Devastation Finally Available In The Tech Tree 

I mean, Sir George Cockburn was a British admiral and they do like naming their ships after admirals, sooo...

honestly just sounds like a vermont

Anchor drift would be awesome, that movie was stupid enough to make it feel like a trick like that wasn't even impossible :D

for 55k dubs and people will pay

And has heal that builds you another ship instead of repairing the old one

i just hope that they wont add the i 400

You just inspired them.😅

@@erichrudorfferr they are adding it to the russian server for now

Imagine super hybrid subs… i’d give them 2 years

I hope they do

HULK RELOAD

is war wamig LMAO XD

wargaming's wet dream

Give more accurate asw, hydro can see them in all cases, expand the asw range, give all ships beyond dd airborne based asw.

That is a start

True. At least you see the planes coming

In full agreement. Had to put the game down this past week. Subs, CV’s, Super ships. Games done! WG’s target market is now collectors.

german bbs are good for beginning I found. good secondarie to help provide some decent damage so you feel like you have some impact in the battle :~)

Wargaming refuses to do anything to help BBS, I've played through American Iowa line, I have the prussen and Kurfurst for Germany, the Yamato. And I got the conqueror last week Every single bb line is outclassed by the incessant HE spam of American cruisers and the stupidly powerful nature of DDs who simply sit in smoke all game throwing walls of torpedoes whilst being borderline invisible

@@KedrChadEater True DDs and CLs are the problem with the game

This right here. PQ's videos have been so helpful for improving my own gameplay.

Bro in 15 games i got 5 300k games and average 200k

Well I believe that may have been what it was like for the real captains in the wars. Personally I think it adds a good aspect in t he game meaning you actually have to learn how to play, imagine this, as a team with the others on your side. Combining ship characteristics to provide a rounded defense and capabilities. Ie a ship with no or little aa not just sailing off by itself and getting deleted by the cv but instead staying with other ships that do have aa to help cover you. Time for people to play "as a team" even in randoms with little communication. Open eyes and watch what others are doing and if they not doing whhat you doing instead of expecting them to be psychic you change your actions to work with them. Just a thought :~)

@@pegasusted2504 So the entire team needs to work together to stop just one person on the enemy team? Yeah, sounds balanced. I'm sure I'll have great success working together with randoms on my team who don't communicate and yolo themselves into the enemy team 2 minutes into the battle. "Just work together lol"

@@Johnisuber Where in my post did I say that?

@@pegasusted2504 Well I believe that may have been what it was like for the real captains in the wars? How about no? Not for warships. Why? Surface speed for a submarine at Flank Speed (maximum combat speed) for a WWII submarine was 19 knots. Submerged speed for a Submarine in WWII was 6 - 9 Knots depending on the class of boat. In WWII a Submarine commander had to guess just right to get his boat into position to launch his weapons against a warship, and virtually every time he would have precisely ONE chance before the warship that is steaming at 25 knots and zig zagging is well out of range. The submarines in WoWS are utter rubbish. There is no way a WWII boat could reload its tubes in that kind of time, and no way they could maintain 30 knots submerged. About the only thing that WWII captains would actually recognise about those steaming piles of turd are the silhouettes of the vessels. In every other aspect they are fantasy pieces....

@@pegasusted2504 Where? The part where you spouted off a whole paragraph of nonsense about how its somehow "Good" that one class of ship can completely outmatch another, and that if you don't want that to happen you should "Just work together as a team! :D"

Yeah was expecting them to keep its F key instead they removed the burst fire it was meant to have so now it’s underwhelming as it’s not what it was quite meant to be designed as

Tbh all Super Ships except the first "Wave", just seem like a Sidegrade to the tier 10s that offer something different , but not being a huge upgrade. Like Clausewitz is more tanky then hinden but worse Dpm, Devestation, Patrie and super petro get more tanky/more guns, but worse dispersion, while the first Wave just takes what the line offered and makes it better plus a Gimmick button.

@@RyuuMurasaki Shikishima is absolutely a side grade, and Hannover us just fucking useless, so atleast she accuracy follows GK and Preussen

Nah Colombo have SAP , Smoke and decent secondaries , Devastation is larger Marlborough .

Might surprise you but its literally conqueror at T11

Already went there years ago, and its never being reinstalled.....

The super montana will have combat instructions that reduce fire and flood damage for an amount of some seconds, and will also have improved aa when activated.

Keep it

The problem is the stats say that subs are balanced, in some games subs achieve next to nothing and then in some they rule there is no middle ground and the good plus bad equals balanced in WG eyes.

With high tier fire resistance coefficient, its actual fire chance against super ships can drop below 20%.....so it should average 1 fire per 5 shell hits against targets that can be set on fire (no DCP active, no fire already burning etc.), meaning its overall fire chance across the entire battle should be well below 20% on average.

Yup World of warships is becoming more and more historically accurate with how powerful CVs and subs are which is shity af for the gameplay but absolutely hilarious when looked at history. Game about naval warfare got dominated by 2 things that dominated naval warfare in recent history

If it was not for ranked odd tiers and the occasional operations I would have quit wows by now. Randoms with its CVs and subs holds zero interest for me.

If you eat cits it's not fun but at least the players can prevent it easily by just playing well. What can you do when a sub is in your side unspotted like here? It's not the result that matters it's how the interaction is done. Subs and CVs only put the interaction in one side, leave the other hopeless. That's bad game design.

@@solidtoto That's not exactly true. You have things like the increased pen angles and shit like that on multiple ships. How are you to counterplay, angle harder? And know all the different ships in the game? In the end, it doesnt really matter. The crux of the matter is that if you are to have fun, is it really objectively true to say the other party will have fun too? Fundamentally i think thats how it should be. But im also gonna say that in no way is that how wargaming have designed their game. Therefore a lot of the complaints are invalid. Because only in a utopia it would hold true.

And take away their torpedo lead indicator until they actually put a few skill points into getting it back, so that if they still want their full dpm builds they either have to work with rng or take away some of that dpm. Either that, or make it so that subs when not at periscope or surface depth they will never see anything that’s happening on the surface as well as making their surface/periscope detectability higher so they can’t endlessly chase down someone with torp salvos that can literally devstrike bbs more reliably than a Yamagiri salvo.

The return is having a sense of superiority in each game you bring them