Did T.rex have feathers? 

Either that or Jurassic Park would've been absolutely adorable.

Chickens are actually the closest known relatives to T-rex

@@edgarr411 chickens actually can get violent. Look up chicken attacks, i'm sure you'll find plenty

@@edgarr411 im pretty sure that if you get your face close to a rooster it would prob gore out your eyes, you think that's not something to worry about?

Cervid Skull roosters aren’t scary, they’re actually very sweet birds I break up rooster fights all the time, especially with flocks of wild-ish ones They spazz the fuck out if you pick them up incorrectly, but if you do everything right the fighting stops immediately and the one you are holding feels secure and safe If a roosters spazzes out on you for the various reasons they do, just pick them up, they calm right down Chickens on the other hand are super affectionate and will come when you call them, sleep in your lap, and cuddle you in general I love chickens

TL;DR, this video is very outdated. Rex was most likely non-feathered.

Ignore this reply.

Dinosaur action attack and Spitting dilo yh

+JakeSnake07 nope those scale impressions changed nothing

My interpretation of T-Rex is that it had minimal covering. Like the level of hair on an elephant.

Oh gosh

Hahahahaha

@@liamgriffin5433 didn't Horner finally concede the point?

XD

Now I cannot get that image out of my mind when I sit down and watch old Road Runner cartoons with my grandkids.

New studies suggest adult t.rex weren't covered with feathers, they had little to no feathers. We're back to Jurassic park baby!

Does this TREX fossil look like a feather to you? thumbs-prod.si-cdn.com/e2px_U_iZaEPKeXQ6JvVWy2Ok_0=/800x600/filters:no_upscale()/public-media.si-cdn.com/filer/51/1e/511e9935-405b-4ad5-bb2a-85431b682379/wyrex-prep_0064_skin.jpg

@@SmashBrosBrawl did you even watch the video? That exact picture is shown in black and white at about 14:18 . Its smaller than a coin and its not even confirmed to be scales. He even explained early on that the tyrannosaurus rex likely had both scales and feathers and later on he said the underside of the tail (where the sample came from) is often scaly on other dinosaurs we know had feathers.

@@doomngloom9088 Do you see any feathers on modern day reptiles like snakes geckos?

@@SmashBrosBrawl I have, and so have you. Not only are birds reptiles, but they are also living avian dinosaurs with both scaly feet and fethers. Birds are more closely related to prehistoric dinosaurs than snakes, geckos, or almost any other reptile. (Source: University of California Berkeley ucmp.berkeley.edu/diapsids/avians.html ).

Trey you there?

Dippersaurus! or otherwise Trey.. t rex is like saurian in feathers

Can you make a _Nanuqsaurus_, the polar tyrannosaur, Paleo Profile?

TREY the Explainer I found another mistake at the beginning you said weptile it actually sounded a bit cute the way you said it

so this video is not 100% accurate.

Raishin _L Thank you and yes! correct

do a video that humans and dinosaurs coexisted

Just a small thing but you seemed to have misspelled Yutyrannus around 12:30

But please make a trex fan art video and Pantera Leo axtro

Love your videos and in my opinion feathered makes them better , to bad that there isn't direct skin leftover to destroy the haters and great video keep making your great work JOP

Its look like her child is smarter,i like them.

TBH I would get intimidated if a feathered eagle would look at me

Ever have a bird aggressively stare at you? Make it way bigger and give it sharp teeth. I agree that they look good.

Adult t.rex was not covered in feathers, that theory is outdated and recent studies point towards a scaly adult t.rex.

@@ansh6370 can u send evidence plz

dalton411970 yes, I also like birbs

dalton411970 we don’t want “beautiful” dinosaurs, we want something badass!

YepItzJ fethers can be badass to you know and not everyone is unhappy with that

In My Opinion, almost every Theropod looks better with feathers, EXCEPT for Carnotaurus. Which probably didn’t have feathers anyways

YepItzJ It’d still make you crap your pants if you saw a living one

HoopsAndDinoMan it's very possible. There are many bird species, such as the peacock, whose males are vibrantly colored and females are dull. It wouldn't be too surprising.

ThatRandom - Dude Its far from new. Paleos have already considered it. Many dinos are the mid point betweeen birds and reptiles so it wouldn’t be surprising for them to exhibit bird characteristics like sexual dimorphism in size and color. However it is already a nearly confirmed theory that female rexes were larger and more aggressive than males.

Fur, feathers, scales, N more - wait what. I didnt type that. Anyway its true.

HoopsAndDinoMan interesting theory. Makes sense when you think about it.

That's an interesting idea! Many modern birds exhibit pretty extreme sexual dimorphism, it sounds very plausible!

and scary

yes

It would be such an amazing sight

Cheb I'm starting to think if time machines would work and if they did, would they do anything? cause I would sell my house just to see a living rex

Carson Dugan Depends on if the Rex is hungry or not (im guessing). As long as you keep your distance from it after it has recently eaten, it shouldn't be that much of a problem. or idk, difficult to say how dinosaurs behaved

Nope, but such line of argument is acceptable in politics, tho (or seems to be!). :-)

David Emery 😂😂

I think it looks awesome, it’s like a lizard a bird and a bear all in one but huge

xD

Mr. Chipper no it’s isnt

+TREY the Explainer Bless you.

Markus Toh Thank you XD

Feathers=Cool (it's a fact)

In my opinion feathers make T. rex looks cool with feathers

Accurate depictions on Raptors and Tyrannosaurs makes me feel I want more Truth.

lol

I don't want to imagine those gory pictures of aliens trying to depict what we could have looked like after we went extinct. The hair oh PLEASE THE HAIR

Not comparable at all but please continue ignoring the science for your own aesthetic preferences…

@@nutyyyy Its their science's problem, not mine. And yes aesthetics is more classy 🙃🙃

@Where's the hen? Also on the back and chest area

PSYCHIC

Bruh momento

4D galaxy brain moment.

I uploaded a GIF of how big your brain must be. Guess it’s still loading, file too large

He can see things before they happen. It’s a Jedi trait.

Matt Parker cool

Because of you, we will have a new generation of paleontologists. Thank you :)

P Heimerz There isn't any evidence for that other than the fact that other reptiles are cold blooded too, but by that logic birds must be cold blooded too. In fact, a study over dinosaur blood cells showed evidence that they were transitioning to being warm blooded.

P Heimerz your dumb

But then there comes the new science the t rex had no feathers just smooth Skin

Or an angry ostrich, rhea, or cassowary

Or modern day raptors or probaby never heard of a terror 🐦

Or a Seagull

Or never seen a Petral, or gotten a bird of prey upset, or encountered a magpie, or any other territorial bird/dinosaur.

Most people get their impressions about what birds are like from tiny songbirds.

Joldsaway ikr so buitiful

Wait do you love him because he's fluffy or because he is a murder machine

Weeellllll

🐦 🐦 🐦

𝚇𝙳

yeah

LIKE THE KARTRASHIANS. NOT !!! COMPLETELY NAKED!

now he weighs 9 tons

now he weighs 9 tons

9 tons? Damn and no terrestrial predator has broken that record. Goes to show how scary nature can truly be.

***** I know right?

@@crypto457 11 spino

What about a realistic indoraptor that would be really terrifying I saw some fan art of realistic indoraptor and I was a little bit terrified maybe indoraptor could be a real dinosaur that we haven't discovered

Fucking emus..

I'm terrified of large flightless birds

Anthony Hayes yeah, emus. imagine a dodo dinosaur.

Some birds like parrots have teeth.

i like that idea

SpaceTaco 101 that could be possible because t-rexes are most related to chickens these days

SpaceTaco 101 unique answer BTW I love your animations

but that's a misconception, Chickens are in the family known as "game fowl" and there ARE other birds in that group other than just chickens. such as quails and pheasants. why not compare it one of them them (even still a stretch, as game birds are recent bird family compared to others)

SpaceTaco 101 king of like how dogs would do it, that sounds like a good theory. I also think when fighting or mating they would fluff up feathers on their heads

Birds are dinosaurs, so that makes crocodilians the closest non-dinosaur relatives to dinosaurs

Closest DESCENDANTS. It would be counter intuitive to mention birds since they are dinosaurs.

oh i get it now

Actually trey is right Birds ARE dinosaurs not a descendent

Suprised to find you here(i'm a sub!) but not suprised at the wall of text. XD

+Poet Plays You certainly know your dinos, Poet!

+Poet Plays Couldn't have said it any better myself and also thank you for watching my video ;)

Phylogenetic analysis saves the day, fortunately - in such analyses (which, admittedly, are still only our best guesses) convergent traits are usually outweighed by ancestrally derived traits.

+TREY the Explainer BestInSlot and Poet Plays!!!?TWO of some of, if not THE most famous dinosaur RU-vid channels just commented on your video Trey!!! You know what that means? You're getting famous!!! I'M SO HAPPY I'M FANGIRLING RIGHT NOW!!!!! Oh and keep up the great work. :)

Well, they _most likely_ had lips, it's not fact at all.

They still could have commonly had the tips of Their premolars. Sticking out of their lip's.

@Sir Corgi The First yes to make up for the fact they couldn't cuddle with their little arms

Makes me wanna give it a smooch

@@artykatykat6742 omg that sounds fuckin cute

not to mention elephants have a lot of tiny hairs

And elephants live on a much hotter environment than T.rex's

Gojiratheking106 As far as we know the earth has always had seasonal variations in temperate and polar regions; feathers would have been as important as mammoth fur in such circumstances.

differous01 hmmm u have a point

They recently came to the opinion that T. rex did not have feathers they have no fossils or any other proof that T. rex had feathers, they pieced together skin fossils from all over the body and they were all scaled like an alligator or foot of a chicken. I hope the T. rex was feathered because the look of feathers on a rex is badass man

... how else would it be pronounced...?

@@_veronica_r We pronounce it as eem-you. Long E, m, long U.

@@ObsceneParadise Kinda weird to me, but makes sense

I got triggered too

Veronica R. We’re Aussie, it’s English, everything is weird

I agree with SeaWorld Tyler, I also want a "What Did Dinosaurs Sound Like?" video.

Like a gaint eagle probely

They might sound like crocodiles, crocodiles are closely related to dinosaur. Look up youtube for "crocodile hiss" they sound very cool!

i cant provide the sounds of every dinosaur but i will give you one thing t. rex most likely let out a very deep and powerful hiss that made your body vibrate

British accents

The more you know I guess

Raptorman 619 being accurate is better, reason it matters more than asking “Why does it matter?” Is because it tells us what they acted like. Feathers can be used by many animals different ways which helps us know behavior. A trex might try to use feathers to scare of competition instead of an epic fight all the time for dominance.

You are very, very correct.

𝙰𝚐𝚛𝚎𝚎

I agree

You were right!

they are DENIABLY somewhat feathered, in context of the rex. Even close relatives today can have different features. until direct evidence of all scale impressions on the body of the rex are found, we cannot have a single correct hypothesis, only ones that are agreed upon.

+gabriel nyman If people are scared of chickens... I can only imagine what would happen if they were spotted by a T.rex... F*ck those people...

T. rex

Emphasis more on NIGHTMARE rather than than ostrich.

It looks more like a gigantic nightmare parrot.

Your iq is probably is below 0

Yes.

That would be awesome. And if there's any surprising accuracies, take off an inaccuracy, like they sometimes do in CinemaSins.

Good idea.

+Eaglelord 145

+Warot Thuvadarakul I would watch that

+Rex H.G. Chen Thank you :) and I really appreciate your comments. -Yeah I understood that, I just wanted to mention that very interesting paper. -I knew that thing about Tarbo, super sad. Would have been super cool to see a tyrannosaur with such a unique organ and to see it's possible uses. -I read that too about Yutyrannus. - I am familar with the muscle attachment point hypothesis and the counter arguments. The SVP Abstract book for this year had this as a counter to the muscle attachment argument: "ULNAR BUMPS OF CONCAVENATOR: QUILL KNOBS OR MUSCULAR SCARS? MYOLOGICAL RECONSTRUCTION OF THE FORELIMB OFCONCAVENATOR CORCOVATUS(LOWER CRETACEOUS, LAS HOYAS, SPAIN) CUESTA, Elena, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain; ORTEGA,Francisco, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain; SANZ, José Luis, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain The Concavenator corcovatusholotype (MCCM - LH 6666) is a skeleton of a carcharodontosaurid from the Las Hoyas fossil locality (Lower Cretaceous, Spain). This specimen shows unusual features, such as elongated neurapophyses of the dorsal vertebrae and a series of small bumps on the ulna. The right ulna is completely preserved and all sides are visible, except for the medial side, which is hidden. The bumps are present on the posterolateral surface of the ulna.Three of them, located more laterally, are the most marked, and their separation is 6 mm. The two most distal bumps are posteriorly directed and their separation is from 10.6 to16.7 mm. These bumps are topologically homologous to the quill knobs of birds. Although quill knobs are generally situated on the posterior surface of the ulna, some taxa, such as Gallinula,develop these knobs on the lateral surface. Alternative hypotheses to explain these bumps consist of their association to an intermuscular crest or an attachment scar for the insertion of an ulnar muscle. A myological reconstruction of the forelimb of Concavenator is performed in order to test these hypotheses. The reconstruction is carried out based on the osteological description, anatomical comparison with extant taxa, and using the Extant Phylogenetic Bracket (EPB). The insertions of M. triceps brachii (TB) and M. anconeus (AN), and the origin of the ulnar head of M. abductor pollicis longus (APL) are reconstructed on the ulna of Concavenator. The first is located on the posterior surface of the olecranon. The insertion site of AN is situated on the anteroposterior surface of the ulna based on EPB. The origin of APL is located on the anterior surface of the ulna. The bumps are not located between these muscles. Thus, the hypothesis that the bumps could be an intermuscular crest is refuted. As for the second hypothesis, the bumps could be a muscle scar of AN. However, the insertion of this muscle is a fleshly attachment that produces a featureless surface, without osteological correlates. In conclusion, the myological reconstruction does not provide any evidence supporting the hypothesis that the series of bumps can be interpreted as an intermuscular line or attachment scar. However, the existence of birds with quill knobs in the same position as the bumps of Concavenator inclines us to consider that this is, so far, the most parsimonious interpretation. This interpretation indicates the presence of skin appendages in Concavenator, preceding the wing feathers present in Maniraptora" Note that the abstract mentions 'skin appendages', not feathers... Concavenator is an area of ongoing scholarship, I personally would not consider the above the 'last word' on whether or not it possessed quill knobs. I agree I should be more cautious with it as they are still under debate. - You are right! I shouldn't have been that definite, I feel like I didn't clarify enough that this is based solely on current evidence and future ones might change this conclusion found in the video. - XD I know I get those arguments all the time and many are entirely baseless. Thank you so much for your comments :), feel free to give any more criticisms or concerns

Thanks for responding Trey! Keep up the great work. I have seen that SVP abstract, by the way - intrigued to see what future research might reveal.

Rex H.G. Chen Thank you! and will do ;)

***** More intimidating if you did so with an emu, cassowary, or bird of prey.

***** You mean *non-avian* dinosaur like animal. Also, we have found soft tissue, but it can only survive a few thousand years in the most perfect conditions. And yes, I'm subscribed to all of those RU-vidrs :D

***** I'm actually planning on creating hybrids of animals alive today to create a creature that looks like a prehistoric animal once I get older.

***** I have already planned to get into genetics. I've learned about CRISPR which will greatly help me. And yes, as you said, it would be avian, but it would be non-avian-like. I didn't say it actually was non-avian

***** If you want me to, I can give you the list of prehistoric animals that I'll try to recreate.

*squealing* BIS COMMENTED ON THIS!!!! I AM SO HAPPY!!!!

I can't believe my eyes.

Lagiacrus I know!

This is going to be fun.

Everyone, he's learning...

Trey talks about feathers. Owls have feathers. TREY THE OWL CONFIRMED!!!

Pigeons have feahers Owls have feathers PIGEONS ARE OWLS

So you're not a feather hater or a scale hater you like both well that's some good advice from officer feathered T-Rex

No guys.this changes everything

I mean, it had an eyesight better than a hawk, bone-crushing jaws, powerful sense of smell, and a robust and muscular body. So yeah not only is it cool but game breaking

Same!

@@slugakristov8343 This only changes the way we think T-Rex looked.

+Hewylewis And no cares if you cared about it.

Dalibor Jovanovic No need to be rude.

I care!

The Poke'Saurus I mean as in it's not a big deal to me. If he had feathers, that's fine.

Hewy Toonmore Okay! All is good then!

That actually gave me a good belly laugh

Goddamnit i get it 😂

👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👍🏻👌🏻

That hurt.

Tyrannosaurus fossil had no evidence of feathers

T.Rex*

+plox the title has T.rex

Imagine a T. rex with a big shaggy feathery mane sneaking along behind a herd of sauropods.

sauropods didn't live in hell creek

JARI B *Cough Cough* Alamosaurus *Cough Cough*

Who and what is Sue

+Echo Does Things the largest, most complete and best preserved T. rex in the world. Also the most famous.

Cole Czajkowski Oooo Ok

Cool!

+Cole Czajkowski C. sastrei doesn't have real digits or even claws, they don't even have elbows. Tyrannosaurus had two large meathooks for claws, grasping digits, and elbows. They aren't anything alike.

We did not evolve from apes

@@nancy3823 but we are closelly related, "branched" in this con5ext means that we separated from them

Unfortunately this fight has been gearing for a while, humans love their books and movies, and our imaginations can make it impossible to get the truth. If palaeontologists have to butt heads with creationists that the Earth isn't 10,000 years old despite all the physical evidence then we can expect the old school dinosaur fans to fight tooth and nail to get their beloved scaly T. rex back. Can't trust humans to not push confirmation bias as far it will go, especially when they got a pokemon artist to redesign an actual creature.

It looks fine to me, Some sparce feathering on the back would be nice but it generally looks good to me, Miss the horns from the feathered design tho.

Fussel Knolle agreed buddy

I disagree with you, but I am NOT saying that they didn't have feathers- I totally accept that they likely did. I just don't find the look conjured by this, and most concept art born of it, to be awesome in the slightest.

they probably made sounds never expected

+Tristan Dorame I can answer that for you its just Hollywood more likely t rex sounded like a giant crocodile or a bird meaning it either made a deep rumbling growling noise when angry or possibly even hissed and shrieked I don't know about you but either of those options sounds much more terrifying than anything Hollywood can cook up. either it makes a deep rumbling noise than makes your very bones vibrate or it shrieks and hisses like a giant bird of prey.

+Tristan Dorame Its probably just Hollywood. I highly reccommend Matt Martyniuk's blogpost about this :) dinogoss.blogspot.hu/2014/06/what-does-t-rex-say.html

+Tristan Dorame I would say it's more likely that they made sounds similar to crocodilians, and the deep grunts / clicks of modern avians. A true screeching roar doesn't seem to be quite likely as that's specifically Hollywood trying to make them seem "cooler" rather than realistic.

+Tristan Dorame If they do then all birds (particularly the largest/large ones) would've. But they don't.

+Torsten Gaming Hater more fascinating,giant chickens!

yeah

Yeah but the only dinosaur that will look abnormal and worse is spinosauridae they must have NO feathers so that they will be more like crocodile than lizard.

+Torsten Gaming Hater I agree.

+MrSebastian6789 Well, we do have Kulindadromeus...

Yep, pretty much.

I see them all the time. I live in Raptor Land lol

chickens are dinosaurs cuz dinosaur is a Clade of which all modern birds are a part of. This means all modern birds are technically dinosaurs.

Yes you are. But I am a terror bird so I eat mammals

𝚈𝚞𝚙

abyscidis whats hell creek

@jonathon koeing It's a dig site in north america.

The scarier thought is this: now that we know dinosaurs were warm blooded and had heat insulating feathers, we know there weren't many places they couldn't survive. Heck, some of them could do just fine in the modern world, complete with slow, stupid humans to prey on.

EATHER2468 Imagine just encountering a T-Rex eating its prey, blood all over its feathers and teeth.

That sounds badass

EATHER2468 like a palm cockatoo

That sounds like anchiornis

Actually feathered trex has been disproven by a paper that says they have scales search it

@@katakai7117 Trey, made a video about that paper. The scale impressions found were very small, and in areas of the body that were already speculated to not have feathers - the paper doesn't really change anything.

@@liamkallianpur8870 Trey is idiotic As soon as he saw change in the way dinos are represented he immediately jumped on the bandwagon without question and berated anyone that disagreed and put drawings of fully feathered trexs Now that studies reveal that may have not been the case he doesn't agree

@@katakai7117 I agree that T. rex probably didn’t have feathers but not that trey is idiotic, this is an old video and for a while it seemed more than likely it did.

@@FirstnameLastname-bv8ke That video came out in 2017, Ben's in 2018.

@@FirstnameLastname-bv8ke That he never responded to the video in question.

Could you comment the link to the paper? I did see one article mention it but I can't fine it.

Rahul Pranjivan sorry man I don’t know where it is from, I got my sources from ben g thomas’s video, but I’m sure if you go to the video you will see the website name or paper title that you could probably log up if my info helps

The evidence of feathering in tyrannosaurus or any tyrannosauroids is very scarce, we only have evidence of feather integument on the early tyrannosaurs such as yutyrannus, but they split off the family millions of years before any tyrannosauroid was alive. So in all answers we do not know if even juveniles had feathers, it is definitely plausible but the evidence is very low.

@@paleostories_7839 true, I only meant if they did have feathers, as I said, it would only have been a very light layer of them and probably would have been leftover from their early stages of life. edit: I messed up on my reply, and I 100% agree with your comment, my comment from 2 weeks ago is outdated, probably the only tyrannosaurs that had feathers were yutyrannus, Nanuqsaurus, other early tyrannosaurs, and maybe some larger tyrannosaurs as juveniles, such as Albertosaurus, all though that's pretty unlikely.

And funny how we now onie trex definitely didn't have feathers

@@notflyingcereal3575 Based on what proof?

Thank you so much! I'm happy you enjoy them ;)

hey i know you from the facebooks

yo

No you are not. It's hilarious seeing the people who are mad.

daBirb yep. Saurian is getting unholy amounts of criticism for it.

daBirb yoooo, i love your profile pic lemmergeier

Oh......ok...

NO the damage has begun

Protoceratosaurids were related to tyrannosaurs

@@turkeyvulture2882 tyrannosaurus was a tyrannosaurid, and yutyrannus was a tyrannosauroid.

unfeathered raptor would be so ugly

Really, I haven't actually done it, but I always want to.

Magnus Høier Holck I feel you bro

Magnus Høier Holck agreed

"fix"

I'll the police and the real scientist.

The evidence supports this hypothesis.

The Nerd Beast makes sense

matt R is it the legend 27?

thats actually a really good point

And imaging a baby feathered t-Rex, so fluffy

je AK47SW saurian a baby Rex is adorable

je AK47SW I would take it and train it to be a guard animal. THEN, THOSE PESKY HOOLIGANS CAN STAY AWAY FROM MAH LAWN!

@@AlexanderKSwart then it bites you with it's teeth that is speculated to be covered in bacteria(due to most reptiles having them) and then wait next to your dying body, waiting for you to die of infection for a good meal.

@@jaimelojeda1904 We can't train kamodo dragons or crocodiles. i doubt we can tame them.

+Arvid Magnusson Thank you :)

+TREY the Explainer hey trey i got a video idea for you are dinosaurs gay and i don't meen that in a negative sense but in a sexuality sense . is it possible that dinosaurs had homosexual relationship or bonds like some modern day animals? What do you think

+Will Shea (DRAGONX) probably

Will Shea It is actually highly plausible! May modern dinosaurs have exhibited homosexual behavior, penguins, many seabirds, and ducks.

TREY the Explainer instead of i am cait we should have i am caradontosarus

Definitely

Feathers look both magnificent and terrifying

Yeah

Feathers are awesome! I like both scales and feathers, but I like feathers more.

You are exactly right!

besides elephants are kinda hairy anyway

Losaru It was a reptile, it just wasn't the classic scaly lizard you're used to seeing in the modern day.

It technically was a reptile, but I get your point.

T-rex was a reptile, genius… Dinosaurs may have not been very closely related to reptiles, but they were and still are considered reptiles regardless today.

Certainly!

speaking of court ship and mating i don't think that predatory dinosaurs even with feathers shaked there tail feathers to impress a mate. oviaraptors probably did but they are mostly omnivorous predators are diffrent for example most modern day predators including predatory birds like eagles and hawks impress potential mates by ethier catching prey and bringing it back to that potential mate or fighting off other males maybe some dinosaurs like troadon or compys built nests to impress a mate but i don't think fairly large raptors did like dakotaraptor or utahraptor ( just stating my own opinion not going against anyone else )

+Lord Dinosaur considering Tarbosaurus was so closely related to t rex to the point where some argue it should be considered a subspecies of t rex and be called Tyrannosaurus Bataar I think its more likely male rexes had a wattle or a throat pouch or generally a colorful patch of skin on there neck.

Yeah, though we can't rule out a feather crest.

Of course it is. It would not be a disvantage at all.

It couls still have some feathers anyways so it's not entirely disproven.

U're wrong t rex don't have feathers, and this video is suuuuuper dated. It's like what they say "are perception on dinosaur is always changing"

@@jjllanoproductions5294 I didn’t say he did! Do you know how to read?

There is 0 evidence they didnt have feathers. There is some evidence they did.

Thank you :)

TREY the Explainer I think the feathers would make a t rex look cooler especially if the feathers are around the neck or head I think it would probably give off a badass king crown vibe

Spino was quadruped...

So why doesn’t he make a new video addressing the fact that this video was wrong?

ARPromo1 - its actually tiny and didnt have that "scary" thing in its neck

Random its bigger than a human

@Random the dilophosaurus actually had a roughly 23 foot posture and couldnt spit acid it was just a big dinosaur with crests but no frills on its neck you got that right

If Sauron has a not feathered T-Rex maybe they wanted to update it and see if it didn't have any there's no direct evidence I'm not a feather hater I like feathers on dinosaurs they look pretty cool but I think they were just doing it on evidence until actual evidence comes out then they'll probably updated again

He's really not subjective in the vidéo... You can see loads of logical errors you can clearly see he wants the t Rex to be feathered

@@florix7889 He said he'd try to be. Also, I'd like a time stamp so I can agree with you.

@@thegodzillafandomsrookie5514 most t.rex relatives had feathers,so it is the most logical thing to think unless we find an impression of t.rex scales covering a large amount of the body

@@florix7889 So you think it's more plausible for T-rexes to be an outlier with avian scales compared to its relatives, ancestors, and descendants?