an interesting story about anti runway bombs. When I was stationed at RAF Lake Lakenheath, we trained on a French made munition called the Durandall. It was one of those weapons, even in training you just despised. But its what you get when you buy French made weapons I guess. This weapon was a nightmare to load. Its a complicated weapon. Not only does it have a Fuze for exploding slightly after impact, it also has a drag chute, to slow the weapon down to get it into a proper angle as it drops so it can fire its rocket motor. AND it has a special safety device to seperate the rocket motor from the bomb body, in case of fire, so it doesn't shoot of in some random direction, thank you Mr French weapon maker. So we could carry a HUGE number of those on the F-111. I have loaded 24 of them on one aircraft, once. Even while in theater we had to continue our weapons load training. The interesting thing about load training, "load training will not be performed with live munitions". This is in the safety tech data for the Durandall. The reason for this is because its very easy to accidentally arm a Durandall bomb while loading it. Which is problematic because if you are loading it, and it arms, and you stop the Jammer too fast, it could fire its rocket motor! Thanks again frenchy! 🤨 Now, during the first phase of the actual war, we were tasked with taking out runways. [I think someone just wanted to finally use the d I Durandall in real word use. We never did. I was one of the first load crews to load train with them. WFT? YOU CANT LOAD TRAIN WITH THESE LIVE ONES!!! I refused. I was told we only had live ones and that made it OK. I responded, "No." I said get an officer to give me that order, and I will then consider it. My acting first seargent showed up though, and said, "SSGT Johnson, whats all this about. I regurgitated the safety reg. He laughed and walked away. No officer gave me an order. Later that day, we were told that there had been incidents everytime they attempted to load train with the Durandall's, they kept arming during loading. LUCKILY non of them fired off. So we never got to use them at all, and finally just dropped them from out loading inventory. But will did complete our mission for runways. Its impressive what a MK-84, 2,000 pound bomb will do to a runway, with a .25 sec Fuze delay and explode many feet under the runway. A much better a d safer job than a Durandall! F-off frenchy, we got this.

@@dr.robertjohnson6953 Wow, great story!! I think the F-111 is one of the most beautiful planes ever made. Be awesome if you made some videos and tell more stories! Your great at it

@@dr.robertjohnson6953 I worked on F-4C Wild Weasels from 78-79. Kadena AB Okinawa.

@BRAVOZULU DWEST boathouse Annoying, some truth there. Fwiw, I'll never forget the poor Brit pilot displayed on Iraqi (and world) TV. He was from the downed Tornado that was mentioned in the vid. Oh hell, did I just prove your point?

That's because it was over so quickly, everyone pretty much forgot it happened.

Islam will conquer you one way or the other...

@@user-jn7jf3kv6k Islam can lick my balls, get out of here with your death cult

A crusty old NCO in 1AD told me his proudest moment during Desert Storm was when the division commander came by after the first major tank battle and saw an RPG all bent around his mine plow. The general made a beeline for it, leaned in to examine it and then examined the front of the tank. He turned around with a huge smile on his face and asks "He got a shot off?" The NCO nodded "Yes sir". "Did he hit you?" The NCO nodded again, "Yes sir, and then I ran him over". General looks like he's about to giggle with glee, he looked at the LT and the LT nodded. Division commander gave the him a medal right there for pitchforking the slowest infantryman in Iraq with his plow. That was when the Army was the Army.

Beehive Tetherball = Going to war against American air power

Dude 😂

Im kenny rogers

"I'm George W, and i order the de-bathification of the Iraqi military and government.. and this is jackass."

HAAAA!!!!

Ikr!!

That's an AA+ maneuver for me.

“We have been tricked..!!”

Old trick going back before Viet Nam

@zino dino shut

Also an underrated comment 😆

Yes!

*Kirov reporting*

Yeah I do that in Zero Hour Reborn AF general.

@@rovat6285 Watch the skies general, we're going to put on an air show.

Dennis Svitak what a story, thanks.

Tonight's Forecast: Mostly dark, then lighting up with a 100% chance of severe explosions.

You did an excellent job. Congrats to you and your team.

I was perplexed as to why The Weather Channel spent weeks showing a map of where the theater of operations was, just to tell the American public that the forecast for that region was classified.

Thanks -- I was in first grade at the time, and this is the first world event I remember. "Desert Storm was the FIRST war where the weather guy became part of the decision making process." -- The specific target-engagement tactics, right? I thought there was a meteorologist in the operational loop on Normandy. Was the target-engagement sensor factor a lesson learned the hard way from the '70s? I seem to recall someone using laser-guidance, maybe the bridges between Việt Nam and Red China.

A-6 Was the old bird of the navy bunch, designed in the darned 50s and still kicking ass till the day she retired

Even better: superpower with allies that aren't just 2nd/3rd world dictatorships.

One more thing They actually can form a coallition while them "2nd best army in the world" can't

Agree. Goat video

BazBattles also offer a great documentary however its world history such as ww2 😊

Agreed

You guys haven’t seen this yet then. From the big man himself, Storming Norman: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-8ReU2QlwX2o.html

I fully agree.

Yeah at first i was thinking why not just start raining death and destruction but that might alert other areas of the battlefield before everyone else is in position.

Yeah massively, plus organization and movement of logistics etc etc its all insane.

Hitting every target all at once is something that goes back as far as WW2, where American artillery used a tactic called a ‘Time On Target’ bombardment, calculating projectile arcs and shell flight times so that several volleys from multiple batteries would all impact a relatively small area at once. It was incredibly demoralizing. This is the modern version (and now you can do the same thing much more easily with computers)

While waiting some figures ran out of the buildings,,,, that was the smart Iraqis.

Imagine how much more of a scale it would be today by 2021 tech level improvements and optimizations in advance warfare

america has one heck of an Air force

We have to 2 largest airforces... the US Airforce, and US Naval Aviation.

More like “Oil?” America: “YES”

@@shadowtrooper1 no. The second strongest would HAVE to be Naval Aviation and Marine Corps Aviation combined otherwise Russia would be stronger

@@wellifailed392 I said Largest, not Strongest. Also I tend to loop Marine Corps Aviation with Naval Aviation as the USMC is a department of the Navy.

Ik right, brown lifes dont matter so you bomb everything.

@@breathofyahmosthigheliyohi1268 What?

Cultural difference 😂

@@lookoutforchris yeah Russia doesn’t rly care about soldiers lives that much

Yup!!!

tyfys

This operation would take at least a year to plan. Even D Day was 12 months in the planning.

And yet they totally botched Libya which is now a slave state, is that mastery? Maybe they knew it in the 90s, but i am tired of seeing people citing this 30 year old conflict when there are more modern ones that show the only thing american military intervention results in is endless war and a happy mil industrial complex USA was playing games in Syria, financing terrorists befpre russia gpt involved, and now the FSA is no more and turk alligned. All the smart people who made DS work are gone and replaced with divirsity hires, financially interwsted parties, and ideological allies, and other useful idiots for the financial powers that be, there are no more war fighters

Well, in my opinion since the second world war they were, not everyone correctly supplies their troops thousands of km from their borders

@Brandon BP well yeah, they're animated. They are intended to represent their position at the time

@@recording_closet9100 He wasn't referring to position, he's referring to the fact that when EF-111's were being discussed, the 3 planes moving on the map actually looked like EF-111 Ravens. the F-117s look like an F-117, same for teh B-52s.

except for the mirages

@@RAAFLightning1 12:05 looks like a mirage F1 to me, those were the only types of mirages fielded by either side. The French flew mirage F1s and so did the Iraqis.

Good old powell doctrine for ya. Military force as a last resort. But when it's used. It's utterly overwhelming force. Ultimately this minimized casualties on both the coalition, and Iraqi forces. Like mentioned in the video. Mass surrenders were everywhere

@@justinbiggs1005 powell with the UN resolution lie on Iraq II was sad though.

​@@justinbiggs1005Powell was not part of the planning phase of ODS, that honor falls on both Schwarzkopf and Horner. Powell tried to push the bear to attack in 1990, the bear knew he needed all his assets in theater before committing his Corps and their divisions. Powell is a good yes man, the bear wasn't.

Korean war videos would be very good to see.

Agree mate

Don’t be arrogant. It’s was always a battle. The pilots who were killed and had batteries clamped to their balls will also agree with me.

You barely understand that an Air Battle can be overwhelming. It's not a damn game where both sides are evenly matched.

We gained air superiority in a single day, I wouldn't call that an even battle.

Air Massacre would be more appropriate

Haha

Geez that joke is getting tired...

I'm an Air Battle Manager. That's always the answer. Yes.

"How many aircraft do we need to use?" 10%

“All of Them”

Yep a live fire exercise with moving targets

What the fuck are they training for then?

@@spankythedog56 they weren't actually training, it was a joke for how easy they were to beat

@@AK-nm1jh just becuase they are outnumbered doesn't mean it would be easy. I mean they had a huge AA defense system that was so potent that only f-117s could go to baghdad

@@KillerSpoon575 80% of AAA are no function because the lack of spare parts And the same thing for the aircraft and tanks

That was back when reporters were respectable, instead of just doing op ed pieces masquerading as news to slander whatever party their bosses don't like.

@@ananthropomorphictalkinggo6641 I get that but shit you gotta be crazy to go to a country that is at war with the country you’re a citizen of. Especially a fascist dictatorship like country like Iraq was at that time

@@reedhedin2777 Not only did they go to the country, some of them were actually embedded in active combat units. They literally got shot at as they reported. They had cameras instead of rifles. Like I said, being a reporter used to be viewed as a constitutional duty that this country used to hold as sacred. They didn't want to go, they felt that it was their duty as citizens to go. That's why the mainstream media is such a disgrace nowadays.

@@ananthropomorphictalkinggo6641 No slander just facts.. but ya, i liked cnn back then... that was before they were just another new service reading stuff off of the AP wire. I have a copy of the press core video from that war they Bagdad missiles

Most of the "News coverage" from CNN was faked- I really find it hard to believe that people were not made more aware of this. Here is a link ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-rWtwjDhgN3Q.html If you watch that and think it is real- I can't help you. Hahahaha. There were many other examples of fake news coming out of that conflict but they have been wiped off RU-vid.

I was thinking the same thing. I have the pleasure of living near the Wisconsin, so it really gives me a new perspective on the old girl. The fact that she got some combat use so recently makes me happy somewhat. Its just a shame that the guns like the ones she has don't really have much use anymore. She is very beautiful however. You look at her and think about the fact that she's a battleship, then you also realize that she is sleek, and is genuinely a fast ship and is one of the last ships with the amount of armor she has that is still in active service technically speaking. While I certainly don't want to imagine her sinking, it would still warm me up to hear about her doing her duty once again, and is why this video warmed me up as well. I had no idea she took part in Desert Storm until now and I am very satisfied to have learned that today.

@@wruenvadam hey mate! You are talking about which boat? wich one ? sorry for my bad english

@@roflomaozedong the USS Wisconsin (BB-64)

@@gnranger Iraqis were seen surrendering to the Wisconsin drone. They didn't want any of them 16 inch shells

@@wruenvadam Here's hoping they turn her into a museum like they did the Intrepid, IMO.

Woah weird history your here.

O snap

Yea the vid was but george bush sent men to die to save kuwait

@@peytoncross7026 no my boy to save precious oil You know why iraq invaded kuwait in the first place?? Because kuwait wanted to break iraqs economy by dumping huge mount of oil into market at very cheap and low price Sadam guys went to there leaders and you selling cheap OK but don't sell so much amount of it and that's how it all started And kuwait did that in the first place by command of USA

Oversimplified is better

It’s too good to be on the History Channel.

Push Back history channel promotes falsehoods

I was there too but as a nurse manager for Aramco. It was frightening! But when the troops arrived we had them in our homes. They called their families, washed their clothes, and were well fed. We tried to take care of them. Some people took caravans out to the troops on the weekend. ( Thursday and Friday) Katherine Connell Fielder

See that’s the problem, this is actual history, and not aliens or pawn stars

How could it be on History Channel when there are no UFO's or alien lizards from planet Brz present? The tinfoil hat editorials disagree surely with your suggestion.

If you hunt around RU-vid you’ll find some footage of them flying at rooftop level. Incredible stuff

@@brendanmalone-ewing6535 can you please send me a link to one of the videos? i haven't found one

Air Force General #2: "We just turned off CNN...high five!"

There's no more fake news. Mission accomplished

@@JohnDoe-tq3ye Back then, CNN really was probably the most trusted name in news. For good reason.

All those videos you guys got to watch? I watched them first, in theater, so I could verify the accuracy of my weather forecasts...or at least, that's what I convinced the command staff why I needed to be there!

@@LRRPFco52 Absolutely hilarious. Hey, check this out.....Lights out!

You know the logistics guys are like shaking hands, and jerking themselves off. I mean HOLY SHIT the time and effort gathering info, planning, sending shit up to high command, adjusting for possible outcomes, taking in new information, giving new information. Gotta pat the communications teams on the back as well, we never think about the guys behind the front lines planning every move.

it gives me a headache to even imagine a 10th of this operations possible paper work and time spent.

@@notleviathan855 I would be!!

Gathering from all across the world a million combatants, twice as much support personnel, dozens of ships, thousands of tanks, hundreds of planes, countless artillery pieces, evac vehicles, helicopters, logistics vehicles, all manner of special equipment and food, apparel, ammunition, fuel. And managing to get all of that in the right places and the right time. On top of that, organising all of that to seamlessly integrate into a unified force. And some people say we don't have the technology to build the Great Pyramids so it must be aliens. Logistics specialists: quietly doing the impossible since possible was invented.

@@LoisoPondohva And yet it is tiny compared to June 6th 1944. I heard on the radio yesterday that during WW2 the Japanese army was able to deliver 5 pounds of material to each man in the field per day. The US was able to deliver two TONS and at an average distance over 6,000 miles. One Liberty ship built every 4.5 days.

The crazy part is that it’s not the whole air force

I guess Billions of dollars were paid by Kuwait

B-1b or bone was not used

Coalition force? Oh yeah you guys come in after we’re done.

@@dannileigh6426 the BONe wouldve been awesome in this role.

They're too busy uncovering evidence oh ancient aliens...LOL

Too many commercials killed the History Channel. This video is better than most you’d see there anyway.

The History Channel has been dead for years. They’re irredeemably garbage TV.

I agree. This was superb

@wesley Johnson 😂

@@belliduradespicio8009 they could still dismantle any world power

@@belliduradespicio8009 What makes you think this couldn’t be doable today? Lol NATO can’t be more united.

@@belliduradespicio8009 -Most NATO countries have bigger budgets than they did in 1991, specially the US. -deindustrialisation, ??? -war on terror has nothing to do with this nor proves your point, NATO have been training to fight peers since the Cold War. -Scrapping of old systems is a great thing… No brain, unsurprisingly

@@CrayonEater255 lmao this aged poorly 😂😂

@@calemitchell5764 ? Nothing has changed in NATO lol, you’re delusional

Fun fact there was a idea to refit the Iowa class , strip out some of the rear turrets and put in a hangar/ launch pad for Harrier jets.

@@kybercat7 Battle-Carrier plan, a hybrid that is so cool, the navy are considering it if I'm not mistaken

46 years after the surrender ceremony 😳😳 wow

that pos ship shot down an iranian passenger plane in the time of the gulf war.

@@daktarioskarvannederhosen2568 Considering you have a Dutch name i would just like to say, Fuck off. True Dutch people like me support the US operations here. Iraq has caused 2 wars before this and they are liberating a country which had done nothing wrong.The Iranian plane is a sad fact but that is war. That does not make it a POS ship.

Remote warfare is something I'm definitely not looking forward to, as the civilians will surely be the only ones to suffer the fallout.

@@macktheinterloper Who cares man, as long as Uncle Sam and Zion get what they want. Just dont report on it and noone will know or care!

Staff in the USA flying remote drones is already reality. There are plenty of articles about the PTSD suffered by such remote pilots during Afghanistan.

How long do you think a transcontinental flight from the US to Kuwait is? 😂

As of the time of my commenting 43 dumbasses can't do basic math either

I think comments in the first group are there because there is an interesting comparison to be made about how to correctly carry out SEAD and how to incorrectly carry it out.

you are right. there are sub-types of these commenters: the philosopher, the dumb-philisopher, the US hater/russian shill, the troll and the ignorant but -i-know-it-all

Dude I’m literally Iraqi and when I see the comments mistaking the gulf war for the iraq war I cringe so bad

Tf are you doing here?? lmaoo

Cobra LMAO trying to learn some things

And this video was only Day 1, over the next 41 days over 100,000 combat sorties were flown. Even more complex was ensuing ground war, which involved (among other things) thousands of tanks. Remember, when Desert Storm began Saddam had the world's 4th largest military force. A few weeks later, he didn't even have the largest military force in Iraq.

@akjohnny got the big touch.

Holy shit. Used to watch you all the time during AW era wr3tched, I even played w you a few times. Then I randomly see you commented on a video about the gulf war? LMFAOOO

Well now that awesome military might is there for you :)

Wow, that's an amazing story!

Thats a hell of a story man. I hope you've enjoyed being an American!

Yes, we really messed up your country. Sorry about that...we have no control over our crazy ass Pentagon ghouls who love the military / industrial complex PERSONAL profits. Too bad Israel tells America how high to jump, when we do their dirty work.

@@mjb0183 Iraq's also had no control over what their military, or government, did. I have Kuwaiti friends who are very happy about the liberation efforts.

Thank you for your service

Thank you for your service.

Thank you for your service

I’m 33 now and I understand now that you were either a patriot who fought for freedom or you had no better option after graduating high school and join the military. Not all veteran deserve respect.

@@ddennis6398 regardless of who they are they put their life on the line. They deserve respect for what they did not who they are

And remember this was in 1991!

NO! Let them stay that way :)

@@zebra6636 not like it'll matter. Russia's war in Ukraine is very likely to be the last conventional war they fight.

That pathetic country will never display the competence of a western military.

​@@Just_A_Random_Deskyeah after Putin left (i hope he's not immortal 😂) Russia will be a lot different

@Fred Barendse he was just saying that he has never and will never see that many planes again..

@Fred Barendse that comment was so irrelevant its not even funny

Fred Barendse ur not in ur 70s checked ur sub list dipshit lol

@Jeff R. While true, we GAVE them the chemical weapons they killed the Kurds with and then we fucked the Kurds in the same way. I'm a vet as well, but almost everything in the middle east including desert storm came as a result of things we were already putting our fingers into and helping to cause.

@@tonymorris4335 the mere fact that over 30 nations joined the war says how much they were afraid to lose their money and to keep that region under their control to suck off oil

And the Navy launched over 100 ADM-141 Tactical Air Launched Decoy , 6 of them can be launched from a single Hornet. The use of the BQM-74C drones was AirForce and the 40 man crew was put together quickly 2 teams were responsible for the 37 successful drone launches.

@@hoghogwild that’s incredible, very smart usage of those drones and decoys

@@billyjoe8185 I thought so too. Why risk all of your human/aircraft assets to, when you can saturate defenses with assets of considerably lower value? Since this was an example of warfighting 30 years ago, just imagine what's in the pipeline right now?

Israel has actually used the same tactic in 1982 to wipe out Syrian air defense

@@hoghogwild considering that 6th gen fighters are anticipated to be working as a command and control center for squads of drones. my quess would be that they design the Radar Cross Section on the drones to mimic the fighter jet so enemy missile systems wont be able to tell the fighter from the drones... that would definitely be hell for anti air missiles.

@uNnHkP8mza imagine trying to air traffic control all that.

@uNnHkP8mza I’ve heard recordings of an A-10 Pilot puking in his cockpit out of guilt and horror after finding out he strafed British Armored vehicles by accident. Apparently this was because there was a certain British armored vehicle that looked similar to most Iraqi armored vehicles

@@tylerclayton6081 yeah you would feel so bad after that. especially if you killed your fellow soldiers.

@@st3gosaurus do you drink seamen?

But Masterpiece have worst cheap copy

I hope so! After the effort that went into this I am now going to the pub to finish my Saturday 😁

@@TheOperationsRoom When it comes to air battles and air campaigns, you are definitely the best of all the RU-vidrs who make battle animation videos.

@@zackyjenkinson6902 that's very kind, thankyou!

The Operations Room Well deserved. Great video

USAF: Correction, Baghdad WAS the most heavily defended city in the world.

USAF: *Used to be

not just the USAF

@@georgebarnes8163 just the USAF

@@lollardismontop1026 deluded

Thanks!

The Operations Room Just my 2 cents but i feel like different thumbnails could massively increase your view count, if you look your second most viewed video has a thumbnail showing what’s actually in the video similar to eastory who gets millions of views a video. These kind of videos are incredible to watch and should be getting 10x the views they’re currently getting. Collaborations would be massive too to expose yourself to the niche military community

I more can't believe this heroic story, where only a handful of the great american aircrafts was shoting down. 😂

@@joemama8 You can't judge a book by it's covers, but sexiness does sell.

Imagine...

Man I can't just imagine the pressure and adrenaline of joining such large formations being defenseless as you are. Radar screens must be all over the roof. Nice story about the people supporting the fight behind.

I think if the Iraqis had done a soviet style all out attack that would have worked out better for them. Its a good thing they didn't

Seeing those big boy kc-135s in person is something else.

Oh God what kind of air traffic it would had been and also tension, stress, adrenaline and all kind of feeling you get hit by in that moment. I almost got head-ache while watching this animation can't even imagine what your POV would had been

Thank you from the bottom of my rotten old American heart. Braving the pucker factor for your country and countrymen is the greatest act of courage and sacrifice possible.

Trigger ain’t fucking around

"Cipher. That prides gonna get you killed"

Obligatory Belka Did Nothing Wrong

The sand was very hard on the aircraft engines at takeoff and touchdown, especially. This put back the installation of equipment requiring precision grinding of stainless steel.

All we needed was a giant mchuge Drone carrier

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-p7ecxzJ3PAk.html Azerbaijan and Armenia accuse each other of breaking ceasefire

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-p7ecxzJ3PAk.html Azerbaijan and Armenia accuse each other of breaking ceasefire

@Jay R The absolute *fear* that comes after such an intense show of air power. "It can't get worse, right?" I am sorry, my friend. But it's about to get much, much worse.

As a former Marine Amtracker I agree!

Right

I'm sure most of us didn't this was all out war.

The Iraqi Military were so crippled by the Air Strikes that it only took the ground troops (launched later) 100 hours to settle the battle.

It set the record for the largest tank battle in history. President Bush decided to go all in from the start. The fear was if the war dragged on the American public would withdraw support fearing it would turn into another Vietnam. If you want to see more on how intense the war was look up the highway of death massacre.

@@DreDay1993 I remember watching the news reports while it was happening. There was a real fear that chemical and nuclear weapons would be used.

Totally! It also highlights the massive complexity of the entire job and how a single Human Being could be totally pivotal to its success or disaster.. (like the weather guy that commented above). Each of these people's stories contain a lifetime of excellence and hard work..and each of those people could tell amazing stories about just ONE single aspect for DAYS!

AGREED 100% I was a kid, but I vividly remember all of this, this is like visiting the past! Thank you!

And this video was only Day 1, over the next 41 days over 100,000 combat sorties were flown. Even more complex was ensuing ground war, which involved (among other things) thousands of tanks. Remember, when Desert Storm began Saddam had the world's 4th largest military force. A few weeks later, he didn't even have the largest military force in Iraq.

I was thinking the same thing. The best visuals i've seen

I agree. I'm trying to find the same thing with the tank battle