Dirty chess tricks 7 (Morphy Attack) 

ikr

@@Tama-sw8tn ; if you don't have a memory for certain moves and positions; than try developing a general strategy and mindset when playing. If you play fast games, will be hard because than you need a certain routine to unlock certain reactions from the opponent that can lead to a quick dominant position. If however you play longer games, try this technique. I don't play chess in competition, never did, I don't like the competitive aspect but I learned my son to play, he is 16 and have a 2200 elo and still analyze games with him and work on strategies and techniques. 1. Take control over the middle of the board, so don't open with a pawn at the sides. In a classical perception of the game, the middle are the four middle square, but I consider it to be the 16 middle squares. 2. Develop your pieces with idea number 1 in mind, take control over the middle of the board. First develop minor big pieces, be careful with rooks and queen. Look to where your opponent is opening pawns and leaving spaces. You want to castle away from that side and launch your attack there. That is point number 3. Attack. Take your time. Don't be hasty, if your not playing blitz, you have some time to find the best move. Chess is war, don't be afraid for a smart sacrifice. If you can break his line , take out some pawns and maybe a minor piece, than a bishop and a horse might be worth it if you are castles and developed. if your opponent has problems in that department because he has been busy stitching the holes you cause in his defense, than you are almost won. And finding the correct or best move is not easy, sometimes even hard for a grand master.Their are 64 squares on the board, 32 pawns, there are a lot of possibilities... This is a general strategy that can help to some degree, but if you want to become better, there is no other way than to study some movements by hard that you now how to react in the best possible way when confronted with them Good players can take you down with a few moves just by gaining positional advantage in the opening with standard patterns that you need to recognize or you are lost before the game has even started...

@@woudwilder8324 Thankyou for the advice!

@@Tama-sw8tn You're welcome. If you apply this correctly and know some standard patterns and know how to use forks, pins, sacrifices,...to your advantage than you can win some games. Before I really started studying the game, I could beat opponents like this on chess.com with a max rating of 1600, but that was 40-60 maybe 30-70 in their advantage because they know much more lines and plays and can set up traps for you that are hard to identify, certainly in Blitz when you don't have the time to do all the calculating. To reach + 2200, one really needs to study the game, and know how to respond best on every opening. If you don't know the opening or your opponent is doing a variant of it that looks strange to you, no matter you are playing the white or the black, from the moment you have the chance, always try to attack a piece of your opponent, to limit his space and enlarge yours. But don't do it hastily, don't open up yourself and remember, you want to control those 4 squares in the middle and the ones surrounding them. Look for the spaces he is leaving you and try to widen the gaps there. Try to mask your real intend, try decoy attacks, for example use a bishop to attack equipment on the left side when your real goal for this bishop is situated at the other side of the board. And be careful, while you are trying to set up a trap for your opponent, he is doing the same. So with every move, ask yourself what is your opponents intend and try to use that against him. This is the general idea that my son is still applying on +2200 elo. But as I said, you need also study of the game to reach that level because otherwise you will be the victim of a lot of traps. And you can't take someone out of the theory and make up your own gambit, if you don't know the theory. Players that have lets say 1200 elo know a few moves, up to 6, 7,8 moves that they play brilliantly because they just repeat a pattern but if you know how to respond on it, they break down easily after that. If you don't, the game is basically over after that.Without real understanding of the game, knowing some basic patterns will only bring you that far, you also need to know how to follow up on them. But as I said, I am not a pro, but I know how much study my son has been putting in it to reach +2200 and is still putting in it to get higher than that. It is impossible in modern chess to do it without it. The problem for most of us is simple, we don't have the time to study our opponents and develop strategies and gambits against their plays. We have jobs and in the evening families that want to spent some quality time with us. For me it's something else that stops me. As a 6 year old I started going to chess class and soon I was destroying every one. I stopped playing 2 years later. Most of the kids I was playing against reacted frustrated and angry on always losing and I just stopped playing because I didn't liked that attitude and started to take music classes. People don't get angry with you because you know how to play the piano,lol.

Much study is needed to get better!

Haha funny GJ XD

SuperLalulalu 😆

ROFL

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

its chessbase bro

***** Thank you so much :) I like your feedback :)

***** dear gunjay...what EVER u do..DO NOT DIE just make so more videos :) cheers

Then white should either play Rf4 or Bh6. Bh6 is a wild move where fxe4 Bxg7 Rg8 Qh5 and things get crazy

Seriously? There´s nothing mentioned in the material you´ve downloaded? That´s strange I think!! To tell you the absolute truth about this I found it in the old book published in 1982 I think it is, by Estrin, so this must be the first publication or one of the first at least. I don´t know if this gambit has a different name or more of them in different languages, but I know that in my native language Danish, it´s called the Nesjmetdinov-gambit and was published in Danish from "Skakcentralens Forlag" or in English "The Chesscentral´s Publisher/Publishingfirm" to give you some information to work with. Should later versions of the book really have been altered so much???? Or did Estrin or the Publisher choose not to publish it??? There are other gambits mentioned as well. If I remember correctly there´s also one in the Open Spanish called the Rabinovitj-gambit. The Nesjmetdinov however has similarities to the Schliemann-gambit/Jänish-gambit in the way that Black thrusts with the f-pawn. It´s also mentioned on the backside of Estrins book together with the Marshall-gambit of the Spanish as the book´s two main gambits of the opening. Strangely enough I doesn´t even seem to be known by the great chess-engines. Siesta-variation YES, but NO the the Nesjmetdinov-gambitlines. It doesn´t seem to recognize it at all, which I don´t understand, because engines are fantastic in attackingplay. And I think the Nesjmetdinov appears more sound than for example the Englund-gambit of the Queen´s pawn games so what does this mean? That the well-established theory has forgotten or overlooked it? Maybe. Now don´t think I try to play smart or something. This has actually wondered me for years. Nobody except me or Estrin himself seems to know about this. And here I thought it was common knowledge among chessplayers. But maybe not. I´ve also noticed that many don´t seem to know about the Steiner-variation of the Marshall-gambitlines too in the red book published by Bogdan Lalic. I hope you can get any further with this little information I have about the gambit, but please understand that it´s difficult for me to give you this information over e-mail when all I have is Estrin´s old book. But thank you for mentioning the other gambit in the Siesta-variation which I must admit I´ve never heard about. I´ll look it up to wise up on my gambit-repertoire... :)

+René Henriksen Yandemirov Gambit (with ...Bg4, meeting h3 with ...h5!?) The regular Siesta is fun too1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Ba4 d6 5. c3 f5 6. exf5 Bxf5 7. O-O Bd3 8. Re1 Be7 9. Re3 e4 10. Na3 Nf6

#jamesdean36 At 13:46 what happens if rook moves to g8? @Tangible vered

then rock to c1

According to my engine, black is slightly better after f6. It couldn't find any good response, as with me.

11.Nf6+ gxf5 12.Bxf6 and then Black has to find a way to not lose.

After 12.Bxf6, Rf8 then black is 1 bishop up, when I played w/ an engine w/ all possibilities I believe black wins.

***** could u illustrate some possible lines for Nd6+ sir,, maybe Nxf6+ is much even better or maybe i am missing something... TYVM for this another great series sir,, BTW, who do u prefer to win the candidates! Vishy or Aronian!? :)

mykheL tresE oh no! maybe Boyd Lloyd mean Be7..

if the pawn captures the rook then Ne5 check with a discovered attack to the black queen and when pawn takes knight , QxQ and white is better