Did FAST Detect an Alien Signal? Probably not, but still...

Подписаться 224 тыс.

Просмотров 38 тыс.

50% 1

Did China's FAST telescope detect an alien signal? Probably not, but let's take a look.
00:00 Did FAST detect an alien signal?
00:57 Kepler-438b system
02:08 Comparison to the Proxima Centauri signal
03:28 How the FAST telescope works
04:51 Radio Frequency Interference (RFI)
05:36 SETI observing strategies
08:21 FAST's 2020-2021 SETI search
09:20 Kepler-438 candidate signal
11:40 How to confirm the candidate signal
13:25 Support Seti.org
13:49 Thank you, Patrons!
🔔 Subscribe for more: ru-vid.com...
🖖 Share this video with a fellow space traveler: • Did FAST Detect an Ali...
🔴 Watch my most recent upload: goo.gl/QbRcE2
🚀 Help me improve the channel by joining the community on Patreon
/ launchpadastro
🚀 Check out Launch Pad merchandise!
teespring.com/stores/launchpa...
Disclaimer: Some of these links go to one of my websites and some are affiliate links where I'll earn a small commission if you make a purchase at no additional cost to you.
🧭 References:
Zhang et al 2022 (preprint): www.researchsquare.com/articl...
Donate to SETI.org: www.seti.org/givenow
✅ Let's connect:
For business inquiries - chris AT christianready DOT com
Twitter - @launchpadastro
Instagram - @launchpadastro
Facebook - / launchpadastronomy
Discord - / discord
📭 c/o Christian Ready
P.O. Box 66
Westminster, MD 21158
United States
Earth
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Watch next: Solar Orbiter Discovers Surprising new Phenomenon in the Sun
• Solar Orbiter Discover...
~-~~-~~~-~~-~

Наука

Опубликовано:

5 июн 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 220

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

🔴 Learn about the message we sent with the Arecibo telescope: ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-5V2KuClix_k.html

@QUIRK1019 Год назад

Even with 200k subscribers, I think this channel is still a hidden gem. The quality of information, narration, and graphics are on par with RU-vid's biggest channels. I hope you keep getting bigger

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

Wow, thank you so much!

@QUIRK1019 Год назад

@@LaunchPadAstronomy You're welcome! I definitely rank this channel up there with the big ones like PBS Space Time or Sci-Show Space

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

I'm honored to be mentioned in the same sentence as those channels!

@KaiseruSoze Год назад

I agree. I have much more confidence in content that is based on observation rather than theory. (PBS spacetime et.al. not so much)

@jerrypolverino6025 Год назад

@@LaunchPadAstronomy I agree.

@infinitumneo840 Год назад

I like the fact that astronomers from the US and China are working together on these kind of discoveries. One day we will have a radio receiver on the moon. That would be awesome.

@DirtRider999 Год назад

Phuk china

@ff-qf1th Год назад

@@DirtRider999 I mean yeah the CCP is bad and has done a lot of human rights violations. It's an authoritarian state, what do you expect? But there's nothing wrong with collaborating with China on a scientific basis. International scientific collaborations should be the last thing you care about in this respect. I don't think astronomers are the ones running sweatshops in China.

@666chapelofblood Год назад

China did so well with communism.

@mj1653 Год назад

Are they though??

@maboleth Год назад

It's astonishing how much ignorance and sheer stupidity shines among fellow amateur astronomers that never been to China, let alone know anything outside of junknews.

@RingoBars Год назад

Upvoted and watched explicitly because of the anti-clickbaity title. Keepin it classy as always, LPA!

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

Thanks 🙏

@andyoates8392 Год назад

Audible “ping” “Dude..noodles are ready” …

@captain_context9991 Год назад

You know the rules... Its NEVER aliens. Until its aliens, then its aliens. Point being that everything else is more likely than aliens.

@lexington476 Год назад

Lets just always says its aliens 🙂.

@captain_context9991 Год назад

@@lexington476 Most RU-vid channels do that. Its always aliens!!! And when it isnt, they forget about it. Until its aliens again the next time.

@Nickelodeon81 Год назад

Ancient alien theorists say yes!

@jasoniannone9675 Год назад

You have such a striking way of delivering information. You lead us through the step by step process of falsification in such an elementary way, digging into many practical obstacles that these researchers have to manage. At some point, they run out of ideas or hit the limits of their instrument's capabilities and have to publish as a cry for help. "Global scientific community, please help me get rid of this line!"

@HansDunkelberg1 Год назад

Even if you could with certainty say that you have discovered an alien signal - what would it help? Could you then also already _interpret_ such a signal?

@dmanagable Год назад

Great video as always! And a reminder, "It's never aliens until it's aliens." By the way, if you ever take video ideas from random commenters I and I bet a lot of viewers would love to hear about that Nancy Roman Space Telescope which AFAIK is NASA's next great observatory after Webb. Thanks so much for the videos and all you do!

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

Thanks Daniel, RST is certainly on my "to do" list!

@dmanagable Год назад

@@LaunchPadAstronomy Fantastic! I'm sure whenever it comes out it'll be an excellent video. Thanks again!

@TheSpiritoftheCocktail Год назад

CHRISTIAN!! This was fascinating!!! I cant even imagine how the world would react if we actually found a real alien signal. Great video as always!!!

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

Thanks buddy:)

@selfworthy Год назад

it will be, oh, ok, interesting, anyways. Because people are too much caught up in their lifes and problems.

@SMaamri78 Год назад

@selfworthy …. I agree. Most people are too concerned about their favorite celebrity or what the Kardashians are doing to give much of a hoot. To me, it would be a view changing event since I tend to think we are alone.

@fabiorodrigo3638 Год назад

I recommend reading a sci fi called "The Three Body Problem". It's fiction but it shows the most plausible scenario about what would happen if we receive a signal. Little spoiler: it doesn't have a nice ending.

@TheSpiritoftheCocktail Год назад

@@fabiorodrigo3638 HA!!! I'm still going to grab a copy!!! Thanks!!!

@Leo.Wirabuana Год назад

Thank You for reporting China's radio telescope. Salute.

@safe-keeper1042 Год назад

The opposite of clickbait -- you say right in the title that this is probably not what we're all hoping for. Then the video itself is divided into chapters so we can easily navigate to the part we're interested in if we don't feel like watching it from beginning to end. More YT channels should be like this.

@KentheDeer Год назад

Quiet interesting info! Thank you for explaining things in a clear, concise, and easy-to-follow manner, Mr. Ready. Always look forward to your videos!😊

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

Thank you so much!

@BenitoAndito Год назад

Shoutouts to the Viridis color scheme (and likely python seaborn-derived plots) in the time vs frequency RF heatmaps.

@christianobrandao9972 Год назад

Great video my friend! One of the best about the subject! Keep on rocking in the astronomy world Christian!

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

Thank you, Christiano!

@Entropy825 Год назад

I love this channel.

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

Thanks :)

@pipertripp Год назад

congrats on passing the 200K subscriber mark!

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

Thank you so much, my friend! 😀

@pepe6666 Год назад

'hey i think i found aliens!' 'not so FAST'

@DON.229 Год назад

Always nice informative videos keep it up and keep making knowledgeable videos

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

Thank you 🙏

@hanisultan179 Год назад

thanks for the video sir ... thanks for upload

@zazugee Год назад

usually i get annoyed by "it's not aliens", as if it's the only reasonable assumption they can come up with, but your explanation was very helpful, i had no idea those radio telescopes gets thousands of signals very often (false positives) i always thoughts that SETI worked the other way around

@Chmee2 Год назад

Very nicely done movie, thank you a lot for it.

@jerrypolverino6025 Год назад

Very good video. Thank you.

@goldwingerppg5953 Год назад

I went to Green Bank Observatory on Friday and I highly recommend it. Make sure you buy tickets before you go, they sell out fast. I learned a lot, like it was the GBT that discovered Sag A.

@daviddean707 Год назад

To have strengthened their candidacy must be the goal of every alien civilization.

@shdii4132 Год назад

i love your channel

@benmorgan59 Год назад

wonder if fast was featured in the film Cable guy with Jim Carrey lol

@tankerock Год назад

accurate titles i'd actually click on and watch

@hoekbrwr Год назад

I am interested in many things so I spend little time on a lot of interesting science facts. Therefore I appreciate this video for its high concentration of information in a very clear format. A short one but most probably a lot of work to produce all those fragments. As it is for the scientists to deal with over a million signals and then sifting out only 1 interesting subject.

@badartgallery9322 Год назад

I really like this guy.

@AdultZechez Год назад

Best of the best

@asdf123311 Год назад

I am not saying it was aliens, but it was not aliens

@DDG2023 Год назад

"You're a red dwarf, man!" - Creed

@peterw1534 Год назад

Loved the video! Concise and informative as always. So after all our work at radio silence on the hydrogen line we somehow made a telescope that can perfectly fool itself with a fake signal (from itself) right on the hydrogen line? With all the hallmarks were looking for? Also with respect to the habitable zone and liquid water, a huge caveat is that you also have to have a substantial atmosphere. Seems like no one ever mentions this. The moon is in the habitable zone and liquid water can't exist there because it has no atmosphere. Atmospheric density also plays a huge role with respect to distance from the star and liquid water. I know the habitable zone is just a ballpark but atmosphere is at least half the equation and is never mentioned.

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

I'm glad you liked the video :) And yes, point well taken that just because a planet is in the habitable zone, it doesn't mean it actually has water. An insufficient atmosphere would be a very good reason.

@JurassicJenkins Год назад

If the signal was “internal” why is it only present when targeting Kepler 438? Or am I just missing something?

@brucegelman5582 Год назад

Pray we are never discovered by another civilization.DINNER TIME

@ricoreyes6044 Год назад

I wonder how strong this signal was, just as a general point of reference. If it was an omnidirectional transmission from Kepler 438b, what's the order of magnitude of the transmitter power? Megawatts? Also, I wonder, would we even notice our own civilization in a mirrored SETI search? Doesn't seem likely, we just make a lot of relatively low power noise all over the spectrum. Nothing that'd make a big bright narrowband trace on an alien spectrograph, like the ones we're looking for.

@justexactlyperfectbrothersband Год назад

I hope its not Vogons bursting with poetry.

@muheniathili5414 Год назад

It might be true ... I got that signal too...

@ff-qf1th Год назад

what? do you own a personal FAST?

@peters616 Год назад

There seems to be a problem with explaining the waterfall signal from Kepler 238 as coming from the instrument based on matching polarization. That is -- you would not expect the signal from the instrument itself to be a waterfall signal - as you point out, you can get a waterfall from the Doppler effect of a moving satellite or airplane but not from a stationary component in the instrument. Also the fact that just the central detector registered that signal also tends to distinguish the instrument itself generating it, as all the detectors should have detected it. Is the polarization detection relatively new? If so I'd check if that was working correctly.

@peters616 Год назад

Kepler 438

@user-pk9qo1gd6r Год назад

Perturbations from unstabilized sources like microwaves can drift in a similar fashion to this, and while it's improbable that it would drift in just the same way a Doppler shift would look like, it's not impossible. Also I said microwaves but don't actually expect them to be as narrow banded as this.

@yourstruly4817 Год назад

If we were somehow able to build a big radio telescope on the farside of the Moon, would it be much easier to discover signals?

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

Yes, as long as we can keep it radio quiet there.

@takanara7 Год назад

If the source was a planet, wouldn't it's frequency also drift due to the movement of it's planet, as well as earth?

@Wave1dave Год назад

"It's not aliens, until it is aliens." - Matt O'Dowd, PBS Space Time

@dosomething3 Год назад

0:43 “but it hasn’t been accepted for publication yet“ so how did you read it?

@EnglishMike Год назад

Scientists can publish a "preprint" version of their paper while it is still undergoing peer review. Good reasons for doing this are for time-sensitive research (e.g. many of the papers about Covid-19 were preprinted to help inform and guide other teams in their efforts to understand the disease and how to combat it), and to help control the flow on information when word of more controversial or newsworthy research (like this one) leaks out leading to lots of ill-informed speculation. Of course, preprints can be used by more unscrupulous scientists who, for example, know their paper won't pass peer review, but want to make a splash anyway for less-than ethical purposes --- like promoting fake cures for Covid...

@geophat75 Год назад

What was the verdict on BLC-1 in 2020? The proxima centauri signal. Was it ruled by the scientific community as inconclusive after peer review?

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

I discuss BLC-1 in the video.

@isbestlizard Год назад

What makes signals 'interesting'? How is their interestingness quantified?

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

I discuss this at some length in the video.

@sachiperez Год назад

The last 6 years have been so wild, that I don’t for a minute doubt that it is “aliens”!

@physicslover1950 Год назад

I hope you are making a video on the Webb's first images... Please also demosntrate the corresponding MIRI images of all the four images taken by webb.. Also please tell that which color represnets the most energetic (high frequency) short wavelength light and whichcolor represents the least energetic (low frequency) longer wavelength light in both NIRcam and MIRI images... I am only confused by the blue purple and green color in the MIRI images; there are no purple and green stars then why so much purple , blue and green color in MIRI images... Furthermore , Nasa recently released yellow orange and red colored NIRcam and MIRI images of Jupiter... Which are absolutely making no sense... Why they haven't used all the seven colors for the depiction of different wavelengths in the Jupiter image? Will we ever get the colored image of Jupiter? Please clear these misconceptions in your next video on Webb's first images.. One more question Will Webb give us answer to the question: Whether we live in an open universe or a closed universe?

@aaronsmith4940 Год назад

All the UAP stuff is happening across the world so not surprising China's looking too.

@fstopPhotography Год назад

With the ever increasing global satellite, Space X, won't that interfere with these audio-observations like the one you spoke of in China?

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

They're supposed to broadcast outside of the frequency range reserved for astronomy but it's hard to completely avoid spilling into that range on occasion. So yeah, it'll probably get worse :(

@fstopPhotography Год назад

@@LaunchPadAstronomy Lol. Thanks Love the videos BTW. I've learned so much watching them. Take Care.

@timminh468 Год назад

"Probably not Aliens" My fellow humans, this is the reason why we haven't detected a single Alien signal in decades...

@chrisholdread174 Год назад

How much money do we need to raise to rebuild Arecibo?

@EnglishMike Год назад

They're not going to rebuild Arecibo. If they reuse the site, it will be for a completely different radio telescope with far greater capabilities than the original. As for cost, nobody knows unless or until the new specs have been completely, and that depends on what the astronomers want and how much Congress is willing to put toward the project. Puerto Rico doesn't have anyone representing it in Congress, so it's going to be an uphill battle.

@DucaTech Год назад

All the money will be directed to the MIC and Ukraine War

@lexington476 Год назад

Did anyone check the microwave in the break room 🙂?

@EnglishMike Год назад

Wouldn't polar telescopes on the Moon be a better option? There's a bunch of craters located near the poles that are in permanent darkness and yet are mere meters away from almost permanent sunlight, the perfect source for powering any telescopes and other equipment within the crater. The deeper parts of these craters are also shielded from RF interference from Earth (and the Sun!), but again, a judiciously positioned radio antenna outside the crater walls would provide continued communications with Earth without requiring them to be bounced off a satellite.

@TuNguyen-vu1cg Год назад

Actually no, because polar telescopes can't see anything out of the direction of the pole, and that's bad

@TheEvilmooseofdoom Год назад

Just put them on the far side, larger sky.

@Rudderify Год назад

The signal the Chinese ‘received’ was from someone who opened the microwave door before the timer stopped as he was heating up lunch.

@user-pk9qo1gd6r Год назад

Just to be sure, are you joking?

@vimalramachandran Год назад

How far away is Kepler-438?

@user-pk9qo1gd6r Год назад

It took be 12 seconds to look it up. Can you beat that?

@vimalramachandran Год назад

@@user-pk9qo1gd6r I know, but it would have been even better had he given that info upfront coz he was talking about it anyway.

@allthingsdestructive Год назад

Do not answer! Do not answer! Do not answer!

@PUNKMYVIDEO Год назад

Am I going to watch the whole video? Probably not!

@kathykline7202 Год назад

"Watch 581D" " Last of 5" - thats what Wow signals says, and I never heard of 581D so I couldnt have made this up. Thats what the 2nd and 3rd WOW messages say. I wont say the first one. There were 3 not 1, wasnt there? Maybe not at same time. They ciphered them all, but what they did, was use a variety of earth languages, sometimes, right in the middle of the cipher. This is what they say in English. All the public has heard of was the first one.

@olips2010 Год назад

Another Great Video 👍🪐🌙🌖 This channel should have millions of subscribers 🌙🪐💫💯

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

Thanks 🙏

@Jessicatt88 Год назад

Clicked away at….or not probably not….but good job on to the next alien video thanks for not wasting my time

@EnglishMike Год назад

Shame. It's a very interesting and educational video. Very much worth your time.

@ibluap Год назад

It's funny! They spend such a long time trying to find any ET signal in the sky, and when they finally find it, They don't believe it actually is ET!

@free_spirit1 Год назад

Great! Now watch astronomers ignore this signal for the next 20 years, then point the telescope back and say "see, it didn't repeat!"

@bobbymac1947 Год назад

how come no one tries to decode the signal? If this is the signal, then it will include information.

@darrylpioch2055 Год назад

1.14GHz with a bandwidth of only 1Hz is artificial. That’s a perfectly tuned RF signal. If it is interference can’t they just figure out if one of their pieces of equipment is operating at 1.14GHz and rule it in or out? Help me understand

@sarthmotaphale2597 Год назад

Hello all i am in tenth grade confused that which enginnering field should i take please comment this this one to let me know and why........................ i am very serious about this .............. Thank you in advance and see my fav subj. is maths :)

@StrongerThanBigfoot Год назад

Whatever you feel most pulled to

@Big_Tex Год назад

You’ve got plenty of time to figure it out. You can change you major if you change your mind and that’s still years away. None of us can tell you what you should do. I’d think at this point you should just focus on mastering math and computer programming as well as you can.

@muheniathili5414 Год назад

In my opinion don't take engineering .. rather focus on pure physics

@sarthmotaphale2597 Год назад

@@Big_Tex heyy thank you big bro

@maths4noobs Год назад

What is your favourite subject?

@ramiromunoz7168 Год назад

The Thing is that sígnals most probabably are not attempts To comunicAte But residual activity not necesary trying to reach us… really nature behaviour of the electro magnetic spectrum is easaly distinguible

@25jessieg Год назад

Probably a washing machine in Albuquerque they're picking up :)

@awsumguy-bh9pz Год назад

wait doesnt proxima have 3 planets u said 2

@mmenjic Год назад

don't you think if they wanted for us to hear them we would ?

@BrainDamageBrian Год назад

can we please start to pronounce the first R in "temperature"?

@user-pk9qo1gd6r Год назад

Who cares?

@jazzmusiccontinues1134 Год назад

@@user-pk9qo1gd6r pedants

@ArtDocHound Год назад

👽📻🌊

@lexington476 Год назад

Don't leave us hanging. What are the Waterhole frequencies? And why would civilization to drink water look there?

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

1420 to 1720 MHz. It spans the range of frequencies for hydrogen (H) and hydroxyl (HO), so the hypothesis was that since these two molecules combine to form water, and since it's also in a naturally quiet part of the radio spectrum, that might be a good range to broadcast in.

@manw3bttcks Год назад

I has nothing to with drinking water. It's because water in the intersteller medium absorbs in that wavelength so it's handy for telescopes to look in that band since there's less noise.

@mmenjic Год назад

7:24 is that why it is called fast ? very creative if it is 😂🤦‍♂️

@mmenjic Год назад

1:59 the red dwarfs are not habitable !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! But planets around them could be !

@IlIlIlIlIlIlIIlIlIlIlIlIlIIIII Год назад

I would suggest an improved mic. The audio causes fatigue it is so tinny. Excellent channel otherwise, thanks.

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

Thanks! Audio has always been my most frustrating thing. Happy for any audio hardware.

@OlichkaNesterova Год назад

So we need a radio telescope on the moon

@dosomething3 Год назад

0:18 “probably not” can you show please the calculation of the probability?

@EnglishMike Год назад

The answer is at the end of the video.

@dosomething3 Год назад

0:49 “ Even if it does get published it’s by no means conclusive” you mean it is scientific. Science is never conclusive. Science is always self speculative.

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

True that

@666chapelofblood Год назад

It's unrealistic to assume that there's no other civilisations out there capable of our technological advancement.

@EnglishMike Год назад

True, but unfortunately, it's not that unrealistic to believe there's none within reach of our telescopes. We could easily be the only technological civilization within a thousand light years of here.

@666chapelofblood Год назад

@@EnglishMike They wouldn't be detected through telescopes, they'd be detected through radio signals. There could be civilisations out there right now like ours and there hasn't been enough time for those radio signals to travel to Earth.

@TheEvilmooseofdoom Год назад

@@666chapelofblood There is also the problem of inverse square law. Any signals to be picked up by our dishes would need to be VERY powerful. A civilization like ours 1000 ly away would be undetectable from here.

@EnglishMike Год назад

@@666chapelofblood Radio telescopes are a thing too you know :)

@EnglishMike Год назад

@@TheEvilmooseofdoom I suspect any transmitting civilization that wanted to be found would use more than one transmission. The first would be a powerful but basic (though unmistakable) "we are here" signal, telling use where to point our most sensitive instruments. The second would be data rich requiring much more sophisticated and sensitive receiving equipment, perhaps even beyond our current capabilities. You can bet that if we're pinged by the former, we'd be investing a massive amount of time energy and resources to detect the latter. Yes, we're talking about very powerful transmitters, but then what else is an advanced alien civilization to do if they're lonely and want something new to study?

@rodnee2340 Год назад

This is China we are talking about...

@pogo30pago Год назад

Donation to Seti donne!

@LaunchPadAstronomy Год назад

Awesome!

@splodge561 Год назад

Chinese state media? Oh it must be true then!😂

@mahokhan9122 Год назад

I'M PARI Son 👽

@user-pk9qo1gd6r Год назад

Wow I'm early

@ivan-Croatian Год назад

Well, I'm not as early as you, but nevertheless, I'm early enough!

@Jimmy-B- Год назад

Have you seen the new pictures from James Webb, not impressed at all.

@TheEvilmooseofdoom Год назад

The pictures are not out until the 12th.

@Laszlo34 Год назад

"FAST is slow..." Hmmmm.....

@DanSlotea Год назад

If the signal is not from Earth or Earth-made objects, than it's alen for sure, no doubt. Whether it"s natural or artificial, is the question.

@EnglishMike Год назад

Typically "alien" means artificial in this context, with "natural" being the opposite.

@samsonsoturian6013 Год назад

The thing about the Chinese dish is this is the first time we heard from it since they built the thing and they only have it to one-up the US so it's not clear how well it works. Also, they rushed to publish the signal's detection before they even checked what it was.

@samsonsoturian6013 Год назад

@EMAN67:RP forum Dude, this is a matter of Chinese culture. People have often gone into deep debt to obtain prestige items and is by far the largest consumer of luxury goods. They lack the equipment to build capital ships but go to great lengths to build a carrier they don't need simply because the US has 11 of them. So YES, they'd totally build a dish just to one up the US. This can be confirmed by how the ONLY innovation in China's dish was it was a little bigger than the American one operational at the time, but was otherwise off the shelf tech. They built this dish even as new tech rendered it obsolete as these days there are algorithms that allow two synced up smaller dishes to act as one enormous dish.

@nishitd Год назад

Can't rule that out. Chinese want to engage in oneupmanship even at the cost of science. Winnie the Pooh gotta be "the leader"

@thegreencan1286 Год назад

@@nishitd Oh yeah? Chinese breakthrough in science? Disctatorship. CHinA bAd. F⚛️ck you.

@TheEvilmooseofdoom Год назад

This is the first YOU have heard of it. They've been doing and publishing from there for years. You need to see the world a little past the tip of your own nose otherwise you risk making a fool of yourself again.

@josmeproslonije724 Год назад

Trying to find intelligent live on other planets isn't all that challenging. Try finding intelligent life in serbia! I dare you!

@usptact Год назад

It’s another microwave. Relax.

@ff-qf1th Год назад

why are you saying "relax"? no-one is freaking out about this. This is a SETI thing, we're looking for aliens. Here's a possible signal. let's talk about why it's probably not aliens, and what evidence would be needed for something to more likely be extraterrestrial- perfectly reasonable science communication. Please stop projecting