DIABLO 4 PACIFIST CHALLENGE 

DIABLO 4 IS BROKEN - PACIFIST CHALLENGE IS OVERPOWERED LIVE EXPLOIT

‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎‎E

~Sighs~ this does not work at 50+ because necromancer and your skellys are made of wet tissue paper between the buttocks of a zombie. So this is not an exploit. Nor is it overpowered. And your party would be required to carry your necro so much there back would hurt. next your skellys kills count as your kills as well.... thus contribute to xp sharing. ~sighs~ another person who is unjustifiably calling for nerf of necro minion build. You have not really shown a exploit... I love alot of what you do, but this is just failure. Come on... Jesh.

Do it solo, then i'll be impressed ;)

@@revoktorment440 but then I would have to try xD

Spiffs attitude and use of the LAWLS Sec thing have always had me wonder if he was one of the members of that team from back in the day, less trolling government agencies, but the sense of humor seems about right, I enjoy it.

It also a given that it has additional cheese.

I just got a RU-vid rating thing pop up on your comment, so I gave it an excellent mark, and put relatable, and funny. Also true to the content creator, not sure what it means but great comment. Lmao I just reviewed a comment...

E

Big facts i never seen such a well balanced game no exploits whatsoever 👍

This is a perfectly balanced comment to a perfectly balanced video of a perfectly balanced game with no exploits :)

Loot goblins were also introduced into D3. High hit point monsters that randomly appear, initially on a 15 minute timer. Pacifist monsters that in D3 ran to nearby elites... making it impossible to kill them before they timed out and used petals to disappear. Later on in D3 they created several types of goblins: for gold, loot, and limited phoenixing.

Wow that's hilarious I didn't know you could rush D3 like that.

@@Oblithian D3 is barely a game.

@@toastedt140 D3 was designed to include children as players... all about market share.

@@toastedt140 D3 stayed alive with minimal cheaters for quite sometime (pc not console) and was still played after D4 dropped because of the horrendous load times when it first dropped.. but yeah you do you xD

Yea I know some exploits that don't need me to hit directly tho I play dioblo 3 😊

Nobody tell him about the goblins in WoW or he'll want to nix them next.

I see Ghom (an obese glutton demon lord in D3) and think: Bobby! You’re in the game!

There's a step between beta and release called release candidate. Basically, you think it's ready for wide release, so you open it up to a large group but not the full one for checking on more hardware. Not everyone does that, though, they release beta to the public.

@@Zirnike It depends a lot on the company and the game/product they are releasing. The two are talking about two different things and today the "beta" doesn't even really apply anymore. Any RC (release candidate) is saying that the product is "finished" as far as programming is concerned. That isn't always the case though and sometimes things are discovered that need to be changed/fixed before it goes Gold and actually releases. When this happens they fix/change what they need to and then it becomes RC2, RC3, etc. One of the tools that they can use is a "beta test", but there is no real time/stage limit attached to that phrase anymore. It could mean a test done in the legit Beta stage of production, or it could be a server stress test, or even just a free weekend "beta test" to try to drive hype before release. All of the Diablo "beta tests" are not actually done in the beta stage of development and have always been for server stress testing and marketing/hype...even all the way back to Diablo 2. If you played D2, 3, or 4 then it was an RC or Gold build. None of us ever got even close to getting our hands on an actual Beta build (and I was a "Beta Tester" for D2 and D3...). We see true RC versions being released as "beta tests" most of the time today. The last thing a big AAA title wants is the memories of true beta version bugs out in public. True beta testing is almost always in-house or at a minimum it is done in private with a private company so nobody sees just how buggy game development is in nearly everything except the last stages of development (RCs). Having a game force close and delete/corrupt your save (or something equally catastrophic to a player) is quite common in real beta testing, but certainly doesn't LOOK good to the public and can kill your hype once mainstream media hears about it. They just use the phrase "beta test" because it gives a good excuse for why the game isn't bug-free and balanced on release day. It is far easier to control the perception about a "beta test" that shows some flaws and balance issues than to admit that you thought you were done, but really weren't. Also if you are releasing something with known bugs (which seems to be the norm today) then it is a very convenient way to gauge which of those bugs are going to be big enough to be a PR issue and need fixing before Gold, and which of those bugs fly under the radar and can wait until a future update (or be ignored forever). Today this is all about marketing and PR, with a touch of "how many servers to have without spending too much money and still giving acceptable performance". Nothing at all to do with Alpha/Beta/RC/Gold stages of development any more. Some smaller companies (especially the more Indie you go) have actual true public beta tests still, but it is rare and never for a AAA type of game. Small scope games can also reach a stage of being relatively bug-free even before their Beta stages, so there are certainly some exceptions. But any large, expansive game with more than a few people working on it nearly always has tons of large (and at least a few major) bugs in it until you get to RC1. If you are EA, then it probably still has tons of large bugs and a few major ones even at Gold.

Yes. It’s ‘always online’ and MMOey so you’ll bounce into other people occasionally as you wander the world (with unique individual instances for Dungeons, etc), but I’ve been playing Single Player since early access and it’s been fine and pretty fair. For example, I’ve died occasionally, but each time it’s always felt like my fault for not dodging/healing at the right timing compared to ‘This is impossible without a party’ kind of thing. The only part that I’ve really had difficulty with playing alone is depending on your build, some of the Events are hard to get the Mastery bonus on. For example, there are some random events in the wild where you have to protect like, 3 merchants hiding under their carts from waves of enemies … And that can be rough because sometimes they’ll be fairly spread out so as you’re trying to clear the wave on one end the other is getting hanged up on and falls before you can get to it.

And d3, but it was even easier again, you only had to be in the same level lol

I think the live stream video is almost the same, minus a few little jokes and what not, but I suppose I omost didn't notice the fat chat log just big chillin to the right. Lol, damn I'm dumb sometimes

Door step camping makes for a very boring video though. But it is the 0 effort way to go.

MacroBioBoi has the patience to play pacifist builds just to see if it’s possible. D2R. I think MrLlamaSC has done pacifist builds in D2 and D2R too.

Yeah this was disappointing

It was a nerf that most people including youtubers complained after the Beta during server slam. Blizzard did tune Necro however it was very late on server slam event

same

I thought world bosses were on a timer. Kind of like the loot goblins... which basically they are the grown up version... once the timer runs out the world boss despawns.