Dev Server First Impression : Su-27SM 

Just a little tho

Crankin the peanits

Straight up jorkin it

I agree

The S chlort

I don't

dear god...

What have you done

Taking that as a compliment :-)

I got your point but you can word it better

Nah its fine. Calm down.

it should've been 15.0 when the F-16C was added, and atleast 17.0 by now

Kloow

Ye, it gets R77s and 6 of them in fact, somewhat evening field with Flankers, while retaining superior radar set.

The purpose was to test the reliability of the inertial guidance phase.

It would all depend on targets vector and seekers' FOV once pitbull if the INS would put the target within the seekers' vision. One *theoretically* should be able to put a missile out maddogged just in the area you suspect the target will end up being and it would then pitbull on whatever it can find.

Look, I don’t mean to be rude but I don’t think it’s your job to monitor Tim’s burnout meter.. I think that’s his job..

@@Soul-Clutch-Man if one of your favorite creators makes multiple videos in one day with the first one noting they are ill one would hope you would feel predisposed to insinuate they should repose themselves from work.

It would take too long to re-do them all, so I'll probably have a more generalized guide on ARH missiles where I'll mention the new additions.

fun trivia here, those grid fins do not generate dragg at specific speeds, the ones the missile usually get at, not modeled in game tho

Should be launching in tws anyways

Nope, they have the target data in their memory

@@ВячеславФролов-д7я unless that data is being constantly updated via some form of datalink, i fail to see how it will help the missile guidance. I mean, it can continue on inertial navigation to the last point of the bandit it has stored in its memory and then go active and try to find the bandit at the spot it thinks it should be, but the bandit is not likely to be there, so it would just go mad dog. On the other hand, if it goes active immediately with the radar pointed at the last known location, it might just pick it up, if close enough. Right?

@@SeventhCircle77 i agree. And support the missile as long as possible. Both for trajectory optimization and radar range.

​@ilejovcevski79 if lock breaks it will always continue on the same trajectory using inertial guidance and activate its own radar seeker at max range it can, the big difference being locking first thing it sees if the target is not illuminated by aircraft radar (or nothing if it can't anything after arriving within own radar range via inertial guidance) So don't blindside fox3 into furballs lmao

gonna be really situational...

a helpful strategy would be to not fire fox 3s when there are friendlies in the missiles line of sight.

There are now 11 F-104s in the game. As a Starfighter enjoyer, I see this as an absolute win. (Spain and several other nations also used them, so we're not done either)

It's a separate vehicle, after the Su-27

Dev server is open you can try it yourself

Not foldered

@@HerpesHabenderHauptmannHarryIt’s like a 3hour download on my 500gb laptop. I rather pass.

yes lmfao, nothing is going to compete with the absolute range of the ER for a while

Not sure, and I haven't seen it come up yet.

Don’t worry the stat card is wrong anyways. In game it can’t pull anything close to 50Gs

The aim120 pulls harder ig than the r77 so theres 100% something wrong. Either the state card is wrong or the r77 is under performing

@@llthk138it’s probably under-preforming because irl it is 50gs but only 5 seconds after launch

Its not really cut-and-dry. I think both will be pretty good overall, and very comparable.

And is the f15c MSIP II better than the f16C?

@@maimutoi961 Again, kind of a "better .. what?" .. the F-15c will carry more weapons, but the F-16c will have slightly better agility, etc etc.

Yeah, the devserver is a special place sometimes :-)

Years dont matter in wt. If it does, the tiger1 h will face 3.3 tanks which will be absolutely broken.

@@altacc0604 its more just an interest bit of info that something from the 1970s is at the same br as something from post 2000. it is bullshit in many ways, the game feels balanced around how much corruption is in a nation :p

ofc it is its ruzzian

Muh bias

The 120a should by worse than the R-77. That said, I'm pretty sure the R-77 should only have 40G of pull and not the 50 it has on the dev-server

@@jonathonspears7736 it’s probably a stat card error. From trying it in game it honestly feels less maneuverable than the 27ER

​@@sirbonobo3907 F35 got shot down by Pansir and S500 anti aircraft missiles 😂

I really doubt it. All it’s gonna do is cause more team kills if anything, just like in the test server. You can still easily multipath them like every other radar missile.

Not going to happen, multipathing is still working just fine, thus flying low works like it used to for last year. Simply any ventures into vertical will be penalized even harder with FnF very maneuvreable ARH missiles that are capable of 180 turn. MICA, Derby also was able to pull that off, R77 probably as well.

Statcard is second best, but it lacks compared to the AMRAAM in tracking capabilities and more drag. The French MICA is the absolute best though

aam-4 and mica will be better.

@@awesomedinosthefirst3494realistically Yea, idk how the game will be

MICAs are so bonkers it's insane, even at knife range they act like R-73s

@@m1sz3lpl24 Figures. I really need to get into DCS I think lol

Its still a brick so its still kept in check by the Gripen and F-16s.

I record in 1440p and render in 4k. How it ends up looking on youtube is out of my hands.

Neat! Do you know what part, or was it just random scrap?

You got scammed lol

I’m pretty sure the Su-35 is much improved.

Incorrect, 27SM and 35S share almost nothing in common except the airframe. The former is relatively small midlife upgrade of existing soviet Su-27's (Т-10С) that Russia inherited after the collapse of USSR, while the later (Т-10БМ) is an entirely different plane built from the ground up since 2008. Different engines, avionics, radar, IRST and so on. You're confusing it with late soviet modification test beds that were internally known as Т-10М, initially they were proposed as Su-27M, but in the 90s were renamed to Su-35 to attract export sales (not Su-35s/БМ, those came way later), that's why they are quite often mistaken for one another. One is a handfull (a dozen or so) of very different raw prototypes frome late 80s - early 90s, the other one is a mass produced serial aircraft from late 00s.

​@@sanichagehag8909airframe on 35 is slightly changed as well

f16c block50 is from 1991

​@AndreDiasRJ Not even gonna mention how the specific Block 50 we have is a 2000s modification rated for 9Xes (it wouldn't have JHMCS otherwise).

It's just an upgraded 1985 aircraft using armaments from 1991.

The F-16C is so good they have nerfed the flight envelope.

"Just 35G" My man, the more Gs missile has, the faster it loses energy. For anything other than close quarters dogfight, 30G is already undodgeable without going cold/using countermeasures. So in close quarters R-77 is slightly better, but in BVR aim-120 outclasses it

Thats why Su-27s and MiG-29s FMs are nerfed into oblivion? Literally, no chance in dogfights even with M2Ks

Yeah sure bud keep whining