Did Noah REALLY Bring Dinosaurs on the Ark? 

St. Luke cp.3 gives a calculated time of the flood, about 2300 B. C. The dinosaurs were destroyed over 60 m. Years ago by an astroid.. there were no dinos. At the time of the flood.

Simple: what they found was their fossils, and the imaginatión did the rest....

Mmmmm, hmmmmmmm. *Sure...*

There was no Noah’s arc, every human tradition on earth has a flood myth, everywhere on earth has witnessed floods & still are. It doesn’t require a sky fairy to magic up one, too much rain or a river breaking its banks = local flood.

So Dungeons & Dragons is a thing for healthy imaginations & the bible is a book of mostly rewritten stories. 60% of it is added material of Kings stretching their ego. There have been many floods that filled both the Black Sea & Mediterranean several times, recently about 7000 yrs ago, there's underwater coastlines in the Black Sea that confirm it. These stories start in truth referring to something else completely, then grift to become something else. Sad. We are connected to the spirit world through Entanglement, which has been proven. Right there is a bridge of Science to Religion.. that's begging to be explored & understood. but some are still dealing dated speculation as a version of one of these stories. Drop the tin hat act & progress with evidence based faith ?!

Which textbook do you use?

🤣🤣🤣 this is hilarious!

Of course you are....LOL

They don't even know how many genders the human race has in public school.

im sorry you have to waste your time learning that at home when you could be getting an actual education

Amen!

Lol it's so crazy that people still believe in fairy tales in 2024 😂😂

@@richardtyree4969 You mean like evolution .

@@RobertStambaugh-l5r evolution happens all the time at least I'm not waiting for 2000 years for a mythical character from a book to show up and fix things

@@richardtyree4969you’re right you’re not waiting 2000 years, you’re waiting millions of year for the next “evolution” 😂😂

@@stephaniet.1079 seriously, how old are you 10 ?

Urainium-235 eventually breaks down into lead it takes around 700 million years for that to happen, yes the earth is billions of years old.

The obvious answer is, it never happened.

How could I have more then 25 Cousins? I only got 7 aunts.... Maybe the Main DNA carrier were on Board and miltiplied

ever see how small baby animals are they much smaller then the adults... plus easier to feed a bunch of baby animals then adults..and not all made it to the ark look at the bones they are finding they are all in the same position like they were drowned by a major flood

@@amandas198 Actually baby animals require MORE care than adults. There NEVER was any "Ark". It is a fairy tale than has no basis in reality.

@@amandas198 , Did you ever try to feed baby animals? Most mammals need their mother’s milk and require much more care than adults.

The first point is that if Christians don't believe that dinosaurs were on the Arc, then there is no point in discussing it farther. Scientific evidence and answers to the Genesis account of Noahs Arc can be found on the Answers Canada RU-vid channel. So, yes your first came is correct, but makes sense when understanding context. Your second point I disagree with, please see the previously referenced RU-vid channel for a host of videos across a wide range of topics, including the Genesis Account of Noahs Arc.

How about learning how to spell and punctuate before you post your opinion? That way those of us who can read can understand what you're trying to say.

@@stevetodd551 ["How about learning how to spell and punctuate before you post your opinion? That way those of us who can read can understand what you're trying to say"] What exactly is the problem for you?

There’s evidence of ancient civilizations with artwork depicting dinosaurs. These civilizations were after the Flood event. Why are there dragon myths around the entire world from groups completely isolated from each other. If you do research there have been artwork from indigenous people depicting them riding dinosaurs. All this was covered up by the Smithsonian

Hi. I assume that this was a response to me? I've only just noticed it as it was posted to the main comments section instead of our own thread. I'll reply on the assumption that it was... Firstly, it seems peculiar that you are asking if I "believe" in evolution. Evolution is not something that can be treated as a belief, it is as much a fact as anything known in science. The basic theory of evolution is confirmed so completely that scientists consider it simply a fact. And if you accept adaptation you are nearly there, as evolution involves both adaptation and speciation. But talking of "kinds" is hardly scientific as it is not any kind of taxonomic classification, and suggests you are possibly taking it from either the bible or a creationist source, neither of which are reliable sources as far as science is concerned. And I'm concerned you may have used a creationist source to conclude that there are no transitional fossils, which I'm sorry is total nonsense. There are many transitional fossils that have been found including the most famous such as Archaeopteryx, Tiktaalik and Pakicetus. I suggest you research these if you are unaware of them. And I'm confused why you are bringing the fossil record into a thread concerning Noah's ark anyway? If you believe the story was a literal event in history presumably you accept the biblical timeline that it occurred around 4,500 years ago? Many creationists point-blank refuse to even discuss the fossil record for the simple reason that the fossilisation process takes roughly around 10,000 years, so to try to use fossils as any kind of evidence for Noah's flood/ark is redundant. Happy to discuss more if you wish, and if this post wasn't meant for me... OOPS! Take care.

@@cbdwarfer9492 Hi there and thank you for your reply. I don't know why my reply went into the main thread... firstly, let me clarify.. evolution is a theory. You even stated in your reply above that evolution is theory. Theory = unproven!! I don't know what scientists you're referring too that claim evolution is fact. That would be a very bold statement! secondly all those examples of evolution aren't examples of evolution they are more like examples of adaptation. Evolution is the supposed theory of the gradual development of something evolving into something totally different over a very very very very long period of time. Like a cat evolving into a dog. Archaeopteryx was a species of bird. What did it turn into?..... its still a bird!! Can you tell me why there are fossils of sea creatures on Mount Everest? Can you show me something that started as one kind of organism and evolved into another kind of organism over a very long period of time. Then can you show the transitional fossils?

​@@LittleDreamersEducation I have to admit, I'm a little disappointed with your reply, as you now seem to be making efforts to misrepresent evolution that are straight out of a Kent Hovind video. Apologies if you've never heard of him, but be assured you're doing a rather good impression of him with comments like "evolution is just a theory" and "we've never seen a cat turn into a dog" and "fossils of sea creatures on Mount Everest are evidence of the global flood". He is fairly well known on RU-vid creationist channels, but not a nice chap so I don't recommend him. If you're going to continue those kinds of disingenuous comments we probably have little more to discuss, but in the interests of polite conversation I'll try to explain in the hope that you're interested in learning rather than attempting "gotchas". Firstly, evolution is a SCIENTIFIC theory, not a common man-on-the street theory like "I have a theory whose dog is crapping in my garden". It's like the theory of gravity, or atomic theory. New discoveries/research may improve our understanding of these scientific theories, or "tweak" insignificant elements of them, but the theories themselves have never been disproven. It's extremely disingenuous to pretend otherwise. If you don't understand this, please look up what a scientific theory is. Science rarely claims to PROVE things, rather it provides explanations based on evidence, and the evidence supporting evolution is overwhelming. ""Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution" - Biologist Theodosius Dobzhansky. Secondly, you have either ignored or failed to research the transitional fossils as I suggested (I assume the latter given how quickly you replied). If you bothered to research Pakicetus you would already know that transitional fossils exist AND that that it was "one kind of organism that evolved into another kind of organism over a very long period of time" (your words). You would also have learned a great deal about the evolutionary history of whales. So you clearly haven't done as I suggested. "Archaeopteryx was a species of bird. What did it turn into?..... its still a bird!" - No, you are wrong, Archaeopteryx was a transitional form BETWEEN a dinosaur and a bird. It had traits of dinosaurs AND modern birds.. Unlike birds, it had sharp teeth. And it was unsuited to sustained periods of flight like modern birds are capable of. Exactly as a transitional fossil should be. "Can you tell me why there are fossils of sea creatures on Mount Everest?" - I assume you are suggesting this is evidence of a Worldwide flood? This is due to plate tectonics. It's no big mystery. If you've never heard of it, again please look it up. And once again, the fossil record is solid evidence AGAINST the "global flood", not FOR it. My time is limited at the moment, so hopefully that will suffice for "1-2-1 evolution". Getting back to the video, at the end of the day there is no evidence to suggest that the Noah's ark story was anything but an allegorical tale with no basis in reality. I'm happy to discuss this more if you wish (preferably more a two-way discussion if you feel there is evidence to support the story, rather than my continual responding to evolution/science-related questions), but I have some work to do so my responses may be delayed. Take care.

And yet creationists believe that one canine “kind” evolved into 35 species and one feline “kind” evolved into 38 species in an incredibly short period of time for example.

Sin did not begin with Adam, or Eve. It began with the great angel Lucifer, who decided to make himself greater than God the Father. He then persuaded 1/3 of all angels to follow his leadership. He and his followers were thrown out of heaven, and landed on earth. I am unclear if this was before or after creation of Adam. In any case, at some point, Lucifer, now changed by his rebellion against God into Satan, invaded the perfect garden, Eden. Satan possessed the snake, apparently finding it somehow more convivial to him than others of God's creatures. It was after that the first humans sinned.

@@joycebrewer4150 One minor correction. Lucifer didn't want to make himself greater than God. He knew well enough he couldn't be, but he wanted to be like God so his pride launched his downfall.

@@joycebrewer4150 , You should start the story “Once upon a time”.

@@sansebastiansj He let his pride get the best of him. He did want his throne higher than God!!

Sorry, but there is no "truth" or "learning" to be had here, unless you wish to learn how disingenuous creationists can be. The bible mentions nothing about eggs or juveniles. so trying to crowbar such details into a clearly allegorical tale is akin to debating what made Alice fall down the rabbit-hole. No offense intended.

Thank you for posting your reply and no offense taken at all. You are correct when you say that there is nothing written in the Bible about dinosaurs. What does say though Genesis 7:15 says that two of every creature that has the breath of life came to Noah and entered the ark, including animals, birds, and creeping things of every kind.

I have a question to ask you 😊 Where did the 🐓 chicken come from? Did the chicken come first or was it the egg that came first? If it was the chicken then we have an objective fact that the humble chicken was on Noah’s boat. If it’s the egg that can first was the egg fertilized?

@@LittleDreamersEducation I guess that is the classic "Which came first, the chicken or the egg" question! I'm no scientist, but the answer is pretty simple. Eggs came first because eggs dramatically predate chickens. Chickens are descendants of dinosaurs, and we know that dinosaurs laid eggs. Our current chickens are a domesticated version of the Asian red junglefowl. As humans consistently chose the tamest birds and bred them together, the genetic makeup of resulting birds shifted, and during the domestication process the red junglefowl evolved into a new subspecies that we now know as the domesticated chicken. So basically, chickens lay amniotic eggs, a trick they inherited from their reptilian ancestors, which means that the egg came first long before what we now regard as the chicken. I hope that makes sense.

🦖⏳...and who established those long eons of time?...🍖the same science orthodoxy- who have recently discovered soft tissue proteins in dinosaur bones(...er... I mean "fossils")...its all just postmodern myth/narrative; circular logic; and a house of cards...

That's your opinion. There is zero evidence for evolution. With your free will you can believe whatever you please though, even if it does you harm.

...and who (and how exactly ) did they measure those long eons?...same "Science" that recently discovered 🍖soft tissue protiens (blood vessels & calogen) in 🦖Dinosaur bones? ...er... I mean fossils...

@@anarchorepublican5954 The age of the Earth is established from Radiometric dating. The soft tissue in dinosaur fossils does NOT refute the fact that these dinosaurs are over 68 million years old.

@@dankmatter3068 No creatard, there is no evidence for Evolution that you will accept. That is NOT the same as there being no evidence.

There are no human fossils or artifacts found with dinosaurs, and there are no dinosaur fossils found with human fossils. Furthermore, there is an approximately sixty-four-million-year gap in the fossil record when there are neither dinosaur nor human fossils. If humans and dinosaurs coexisted, traces of the two should be found in the same time places. At the very least, there should not be such a dramatic separation between them.

The earth isn't as old as they say but still no dinosaurs lived with man.@@plainsman

Please don't use the misinformation in this video to teach your children. By all means teach them about the bible, but not not to pretend it is based in reality. Take care.

*There is no clear definition for (KIND) & there never will be. Some things are interspecifically fertile & some species have sub-groups which have lost the ability to cross breed with other sub groups of their own species. Some subspecies are both, being able to make interspecific hybrids with other species, yet unable to breed with a different sub-group of their own species. Sometimes fertility of subgroups flows in 1 direction. Group #1 can fertilize group #2, but group #2 can't fertilize group #1. Some species have strong ("Allele") rejection, thus can only fertilize that which is very different from itself. Such species end up with very fast (KIND) evolution resulting in profuse diversity. Such species can end up with multiple Chromosome counts & ploidy counts in the species. AiG videos a misinformation!*

Mars also appears to have been a water world billions of years ago.

While hundreds of thousands of man made structures under the oceans suggest the oceans were once much smaller. Basically the flood waters never fully receded.

@@nathanhale7444 , The melting of the ice age glaciers raised the sea level 400’.

@@davidgardner863 that's just speculation. There's no proof that happened.

@@nathanhale7444 , No it isn’t speculation. The proof is worldwide. Put down your story book and pick up a geology book.

The Ark Encounter is full of pseudoscience and lies

You have lost it.

@bdawson6473 what have I lost? the facts are the facts.

@@defenestratefalsehoodshave you heard of a ship before? The hull doesn't have windows, does it? Think about what your sayin’ buddy.

@nawksybawks the ark was said to have 1 window. Ship builders had to learn to add vents to let the air circulate through the ships. If the ark only had 1 window it would have exploded or everything in it would have died from the methane gas. it is a fact of ship building that circulation is needed.

@@nawksybawks There is also a problem with so many animals and a small crew. How did they get all the poo off the ship with 1 window at the top? There is so much wrong with the Noah story that proves it is impossible to have happened.

Hi! I found all your questions so interesting so I'm here to answers them! 1) so 4400 years ago was in simple terms the bronze age and what was happening at that time was all Civilizations develop now I'm not sure where you got the most common date of the flood was 4400 years go...because that would not be possible due to it being so short of a time-line And another thing there has been studies done to suggest the hole earth was not underwater :" leave the earth dry. That is, no multiple worldwide climatic conditions are described in which flooding, then drying to a dry earth, more flooding, more drying to a dry earth, in repeated cycles that occur over and over again in that Flood year. On that basis, it is logical that all the kinds of evaporite deposits and red beds in many different levels in the supposed Noachian Flood deposits could form only in local climates with desert drying-conditions and could not possibly have formed all at the same time - a time when a flood covered the whole earth for more than one year (Collins 2006). On that basis, the Noachian Flood story cannot describe a whole-earth flood, but it could only represent a large regional flood. Because this flood was intended by God to destroy all flesh on earth (Genesis 6:13) and because sedimentary rocks on all continents contain fossils that supposedly represent the "destroyed flesh of all life," it might be thought that the Bible story, describing a wholeearth flood, was true. However, interlayered with these fossil-bearing sedimentary rocks on all continents are layers of evaporite rock salt (sodium chloride), gypsum (hydrated calcium sulfate), anhydrite (calcium sulfate), and various potash and magnesium salts, which are associated with red beds (shales) containing fossilized mud cracks (Schreiber and others 2007). Many of these mineral compounds and red beds have combined thicknesses on different continents of more than one kilometer (~3,281 feet) (Collins 2006). The red beds are red because they contain red hematite (iron oxide) which formed from magnetite grains that were oxidized while the muds were exposed to oxygen in open air. The mud cracks can form only under drying conditions that cause the mud to shrink and form polygonal cracks. The evaporite mineral compounds in the layers are deposited in the correct chemical order predicted by the solubility of each kind of ion in these compounds and whose increasing concentrations during the evaporation of water would cause them to precipitate in a predictable depositional sequence as the water volume decreased. Such evaporite deposits would be expected to occur where a marine sea was once present and to disappear when the sea became completely dry. Therefore, one could expect these evaporites to be at the top of the supposed Noachian Flood deposits when the water supposedly receded and the land dried out, but certainly not in different levels in between older and younger fossiliferous "Flood deposits". 2) Rain 3) answers in in my first statement 4) In our Bible God gave Noah instructions how to build the ark and God knowledge is far more superior then our modern day knowledge 5) Our Bible verse tells us that God remembered Noah. God promised to deliver Noah and his family through the Flood. God was looking after Noah, and God was in control of every detail of Noah’s voyage. One possible answer to your question is that God could have miraculously stopped animals from eating each other. There is another possibility. We know that before sin, animals only ate vegetation. By the time of the Flood, a number of animals may have become vicious because of the effects of sin. But we notice today that even with animals like wolves-which are of the dog kind-there are other dogs that are not vicious. So God could have chosen the more friendly ones to represent a kind. God could also have supernaturally caused the animals to hibernate much of the time. And Noah no doubt built cages or rooms with doors to keep the animals from roaming the ark and possibly hurting other animals 6) assume my previous answer answer your question 7) like I said in my answer 1 your date of the flood is not accurate for the process of evolution between animals thus we need to assume the flood dates are further back 8) you repeated your question 7 and 8 9) So the book of jasher is my first concern...Book of the Upright or the Book of the Just Man, is a lost book mentioned in the Hebrew Bible, often interpreted as a lost non-canonical book so I'm not sure about the information about it but it took Noah 120 years to build the ark now this also answer 10 Adam and eve had multiple children and Cains wife was his sister God made Adam and eve with so much genetic diversity that it was not a problem and because it was yet a sinful word God had not outlawed this now times goes on now we are at Noah and the flood God still had not outlawed this since there was still so much genetic diversity And long story short only in Abraham's time was this outlawed because there were enough humans to populate the earth thus making more genetic diversity so we can apply this to the animal kingdom they had so much genetic diversity that they where Abel to do this and then after the floor they went there own ways becoming new species...and so on 11) I'm not sure I have read that if you could apply the verse of the Bible books that are accepted 😊 12) I feel like you should read my answer 1 it answer this question that the hole earth didn't flood but parts at a time 13) again 4400 is not accurate date the flood HAD to happen way before that to make a comparison...Plato went to visit Egypt in 395 BC Solon (law-giver of the Athenians) went to Egypt to learn from Egyptian priests. the Egyptians have preserved, the story goes, is that, in fact, there was a city that preceded Athens and that city and its people were superior to all others, including Egyptians. Floods and other disasters meant that the Athenian people no longer had record of that earlier superior civilization, but the Egyptians had preserved that information due to the fact that such disasters are imagined to not occur in Egypt. (This is also documented ask and I'll add the link so you can read) another ons is Plato's Timaeus, written c. 360 BCE, Timaeus describes a flood myth similar to the earlier versions. In it, the Bronze race of humans angers the high god Zeus with their constant warring. Zeus decides to punish humanity with a flood. Where I'm getting to this is the flood happened way before 4400 like you said if I said you feel is incorrect please reply with a factual sorce

@@angelique7560 first of all animals, including humans, cannot reproduce two by two , the gene pool would be to weak , the offspring would be susceptible to disease and more than likely would die out, there is no way we would have the diversity of species we have today. Freshwater fish cannot live in saltwater, and saltwater fish cannot live in freshwater, especially tropical / reef fish , would die out in days. Not to mention Coral Reef and Marine plant species, also land rainforest, temperate forest and plant life would also die out from that amount of water. there would be uncountable mass of the millions of species that were wiped out once the water receded, there would be remains , there is no such evidence found at all. Also, 180 different species of marsupial., would have to find their way back to Australia, where they are endemic and found nowhere else, remembering these species were not discovered until the 1700s , and NO there were no land Bridges . Predators, like lions and tigers etc…. Would have to wait for prey animals, zebra, deer and antelope, to breed a gestation period of 7/8 before hunting them , which is just as impossible as the genetic impossibility, the geographic impossibility, the biodiversity impossibility, and biological impossibility.

@@angelique7560So magic?

@stefangodilo3763 Hi so if your not religious then some of my answers you will find "Wierd" but some of my answers are based on facts and my sources are people who are specialized in there fields so I'm not sure which one of my answer gave you the impression of magic...? but if you confused on something I'd love to help correct you.

@@angelique7560 How did Noah build the ark? Your answer is God told him how. That’s magic my friend. I could help you though if you want.

And what your told isn't fairytales??? Just how many times have Neanderthals been perceived, changing from being a very primitive Bigfoot like ape to now being pretty much a modern human with nearly no differences in looks or culture? How many wrong interpretations were passed off as fact concerning dinosaurs like T Rex being an apex hunter or just a scavenger, or Spinosaurus being a swimming Dino or not. Or the idea that large dinos like Diplodocus for example had to be confined to water given the size but that "fact" is no longer either! Or the Coelacanth being extinct and then, not so much lol! Giant squids being pure myth to actually being real! Perhaps you believe that an asteroid was the demise of the Dino Era but there are scientists see issues with this idea, oh but there are an entire plethora of ideas on how the dinosaurs went extinct, pick one, climate change, a meteor, volcanos, a deadly Dino virus, a super nova, super toxic dinosaur FARTS!!! The fact is, they REALLY don't KNOW, ALL just theories with the asteroid being on top, but just how did only dinosaurs die off and not say crocodiles and every other living creature? What caused ALL of the other mass extinction events? Piltdown man (both 1 and 2) being taught and pushed as THE primary example of an evolutionary missing link for over 40 YEARS with over 200 publications, 50 PHDs handed out, and even 3 knighthoods given and the ENTIRE thing was fraud! FORTY YEARS taught as true! Or Ernst Haeckel's embryos chart being taught as fact in schools for more than ONE HUNDRED AND FIFTY YEARS (150 YEARS) despite being revealed as fraudulent from the very beginning! They ONLY just stopped using them in MOST of the world (notice I didn't say all the world, but yes even America still had them in textbooks even as early as 2020!) A lie published as fact. The "March of progress" chart lol, where to start with that fairytale of artwork!!! Passed off as factual but in reality not even close! I once believed the fairytales as you do now but I woke up and saw through the lies and deceptions! Tell me can we observe and test dark matter, dark energy, the oort cloud? The answer is a resounding NO, we can't, it's fantasy, made up with NO actual evidence of it's existence whatsoever! Your welcome to keep believing the lie, but I'd encourage you to keep an unbiased open mind and look into the real and actual evidences of biblical history of which there is plenty! Look into biblical prophecy! There is a lot going on right now! Look into irreducible complexity! Ect, ect.

Pride blinded man from seeing the truth, read book of Enoch please, i feel pity for you because deceptions is everywhere, i pray may God lift the darkness infront of you, so you may see and know the truth, in Jesus name, Amen

Look into archeological discoveries

@riasapta4109 so you want to prove the Bible with the Bible? How do more fairytales prove other fairytales? The cool thing about science is that whether you believe it or not, it's true.

@damieno3470 I hope you're saying look into archeological discoveries because that proves there was never a global flood. Yes, big floods have happened on Earth, but never one that wiped out all land animals and mankind. The story of Noah is just a fairytale made up by man a long time ago. It didn't actually happen.

Firstly, the book of Job gives plenty of context clues to make it pretty obvious with a straightforward understanding that it is talking about a literal 'sea creature' (modern day whale, some sort of fish, extinct creature. exactly what does not matter) Secondly, the video does explain the context for a 24 hour day in the first chapter of Genesis. To claim anything else goes against everything known about context, logic, and historical writings. Third, it does not matter what anything was called or classified back in that time. Fourth, I personally believe the distinction between land and seas is just the difference between inside and outside body of water. Fifth, the Bible was written by dozens of authors over 2000 years, yet not a single contradiction or fallacy or theological inconsistancy has been found. The way God chose to reveal himself is through people, one of those weird people Job, wrote about the 'paths of the sea' thousands of years before ocean currents were discovered by science. The Bible was written by humans who were inspired by the Holy Sprit. Even when taken as a colection of books with all religious thought removed, the Bible holds up as a humanly impossible achievement... unless it is true. One other thing. Human definitions change. As you mentioned science to have changed over the years, so has human understanding of 'birds'. When looking at a historical wrighting, one must understand the Historical definitions of the time to understand what was actually being said. But also not hold the change in definitions against the historical document. As you said, context is everything. But to state a change in context dismantles/disproves or puts a flaw in something does not make any sense. I hope I was clear in what I meant to get across (weather you agree or not), and I am sorry for responding to a comment from 1 month ago. Anyway if you read this then I hope you have a Great Day! God Bless!

You seem to be adding elements of your own to the bible text to try to crowbar it into reality. It's just a fictional tale, so adding details to try to make it more feasible is pointless. And to use this logic to answer the capacity problem of fitting so many "kinds" on the ark only throws up more unanswerable questions.

Your bible story simply doesn't match reality, no matter how hard you try and shoe horn it into reality.

Well since you think it's all a fable don't blame God when you one day come face to face with him but until that day comes I'll keep praying for you

@@kathygagliardi8727 I'm hardly likely to blame something that has no evidence it even exists. And no offense, but don't waste any prayers on me, they don't work.

​@@kathygagliardi8727It is hard to reason with people who don't know the differences between male, and female. Good luck though.

8 meters plus the height of the mountains.

You have a vivid imagination. What evidence do you have for these claims?

@@cbdwarfer9492 the Bible says all creatures were vegetarian before the flood. I love how people who don't know the Bible and scoff at the Creator behind it, mock it. The Bible refers to you.

@@joinjen3854 Firstly, the bible is the CLAIM, not the evidence. I asked you for EVIDENCE. Are you not able to understand the difference? The bible says a lot of things, this does not make them all true. It is neither a science book nor a history book, and is littered with inconsistencies. What makes you think I don't know the bible, friend? Your "holier-than-thou" attitude may be your undoing, so be very careful about your reply. So I ask again, what EVIDENCE do you have for your claims?

@@cbdwarfer9492 my comments were deleted by yt.

@@joinjen3854 Why should that be the case unless you used inappropriate language...?

And if there was disease and death back then, and a very few populations among all species, then how did any of the animals not die? And if you say only the dino’s died, then how come other species didn’t die? Let’s not talk about other dead species of mammals, amphibians, plants, etc.

By kind my friend, by kind, look all the sauropods kinds and you will find how there were smaller sizes. Same with all others, look deeper and be open to the possibility with what are facts, but look for truth, God bless you.

@@AndemusRay the facts states clearly that man and dinosaurs(at least not the non-avían ones) never cohexisted...

@@AndemusRay the facts states clearly that man and dinosaurs(at least not the non-avían ones) never cohexisted...

Their argument is that they took the young ones. However, none of the dinousaurs, mammoths, and many giant varieties of mammals are alive today. They are extinct. So why assume they were on the ark when it's more logical that they were not on the ark and went extinct because of the flood.

Thanks for Providing Zero evidence for Supporting your argument

There was a flood but that doesn't mean there were dinosaurs on the ark.

@@rascal211 No, my friend, there is no evidence whatsoever that there was a global flood 4,500 years ago as described in the bible. It is just a fictional story with no basis in reality. And to be specific, the Noah's ark tale in the bible was plagiarised from the Epic of Gilgamesh that was written over 1,000 years before the bible story.

There was a 24 hour day. Read Genesis again. And read through the fall again. They were created as adults to create offspring.

Most english translations say 'you will surely die' but the Hebrew actually reads 'die die' or dying you shall die- an immediate spiritual death (separation from God) and the beginning of the dying process where their bodies would return to the dust...

There NEVER was any global flood.

@@walkergarya There may not have been a global flood, but every major religion in the world has a story about a global flood. Doesn't seem like a coincidence to me.

​@@rubbermyducky5998 All with drastically different elements. Huh.

This is a series. I believe that they were on the Arc. Every thing born or hatched is smaller than the full size original.

Dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, so no.

If so then what killed them off?@@scottmccloud9029

Yes they were. : )

Dinosaurs would have eaten man if they lived together.@@calvinsmith7575

No it does not. There never was any Noah's Flood so anything that says otherwise is wrong.

I don’t think it’s a leap to assume that dinosaurs were herbivores before sin entered the world. Everything was perfect in the eyes of the Lord and killing is not “good”. So I think it’s safe to assume that animals began to kill and eat other animals after sin entered.

@@devinellison1642 It may not be a leap, but it is absolutely an assumption.

Book of Enoch answered your question, they were not created by God, they were created by miscegenation experiments

It's called the gap theory

Genesis didn’t debunk anything. It’s a plagiarized tale based on earlier myths.

@davidgardner863 Sure it is. Tell ya what. Write a better version. In 5000 years, we'll revisit the conversation and see which version we're still talking about.

@@inthegarage342 , Genesis is a fable. There were over 1000 known dinosaur species that lived over a period of 160 million years and that is probably only a small fraction that existed considering the rarity of large animals being fossilized. The planet isn’t big enough for all of them to have lived all at once not to mention the hundreds of millions of other species.

And? Iguanas, chickens and snakes are not dinosaurs.

Then why are there fossils with tissue in the bones? Red blood cells? At least you watched, which is good.

@@dawnkravagna3200 why are there people who don’t research the topic, to understand that the soft tissue was due to formaldehyde ?

It has NEVER been hard for atheists, reality is pretty easy and you don't have to lie to crowbar fictional stories into it. If you swallow this nonsense you are incredibly gullible. There is no evidence whatsoever that there was a global flood 4,500 years ago as described in the bible. So no flood, no ark. The end.

I agree, I was lied to all the time I watched this video.

*("Yes the Earth will become a paradise"), yep us atheists will use CRISPR to make that happen & fix the tens of thousands of blunders in human DNA.*

You should not insult 4 year olds.

You are assuming that" millions" of years is the norm.

@@ukmartin2569 I assume nothing,science tells us so.Prove me wrong without bible quotes

​@@HereIam-rg3vyokay...so if dinosaurs were brought to extinction through a catastrophic event then the logical implication is that all life must have been brought to extinction in that event and not just the dinosaurs ...sooooo there were two evolutionary startups then? By the way evolution is not science. Science is science, the objective evidence is science. Evolution is the commonly held way of interpretation.. So no...science doesn't tell us the age of the earth...it just tells us time has passed

Evolution isn't science. Can we just get that straight? It is a worldview used to interpret scientific findings not evolutionary findings

@@HereIam-rg3vy That all depends on which scientists you listen to and believe. Your choice, for God himself gave us free will.

Most young animals require more care and many require one or both parents until mature. Sorry, but that doesn’t work.

@@davidgardner863 After weaning, not as much... Especially since they would be cared for to grow up over a year. Nice try.

@@TickedOffPriest , I said most, you are referring to some. That’s what I call the one size fits all theory. Just what did all those animals eat? The carnivores, the insect eaters, those with specific diets? How did all the land plants survive a year under salty water? How did shallow water species like corals and kelp survive deep water and the sea life that depends on them? But one of the most basic questions of all: how did a very old man and his old sons build a gigantic boat with bronze hand tools? My try was a lot nicer than yours.

@@davidgardner863 You are assuming that Noah and his sons were primitive. Man was planting crops and raising animals after one generation.

@@TickedOffPriest , No, I’m assuming that Noah never existed, nor the ark, and the global flood didn’t happen.

There are no human fossils or artifacts found with dinosaurs, and there are no dinosaur fossils found with human fossils. Furthermore, there is an approximately sixty-four-million-year gap in the fossil record when there are neither dinosaur nor human fossils. If humans and dinosaurs coexisted, traces of the two should be found in the same time places. At the very least, there should not be such a dramatic separation between them.

You believe what you want, but I still want to hear what they have to say.

Ah yes bury your head in the sand my friend, see how that goes.

@@plainsman "Illuminating but spotty, the fovil record is like a film of evolution from which goe out of 1,000 frames have been lost." - National Geographic "Was Darwin Wrong" November 2004 Sure it was stated in 2004, but nothing has changed about the fossil record. The reason that no human and dinosaurs were fossilized is that they did not exist right next to each other. But also, not a single dating method that has not already been proven faulty actually dates dinosaurs fossils to be 65 million years old. The evidence shows that a dinosaur like creature existed along side humans. And this is shown I cultures all across the world.

No offense, but "The bible says..." means nothing. Do you believe the Harry Potter books when they say that children can fly on broomsticks?

@@cbdwarfer9492 The Harry Potter books do not claim to be true to real life. The Bible does. Big difference.

@@TacoBel That's my point, the only difference is the CLAIMS that people make on fictional accounts.

​@@cbdwarfer9492Yes, but the Bible is also consistent with reality. And not only is it true, but it's enlightening. The Bible teaches and develops one throughout one's life, which may sound ridiculous, but I promise you it's true.

@@Bob_Bobson47 Sorry, but the bible is not remotely consistent with reality. If you adhere to the biblical narrative. The earth would only be around 6,000 years old. And as this video series comically suggests there should have been a global flood around 4,500 years ago, for which there is no evidence whatsoever. The Noah's ark story is no more than an allegorical tale with no basis in reality. It's not even an original text, but shamelessly plagiarised from the Epic of Gilgamesh. And if you worship the God of the Christian bible you are worshipping a global genocidal maniac that endorses slavery. Not my kind of role model, I'm afraid.

There's a big ark on Mt. Ararat on Turkey's border & one on Mt.Hebron, Lebenon-Syria. There's probably more.

Prove it .. Empirical Proof

There is an ark buried in turkey in the mountains of the Ararat. It's been found ergo proven.

@@brandonsturgell9315 Nope. No ark there. Just a slightly boat shaped rock formation. Try to keep it real dude.

@angrydoggy9170 they did ground penetrating radar and found its there and even 1 room still intact but could never be reached without collapse but ok.

Wow. So much stupid!

the book of Enoch is not biblical. look up how it contradicts the bible. pray to the Lord alone. not Enoch