Differences between ATR 42 & 72 | Revised 

I’m starting ATR 42 TR in a month, your videos have been immeasurably helpful as an introduction. Thank you Capt 👍 oh and just as a curiosity, I’m from the U.K, however my first flight instructor position was in Thailand a decade ago teaching foundation training for Bangkok Airways sponsored cadets. fantastic place, wonderful people.

2:10 that 42 livery looks sick!!!!

Very nice video! I bumped into this video looking for differences between ATR 72-500 and 600 for scale modeling purpouses, since scale modelers look for making their model the more accurate to the real thing as possible regarding visible details, going down to things like the amount of hydraulics panels doors. I've concluded from this video that it ain't external visual differences from 500s to 600s, not even to engine nacelles as I thought there could be. Thank you for making and sharing it!

Thanks, you really showing facts that a bit difficult to understand in msfs 2020.

Hey Magnar, can you make a new episode comparing ghe difference between q-400 and atr 72? It would very appreciate for your professional opinion 😊

Hey Magnar, how many pilots after you told them about the ATR 42/72 said, "My dream plane is now the ATR 42/72."? For me, it's more about the exotic destinations the ATR aircrafts fly to and it's versatility. I don't really like to fly into those big busy internationals...

The main difference is one has a generator and the other has a gen er ah TOR.

Thank you for another beautiful and insightful video 😊 So if I understand correctly, the ATR42 is faster in cruise (230 KIAS / 300 KTAS) but slower in climb (160 KIAS), while the ATR72 is faster in climb (170 KIAS) and slower in cruise (221 KIAS / 278 KTAS)?

On the atr 42, you showed the incorrect brake wear indicator.