दोस्तों इसी प्रकार की वीडियो तथा सरकारी नौकरियों के बारे में अधिक जानकारी के लिए मेरे दूसरे यूट्यूब चैनल को जरूर सब्सक्राइब करें चैनल लिंक / @m.education484
कुछ पुलिस कर्मी बहुत अच्छे होते है जिनकी संख्या कम है पर ज्यादा संख्या मे जनता के सुख स्वतंत्रता के शत्रु और भ्रष्ट गालीबाज अन्यायी होते है ज्यादातर बडे अधिकारी यही वास्तविकता है आज की पर लोग उन बुरो को न देखकर अच्छो से आशा रखते है और यही लोग जनता के मित्र होते है काश सभी अच्छे होते।
जांच करने की पावर कभी पुलिस अधिकारी के अधीन नही होती , पुलिस अधिकारी केवल अन्वेषण कर सकता है, जबकि जांच करने की शक्ति सम्बन्धित थाना क्षेत्र के न्यायिक मजिस्ट्रेट के अधीन है। जांच और अन्वेषण दोनों में फर्क होता है ... द.प्र. स. - धारा 2 (g)
Bilkul sahi jaankari diya hai Mujhe thoda gahrai me jankari hai Assistant police inspector jiski vardi pe sirf laal patti aur 2 star hote hain ye sirf maharastra police me hota hai waha ki police topi bhi alag (nukile type ki) hoti hai
Nhi Police Station me Inspector rank ke officers ko police station ka head yani ki SHO banaya jata hai... Agar koi police station me Senior level SI ko head banaya jata hai to tab usey SO kaha jata hai... Jyadatar Police Station me Inspector rank ke officers ko hi waha ka Head banaya jata hai.
Police k hone se safe kam feel hota hai aur dar jayda lagta hai Aur Rahi baat soldier ki to unhe dekh kr hi bahut Proud feel hota hai aur Happy bhi 🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉🎉
Dear sir Aap ek videos police thane m kitne register hote h or unko kaise mantaine krte h or Koun Koun se register hote h details m ek video bnae sir please. Sir m Apka bahut bada fan hu sir. Reply Jrur krna sir
Jury System in India and why Jawaharlal & eminent intellectuals killed Jury system. The British realized long back that their own Collectors and Judges were corrupt to core, and population would get crushed to the point of rebellion if their powers are not curbed, which is why, in 1870s, British enacted Jury System in India. The Jury System reduced injustices in India in private cases and gave stability to British rule. . . In 1956, Jawaharlal and the then Supreme Court judges abolished the Jury System by citing Nanavati case as reason. This was utter nonsense. . . Here are the case details. Nanavati had killed a person named Ahuja who was adulterer and had affair with Nanavati’s wife. The Jurors had accepted the Nanavati had killed Ahuja out of rage. . . Nanavati was a Navy officer and citizens have tremendous respect for military officers. The respect doubles when they see that a young man from wealthy family leaves posh comfortable life and accepts harsh life of Military. . . And Ahuja was a proven adulterer, and back then since paternity tests did not exist, citizens in entire world considered adultery as more heinous than murder. Now the Jurors were in dilemma - if they convict Nanavati, the judge would hang him (which was exactly what happened in the second trial). If the Jurors had power to decide the punishment, the Jurors would have surely issued some punishment like a few years of imprisonment. But Jurors had only one power --- to call him guilty which may mean his death or call him innocent. . . The crime of Nanavati was not motivated for economic gains nor Nanavati was a career criminal. And he was a respectable Navy officer. And so Jurors rightly believed that he did not deserve death for his crime out of anger. The Jurors IMO took right decision in saving his life. Their wrong decision of “zero punishment” because they did not have powers to imprison him for a few years not an error in wisdom. . . Which is why in the system we at RRP have proposed, the Jurors decidepunishment so that Jury is not forced by their inner conscious to give “not guilty” verdict when person is guilty, but not guilty enough for highest punishment that the Judge might throw. . . So Nanavati case shows that Jurors took a very reasonable decision, and what was needed was to increase the powers of Jurors and let them decide punishments instead of judges. Despite this, Jawaharlal (due to his feudalistic mindset) and Judges cancelled Jury System in India without any debate by citing one “Nanavati Trial” as reason. Jawaharlal and eminent intellectuals of India used Nanavati case as pretext to abolish Jury System in India, and all MPs of Congress, Communist Party etc back then supported him. Jawaharlal and eminent intellectuals killed Jury System to support the landlords who were using criminals to beat the landless. Due to Jury System, the criminals were getting prison sentences and so landlords were finding it difficult to ask criminals to beat the landless. . . So Jawaharlal cancelled the Jury System in India so that landlords can beat the landless and block the land reforms. And eminent intellectuals were on payrolls of these landlords and so eminent intellectuals supported Jawaharlal’s decision to ban Jury System. Nanavati case was just a pretext.
Police chuki thna kotwali jyadatar public janati hai lekin inko public deal ki training thik dung honi chahia viksit deso ka udahran aur unka karya pradali ko bhi dekhana aur ssmajhana chahia
Postman.hai. .. change... names is the new friend hai to you have been a girl ☺️ I am a girl ❤️❤️ years ago today is very good morning to kuchh bhi pata hai ki my friends are very good.so...virchual.card...gum..hai...old..debit. post man ..420... hain
Jury System in India and why Jawaharlal & eminent intellectuals killed Jury system. The British realized long back that their own Collectors and Judges were corrupt to core, and population would get crushed to the point of rebellion if their powers are not curbed, which is why, in 1870s, British enacted Jury System in India. The Jury System reduced injustices in India in private cases and gave stability to British rule. . . In 1956, Jawaharlal and the then Supreme Court judges abolished the Jury System by citing Nanavati case as reason. This was utter nonsense. . . Here are the case details. Nanavati had killed a person named Ahuja who was adulterer and had affair with Nanavati’s wife. The Jurors had accepted the Nanavati had killed Ahuja out of rage. . . Nanavati was a Navy officer and citizens have tremendous respect for military officers. The respect doubles when they see that a young man from wealthy family leaves posh comfortable life and accepts harsh life of Military. . . And Ahuja was a proven adulterer, and back then since paternity tests did not exist, citizens in entire world considered adultery as more heinous than murder. Now the Jurors were in dilemma - if they convict Nanavati, the judge would hang him (which was exactly what happened in the second trial). If the Jurors had power to decide the punishment, the Jurors would have surely issued some punishment like a few years of imprisonment. But Jurors had only one power --- to call him guilty which may mean his death or call him innocent. . . The crime of Nanavati was not motivated for economic gains nor Nanavati was a career criminal. And he was a respectable Navy officer. And so Jurors rightly believed that he did not deserve death for his crime out of anger. The Jurors IMO took right decision in saving his life. Their wrong decision of “zero punishment” because they did not have powers to imprison him for a few years not an error in wisdom. . . Which is why in the system we at RRP have proposed, the Jurors decidepunishment so that Jury is not forced by their inner conscious to give “not guilty” verdict when person is guilty, but not guilty enough for highest punishment that the Judge might throw. . . So Nanavati case shows that Jurors took a very reasonable decision, and what was needed was to increase the powers of Jurors and let them decide punishments instead of judges. Despite this, Jawaharlal (due to his feudalistic mindset) and Judges cancelled Jury System in India without any debate by citing one “Nanavati Trial” as reason. Jawaharlal and eminent intellectuals of India used Nanavati case as pretext to abolish Jury System in India, and all MPs of Congress, Communist Party etc back then supported him. Jawaharlal and eminent intellectuals killed Jury System to support the landlords who were using criminals to beat the landless. Due to Jury System, the criminals were getting prison sentences and so landlords were finding it difficult to ask criminals to beat the landless. . . So Jawaharlal cancelled the Jury System in India so that landlords can beat the landless and block the land reforms. And eminent intellectuals were on payrolls of these landlords and so eminent intellectuals supported Jawaharlal’s decision to ban Jury System. Nanavati case was just a pretext.
Sir, पुलिस थाना में FIR दर्ज क्यों नहीं करते ,दर्ज करने के बजाय जो fir दर्ज कराने जाते है उन्हे ही को अपराधी मानते है,fir ke लिए भी अप्रोज लगाना पड़ता है।
Sho sirf Inspecter with three star wala he banta h jo bara thaana hota h usme sho hota h.. SO daroga sub inspector ko bola jata h choote thana me SI ko SO bana diya jata h
माया चौधरी की शिवराज माया गुर्जर हरिओम गुर्जर लक्ष्मी चौधरी मेघराज चौधरी दीक्षा गुर्जर myina राखी रंगीली तिहारी थाना प्रभारी 🛸🛸🛸🛸🛸☯️☯️🇵🇲🇰🇲🇸🇴🇸🇴🇲🇵🇲🇵🇳🇨🇳🇨🤴🤴🤴🤴🤴🎾🎾🚔🚔🚘🚘🚘🎆🎆565556 aslp yas x ok good mornig s 🎆🎆🏅🏅 तिहारी थाना जानवी कपूर जी सोनाक्षी सिन्हा जी
