Тёмный

DJI O3 vs Avatar V2 vs Caddx Vista Range and Penetration Testing 

Chris Rosser
Подписаться 35 тыс.
Просмотров 19 тыс.
50% 1

Support more content like this:
/ chris_rosser
www.buymeacoffee.com/chrisrosser
Learn more about AOS frames? www.aos-rc.com/
Looking for FPV product recommendations? www.aos-rc.com/recommended-parts
Lab test results: www.aos-rc.com/aos-labs
Timestamps:
0:00 Intro
1:07 Bench Setup
2:57 Digital RF Power measurement is HARD!
5:40 RF power measurements (TBC!)
6:38 Test Method for Range and Penetration
7:42 Avatar V2
10:31 DJI O3
12:31 Caddx Vista
13:54 Conclusions

Наука

Опубликовано:

 

27 май 2024

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 166   
@JoshuaBardwell
@JoshuaBardwell Год назад
I'm skeptical of the Walksnail reported latency numbers. It's not plausible to me that the actual latency is as consistent as they report.
@jfrowiess
@jfrowiess Год назад
+1
@thomasluesink
@thomasluesink Год назад
I was going to comment the exact same. I'm also wondering if the log frequency of the Avatar system is as high as the O3 or Vista. Maybe the Avatar system takes an average of the actual values to prevent values hopping all over the place. Technically you could confirm this by measuring the latency as y'all did before, instead of using the logs of the systems itself. Anyway, cool to see some testing like this. Edit: probably not even an average.
@MrAlekoy
@MrAlekoy Год назад
Was about to comment the same thing. they probably average it over a longer period, or round to a close value, same can be true for the bitrate
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
WS reported link latency I've measured to be consistently 2ms less than their glass to glass. That difference may be due to some part of the pipeline that they don't include but I don't see any reason to disbelieve the numbers.
@jfrowiess
@jfrowiess Год назад
The subtitles from DVR used to show different numbers than the actual OSD. Is that still a thing? I lost trust after that
@spacecentraleurope9826
@spacecentraleurope9826 Год назад
There is one piece of information missing here: The DJI system calculates the distance to air unit by measuring the signal propagation time and reacts in some way to that. (By the way, that is how the Goggles V2 does know when to cut the video output at 13.3km). We don't know yet if the system scales its output power with measured distance. This has to be measured in the open, since you cannot easily simulate signal propagation time in a lab.
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
This is true. Given that in built environments the link can drop even at very close range I don't think DJI would limit power based on distance. I think if the signal is weak they would try to increase power. Otherwise you could fly behind a wall and lose video for no reason just becasue you were close to yourself.
@jaykrishna4417
@jaykrishna4417 Год назад
@@ChrisRosser I think the real way to test O3 power would be to connect your variable attenuation at one antenna and connect the Power Meter at the other antenna out...while increase in attenuation may simulate distance, hence increase in power shown in power meter...Also try this in your New RMS power meter..
@Fly_High_FPV
@Fly_High_FPV Год назад
Can confirm in real life that 03 has more penetration in concrete than any other video system (vs analog, hdzero, og dji, and walksnail)
@DroneMee
@DroneMee Год назад
Yup and in my experience the v2 with crystals on have better penetration than the g2s stock. That's running the stock O3 antenna too.
@lunaticfpv17
@lunaticfpv17 Год назад
this man and his concrete obsession 😂
@Fly_High_FPV
@Fly_High_FPV Год назад
​@@lunaticfpv17 💪
@ugpfpv361
@ugpfpv361 Год назад
Yep that's kind of what I would expect at the price.
@TheTomJon
@TheTomJon Год назад
Lies! I know a certain bench tester who madly disagrees! ;)
@fefernan87
@fefernan87 Год назад
Awesome work! With this first round, HDZero could very well jump in! Great content as usual!!!
@ugpfpv361
@ugpfpv361 Год назад
Just started watching, but just wanted to say THANK YOU! Finally someone who does a proper test.
@Quad_Father
@Quad_Father Год назад
One thing I notice with walksnail is that it seems to perform best at 700mw on 25mbps. Would be interesting to see a bench test with those settings.
@ChrisHarmon1
@ChrisHarmon1 Год назад
Yeah it almost seems like the processor doesn't quite have the performance to run full 50 megabits without hanging in the code. One of the weird things about walksnail and dji that I have noticed is even though it says 100+ fps it feels closer to 30. Makes me wonder how many of the "frames" are really just the same data.
@SebastienChedalBornu
@SebastienChedalBornu Год назад
Yes I agree personally I fly at 700mw 25 Mbits because I feel it loose signal more closer if I ever set to 1200mw or 50mbits. But anyway the test is really interesting
@ChristopherF_1971
@ChristopherF_1971 Год назад
I’m finding this out as well. 25mbs seems to outperform 50mbs on 700w and 1000w. I never run 1200w on WS since I found it drops out way faster on upper levels
@FordTom
@FordTom Год назад
I don't think that's the best way to word it, at least from my testing. I would say that 700mw 25mbps performs just as well as 50mbps or 1200mw, not better and not worse. If that is the case, then these tests are basically the same across the board. I think for 1200mw the increased RF power makes up for the worse quality of signal, and it sort of evens itself out
@SebastienChedalBornu
@SebastienChedalBornu Год назад
@@FordTom I disagree with you. Maybe it's better with latest firmware but at the beginning of the year, tests where unanimous: 1200mw seem to get a little bit better nitrate at short mid range but then it drops dramatically compared to 700mw. Just like if you over boost the rf power but get a bunch of noise with it. And about the 50mbits caddix is struggling since the beginning with the same pattern: very clean until the signal degrades a little and then the bitrate and latency get very bad really sooner.
@022fpv
@022fpv 16 дней назад
Thank you from Brazil! Great content.
@wearemany73
@wearemany73 Год назад
Nice video Mr Rosser. 🇬🇧You sound normal again after that nasty cold, (Prob flu 🤒) good that you’re back. 👍😎
@Rcschim
@Rcschim Год назад
Great testing! I've done something similar but with vista and antennas. Attenuation in my case by distance ;) Cool to see in such a controlled test how the o3 is more consistent in the extremes, which correlates to a lot of real world flying in the wood tests. Greets, Mario
@andrewbt87
@andrewbt87 Год назад
The problem is that this is the reported latencies, and we know that WS is not reporting the true latency...but O3 looks to keep the link with a lot more range and low latency at the limit not spiking, we should also check how the image looks like when the bitrate drops that would be more useful because on the same bitrate O3 will have a much better looking image
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
WS reported link latency I've measured to be consistently 2ms less than their glass to glass. That differencemay be due to some part of the pipeline that they don't include but I don't see any reason to disbelieve the numbers.
@pasha1999ful
@pasha1999ful Год назад
long awaited, thanks)
@sarahdaviscc
@sarahdaviscc Год назад
This is great and sheds a lot of light on the two major variable latency digital video systems. I too would love to see a comparison between the Avatar power and latency modes to see why it seems to counter intuitively so better on lower power.
@JoelRehra
@JoelRehra Год назад
Hmm, the fact that the Power output of the O3 seems to be the same in CE and FCC strongly suggests that there is some flaw in the Test setup... But interesting nevertheless... Will be interesting to see the true rms power in the two modes :)
@definingslawek4731
@definingslawek4731 Год назад
Isn't it meant to be 25mw in ce?
@auckwads8169
@auckwads8169 Год назад
Pretty sure it is 25mw . Ham file still on goggles ?
@enjoy_and_fly
@enjoy_and_fly Год назад
fly with CE mode and then with HAM File. and you will see much more range with HAM file. so obviously much more outputpower. must be something wrong with the testsetup i think.
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
We'll see when my TruRMS power meter arrives!
@enjoy_and_fly
@enjoy_and_fly Год назад
can you measure the two antenna outputs simultaneously? would be interersting to know if the two antennas transmit simultaneously or alternately.
@wisdomfpv1499
@wisdomfpv1499 Год назад
walksnail consistency OP! great stuff. i had a feeling it was good.
@flyinryanfpv
@flyinryanfpv Год назад
I look forward to the next video on this! From my findings, the V2 Avatar system has less range then the V1. Also, for some reason the V2 wants to be powered by 6S or the voltage OSD will be red like it's warning you that it's to low of voltage, and I believe it's affecting the range just slightly, not by much but some. The V1 system has the best range, as I have tried several different antenna setups and configurations and the V1 was the best everytime. Cheers 🍻
@ugpfpv361
@ugpfpv361 Год назад
Yeah this is what I was afraid of, they probably did that developer hack to lower the power for more consistency, should see if you can raise it.
@painy6588
@painy6588 Год назад
Really cool testing! I do wonder tho, how accurate the walksnail delay readings are. Werent does numbers self reported by the system quite fake and higher in reality?
@GinTonicFPV
@GinTonicFPV Год назад
Hi Chris, is it possible that the higher framerate fluctuation for the DJI units is due to that system using a smaller time window to calculate the framerate compared to Walksnail? Curious to also see you do some testing using 700mv on Walksnail.
@flightlab3949
@flightlab3949 Год назад
Great work! Still thinking about a digital system to go on with. DJI and Walksnail both have pros and cons. Hard choice which costs a lot.
@fbrou3115
@fbrou3115 Год назад
Respect for your work and time you tale to choose the good process. I don't know what is your job but i think your company has Lucky.
@ChristopherF_1971
@ChristopherF_1971 Год назад
Well done!!!!
@MrStevegibb
@MrStevegibb Год назад
I wonder if the latency reporting by dji and walksnail are directly comparable as one could be using some sort of averaging algorithm to make the latency seem more stable than it is. I guess the only caveat to this is that you are reliant of the two systems reporting of latency and bitrate being accurate and/or truthful.
@marcino.3361
@marcino.3361 Год назад
Good testing. I'd also add information about sw verions that was used in tests. WS users report performance degradation for 33.39.10
@FordTom
@FordTom Год назад
Very interesting, having flown walksnail I think I prefer the delay values for the O3, the occasional spikes to hundreds of ms are far more annoying than consistently going between 30-50 imo. One other factor that determines range/pen in a practical sense is the method of breakup for each of the systems; Walksnail when I fly in bandos starts horizontally smearing a lot which makes me less confident flying at lower bitrate walksnail than I would be with the O3 breakup, which is fuzzy round the edges and holds the centre image very well.
@ugpfpv361
@ugpfpv361 Год назад
But when the big spike happens you probably videos probably bad anyway, but like everyone's saying we don't know how accurate the reported delay is anyway
@kandredfpv
@kandredfpv Год назад
@FordTom, you can always enable focus mode in WS to limit breakup to the left and right edges of the image.
@FordTom
@FordTom Год назад
@@kandredfpv in my testing focus mode made it slightly more robust but when breakup inevitably occured it was still smearing across the whole screen
@kelsey7k
@kelsey7k Год назад
great data
@stevegulick7656
@stevegulick7656 Год назад
Thanks, very interesting! Could you please provide links to the variable attenuator and power meter you used? Thank you!
@TheTomJon
@TheTomJon Год назад
Great to see this done with math and science Chris! I'm a trained artist and only a "self taught scientist" so my method for this test was fly the same forested trail with the various systems multiple times each system. My results def mirrored this (for O3 and Vista, have no Walksnail) except you reported minimal latency for O3 before cut but I've always experienced dramatic latency ~100-200ms and massive FPS drops before video-cut. I've always preferred testing by phenomenology instead of measurements when it comes to consumer products which is why I went the route I did in my testing -- I had developed a method of using faraday cages of various strengths to place over the quads but scrapped it for sake of "I want to get out and fly and feel the differences and react accordingly." p.s. this isn't a bash, 2 sides to a coin and all, loved this video and methodology. Thanks for doing what you do!
@OranJuno
@OranJuno 9 дней назад
Do you feel that O3 has better penetration than CADDX Vista in your experience?
@TheTomJon
@TheTomJon 8 дней назад
@@OranJuno yes
@AykutArgun
@AykutArgun 3 месяца назад
Very interesting as always! I would be curious to know if switching to 8 channel 25mbps mode changes the behaviour of the penetration for the DJI system. What is your guess on that?
@MountaineerFPV
@MountaineerFPV Год назад
Thanks Chris! Science! Fook It 👍👍👊😎👊
@BBFPV
@BBFPV Год назад
I have had delays of more than 120ms with the AU, V2 and stock antennas at distances over 5km which also took a long time to come down again.
@wakingdreamfpv
@wakingdreamfpv Год назад
Thanks
@prki1024
@prki1024 Год назад
Hi, great research! Could you also look into output power on different channels? We know HDZero is strongest on R1, I wonder what channel should I use for my Walksnail flights.
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
Will do once I build my fancy trurms power meter!
@SpringHaIo
@SpringHaIo Год назад
Did you use the same antennas for the walksnail and DJI goggles? In the video it looks like you have DJI antennas on the WS goggles, so I'm assuming you use the same for both, but I didn't see it explicitly mentioned. Can't wait to see the data for the WS V1 diversity module to see if I'm missing out for my longrange planes. I'd also suggest you scale the graphs equally and possibly make a simplified trend graph that overlays them so you can more easily make comparisons. Cheers!
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
Yes same antennas all around and thanks for the suggestions!
@JanPeterSimonsen
@JanPeterSimonsen Год назад
When you say consisten latency - you are actually saying it reports a consistent latency.. are we sure that this is acurate? - Same goes for the bitrate...
@sten6537
@sten6537 Год назад
Would you say that Walksnail has bettere signal penetration then analoge or HDzero?
@FelipeCristancho
@FelipeCristancho 10 месяцев назад
Could be possible combine the 2 power outputs of the old air unit into a single antenna? To get more power without the phase problems Thanks 🤗
@MactacFPV
@MactacFPV Год назад
I think that the other important part of the story is that the o3 bitrate and the vista bitrate cannot be directly compared because they use different compression schemes. If the objective is to know if one has "better video" that the other with various penetration tests, it would be interesting to see how much the compression scheme affects the end result - what we see in the goggles. What I have found in my testing is that the o3 has better video farther out that the vista when I do long range flights. This can be dangerous a bit because the o3 will SEEM to fail faster because it can "hang on" to a better image for longer than the vista because it can cobble together a better image at a lower bitrate.... until it can't.
@ChrisHarmon1
@ChrisHarmon1 Год назад
What happened to not relying on walksnail to accurately display the delay? Was this fixed on v2 vtx or with a firmware update I didn't hear about?
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
I've tested the latency on WS and can confirm that the reported link latency is consistently 2ms less than the glass to glass.
@MCsCreations
@MCsCreations Год назад
Fantastic testing, Chris! Thanks a bunch for all the info! 😃 Stay safe there with your family! 🖖😊
@henrikhavelindberg3268
@henrikhavelindberg3268 Год назад
Did you use the stock Walksnail antennas, or good antennas like TrueRC or Lumenier? It is commonly known that the stock Walksnail antennas are absolute garbage. So I'm very interested in hearing if the stock ones were swapped for proper antennas in this test.
@jangtime2098
@jangtime2098 Год назад
Thank you for your scientific testing! Its what i was hoping for to find out which digital system to get. Would also be interesting to see HDzero in the mix :). Anyway questiointime: Is it just me or does the walksnail latency seem just a bit tooo consistent? To be clear, i haven't flown any digital system yet, but from a technical point it just seems a bit too good to be true? Has anyone tested, if the reported latency is accurate on walksnail when obstructions/obstacles occur? Probably tough to setup, but if your running this at home two ethernet connected microcontroller of some sort might do the trick of providing physical refference fixed latency connection?
@artifixprime
@artifixprime Год назад
Would it be possible to see a few seconds of video from each time the attenuation is increased? Just curious to see what the "real world" experience is - although you may need a moving image to get a better feel for things. If you have a chance to include HDZero in any future testing it would be interesting as its response to a weak signal may be more visual than the other systems.
@DriftaholiC
@DriftaholiC Год назад
Can't you do ham file on 03 to get more power? Also would be cool to see your latency test at different attenuations and compare that to the goggle readout.
@DroneMee
@DroneMee Год назад
He said he couldn't see a difference.
@KwongKan
@KwongKan Год назад
Good info - just want to add that O3 eats up soooooo much bandwidth that it kinda "obliged" to deliver superior performance.
@k4x4map46
@k4x4map46 Год назад
nice!!
@chrisbee5481
@chrisbee5481 Год назад
Thanks Chris. Some time ago in a video you said you would test 3.5" props. Is that still planned? I'd love that. Maybe add some 4" props too.😊
@daniel_s1337
@daniel_s1337 Год назад
Would love to see the 3.5 inch prop test, just ordered my aos 3.5. Maybe testing different prop/ battery setups for "long range", silent, acro and cinematic...
@chrisbee5481
@chrisbee5481 Год назад
​@@daniel_s1337 I'm waiting for the aos 4 evo to be in stock at vendors
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
Yep just ordered a bunch for testing next month
@daniel_s1337
@daniel_s1337 Год назад
@@ChrisRosser 👍
@muchthump
@muchthump 11 месяцев назад
What ring light are you using over your bench there and what camera?
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser 11 месяцев назад
LS08 desk stand and Just a cheap amazon 12" ring light
@eliokreier522
@eliokreier522 Год назад
Nice technical analysis as always 👌 What Goggles did you use for the O3 air unit? Goggles 2 oder V2? Also did you use the same antennas on all VTXs and Goggles?
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
Goggles V2 and yes all the same antennas on both sides.
@eliokreier522
@eliokreier522 Год назад
@@ChrisRosser would be interesting to see what's the difference between the Goggles 2 and V2 is. Because to me the vista did better then the O3.
@TechnicallyTom
@TechnicallyTom Год назад
I think not using the second antenna would have a negatively be effect on the results. You are trusting that the numbers in the OSD are correct but the software might be rounding the displayed value which would explain why the value is more consistent. I’ve heard others say they thought the numbers on the Walksnail system were a bit higher that the quality would indicate for latency at least.
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
I'll do a follow up with both antennas actively attentuated and accurate RMS power measurements. This is very much the first batch of testing.
@christhorney
@christhorney Год назад
would i be right in thinking that when the latency is varying, that means the footage your seeing would be slightly speeding up and slowing down compared to real time?
@ugpfpv361
@ugpfpv361 Год назад
Latency= delay so yes the frame would be delayed, then probably dropping frames when delay drops.
@mlentsch
@mlentsch 9 месяцев назад
Walksnail has a new firmware coming... apparently they've made some improvements to the radio link.
@alexorlovecky6662
@alexorlovecky6662 Год назад
Thank you! What I want to know it's about antennas on O3 unit, because original antenna have left and right polarization. But for now, I don't see that somebody do experiment with different polarization on goggles. I tried to install one left and one right antenna on goggles, but it's looks no different. Also, on air unit antenna for 5.8 and 2.4. Maybe if to install antenna for just 5.8 and both with same polarization...
@cobrafpv77
@cobrafpv77 Год назад
Need test with the Vista on firmware 1.0.0. Which works with DJI Googles 2.
@zerotasteguy
@zerotasteguy Год назад
is there a reason you didnt test the hdzero system?
@alexmccumber2799
@alexmccumber2799 Год назад
Is this method Wez Varty approved? nice work here
@VictorPadillaG
@VictorPadillaG 6 месяцев назад
The fade to black transitions are a little bit distracting, its make me think that my cellphone is about to lock. Any way thanks for all the hard work.
@bitterrootfpv2207
@bitterrootfpv2207 Год назад
I have all hd systems excluding the 03 and goggles 2. I have found my walksnail experience to be the overall best if i was to choose only one. The 1s option is so good on my babytooth. The others just can't compete with that. The goggles are pretty nice as well. I think Hdzero is just too different from the others compare.
@Stefan_73
@Stefan_73 Год назад
The latency is probably based in what these systems log. Can we trust these logged values?
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
Yes, I've extensively tested latency and found consistent agreement with glass-to-glass and reported link latency. In general DJI is spot on and WS Avatar link latency is consistently 2ms less than g2g.
@geehe
@geehe Год назад
You shouldn't rely on the goggles data for latency, we don't know if it can be trusted.
@baptiste_nonat
@baptiste_nonat Год назад
What to look for then ?
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
WS reported link latency I've measured to be consistently 2ms less than their glass to glass. That difference may be due to some part of the pipeline that they don't include but I don't see any reason to disbelieve the numbers.
@floooowsn
@floooowsn Год назад
But.. So all the measurements on the O3 were done with only a single antenna connected??? Could you maybe clarify? I think this can then not really be an accurate test.
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
All measurements were done with 1 antenna or all systems and I plan to do more testing with both antennas active in the future.
@mfrfpv9079
@mfrfpv9079 Год назад
How to fix the dji goggles 2 fit and focus ?
@disco.volante
@disco.volante Год назад
For my quite narrow face with big nose I got it fixed with the iflight foam (the thin soft one) and some velcro wedges from the hdo2 foam set that I cut in shape and put in on the sides.
@mfrfpv9079
@mfrfpv9079 Год назад
@@disco.volante got a video?
@dannehnyu2369
@dannehnyu2369 11 месяцев назад
Whens the new test coming! 😂
@chibikaiju922
@chibikaiju922 Год назад
A chain is only as strong as its weakest link...I'm not sure I'd trust the caddx reported latency and bitrate numbers and kinda hurts the analysis of these systems as many have reported WS numbers to be inaccurate. The WS curves looked very strange to me, how does it 'lock' in at steady bitrates and latency over the signal attenuation? Seems as signal attenuation increases, bit rate should have a continuous negative response and latency positve. Am i not understanding the data or is my dji bias raging again?
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
I've tested the WS latency numbers and found them to be consistently 2ms less than the glass-to-glass so I trust them. In terms of bitrate I don't see why that wouldn't be accurate as the link certainly knows it's own bitrate. As for locking at certain bitrates I think it makes sense if you only have a few modes set up for your encoder and you switch between them. Continuously varying the bitrate is much harder.
@sRoGoRs
@sRoGoRs Год назад
Why do you always ignore HDZero?
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
You can't do this test with HDZero because it doesn't report bitrate. Also range and penetration is not really what HDZero is about.
@botchitong
@botchitong Год назад
im no expert but O3 ce (25mW) and fcc (2W) modes are both seen to have the same output power ... i was expecting ce mode be almost invisible...
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
O3 outputs a lot more than 25mW in CE mode. Not sure how it complies with regulations but it outputs 100s of mW and as far as I can tell the same power in FCC and CE modes.
@botchitong
@botchitong Год назад
@@ChrisRosser yes i've always thought that ce mode limit is 25mW for 5.8Ghz and 100mW for 2.4Ghz. hence the reduced range in DJI drones. otherwise, there'd be no need go 'hack' the drone for maximum transmission output for drones in CE regions, except to bypass geofencing, like dronehacks...
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
@@botchitong The 25mW limit is only for devices that do not monitor and react to other signals.Dynamic frequency selection (DFS) 5GHz transmitters can go up to 1W in the EU they have to actively check their channel for weather radar and yield to it if present. I would bet this is what auto mode does. Check the channel and hop if needed to avoid other signals. metis.fi/en/2018/02/5ghz-channels/#:~:text=In%20Europe%20(or%20in%20ETSI,attenuation%20due%20to%20higher%20frequency.
@botchitong
@botchitong Год назад
@@ChrisRosser thanks that's good to know.. so if im understanding correctly, as long as there are vacant channels to hop, ce mode can output max power... if all channels are busy, than it stays 25mW... meanwhile fcc mean goes idgaf even if all channels are occupied... so the ham file hack adds more channels to allow ce mode opportunities to hop and stay in max power... 👍👍
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
@@botchitong I don't know what the behaviour of the system is if it detects weather radar. I would guess it moves to another channel (maybe that's why you only get one in CE mode)
@chrisbee5481
@chrisbee5481 Год назад
I'd have thought you really went out and did some long range and can tell us about what distance you did and where they limited at. That would ba awesome. Dji has a 13km hard limit I saw. Not sure how far you can push walksnail
@DroneMee
@DroneMee Год назад
O3 pushes out to 23km now I believe.
@chrisbee5481
@chrisbee5481 Год назад
@@DroneMee nope. 15km not further I believe. That's what dji claims in FCC mode too
@andrew-729
@andrew-729 Год назад
@@chrisbee5481 I have walksnail. Upped the power to 1.2w. Still not sure which resolution, speed, power, channel combo I should use.
@painy6588
@painy6588 Год назад
​@@chrisbee5481 someone flew the o3 to 23 or 24km.
@chrisbee5481
@chrisbee5481 Год назад
@@andrew-729 R1 for long range is what's proven best frequecy
@MrPashee
@MrPashee Год назад
At last!!! Science not a subjective opinion ;-)
@timrodriguez1
@timrodriguez1 Год назад
🤘🤠
@aphinion
@aphinion Год назад
You did it you did it you did it! I knew you could come up with a way to test those RF-signals more scientifically and rationally. This is a pretty interesting result - I'm impressed about the overall consistent latency now... I remember my caddx vista about 2 years ago was consistently spiking and doing all kinds of crazy stutters and needed seconds to recover. Those links have come a long way since then. I would love to see a bit of an orientation on how much DB certain objects draw and that -60db would mean in reality. I'm also curious how they perform on different output power levels. And... can any object just be described in x dB of attenuation of an RF signal or is there more to it than this?
@disco.volante
@disco.volante Год назад
I still have annoying stutters with my Vistas, even with the Goggles 2.
@marcodecesare5623
@marcodecesare5623 Год назад
You cannot add 50ohm to dji and pretend it output the same between fcc and ce as they work in balanced mode you have to test both antenna.
@eightiesfpv
@eightiesfpv Год назад
Hi Chris, I love your videos and actually haven't missed one in a good 2 years. But with this video, we're getting to a point where the whole topic is just way too theoretical. In my eyes, the only truly representative analysis of range and penetration is a field test. My experience has shown that the Walksnail Avatar system does not come close to the range and penetration of the DJI systems. Please don't get me wrong, I am anything but a DJI fanboy and wish there was a real alternative to DJI in terms of image quality, but so far there isn't.
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
Your field experience and my bench test agree. DJI is ahead by quite a few Mbits/dBm. I'm a firm believer that a highly controlled testing environment is the key to good quality test data. You can't create the key graph of bitrate vs attentuation with a flight test because you can't measure or control the attenuation accurately. With my test setup we can see exactly how far one system is ahead of the other in terms of bitrate/latency at every attenuation from 0dB to link drop.
@TheVeganarchism
@TheVeganarchism Год назад
Could you please verify the data using a real-world environment to confirm that your home setup correlates with what happens in an actual building? If yes then I think more people would accept the results.
@Magneticitist
@Magneticitist Год назад
If only the O3 could penetrate even the slightest bit of darkness
@OranJuno
@OranJuno 9 дней назад
You can modify exposure compensation values and reduce contrast to improve brightness for O3, but yeah not as good as Polar
@f2bcnc74
@f2bcnc74 Год назад
Strange results between O3 and caddxvista ?? In real life the O3 is way better in bitrate, pénétration and range than caddxvista Maybe due to the diversity antenna ? So strange ...
@petersvideofile
@petersvideofile Год назад
Love your videos. Your accent sounds just like another channel I watch "the wood fired oven chef" from sound alone, I would aware you were his son, you appearance even could match. Check him out I love his content, as I do yours :)
@drcobb84
@drcobb84 11 месяцев назад
im actually relieved and dissapointed, Releived there is actual science behind this, However dissapointed as i was hoping for something with better penetration. I have an Avata at the moment and it just seems when i get into any kind of forest im lucky to get 500m, open range line of site range is fine, but the penetration is what seems to be killing me.
@AB-jw5bh
@AB-jw5bh Год назад
What is the point of comparing DJI O3 - 33dBm (2 Watt) vs Caddx /Avatar 30dBm? Like - "Omg! 2 watt is more powerful (more penetration) than 1.2 watt !!!!?" Also, you don't know how the DJI algorithm works - how it "takes in to account" the distance to adjust power output.
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
When it comes to range and penetration it's not just the power output that matters. I ran both systems flat out to get the best penetration possible which is the fairest test (no reason to limit one system to less power arbitrarily). I also didn't see O3 hit 33dBm yet we'll have to wait for the TruRMS power meter to confirm what it actually outputs. Regarding the algorithm, I pushed O3 until the link dropped so I think we can be sure that it ramped up to full power. The air unit had great cooling and knew the quad was armed (which is important). Obstructions can cause the link to drop at close range so I don't think distance is really a factor (epecially given that O3 out perfromed vista and WS avatar).
@davidefelicione
@davidefelicione Год назад
Guys is it just me seeing continuous microlag with walksnail at 720p 50mbs 100fps even when flying in the open field 30 meters away? it's an impossible thing to fly...... Nobody sees them? How is this possible?
@ChrisRosser
@ChrisRosser Год назад
Have you updated your firmware to the latest? I've only seen really poor perfromance on super old firmware.
@henrystanjr
@henrystanjr 7 месяцев назад
I think dji hardware is more faster than walksnail.. faster memory faster processor for dji ...
@Proempireking
@Proempireking Год назад
Walksnail V1 has better range than v2.
@jankucera8505
@jankucera8505 Год назад
DJI fanboys in disbelief
@GrauFPV
@GrauFPV Год назад
Don’t even gotta watch the video to know walksnail is the third wheel in the digital market. Dji knockoff
Далее
3 - 3.5 inch Open Prop Testing: Let's find the BEST!
15:43
This is so cool 😲
00:31
Просмотров 9 млн
Редакция. News: 118-я неделя
47:33
Просмотров 1,9 млн
DJI O3 CE vs FCC vs Ham Hack- Is There A Difference ?
23:34
DJI O3 FPV Antennas - Everything You Need To Know
15:01
The MOST EFFICIENT 2207 motor: Mepsking Space Motors
9:21
Эволюция телефонов!
0:30
Просмотров 6 млн