Did Caucasians Rule All the Great Ancient Civilizations? | Robert Sepehr Examined 

Good point.

Just canceled my order for a metal detector.

@@chickenduckhappy hahahah

There was no Noah's Ark.

@@LyleFrancisDelp Don, look up the Ron Wyatt discoveries. There is something there, that is a boat made of wood, the beam structure being revealed in scans, with some sort of primitive rivet use. There is a slide down a mountain, which had a village at the top, which seems to be made from the top wood from the boat. In the region seems to be large under hanging stabilising weight stones (called anchor stone). Even though there are many, and one used as a grave stone for a woman with her husband and family depicted, and a large ark on a wave, with a grave with 9 foot skeleton (since extracted). With a house said to be Noah's house, which got demolished by locals after finding out. But, are they? Proper research is not something biased researchers like doing. So, we have this much research so far, which is far more than any biased person who did. So, the question remains.

Explains alot!

Oh yeah that’s right he did a whole video about getting his DNA sent off to one of those genealogy companies.

Wow

What was Germany fighting? And why do you hate the people of Iran? Because it`s trendy to hate certain races now?

@@logicmontano3160 So it`s bad to be from Iran or be white, is it? Or to have German ancestry? You people are evil psychos.

Sorry

@@Vaughan2323 It's not Russian propaganda, it's Armenian propaganda. Totally different nations. I've never heard an Armenian claim this made their culture or people any better than any other cultures, it's just one of those ancient genealogical things from back when you needed to say you're descendant from a biblical character or a god or a hero or someone like that.

Calling a mention of the Armenian genocide Russian propaganda is asinine. Btw., about looking like everyone mixed with everyone, just look a Switzerland and western Austria at the crossroads north of Italy with trade going in all directions 🙂 Not on the same geographic scale, of course, but Europe by itself is also kinda big-ish and diverse 🙂

@@chickenduckhappy Really goes to show that there is really only one race, the human race. Well, two if you count Italian people.

@@chickencharlie1992 hahaha

"I stopped in the park to feed the ducks, which caused me to think about how white people are single-handedly responsible for the creation of civilization, and probably for every good thing in modern society too. Also, were the Nazis maybe just misunderstood good guys after all...? " --- Bob Sepher... probably 😂

@@aaronmerrill4730 that shit got me! Almost spit out my drink 🤣🤣🤣 I like different ideas but this guys nutty! He even promotes eugenics in his other videos

@@satanwasframed5083Cringe take from someone with an even cringier name. Well done.

@@melaninfarmer play chicken with a bus

@@melaninfarmer so your name is melanin farmer and you want to defend eugenics? I stand by my previous statement but with one modification. Let the bus win

He was a high ranking ShitsStaffel officer...

I don't like to damn the children for the sins of their (grand)fathers, but Sepehr comes way too close to embracing it.

@@mrjones2721 seeds always spread not fare away from from the tree

Very cool! I’d love to get mine tested some day, it doesn’t seem to be too expensive any more. Human biodiversity is honestly incredible!

Those are the tocharians

@@cariopuppetmaster Wrong the Tarim Basin mummies were not Tocharians, the Tocharians were a later people that migrated to the Tarim Basin. The Tarim Basin mummies belong to the Ancient North Eurasians and are an older group that arrived in the Tarim Basin, being one of the first peoples in the region, they are essentially indigenous. Yes, they were Caucasians, but they were not Indo-European

@@Skypad00 ancient north urasians are distinct from Caucasian, but ANE were one of the precursor for Caucasian, but still not the same

​@@Skypad00ANE didn't have red hair, so how did tarim mummies have red hair, even native Americans don't.

I knew it! We wuz kangz!!!

Viracocha was an Aryan... ....and so was Quetzalcoatl....

I had to break this to you, but neither of those characters are real.

@@WorldofAntiquity It's interesting to see how in that video a lot of the things mentioned that were supposedly introduced by aryans and allowed for empires to exist in the first place never existed in Mesoamerica and yet civilization and even empires managed to exist. Incas never had chariots, or horses, or writing (at least that we know about or can decipher), or horses, or even the wheel. We know, for instance, that the wheel was probably known to these peoples, but it simply was not practical or useful for an Empire that developed in the Andean highlands where either the geography or the lack of strong pack beasts made wheels as a means of transport useless. Means of registering information in a very much different way existed, khipus, not resorting to what most people would consider "writing". I guess a lot could be questioned by people who believe the whole Aryan supremacy if they looked outside Eurasia and Africa.

@@WorldofAntiquity Oh, so native peoples are making stuff up too... I see, everyone is lying, except Dr. Schoolboy...... ..lol....racists like you are so predictable..

@@akwida "making stuff up too" Of course they do. Or do you actually believe that all the gods a fantastic creatures of all the different cultures in history are real?

As a chechen fully agree

Yea. I've always noticed that alot of these " debunkers" don't mention the Eugenics and royal family's involvement with everything being discussed ..from bloodlines. To the FAVORED RACES,mentioned in Darwins title

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻 well-said!

@@jasoncarey157 “races” refers to species, and “favored” refers to an organism’s ability to survive its environment. It has nothing whatsoever to do with racism or eugenics, even if people later misused his book for their own agendas. You are perpetuating a common misconception amongst fundamentalist Christians who don’t believe in evolution, have never read “On the Origin of Species,” and use those incorrect definitions to attempt to discredit Darwin.

@@birgbirg111 you agree that I'm not Caucasian because I'm from Western Europe or you agree that people from the Caucasus Region are the most handsome and beautiful of all "white people" You definitely have some good looking women over there

Well when you keep getting different research and investigations always leading back to the same conclusion, then at some point you have to ask yourself... is this a fact/truth? Especially when these researchers are among the top highest IQ professionals. The Germans were absolutely brilliant as much as no one wants to admit. They were far ahead of all the Allies and Soviets combined and everyone knew it. Thats why the Soviets and the Allies immediately engaged in a race to secure the German scientists, engineers, technicians, etc. and bring them back to work in developing all our most advanced technology. See Operation Paperclip.

​@@colonelclump2000Nazi Detected opinion rejected.

Yes, it's the same copy pasta pseudo science.

I think you don’t want to look in the mirror and accept that perhaps Germany had more to offer back then, and now we are living in a society where men use the women’s room because “they feel like it’s right”.

You don't have to believe truth it's still the truth

If you and Robert want to speak your own private language, that’s up to you.

That is correct. White/Caucasian is a person of European, Middle Eastern, or North African descent. -NCBI.gov.

The word caucasian is still used by Americans but overall it is out dated

The best example to this is us, Hungarians. We speak a Finno-Ugric language despite the fact that we have very little genetic connection to Finnish or Estonian people. And we just recently found evidence of connection to some other people who speak a language from this family.

Yeah but the Norman's and Anglo saxons are both in the undo European language family.

@@HomoErectusIsAFunnyName Yes an agglutinative language

Basque are a good example of this - high concentration of Indo-european R1b haplotype but non-indo european language.

Mr. Sepher connected the dots on many levels. Including DNA. NOT JUST LINGUISTICS

He has... many times..

You are incorrect. Yamnaya had blue eyes. That is where the gene comes from.

@@eodyn7 No, No it ISN'T.

​@@eodyn7no? Blue eyes came from western or northern Europe Yamnaya have nothing to do with that

Aren't these Scythians, but these Persians, what is their relationship to the Europeans?

Persians at that time were blonde and blue eyed. They possessed the R1A/R1B that Europeans have.

@@romulusaugustus5894 and black hair & dark hair

@@romulusaugustus5894 But Indians have the same genetic trait that has been continuously there’s for 10,000 years. The one Europeans have is much younger

Restored pigments of Greek reliefs of their battles w Persians in the time of the height of both empires show the traits I described… dark hair was there I’m sure but question was “what’s their relation to Europeans”… that, along w DNA, was my answer. Dravidians of South India hv diff traits and also created impressive expressions of culture.

Set it up, and I'll be there. All I ask for is a neutral moderator.

@@WorldofAntiquity I bet you'd be embarrassed

@@asuraazoth7137 I bet he would.

I’m not anticipating any set outcome, as it is hard for me to keep up at times in this field of studies, but would be nonetheless very interesting to see both these intellectuals debate. Maybe have a few rounds of a debate so both can thoroughly examine, research, and respond to ideas to deeper degrees.

@@WorldofAntiquity "set it up" Lol, just say you're scared. Expecting some random commenter to do you work for you while you sit and wait, sounds severely hesitant to me. :D

: 100% accurate right there, Cole.

Then why are natonal symbols the world over filled to the brim with Indo-Aryan symbology. What you need to understand is all claims Sephyr made are not his, but that of the kings and monarchs of the ancient world. Etched in stone.

@@cristiangalvan9219 hear hear. This idiot starts his bs by nit picking over the term Caucasian lol what a plonker while having to reluctantly agree with the rest of what he said. Yes the Pharaohs are genetically much closer to modern Europeans than modern Egyptians. There is much this idiot critic doesn’t understand.

@@cristiangalvan9219 This is a channel for people with an interest in ancient history. The reason this is the top comment is that we _all_ had that precise reaction. This is part of a series dealing with absurd claims: aliens building monuments, out of India theory, Atlantis, all sorts of dreamt up nonsense we know to be false. Even in that context this claim was cringeworthy. To anyone that knows anything about ancient history this claim so breathtakingly asinine the only response is to laugh. Is this really where you want to plant your flag?

@@cristiangalvan9219 Then why can't your claims stand up to the most basic scrutiny? Is it because your worldview is a vacuous pile of dog shit?

I absolutely adore the particular group going around defending Sepehr’s video by calling everyone else leftist propagandists. As if everyone is invested in American politics or even American 🙄 edit: misspelled name

@@luckyblockyoshi many people promote leftist propaganda unwittingly, by outsourcing their thinking and engaging in group think. Mass formation psychosis. "the aim of ideological subversion or active measures is to render members of the target population completely unable to come to rational conclusions"

Sephr is peddling the Oera Linda book, and literal nazi ideology so, you know a leftist is left of that I guess. Anyway his books make a wonderful gift and I hope everyone here has a wonderful day.

What the hell is a young Earth creationist sounds like you're trying to take new ideas and thought processes and blame them on the youth😅

@@skynote1728 :: _Young Earth Creationists_ is not a reference to _Young People,_ it's a reference to people who believe that the Earth is only 300,000.00 yrs. Old.

@@cliffgaither they think its less than 7k years old

@@AsianTheDomination :: OK ! I keep hearing different figures, but yours seems the most probable.

@@cliffgaither supposedly you can add up the geneologies from the creation of adam and it gives you a timeline of the old testament. ive never done this before but ken ham is one of the most well known and hes compiled one on his website.

The canaanites or sea people are the Venetian oligarchy who rule today.. So it is said..

The Sea People didn't exist yet when the Hyksos came to Egypt.

@@3625hdarrel Not that I know of. But the Sea Peoples first get mentioned by the Egyptians in the 13th century BCE, whereas the Hyksos were in Egypt by the 17th century BCE.

@@WorldofAntiquity Minoans and ancient Egyptians were sea people. They had the stars fully mapped out. They definitely sailed the seas

@@manbearpig710 The Sea Peoples are a specific group, not just people who sailed the seas.

*I ask because from my perspective, it sounded as if you were attacking Sepehr's thought provoking information that you provided.* I'm just fact-checking. He gets a lot of facts wrong. Nothing personal about it. *The majority of the Canaanites belonged to Haplogroup J2. This defers with Neolithic Haplogroup E1b1b and Chalcolithic Haplogroup T Levant populations.* Defers? I don't know what you're saying. *During the Bronze Age, Haplogroup J becomes the most dominant Haplogroup in the Levant. Now the intermingling of Zagros Farmers with Neothilic Levantine populations did occur. However, as I mentioned above, the most dominant Haplogroup J came in the Bronze Age to the Levant with J2 followed by J1.* "Notwithstanding its strong presence in West Asia today, haplogroup J2 does not seem to have been one of the principal lineages associated with the rise and diffusion of cereal farming from the Fertile Crescent and Anatolia to Europe." www.eupedia.com/europe/Haplogroup_J2_Y-DNA.shtml

@@WorldofAntiquity Did you really just cite Eupedia? What Academic Scientific source did they use? I will go Live with you right now to edify you. I mean, did you even ask Robert Sepehr for a Live dialogue or did you just get hurt because he told you not to come on his channel trying to teach?

​@@WorldofAntiquity *He gets a lot of facts wrong.* So because you were wrong on your facts about the Canaanites and that Haplogroup J became the most dominant Haplogroup in the Bronze Age in the Levant, does that mean I should make a video exposing you for not knowing what you are talking about? *Different? I don't know what you're saying.* That means they are not the same. Those of the Neolithic period were not the same as the Chalcolithic and Bronze Ages. *Ancient DNA from Chalcolithic Israel reveals the role of population mixture in cultural transformation* *During the Bronze Age, Haplogroup J becomes the most dominant Haplogroup in the Levant. Now the intermingling of Zagros Farmers with Neothilic Levantine populations did occur. However, as I mentioned above, the most dominant Haplogroup J came in the Bronze Age to the Levant with J2 followed by J1.* "This finding contrasts with both earlier (Neolithic and Epipaleolithic) Levantine populations, which were dominated by haplogroup E [24] , and later Bronze Age individuals, all of whom belonged to haplogroup J [24] ,[ 26] ." [24] Lazaridis, I. et al. Genomic insights into the origin of farming in the ancient Near East. Nature 536 , 419 (2016). [26] Haber, M. et al. Continuity and admixture in the last fi ve millennia of Levantine history from ancient Canaanite and present-day Lebanese genome sequences. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 101 , 274-282 (2017).

@@WorldofAntiquity Who Were the Phoenicians? By Rick Gore "The Phoenicians were the Canaanites-and the ancestors of today's Lebanese," says Wells. Mysterious Canaanite people were ancestors of modern Lebanese Nature 548, 9 (2017) "The Lebanese individuals proved to be mostly direct descendants of the Canaanites, but they also bore the ancestry of Bronze Age individuals from the Eurasian steppe." Continuity and Admixture in the Last Five Millennia of Levantine History from Ancient Canaanite and Present-Day Lebanese Genome Sequences "This Canaanite-related ancestry derived from mixture between local Neolithic populations and eastern migrants genetically related to Chalcolithic Iranians." "We show that present-day Lebanese derive most of their ancestry from a Canaanite-related population, which therefore implies substantial genetic continuity in the Levant since at least the Bronze Age. In addition, we find Eurasian ancestry in the Lebanese not present in Bronze Age or earlier Levantines. We estimate that this Eurasian ancestry arrived in the Levant around 3,750-2,170 years ago during a period of successive conquests by distant populations."

@@WorldofAntiquity The Genomic History of the Bronze Age Southern Levant "[...] we show that the genomes of present-day groups geographically and historically linked to the Bronze Age Levant, including the great majority of present-day Jewish groups and Levantine Arabic-speaking groups, are consistent with having 50% or more of their ancestry from people related to groups who lived in the Bronze Age Levant and the Chalcolithic Zagros." "We therefore reasoned that the Chalcolithic Zagros component might have arrived into the Southern Levant through the Caucasus (and even more proximately the northeastern areas of the ancient Near East, although we have no ancient DNA sampling from this region). This movement might not have been limited to a short pulse, and instead could have involved multiple waves throughout the Bronze Age." “that gene flow into the region started before ca. 2400 BCE. This is consistent with the hypothesis that people of Kura-Araxes archaeological complex of the 3rd millennium BCE might have affected the Southern Levant not only culturally, but also through some degree of movement of people. Our data also imply an increase in the proportion of Zagros-related ancestry after the Intermediate Bronze Age…”

He is very careful to avoid talking about skin color directly, preferring to center attention on blue eyes and blonde hair, but when he talks about an ethnic caste system used in India, he is referring to it. His "Aryan race" is defined by its lighter skin color.

@@WorldofAntiquity well in the America’s at least in the southern region it was the same story and these stories came directly from the indigenous people. Example Quetzalcoatl Kukulcán .

@@westcoastmex629 Same story as what?

@@WorldofAntiquity I gave you two examples . Hey it’s ok to be white and proud . I’m not white but I do admire how the western civilization which was lead by “white skin” people thrived . I’m Mestizo and my kind didn’t even exist till recently so no I will not take any credit or claim anything from those who came before me.

@@WorldofAntiquity I'm Juwish and understand that Caucasians are Ju's without the recognition. I wish other Ju's would stop using caucasians as punching bags 👊

I probably won't make a video on it, but you can read up on it here: courses.lumenlearning.com/atd-pima-ant112/chapter/chapter-5-race-and-ethnicity/

That would completely anger his radical leftist base who funds his channel so dont see that ever happening. He chose that title specifically fully knowing it a dishonest representation of Sepher's work. As Shepher addresses that politically motivated criticism at neaseum in countless videos. Which a large portion of videos are a study into why we are not allowed to discuss the arayan people desipte overwhelming body of evidence showing a near global influence. This channel is pandering to the radical leftists who actually believe there are Nazis and white supremacists everywhere. In the bushes, under the bed, in the closet. It would be hilarious if not such an accurate representation of the mass delusion of these people.

@@MT-ub8qg 💯

@Wayne Smith I am pretty sure most people don't think about the people that live in the Caucasus.

@@WorldofAntiquity well that was a brilliant rebuttal to my critique. You knew full well what you were doing by posting that video with that title. Im sure it got you clicks. I would appeal to your integrity but that would appear to be a zero sum game.

WHat did he debunk? Look outside these CONTROLLED channels!

@@prophetnozza4150 He debunked every falsehood the man on the trike said. Did you watch this video or did you just jump to the comments to debase honest historical research because in your head "they" are controling the narrative?

@@somniumisdreaming He didnt debink anything, do you always believe what people say and DONT CHECK IT OUT YOURSELF..... the state of you gombines

@@prophetnozza4150 So you would rather believe some random guy on RU-vid then an actual professional archeological

@@wellobush9022 Who said i take in for gospel one dudes word on RU-vid..... I said what did he debunk!!! Notice you havent answered it beacuse you are a good little boy who questions nothing! Try looking outside of CONTROLLED academia.... dont you people realise yet YOU ARE BEING LIED TOO! Just try! JUST TRY LOOKING OUTISDE YOUR MASTERS....... anyway, what did he debunk LOL WAITING!

I haven't heard about the Donkey chariots in over 26 years....

He refuses to debate anybody, the coward.

@卐 خانه آریایی ها 卍 Sepher

Ill debate him, let him debate me, in fact ill just ask him a few questions and i just need him to answer them thats all. Not even a full debate.

we wuz kangz.

He would be destroyed

Thanks so much!

Curious, almost as if RU-vid has an algorithm design to stifle content that questions the norm and promotes content that mocks the prior.

@@UltimatePowa Just the opposite. The alternative ancient history channels get all the views and subs. They have grown way faster than me.

@@WorldofAntiquity it's sad because you're objective and scientific based arguments are great. I love your channel as much i do SASA saving ancient studies alliance

@@Antowan That's debatable.

Say you believe what you wish to be true without saying you believe what you wish to be true.

@@WorldofAntiquity nice redditor rage, he didn't say he was subscribing to Sepehr because he agreed with his conclusions.

I’m subbing too

Based

Does trolling make you feel good? Hope you find reason soon.

The people who lived in that area had nothing to do with most civilizations.

"There really is no such thing as Caucasians in a racial sense anyway" I'm curious as to what race the videos author categorizes the peoples of northern Europe as?

@@richardlooney1 We use haplogroups now. More scientific.

@World of Antiquity I appreciate the reply and I would ask which haplogroups are most common to northern Europeans. Do you use haplogroups when referring to other "races" or just Caucasians ?

@@richardlooney1 I don't refer to races at all. No need.

Yes, he is a WS. All of his work is biased.

Yes, I had the same experience with him. Def a white supremacist.

Well, I’m european and I loathe the american multiracial utopia our eu political leaders are forcing upon the nation states. Alot has changed here in the past 30 years and many europeans everyday ask themselves. Do I still live in my country?

@@Sperminski Insecure white guys. Trump's base. Marry a nice white lady and have kids. Abandon that blow up doll!

@@kmaher1424 "have more white babies"??? I wonder, do you tell the Native Americans, or the Australian Aboriginals or other native non-white groups to 'have more babies'? Or, is it only the 'white' groups you laugh at, whist they become minorities in their own ethnic homeland?

Exactly how Spanish and Hispanics will be the norm in USA soon.

Maybe but then we would have to throw almost all anthropological theories out the window since language is probably what is looked at the most for evidence of ancient peoples.

@Mikołaj Dujka I said soon. God your name is so 3rd World and crazy.

@@MrBooYa-yd5er Actually, that's how hispanics of America were born

If you go further back in history, there will be a time when ethnicity and language correlated 100% with one another. That's actually how languages were born, by groups of people who were geographically and subsequently genetically isolated from one another.

Interesting

And what you see is what you get. A child who looks differently from his family will feel kinship with a stranger who looks the same.

Original Aryans were Black

@@aliyourbrother1 So were the perpetrators of mostly all the violence and vandalism during the “protests”

Genghis and Kublai Khan were according to Marco polo and Chinese eyewitness accounts tall heavily bearded redheads with grey eyes.... there's giant megalithic stonework in Japan identical to Egypt Peru Easter island India etc etc long predating the arrival of the current population ...giant earthen pyramids in China long predating the arrival of Asiatics... mummies of tall redblonde blue eyes mummies in Mongolia from thousands of years ago of the type later seen in Genghis Khan.... the history wars of truth vs the lying mainstream narrative enforced by the British Royal Society and cronies....ex CIA director William Casey said when everything the public believes is false then we've achieved our goal....applies to WTC 911 and the current virus and jab bioweapon psyop...sleep🐑🐑🐑 or learn the methods of your overlords

Good point.

@@WorldofAntiquity I just thought about it, didn’t the Aryans just absorb central Asian tribes and cities willing or forced to join their confederations just like the Yuezhi, Huns, Avars, kipchaks, and mongols? Because that would explain ugric and Dravidian names and words in the rig Veda?

@@saratmodugu2721 Who are you referring to when you say Aryans?

@@WorldofAntiquity the aryan tribes that arrived from the Pontic steppe and straight into Central Asia. I wonder if they were as diverse as the Hunnish empire of Attila racially and culturally speaking

It is not a racial term. I like to view it as a "tribal" term. Humans were meant to stick together in groups for survival. Aryans are just one of those groups that migrated a great deal. Many Aryans came from many places and looked different. The common thread is language and spiritual or religious practices. Aryan Mysticism / Esoteric practices is the common thread. Many of these "tribes" did believe that their were "blue eyed" Gods, paganism, astrotheology of some form, and that something in the Cosmos was at work. Sun Worship was the most common thread in Aryan cultures from Ancient Egypt, to Native Americans in the Americas, to South America. The Sun & the GODS were a part of Aryan belief systems. Much of the Aryan Culture is tied back to the Ancient Druids.... Aryan and Caucasian are NOT racial identities. They are indications of where you are from.

*I believe Robert was in grad school in anthropology, and got kicked out , apparently for controversial ideas.* Do you know where Robert talks about this? I am interested to hear more about it.

I always wondered about his academic accomplishments, especially because he calls himself an anthropologist. I also find it strange he has the fascination with the Aryans, caucasians, Indo Europeans, etc. he also has quite a few videos on the third Reich. Because from what I know, Robert's family are Persian Jews. His father is actually a film maker.

I remember dealing with dark brown human hair I used to reroot dolls that turned red in ten years. It doesn't even require exotic chemicals.

they have the agenda of truth. Unlike this dude being debunked.

@@waltonsmith7210 who’s the authority on truth?

@@GrandAncientOak No answer. The authority of truth is the one who has a gun pointed at you. It's understandable that that these commenters are cowardly. Having WrongThink can cost you your job, your reputation and even get you put on "a list" which I saw on another thread under this video.

@@ritasjourney Why do you hate non-whites?

@@1sanitat1 Why is it wrong to have in-group preferences? Vaccine clinics seems to like blacks and Latinos more…

I don't think you're paying attention. Sepehr said the name Caucasian is derived from the Caucasus, but in the same sentence he equates them with people not from the Caucasus. He does that through the entire video.

His comment section is filled with non stop worship it’s like cult

At least he doesn’t hate himself and his race.

The evidence is in the video.

@@WorldofAntiquity With respect I need more than that to brand a man with such a dreadful title. Could you spell it out, as it were, please.

Does the hair color break down to red uniformly. In other words are dark haired mummies concurrent in time? Also, if there is a breakdown over time is it linear with intermediate stages in color?

@@mefobills279 I'll see if I can find an article explaining it. I think it's down to the fact that some people have a certain type of melanin than others which gives brown vs black undertones. If you have hair with the brownish undertones as versus black it bleaches with decay. Don't know about intermediate stages, but I'd suspect it would have to get a bit auburn first before getting to that reddish brown or red. You can see the same thing in Incan mummies too. Most remains are never well preserved and the hair decays completely. But globally, there's a lot of people who actually have very dark brown rather than black hair. Sometimes you can see it better if you're looking at it through strong sunlight.

@@TRUTHTEACHER2007 We need some way to tell the real blonde and red head mummies. Figurines from the period depict people with blue eyes were present in ancient Egypt and elsewhere in the world. I guess it will be up to DNA to tell the story.

You are wrong. They're proven that melanin does not break down from decomposition. Remains with red or blonde hair had red or blonde hair when they were living

@@robertmurphy3608 Thanks. It seems all of the brown people of the world are butt hurting about how Aryan explorers and settlers conquered them so easily. Then they have racial hatred toward their own ancestors, because the Aryans bred into their populations.

Making claims without evidence is worth debunking though

She is more a reference to Alia Atreides from Dune.

The levant is closer to nubia than to the caucuses.

*The quantum advances in DNA science since 2014 have answered many mysteries of history* Did I not refer to DNA evidence in this video? *and it seems as though European emperial age theories on these issues usually hit closer to the truth than subsequent theories from anthropologists and more leftward leaning academics* No, they are further from the truth. Science advances. It doesn't go backwards. *For instance: Black Egypt origin theories can no longer be reconciled to these new scientific discoveries* Science doesn't support either a black origin or a white origin theory for Egypt. *The Ancient Egyptians descended primarily from early neolithic farmers who originated in Anatolia.* The DNA evidence indicates otherwise. *The Hyksos were certainly a genetically closely related group of horse warriors during a millenia when horse warriors stomped everyone to varying degrees.* Closely-related to whom? *Anthropologists used to accurately identify the population group of a skeleton or skull. One of those categories was "caucasoid." I suspect these words haven't been replaced with more accurate identifiers.* Yes, they have.

@@WorldofAntiquity You say **"No, they are further from the truth. Science advances. It does not go backwards."** That is in fact, not true. It's also strangely empty and obscure. You don't seem normally inclined towards platitudes. Newer theories aren't necessarily superior, nor more science based. For instance: The British language enthusiasts in India who first hypothesized a common mother tongue, accurately determined the time period and origin point. Many did anyway. That's remarkable! They were able to determine these things using little more than the metrics of language, knowledge of how it evolves etc. That deserves a Hollywood movie. **"Science doesn't support either a black origin or a white origin theory for Egypt"** This bru-ha-ha has inspired me to hypothesize how political opinions form (to include history, religion etc.) There are the facts, as best understood by whomever is opining, and then.... ...this "Overton Window" thing. Who but white supremacists would ever even suggest that the ancient Egyptians fit squarely into the caucasian category? As it turns out, they do. Disregarding the term "caucasian" doesn't change that, nor does acknowledging this make someone a white supremacist. **"The DNA evidence indicates otherwise"** It does not. The Abusir el-Meleq mummies and DNA studied from Pharoah mummies indicate primary decent from "Levantine farmers" but that's who those farmers were. DNA has also recently told us that farming was spread more through displacement than the adaptation of farming technology by others. These Levantine farmers descended primarily from the aforementioned Anatolian farmers.... probably history's first full time farmers.... they spread into the Levant, and then later into Egypt. That IS most certainly what the DNA says. And these were people with caucasoid hair, high instances of blondism etc. Makes perfect sense. Many mummies have clearly red or blonde hair. Your last paragraph: What are the new identifiers for those wacky and obscure long-nosed-thin-hair folks?

@@Crumbsyums *Newer theories aren't necessarily superior, nor more science based.* That is not what I meant when I said science advances. I'm sure you must be aware that every new hypothesis gets tested in science until it is fully assessed. Our understanding always gets better over time. And the imperial theories you mention have been scrutinized and shown to be wrong. *Who but white supremacists would ever even suggest that the ancient Egyptians fit squarely into the caucasian category? As it turns out, they do.* That makes sense, since supremacists (of any stripe) want to claim great things as their own. *Disregarding the term "caucasian" doesn't change that, nor does acknowledging this make someone a white supremacist.* Sepehr does more than simply acknowledge this. *The Abusir el-Meleq mummies and DNA studied from Pharoah mummies indicate primary decent from "Levantine farmers" but that's who those farmers were.* I said in the video myself that Levantines moved into Egypt over the centuries. But you said that "the Ancient Egyptians descended primarily from early neolithic farmers who originated in Anatolia." Egyptian DNA is not "primarily" Levantine, nor is Anatolia in the Levant. *DNA has also recently told us that farming was spread more through displacement than the adaptation of farming technology by others. These Levantine farmers descended primarily from the aforementioned Anatolian farmers.... probably history's first full time farmers.... they spread into the Levant, and then later into Egypt. That IS most certainly what the DNA says. And these were people with caucasoid hair, high instances of blondism etc.* No historical claim will be accepted without presentation of the evidence. Please provide the scientific evidence to support these assertions. It certainly isn't in the Abusir el-Meleq study. Don't make far-reaching claims from samples taken from 3 mummies, especially when other DNA studies have been done. *What are the new identifiers for those wacky and obscure long-nosed-thin-hair folks?* Which wacky and obscure long-nosed thin-hair folks?

Dude its called cancel culture.

Theories are not facts. It’s either truth, factual or false, lies. No theory. There is no middle

I believe the proper term for the ancient weapon is composite recurve bow

@@swankfiber5278 no

You are wrong ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-Lgyy4hVnOKY.html

It's a common term, just like longsword or claymore. Not accurate but common outside most people except extreme specialists, and pissy pedants

@@Rynewulf it’s almost like this video and the one it was made to reply to is intended to be specialist. Also, getting compound bow vs composite bow correct really is not at *extremely* specialist. It is at most moderate hobbyist level knowledge.

And? He's clearly still doing alright. So clearly his ideals also appeal to people outside of that demographic you refer to. What dishonesty you show, lol. Reminder that animal conservation and vegetarianism also appealed to AH and that the big mustache man drank water. Surely that must mean these things are inherently bad, right?

@@denofpigs2575 Whatever

​@@TankUni 👍

​@@denofpigs2575Sounds like you both have this backwards. Let's judge him and his supporters by their ideas, not the ideas by his supporters. And his ideas are trash.

@@michaeljames4509 So you've analyzed his ideas and claims fairly? Really. So please explain to me where his ideas fall short. I'd love too see how you came to that conclusion. Surely you must have some rational basis for this opinion and surely didn't come to this conclusion without investigation.

Genetic test of King Tut says that his DNA most closely mirrors Western Europeans. The study is available online. He is of the same line as Amenhotep III, Akhenaton, etc. Ramses had genetically red hair, and there are numerous depictions of blue eyed Egyptians. If you Google “Egyptian Mummy Portraits” you will see paintings of the later Egyptian nobility, they look like Southern Europeans. There were blacks in Egypt but there were whites too.

@@romulusaugustus5894 Haplogroup R1B is also found in Sub-Saharan Africa and the Middle East. But none of the Pharaohs you mentioned were native to Europe they were all native to North Africa and the Middle East. Therefore those Pharaohs were not White. Their combination of Blonde, Red, or Brown hair with light skin does not mean they were White as in European. There were plenty of people with those phenotypes in the North Africa and the Levant. The only Blacks who were in Egypt were the Nubians who were not indigenous to Egypt they only migrated there. The only White people who were in Egypt were those who migrated there from Europe during the Ptolemaic era mostly. However, the indigenous Egyptians did have skin tones varying from light to dark. And they were indigenous North African and Levantine people.

@I2byte, for a very easy overview of the topic, it's discussed in the Great Courses lecture series A History of British India, by Dr. Hayden J. Bellenoit. In basic, the British were looking for a way to rule Muslims more efficiently, and instituted a more rigid version of Sharia law than what the Muslims of the time used, looking to standardize it across all lands and using a very fundamental version rather than the local customs of individual areas. The same thing happened with the Indian caste system, which was never so rigid until the British used it as a legal shortcut.

Ancient caste system was strict, in certain areas it became lax, and the British Empire revitalized for personal gain. Earliest accounts of Christian missionaries in the areas around Kerala addressed the difficulty of eliminating caste… Amazingly, even today in both Muslim and Christian areas it is seen (there is a documentary on RU-vid about this). Sharia by definition demands someone follow to the letter of the law, including punishment… saying the British repurposed it is defensible but as doctrine it is supposed to be interpreted verbatim.

he also contends it’s only the new church saying all the races came from noah, whereas before it was different caucasians. the term better describes skull structure as there are east african caucasians with darker skin but different skull and facial structures than sub saharan people

Aryan means Nobel dude 🤡 its Not related to any RACe or anything whites of Europe tryna act like they are Nobel's and others are below them lol !

The oldest one EVER found was not in the Indian subcontinent, so David got that wrong...

it comes from Europe

@@johnpalmer5357 ikr

​@@johnpalmer5357is it matters. Where oldest thing found lol ? 😂 we have best description of that object ! What does it means u guys just not even know before we told the world its symbol of peace and prosperity' lol And Aryan means Nobel 😂

"aryans invented stitches too" -that guy probably

So the history of Indo-Europeans is basically the history of some biker gangs from the steppes. Huh.

Honestly felt like a Tim and Eric sketch. Hilarious

@@3625hdarrel Hating, or hilariously pointing out the factual?

@@rblack1986 im actually not black, im iranian, iran means [the land of] aryans so im pretty sure im more aryan than you ;)

If you want someone versed in reading antique books, Jason Breshears, owner of the Archaix channel, has spent all 27 years of his prison sentence doing literally that.

😂

Could you give an example?

@@JamesTaylor117 I had been following Sepehr since the start of the pandemic, when I had been introduced to his channel and found his views interesting and thought they might have some weight to them, I had even bought his book 'Species with Amnesia' which discussed the possibility of an advanced civilization pre-younger dryas, I would like to pull specific examples from that book but I had lent it to a friend (who I'm not friends with anymore) and unfortunately cannot find a free pdf to recall specific points made, but one thing I do remember finding odd even at the time of reading it (at least a year ago now) that his citations were very vague. Usually, in a serious study that uses cited works, the author will discuss at length his sources, comparing and contrasting them with others, fully analyzing the material, etc., in a footnote at the bottom of a page or at the end of the work. However, with Sepehr, he would number every source he used and whenever a claim was made, would merely put a [1], [1,4,7] etc., without at all discussing the source material he'd supposedly base his findings on. Thus, reading the book back then (and keep in mind I was open to the idea of a lost advanced civilization at the time), I felt that he did not put as much work into means-testing his claims (i.e., pulling from authors with opposing opinions and comparing/contrasting their views). Usually, serious academics will properly cite the sources of their evidence, so rather than just having the name of whatever article/book he was using, he should have also cited what pages he was directly pulling from, that way it would be easy to compare the source material itself with how he uses that source material to cement his arguments. Instead, he only cites numbers and does not take the time to evaluate how different articles/papers compliment or contradict each other. Vaguely, I recall him discussing 'megalithic' works, 'caucasian/aryan' groups such as the Berbers, the universality of swastikas, fair-haired mummies (side note: the embalmment process bleaches hair) etc, but it felt as if he was merely pointing out to different things and would not tie them up in a neat, coherent way that felt he proved his main thesis. It rather seemed like a compilation of his sources rather than an exhaustive analysis of them. Again, if I had the book on hand, I would give more details, but unfortunately do not and can only base it off memory at this moment. Read his book for yourself though and maybe you'll see what I mean. PS: 'Species with Amnesia' was the only book of his I read, though I had watched a good bit of his videos on youtube. Perhaps he did not make the same mistake with 1666 or the Vril Society, but Species with Amnesia was published after those, so I would not be surprised if they were constructed in the same manner.

@@effortlesskyle7013 So I find his videos extremely interesting and I often use them as a stepping stone to bounce off and look up other information. But like all internet personalities I take everything with a grain of salt. It's very difficult to really know what's true or not. I don't necessarily trust the standard accepted version of history but nor do I trust every conspiracy idea that comes along. The truth is probably somewhere in the middle most likely. Now I will admit though I was very disappointed with his book 1666: Redemption Through Sin. 15 bucks on Amazon for a 74 page little thing that covered the quick basics of the story of Sabbatai Zevi and Jacob Frank. Like practically a pamphlet. lol. Overall he does a good job of describing it and many other Illuminati related details but I was actually pretty annoyed by how short it was. I was expecting more from the "The World's Most Dangerous Anthropologist". It's the only one of his books I read but I have to agree with you about his referencing techniques. His books are set up much like his videos where there's a ton of information that all sort of ties together but isn't explored too far in depth depending on the subject matter and can be all over the place, often in the same chapter. He sprinkled some pretty bold claims throughout it though so I started to look up some of his citations. To his credit a lot of them are direct passages from the sources and he does list the source typically in the preceding texts leading up to it's inclusion. But like you pointed out the references themselves just list the book or article and don't include any specific page numbers or context about the original author or the source itself which is kind of obnoxious. Not saying he has to go all in on every single reference (that would make for a pretty tedious read and I'm probably not scholarly enough for all that honestly) but at least a little bit here and there would definitely help to show that he's done his research regarding where he's getting his information and help to show that he's presenting unbiased data. One of the ones that stood out the most to me was at one point about midway through when he's tying Sabbatean Frankish sex cults to "Socratic communism" as he puts it which he also ties to Aleister Crowley within the same few sentences, which ok, Crowley was a well known deviant. But what stood out to me was the next sentence where he just casually throws it out there and I quote: "These sex cults were very similar to the Socratic ideal, which held all things in common, including their wives and children, especially for sexual purposes. This is the real reason why the Athenians convicted Socrates of corrupting the youth, and forced him to drink "hemlock (poison).(37)" That's a pretty bold claim but he's already moving on to something else in the next sentence. No follow up whatsoever. ??? lol. So the reference is to a book called "Why Socrates Died: Dispelling the Myth". I found the book online but I haven't ever read it so I'm not really able to report anything about it's contents. But I guess my point is that's a very controversial statement and one I've apparently seen a lot of debate online about as well as Socrates in general. It basically paints him in a very negative light. He is both revered and villified depending on the source but mostly I'm just pointing it out as an example of his writing style which can be very frustrating. I do appreciate his presentations and if nothing else his videos have sent me in lots of interesting directions but I try to maintain a healthy skepticism as well.

Gutsick Gibbon does a thorough takedown of Robert Sepehr's pseudoscientific bullshit: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-lJPoiFj6P2k.html

It was a chariot

lol

No people had different biology back then

@@julianblacksmith8539They did not.

It’s sooo outrageous that people think Noah fathered the 3 distinct races of mankind or that Noah’s wife came across a sub Saharan African and Asian dude and got knocked up by all 3

Noah had many wifes,

True, it's a common myth especially in India

The vast majority do not believe that, you're simply poisoning the well

It means related.

Practically you are related since those with white skin and any of those features on top IS 100% a European pure blooded descendent unless they are very unique and also have albinism. Regardless of where you are born it's about the GENES

www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7476619/

I'd love to know why you think why it is imperative that skulls be classified by race.

@@WorldofAntiquity From your source For all of these reasons, the use of the term “race” has diminished markedly in forensic anthropology publications, discussions, and forensic reports. Most forensic anthropologists (including the authors of this manuscript) prefer instead to discuss likely ancestry. Reports should focus on the likely ancestry of the examined individual or, alternatively, suggesting how this person likely would have characterized himself/herself or have been socially classified by the communities lived in. Such an approach provides the needed, useful information but avoids any suggestion of use of an outdated racial typology by the investigator. The biological information generated from anthropological analysis of a skeleton must be considered in judging how a person was regarded in terms of community definitions of race and ancestry. Nowadays, the recommended terms relating to the three main geographic groups are African, European and Asian. Specific cases may use targeted groups terminology as defined locally. So how would we define west Asians and Near Easterners?? So they replaced "Caucasoid" "Knee Groyd" and "Mongoloid" with "African" "European" and "Asian" talk about bs, lol So how do we define West Asians and Near Easterners? Europoid? European?? LOL You know there's no such thing as "White" but you sure you use the term very fluently. Why aren't East Asians classified as "White" East Asians are paler then Europeans! Color coding humans is an erroneous alternative, it's wrong and very racist! But I see you're ok with it! " why it is imperative that skulls be classified by race"?? Because if you have different races in one ancient burial, let's say in Egypt, how would you define them? African? Why is East Africa one of the most diverse places in the world? Because they're all Africans?? How would you define the diverse populations in East Africa?? As European African and Asian?? You know "Asia" is not a homogeneous continent, so how would we define each diverse Asian Group? As Asians?? I guess everyone buried in America are “Americans “ right??

@@WorldofAntiquity I'd love to know why its imperative to deny the biological reality of race - which is observable. Who and what does that benefit?

@@gundisaluusmenendiz This video would be very easy to debunk. Notice how he singles out Caucasian as an "obsolete" term, (as opposed to Ne/gro/id and Mon/go/lo/id) when in reality it is not and remains very much in use today. He's also trying to imply that Caucasians are only white and or European, when in fact this term extends from Europe, North Africa, Levant, Middle East, India... so yes, Hyksos, Canaanites, Israelites, Semites, all Levantines fall under this umbrella term as do ancient Egyptians and North Africans. Not all Caucasians are white, but all whites are Caucasian. Additionally, Caucasian is not a race, it is a designation for one of the major classifications and divisions of man. I would like to see this 'professor' prove it isn't, ironically he argues for it throughout the length of his video without realizing it!

Replace the word pigeon with your wise leader joe.

@@gratifyingmyself9474 So true!

lol

Lost Anxient High Techer - “Loincloth wearing primatives” would require levels of technological assistance along the lines of lasers and 3D milling machines to make artifacts that precise. Skeptic: Rome made artifacts that were even more extraordinary. What technology would they have required? Lost Ancient High Techer: Iron tools!

@@josephjackson2010 yes. Iron has magical properties of transferring precision to anyone who uses them. Try using a wooden mallet and you’ll miss by six feet but as everyone knows an iron hammer is accurate to within 2 nanometers. You don’t even have to look, just swing it and the magic of iron just makes it so.

@@SacredGeometryDecoded I usually try to get to them by saying... The Egyptians are the true Atlanteans! Ancient Egyptians, had (knowledge, discovered, created) Medicine, Maths, Government, Sailing, Geography, travelled to and traded with Latin America and Asia, a very advanced civilisation to say the least.

@@SacredGeometryDecoded love your channel mate. Glad to watch an intelligent person debunking BS fantasies.

@卐 خانه آریایی ها 卍 I’m a leftist? I’ve been called a lot of things but never a leftist.

We're talking about the field of Anthropology, not common parlance. And I left links about it under the video.

In the Koran it is

Linguistics are an excellent way of discovering where genetics were. Had Indo Europeans never gone to the Indus Valley Sanskrit would not be there. Had whites not taken Africans to America they would not be speaking English. Linguistics are not genetics but they can tell you where genetics were and how genetics got to be in certain places. For example how could American blacks possibly be here speaking English if whites weren’t a part of the story? Yep we can gain a lot of insight about demographics from location and linguistics alone.

Search for dreams of paradise- bock saga on youtube

His videos are definitely watchable many, many times.

Search King Tut DNA… He is directly related to modern Western Europeans… more than any other group. Similarly the earliest mummies found were red heads… use a different search engine, (recent ridiculous AI historical images show Googles’ odd obsession w race)… just make sure to sure check the validity of the source. That said I agree that most of the later dynasties were darker hair, features etc. With some Nubian.

@@romulusaugustus5894 thanks for your information. There are non-pharaonic mummies with red hair such as the predynastic Gebelein Man (“Ginger”). But the assertion was about pharaohs. King Tut had haplogroup R1b1a2 which means that he and about half the men in Western Europe share a common ancestor. That common ancestor is thought to have lived in the Caucasus about 9,500 years ago.

Fair point, you are correct… I misread your original comment… Sepehr even slides the word pharaoh in there haha. However, I went back to look at the 2017 study of approx 90 mummies. The study, several articles, and the reporting on the testing say that in terms of modern populations, they are most related to Europeans. Apparently, the sample represents 1300 years of Egyptian pre-Ptolemyic history… was surprised such a large period was covered. Some articles say similar to “Ancient Near East and modern Europeans”… seemingly implying that modern Near East populations are not as connected.

I'm surprised he even earned his Bachelors

It's probably a degree in writing fiction

@@ConanTheCimmerian 💩😂☠️😂💩🤡💩😂☠️😂💩

@@ConanTheCimmerian keep liking your own comments