Thanks for the comment. I was trying to do the best video given the time constraints. I went roughly the same route and I was losing light. I think the comparison is pretty obvious, but we'll keep trying to make better videos.
You're very welcome! Yes, I have info in the video description above. Hmm, I think side-to-side (width). I can't recall about the vertical plane. I'll have to check that. Maybe it's all of it, like most lenses? I think you can use an ND filter with it and the Air 3. I don't, but a lot of people use ND filters for Air 3s. Obviously, there are use cases for this, but I remember looking into NDs and decided against it for me, for now for some reason.
Great attempt at a demonstration, but much of the video was too dark to see. Also, would be better if you showed the same pic locations to compare. just a thought. Your the one on RU-vid not me.
Thanks for the comment VDP. I think this provides a good comparison and you see the same landmarks, etc. Also, it was a quick video with the family, etc. That being said, there is always room to improve and I appreciate the feedback!
Seemed fine to me. I can look again. Also, please remember this video was made relatively quickly (not super set up prior, etc.) and was made to show the general difference in point of views between the two lenses on roughly the same flight path and area/landmarks, which it does IMO. Even as is, this video took me many hours to produce and post. People seem to be asking for a "perfect" video on a somewhat niche topic. Yet, many have no videos up themselves, lol. Gotta love the Internet. Bottom line for me is, I have a family and am always super busy with work and projects, etc. Every video can't be "perfect," but I do my best to bring the audience good-great content on a wide range of subjects IMO. I appreciate everyone for watching and commenting. Thanks!
@@ConservativeNewMedia thank you so much for your reply. I am sorry I didn't mean to be rude. I was trying to ask if the wide lens is sharper than the original lens or it was something wrong in post editing. I haven't posted a video myself, but constructive feedback should always be welcome. I understand the effort needed behind every video and how difficult is to balance day job and family nowadays. Cheers
@@lastnamename No worries and totally agree. I would simply add/amend to constructive reasonable feedback, lol. So, for instance there is a balance between volume and quality. I try to cover a lot of subjects, and I'll never have the quality of say a Mr. Beast video, as I don't have anywhere near that budget. That being said, I love constuctive feedback as it helps me improve, make videos the audience wants, or alert me to things (mono audio) that may be off in my settings or something. So, it's all good. To your Q: IMO, I perceive both lenses to be of roughly equal quality and I actually preferred the wide for a bit. However, the wide has more distortion at the edges or upon movement, like all wide-angle lenses. Bottom line for me, I use the regular lens (made default for a reason, I assume), BUT the WA lens is awesome when you need it for like tight shots, landscape shots, real estate, auto, etc. That's why it's so amazing to be able to change fast. Love them both! Thanks for your comment and clarification. Cheers!
