Are You from Hungary? Hungary - The Huns! Kazakhs have Madyar and Qypshaq tribes associated with Hungarians. 12,1 % of my DNA was passed from You! Thank You Hungary !
@xAndr3w_01 Okay i apologize you. But you know, we Hungarians are don't really have a "family" like you Italians. You have Spanish people, French people and so on. While our conqueror population seems to be of Turkic origin (Both us and Turkic peoples saying that we are descendants of the Huns), and the Turkic peoples of these countries identify us as distant brothers and very far relatives, respect and love us. Although our genetics totally changed by now, but the far east spirit are still living in few of us. :) We can't hide where are we came from.
@@GergoMarosvari your conqueror population was obviously uralic. Your language was and still is uralic. Now anything afterwards be it huns or avars was not limited to hungary but swept over most of europe. It is possible to draw a very weak genomic link between Khanty (Ugric group in west Siberia) and Hungarians based on hungarian trace mongoloid adnixture. But these are only traces But your genomic family are largely the surronoding nations. Slovakia, Croatia, so on. Dont be fooled by Aziz Yigido and similar turkish nationalists who go around claiming all of Europe, All of Asia and all of the Americas. You have nothing to do w Turks. Central asian turks share common ancestry (volga ural admixture) w Uralic volga ural folk and hence my heritage's "central asian" stands for more than just one thing. edit; typooo
Guys, i absolutely don't care how our genetics changed during the history, i am Hungarian. Every single nationality is of course show close genetic to their othet neighbours, and so? There are not to many pure European people... I am a human, i am who i am, and i am HUNGARIAN. Love and peace to all of you.
@у казаха истории нету Kipchaks are Xueyantuo they had their own khanate, once they were crushed they renamed themselves into Kipchaks, wtf are you saying dog, they had always looked asian
most of the kazakhs don't look mixed, in my eyes most of them look like another chinese, central asians who clearly look mixed are uzbek, turkmen and uighurs
1. The ethnic name of "Naiman" did not appear until the time of 1100 in the records of in modern day Mongolia. The forefather of this tribe was recorded in Korean sources as having built the Jeong-an dynasty in north Korea and modern day Manchuria in the 950's. He was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom (698~926 AD). His name was Nai Man Kha (midiaeval Korean, and Yeol manhwa in modern Korean) which became the name sake of "Naiman Khan". 2. This dynasty was succeed by a King with Oh (Crow) clan name who was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom and became the forefather of the Kereits (Crow clan) in Kazakhstan and Mongolia. This dynasty was invaded by the Kidans in 1010 and the people moved westward from Korea and Manchuria to the then-time Zubu (Mongolia) and became the Naimans and Kereits. 3. They were conquered by Molgol (mediaeval Korean for Mongol) of Chinghiz Khan and were absorbed by the Molgols. This is the reason why Naimans have about 45% Central Asian (Siberiano-Turkic) DNA and 24% East Asian (Mongolo-Korean) DNA. The naiman kings used use Korean royal titles and Korean Kings name such as Tayanggu (meaning King Taeyang of Korea), Kuchugud clan (Kochuga clan in Korea), Tigin (Ting-an in mediaeval Korean) clan. 4. Naiman has nothing to do with 'Naiman (8 in Mongol)' or "Sekkiz (8 in Turkic) Oguz", but comes from a person (forefather)' s name Naimankha of Korean royal family of Ting-An Dynasy. 5. The Kazakh Naiman scholars also recognize that the early Naimans came from Manchuria.
У нас очень похожий результат. Я киргизка, но у меня тоже центральная Азия вышла, Монголия, эскимо, Шотландия, еврейка, амазонка, восточная Европа, финляндия
I suppose in Balkans a lot of turkic genes from cumans, pechenegs, bolghars, avars. Maybe this is the reason of common genes with Balkans among kazakhs
1. The ethnic name of "Naiman" did not appear until the time of 1100 in the records of in modern day Mongolia. The forefather of this tribe was recorded in Korean sources as having built the Jeong-an dynasty in north Korea and modern day Manchuria in the 950's. He was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom (698~926 AD). His name was Nai Man Kha (midiaeval Korean, and Yeol manhwa in modern Korean) which became the name sake of "Naiman Khan". 2. This dynasty was succeed by a King with Oh (Crow) clan name who was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom and became the forefather of the Kereits (Crow clan) in Kazakhstan and Mongolia. This dynasty was invaded by the Kidans in 1010 and the people moved westward from Korea and Manchuria to the then-time Zubu (Mongolia) and became the Naimans and Kereits. 3. They were conquered by Molgol (mediaeval Korean for Mongol) of Chinghiz Khan and were absorbed by the Molgols. This is the reason why Naimans have about 45% Central Asian (Siberiano-Turkic) DNA and 24% East Asian (Mongolo-Korean) DNA. The naiman kings used use Korean royal titles and Korean Kings name such as Tayanggu (meaning King Taeyang of Korea), Kuchugud clan (Kochuga clan in Korea), Tigin (Ting-an in mediaeval Korean) clan. 4. Naiman has nothing to do with 'Naiman (8 in Mongol)' or "Sekkiz (8 in Turkic) Oguz", but comes from a person (forefather)' s name Naimankha of Korean royal family of Ting-An Dynasy. 5. The Kazakh Naiman scholars also recognize that the early Naimans came from Manchuria.
@@전원철박사Thanks. I’m Kazakh Naiman, all I know is that Naiman lived in Mongolia mountains near Kazakhstan before the Chinghiz Khan conquest and after being conquered by him, they entered Central Asia together.
Irish and Welsh and Scottish have some Scythian DNA (Sak), so that’s why there could be similarities. Some Saks migrated to Europe and then to British Isles, and today only Celtic people in Europe have some Scythian DNA.
Celts have yamnayan DNA (indo european ) who come from steppe of Ukraine. If you are R1A or R1B your male ancestors were horseback riders from the Ukraine steppe. Most of irish are R1B by paternal lineage which mean their paternal homeland is in way Russia :D.
kazak ve Kırgız tam bir Türk 😅😅😅 Özbekler karışık irani vb karışımları var lakin kazakları Türk Moğol dna si var tam bir Türk'te olması gereken gibi 🐺🐺🐺🐺💯💯💯
“Previous genetic studies have generally used Turks as representatives of ancient Anatolians. Our results show that Turks are genetically shifted towards Central Asians, a pattern consistent with a history of mixture with populations from this region. These diversity patterns observed in the PCA motivated formal testing of admixture in Armenians and other regional populations.” www.biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2015/02/18/015396.full.pdf “In addition, although some degree of genetic continuity could be expected in Anatolia (i.e. in modern Turks), it should be noted that modern Turks are a hybrid population, comprising of the original Anatolian stock, Turkic people (i.e. of Central Asian ancestry). This is surely reflected in the modern Turkish Y-DNA” doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0179474 The weight for the migration event predicted to originate from the branch ancestral to East Asia into current-day Turkey was 0.217 (21.7%). Although this implies a major population event from the East to West Asia, we note that these weights are not direct estimates of the migration rates. First, the original contributing populations to the ancestral population in Turkey are not known. For instance, we do not know the exact genetic relationship between current-day East Asian populations and the Turkic speakers from Central Asia who migrated into Anatolia about 1,000 years before present. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4236450/ (Note:%21.7 doesn’t mean %21.7 Turk because first Turks were %40-45 east eurasian not %100 so it means %50 Turk by blood) abload.de/img/untitled-1b3k6r.png media.discordapp.net/attachments/747058885797347388/747081098621616188/74270248_151753982884837_667409747107905536_n.png media.discordapp.net/attachments/746376025944096778/784377847082647582/unknown.png DNA from a 2,000-year-old burial site in Mongolia has revealed new information about the Xiongnu, a nomadic tribe that once reigned in Central Asia. Researchers in France studied DNA from more than 62 skeletons to reconstruct the history and social organization of a long-forgotten culture. Skeletons from the most recent graves also contained DNA sequences similar to those in people from present-day Turkey. This supports other studies indicating that Turkish tribes originated at least in part in Mongolia at the end of the Xiongnu period. www.genomenewsnetwork.org/articles/07_03/ancient.shtml The people of modern-day Iran and Turkey trace their genetic heritage to the ancient Persians and the Turkic ethnic people, respectively. www.myheritage.com.tr/ethnicities/broadly-west-asian/ethnicity-worldwide-distribution Historically, the racial classification of the Turkic peoples was sometimes given as "Turanid". Turanid racial type or "minor race", subtype of the Europid (Caucasian) race with Mongoloid admixtures, situated at the boundary of the distribution of the Mongoloid and Europid "great races".[53][54] en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Caucasian_race upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/f/f8/G25_PCA_East_Mediterranean.png_-_Anatolia_and_the_surrounding.png Some malevolent people or people who do not know enough about the subject try to exaggerate the rate of Turks and Armenians in Anatolia. For example, it is possible to encounter people who claim that approximately 50% of Anatolian Turks are of Greek or Armenian origin. However, when the Ottoman Tahrir registers belonging to the years 1520-1530 are examined, it is concretely revealed that even 93% of the Anatolian people belonged to Turkmen tribes and communities. The non-Muslim population ratio of approximately 10% has remained at the same rates in the last periods of the Ottoman Empire. In some parts of Anatolia, with the effect of Islamization, a small number of indigenous people, who were Muslims, were dissolved in the Turks. Moreover relocation and exchange with the separated Greeks and Armenians from Turkey Turkey genetic structure is completely different from the Turks. Although there was a partial change in the demographic structure of eastern Anatolia with the settlement of Kurds in Eastern Anatolia in the 16th century, it was easier for Muslim Turks and Kurds to merge in that region. Since the 19th century, a significant portion of non-Muslim immigration that took place in Turkey Turks (Caucasus and Balkan Turks) reccommended. These also partially affected the existing population and genetic structure. As a result, his "ethnic Turks", "Turkmen" or "nomads" as a defining Turkey Turkey genetically Central Asians (Turkmenistan) seems to be quite close to the Turkmens. Turkey is quite obvious they resemble each other in the middle compared the genetic structure of Turkish and Turkmen. Turks and Turkmens belong to the Oghuzs in the historical process and show similarities with each other, both in terms of language, culture or ethnicity. you maintain genetic and historical research, Turkey shows that the Turkmen origin, in other words, the Turkish Anatolian Turks. www.haplogruplar.com/turkiye-turklerinin-orta-asyali-turkmenlerle-genetik-akrabaligi/
@@mr.redius I would love to learn that language. And yes Kazakh, kergiz and even uyghurs are my brothers. We share same blood and culture. Almost same traditional clothes and our beloved dambora that we play together. Buzkeshy as a tradition of our ancestors who were horse archers.
@@Orgil. I'm myself hazara and I can say you that culturally food clothes and feature are completely different of Mongolia. Saying that we are mongol is a humor who has never been confirmed because of gengis khan however he is turk by mother and Mongolian by father and over 85% were turk that's why I saw hazara who look like uzbek some of them look kazakh turkmen but mongolia is rare.
@xAndr3w_01 Yes, I red your comment. You are right. I searched more about dna ancestry companies and my Heritage is the worst. Despite this, Myheritage is good for build genealogic trees. But i like the songs from my heritage. Mainly the Asian and amerindian songs.
1. The ethnic name of "Naiman" did not appear until the time of 1100 in the records of in modern day Mongolia. The forefather of this tribe was recorded in Korean sources as having built the Jeong-an dynasty in north Korea and modern day Manchuria in the 950's. He was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom (698~926 AD). His name was Nai Man Kha (midiaeval Korean, and Yeol manhwa in modern Korean) which became the name sake of "Naiman Khan". 2. This dynasty was succeed by a King with Oh (Crow) clan name who was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom and became the forefather of the Kereits (Crow clan) in Kazakhstan and Mongolia. This dynasty was invaded by the Kidans in 1010 and the people moved westward from Korea and Manchuria to the then-time Zubu (Mongolia) and became the Naimans and Kereits. 3. They were conquered by Molgol (mediaeval Korean for Mongol) of Chinghiz Khan and were absorbed by the Molgols. This is the reason why Naimans have about 45% Central Asian (Siberiano-Turkic) DNA and 24% East Asian (Mongolo-Korean) DNA. The naiman kings used use Korean royal titles and Korean Kings name such as Tayanggu (meaning King Taeyang of Korea), Kuchugud clan (Kochuga clan in Korea), Tigin (Ting-an in mediaeval Korean) clan. 4. Naiman has nothing to do with 'Naiman (8 in Mongol)' or "Sekkiz (8 in Turkic) Oguz", but comes from a person (forefather)' s name Naimankha of Korean royal family of Ting-An Dynasy. 5. The Kazakh Naiman scholars also recognize that the early Naimans came from Manchuria.
1. The ethnic name of "Naiman" did not appear until the time of 1100 in the records of in modern day Mongolia. The forefather of this tribe was recorded in Korean sources as having built the Jeong-an dynasty in north Korea and modern day Manchuria in the 950's. He was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom (698~926 AD). His name was Nai Man Kha (midiaeval Korean, and Yeol manhwa in modern Korean) which became the name sake of "Naiman Khan". 2. This dynasty was succeed by a King with Oh (Crow) clan name who was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom and became the forefather of the Kereits (Crow clan) in Kazakhstan and Mongolia. This dynasty was invaded by the Kidans in 1010 and the people moved westward from Korea and Manchuria to the then-time Zubu (Mongolia) and became the Naimans and Kereits. 3. They were conquered by Molgol (mediaeval Korean for Mongol) of Chinghiz Khan and were absorbed by the Molgols. This is the reason why Naimans have about 45% Central Asian (Siberiano-Turkic) DNA and 24% East Asian (Mongolo-Korean) DNA. The naiman kings used use Korean royal titles and Korean Kings name such as Tayanggu (meaning King Taeyang of Korea), Kuchugud clan (Kochuga clan in Korea), Tigin (Ting-an in mediaeval Korean) clan. 4. Naiman has nothing to do with 'Naiman (8 in Mongol)' or "Sekkiz (8 in Turkic) Oguz", but comes from a person (forefather)' s name Naimankha of Korean royal family of Ting-An Dynasy. 5. The Kazakh Naiman scholars also recognize that the early Naimans came from Manchuria.
l have a small percentage of Central asian - japanese and korean - inuit. l write this comnent everywhere central asian+ inuit and native American or andean mesoamerican shows a interesting algoritm. İt shows Real siberian connection and it's Real Turkic blood
1. The ethnic name of "Naiman" did not appear until the time of 1100 in the records of in modern day Mongolia. The forefather of this tribe was recorded in Korean sources as having built the Jeong-an dynasty in north Korea and modern day Manchuria in the 950's. He was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom (698~926 AD). His name was Nai Man Kha (midiaeval Korean, and Yeol manhwa in modern Korean) which became the name sake of "Naiman Khan". 2. This dynasty was succeed by a King with Oh (Crow) clan name who was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom and became the forefather of the Kereits (Crow clan) in Kazakhstan and Mongolia. This dynasty was invaded by the Kidans in 1010 and the people moved westward from Korea and Manchuria to the then-time Zubu (Mongolia) and became the Naimans and Kereits. 3. They were conquered by Molgol (mediaeval Korean for Mongol) of Chinghiz Khan and were absorbed by the Molgols. This is the reason why Naimans have about 45% Central Asian (Siberiano-Turkic) DNA and 24% East Asian (Mongolo-Korean) DNA. The naiman kings used use Korean royal titles and Korean Kings name such as Tayanggu (meaning King Taeyang of Korea), Kuchugud clan (Kochuga clan in Korea), Tigin (Ting-an in mediaeval Korean) clan. 4. Naiman has nothing to do with 'Naiman (8 in Mongol)' or "Sekkiz (8 in Turkic) Oguz", but comes from a person (forefather)' s name Naimankha of Korean royal family of Ting-An Dynasy. 5. The Kazakh Naiman scholars also recognize that the early Naimans came from Manchuria.
Neren orijinal Türk? Artık yavaş yavaş Rus oluyorsun. Moğol kanı da var zaten. Göktürk mezarlarındaki DNA örnekleri niye sibiryalı gösteriyor? Gerçek Türk onlar değil mi?
@@akduman4680 Nege sizderdin tilderinizde farsi sozderi kop?Nege turki bolsanizdar kandarinizda grek italyan kurd shugady?Nege Orta Asia jok 15% bolsadA?Nege?
@@akzholaleuhanov2859 😭😢 no you are not 500 years old, You are even oud than Atilla, than chengiz, than altay. You are our brother, our cousins, our FATHER KAZAKHSTAN is all turk MOTHER LAND.
Hello , I'm just curious to know about the original language of your people . Do you still speak the language of your ancestors ? , Just curious to know how similar is your language to the naiman people in inner mongolia province in china.
We speak in Qazaq-Turk language. Mongolian Naiman Qazaqs speak in our language too. Mongolian Naiman-Mongols speak in Mongol language. Turkic and Mongolian languages are not similar. We understand Turkish speech, Crimean Turkic, the languages of Iranian Turks ...... but we do not understand the Mongols!
Kazakhs speak Kazakh language which is very similar to ancient Turkic language, spoken by our ancestors. Mongols in Mongolia and China probably had a lot of Chinese influence on them.
so.. 46% Turk 17% Mongol, earlyturk (Cuz turks come to central asia from mongolia) central asia was settlement by early pie 12% bankan = early slavonic 8% eskimo - idk but pupular inti Yakut people finnic are in some cases related to mongolian and ilnut so rs normal easter europeans (=late slavonic mutation of early) is related with balkan its normal irish = celtic - normadic peeple they come of norg of central asia.
It is very interesting. The biggest paternal line YSNP in Naiman is O2a2b1a2a1b1b2a-L1360，which is subline of F444 of eastern Chinese. But it looks Naiman don't have any east asian mix.
@@hasancan.5756 aynı coğrafyada yetişen kültürleri aynı olan toplumlar bunlar. Günümüzde bile bir orta asya türkü %20 moğol kanı bir moğol %20 türk kanı taşıyor aç bak. Tarihleri yasayislari ve kaderleri itibariyle bu iki millet birbirine kenetlenmiş, avrupalılar moğol imparatorluğu içinde avrupa hunları içinde Turco-Mongol terimini kullanmış. Türkle moğol aynı şey değildir evet ama bi kazakistanlı veya türkmenistanli %55 60 türkse %10 Moğoldur geriside başka karısımlar zaten. Başkurtlar harici butun orta asya türklerinde azda olsa moğol kanı var. Moğollardada baya Türk kanı var
@@ES-dw5lp Kazakistan'daki aşiretleri Moğol olan ve Türk olan var. Kenetlenme adında birşey yoktur. Kereyit ve Kongrat aşiretleri Mogoldur. C-M216 ve C-M217 nolu Haplogrup bu iki kabilede bulunur. Nayman kabilesinde, O-M122 nolu Haplogrup olur ki bu, Çin halkında bulunur. Kazakistan'daki Türkler, Kıpçaklar Babasanlar ve Argunlardır. Mogollar Çin kaynaklarında Mo-hu adında geçer. Türklerin onlarla akranligi yoktur. 627 yılında Moğollar Gök Türkleri bırakıp Çin'e sığınmıştır. Kaderimiz ve kokenimiz bir değildir.
I’m not sure what you mean. First part: Just the normal MyHeritage music. There are 42 ethnicity zones, so there are 42 different tracks. Searching “MyHeritage Music” Second Part: In the description
Bir Kazakta nasıl balkan çıkabilir anlamıyorum. Anadolu Türkünde çıksa tamamda veya Bir Balkan ülkesinde Central Asia çıksa tamam akınlar filan oldu deriz ama tersine nasıl olabilir . Tarihi bir bilgi var mı ?
@@q-monsters6753 Tamam işte hangi milletle etkileşim olduysa oranın geni gelir karışma olur ama balkanlarda Kazaklar nasıl bir etkileşim oldu da bu kadar oran verdi. Türkiye'nin yarısında bile Balkan geni yoktur. Bir Kazakta olması şaşırttı beni
@@Awalanchee autonomic genes. I don’t understand why so much balkans. Russian based have European genes, balkan I think crimean balkan womans. Kazakhs khan ancestors Urus Khan son of Tukai-Timur, 13 son Jochi Khan. Tukai Timur ulus Golden Horde period Crimean, Kuban-su steppe, migration Kazakh steppe 14 century. My theory😂😂😂
@@bartoszszczepaniak169 It does indeed differ depending out of which region the person is from yet im sure for a Southern Russian there would still pop up amount of east Europe along with balkan, dont you think. Similair types of confusing results appear in Albanians too which show them mostly as Greek.
@@aynuralbek6474 no he wouldnt necessarily. first because nalkan is one of the top admixtures in russia and second because baltic/east euro+ greek forms balkan
Central Asia is made up of a mixture of Iranic tribes in Tajikistan South Eastern Turkmenistan and Southern Uzbekistan and Turkified Mongol Tribes of Kazakhstan Krgyzstan & parts of Uzbekistan. The DNA results from many -Stan countries in Central Asia confirms this. Turkic Peoples originally were far different looking than mongols and as a result of Genghis Khan's Empire a lot of Mongols converted their religion and language with those of the lands they occupied. This is why modern day "turkic" nations are mostly Mongol looking mixture. Much like the Hazaras of Afghanistan who share a mixture of Mongol & Iranic DNA but whose language and culture is Persian
@farus killer Gürbesü and the Naimans Gürbesü and the Naimans Having conquered his way steadily through the Alchi Tatars, Kereits, and Uhaz Merkits and acquired at least one wife each time, Temüjin turned to the next threat on the steppe, the Turkic Naimans under the leadership of Tayang Khan (a title from the Chinese taiwang , Great King; his name was Baibuqa 74 ). Broadbridge, A. (2018). Conquered Women. In Women and the Making of the Mongol Empire (Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization, pp. 73-100). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108347990.004 Among the major players on the steppe at the time of Chinggis Khan’s rise were the large, wealthy, and sophisticated Turkic polities of the Naimans and the Kereits, the settled Uighurs in the Tarim river basin and the Taklamakan desert, and the Öng’üts near the border of the Jin Empire in Northern China. Broadbridge, A. (2018). Introduction. In Women and the Making of the Mongol Empire (Cambridge Studies in Islamic Civilization, pp. 1-8). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/9781108347990.001 Chaghan was the fourth - generation head of a leading Naiman Turkic clan that had settled in Shen - ch'iu district on the eastern border of Honan . Twitchett, D., & Loewe, M. (Eds.). (1986). The Cambridge History of China(The Cambridge History of China). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp.20 doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521243278 In 1199 Jenghiz combined forces with Toghrul - Khan to defeat the Naiman Turks ; but it was not long before he grew jealous of the power of the Keraits. Runciman, Steven (1987). A History of the Crusades. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-0-521-34770-9. pp.240 Manichaeism may have disappeared, but Christianity made some headway among such Turkic tribes as the Kereit, Merkit and Öngüt. The fact that it was the Nestorian denomination rather than, say, the Roman Catholic or even Orthodox or Jacobite ones was no accident: there had been a Nestorian bishopric in Merv, and Nestorianism too could spread from there along the special avenue that was the Silk Road network. Soucek, S. (2000). The conquering Mongols. In A History of Inner Asia (pp. 103-116). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511991523.009 But when the Mongols (led by a Nestorian general from the Naiman Turks , and accompanied by forces from Cilician Armenia and Crusader Antioch) entered Damascus “NON-MUSLIM PARTICIPANTS IN ISLAMIC SOCIETY.” Islamic History: A Framework for Inquiry - Revised Edition, by R. STEPHEN HUMPHREYS, Princeton University Press, PRINCETON, NEW JERSEY, 1991, pp. 255-283. But the text about this King David does not describe the accomplishments of the Naiman Turks . Rather, it is the earliest surviving account of the rise of Genghis Khan, who actually conquered the Naiman Turks . Farmer, Sharon. “LOW COUNTRY ASCETICS AND ORIENTAL LUXURY: JACQUES DE VITRY, MARIE OF OIGNIES, AND THE TREASURES OF OIGNIES.” History in the Comic Mode: Medieval Communities and the Matter of Person, edited by Rachel Fulton and Bruce W. Holsinger, Columbia University Press, NEW YORK, 2007, pp. 205-222. Man, John (2013). Genghis Khan: Life, Death, and Resurrection. St. Martin's Publishing Group. pp. 19-20. ISBN 978-1-4668-6156-5. Rossabi, Morris (2012). The Mongols: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press. p. 46. ISBN 978-0-19-993935-0. Mote, Frederick W. (2003). Imperial China 900-1800. Harvard University Press. p. 407. ISBN 978-0-674-01212-7. Ratchnevsky, Paul. "Genghis Khan: His Life and Legacy". 2000, pp.1-4. Roemer, Hans Robert; Scharlipp, Wolfgang-Ekkehard (2000). History of the Turkic Peoples in the Pre-Islamic Period. Klaus Schwarz Verlag. ISBN 3879972834. Czaplicka, Marie Antoinette (2001). The Turks of Central Asia in History and at the Present Day. Adamant Media Corporation. ISBN 978-1402163326. Li Tang (29 May 2009). "Medieval Sources on the Naiman Christians and their Prince Küchlüg Khan". In Dietmar W. Winkler; Li Tang (eds.). Hidden Treasures and Intercultural Encounters. 2. Auflage: Studies on East Syriac Christianity in China and Central Asia. Lit Verlag. ISBN 978-3643500458.
1. The ethnic name of "Naiman" did not appear until the time of 1100 in the records of in modern day Mongolia. The forefather of this tribe was recorded in Korean sources as having built the Jeong-an dynasty in north Korea and modern day Manchuria in the 950's. He was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom (698~926 AD). His name was Nai Man Kha (midiaeval Korean, and Yeol manhwa in modern Korean) which became the name sake of "Naiman Khan". 2. This dynasty was succeed by a King with Oh (Crow) clan name who was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom and became the forefather of the Kereits (Crow clan) in Kazakhstan and Mongolia. This dynasty was invaded by the Kidans in 1010 and the people moved westward from Korea and Manchuria to the then-time Zubu (Mongolia) and became the Naimans and Kereits. 3. They were conquered by Molgol (mediaeval Korean for Mongol) of Chinghiz Khan and were absorbed by the Molgols. This is the reason why Naimans have about 45% Central Asian (Siberiano-Turkic) DNA and 24% East Asian (Mongolo-Korean) DNA. The naiman kings used use Korean royal titles and Korean Kings name such as Tayanggu (meaning King Taeyang of Korea), Kuchugud clan (Kochuga clan in Korea), Tigin (Ting-an in mediaeval Korean) clan. 4. Naiman has nothing to do with 'Naiman (8 in Mongol)' or "Sekkiz (8 in Turkic) Oguz", but comes from a person (forefather)' s name Naimankha of Korean royal family of Ting-An Dynasy. 5. The Kazakh Naiman scholars also recognize that the early Naimans came from Manchuria.
Казахи и монголы это один народ просто у нас после войн мы разошлись и взяли другие веры религий раньше всех верили в тенгриагство а сейчас это Ислам и буддизм пришло и всех нас разьединило
@Cansu Balkan in myheritage lingo is a term that denotes an autosomal admixture between genetic markers characteristic of proto-Balkanic and Slavic populations. It can only appear in someone's genetic makeup if the person has definite Balkan Slavic ancestry. Russian would not generally qualify.
@@cormacmcquillan828 Bulgars never were turkic.Its very funny all about this pan turkic idea..how the truth could be twisted.They were nomads of Sarmathian origin.They never were your coisins...originaly .I`m not to mention volga-bulgars and chuvash who appears to be turkic now.\but if you ever heard about the caucasian mumies in Taklamakan,so...these are our ancestors.The Balkan DNA reveal to be bulgarian one not greek wich is diferent,not an albanian/pelazgian wich is diferent also,not serbian croatian wich as slavic appears as east european.If you want to now more about bulgars , ask some old tadjik.
@@akzholaleuhanov2859 Yes, but before the Turks, the Iranian tribes of Saka, Yuezhi, etc. lived in Central Asia, and later, with the migration of the Turks from Orkhon, they became involved with the Iranian people. Watch these videos ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-OB8eeVd7R_M.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-95H04tqFdUU.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-KrwJKJChT7s.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-aQ283N_ZdKY.html ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-6Z2Qfot3-HM.html
1. The ethnic name of "Naiman" did not appear until the time of 1100 in the records of in modern day Mongolia. The forefather of this tribe was recorded in Korean sources as having built the Jeong-an dynasty in north Korea and modern day Manchuria in the 950's. He was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom (698~926 AD). His name was Nai Man Kha (midiaeval Korean, and Yeol manhwa in modern Korean) which became the name sake of "Naiman Khan". 2. This dynasty was succeed by a King with Oh (Crow) clan name who was a Korean of Balhae (Koryeo)-an Kingdom and became the forefather of the Kereits (Crow clan) in Kazakhstan and Mongolia. This dynasty was invaded by the Kidans in 1010 and the people moved westward from Korea and Manchuria to the then-time Zubu (Mongolia) and became the Naimans and Kereits. 3. They were conquered by Molgol (mediaeval Korean for Mongol) of Chinghiz Khan and were absorbed by the Molgols. This is the reason why Naimans have about 45% Central Asian (Siberiano-Turkic) DNA and 24% East Asian (Mongolo-Korean) DNA. The naiman kings used use Korean royal titles and Korean Kings name such as Tayanggu (meaning King Taeyang of Korea), Kuchugud clan (Kochuga clan in Korea), Tigin (Ting-an in mediaeval Korean) clan. 4. Naiman has nothing to do with 'Naiman (8 in Mongol)' or "Sekkiz (8 in Turkic) Oguz", but comes from a person (forefather)' s name Naimankha of Korean royal family of Ting-An Dynasy. 5. The Kazakh Naiman scholars also recognize that the early Naimans came from Manchuria.
@@Dersimite kırma ne demek düzgün konuş. Sen kırma olduğuna inanabilirsin ama ben inanmıyorum kendini Türk hisseden Türktür. Ayrıca niye helal olsun diyorsun ki biz kendimiz mi seçtik karışmayı? ya da onlar kendileri mi seçti Anadolu'ya gelmeyip Orta Asyada kalmayı. Hayır! Atalarımız seçti. Türk olduğuna inan veya inanma, ama bana göre Türk dillerinden birini konuşup Türk devletlerinin birinin devletindensen ve ailen asırlar boyu kendini Türk bildiyse, Ve %1 bile olsa herhangi bir şekilde Türk kanı taşıyorsan Türksündür. Bu dediklerim olduktan sonra ha yüzde 1 ha yüzde yüz, fark etmez, Türksündür. Bak hiç, %1 bile olsa Türk kanı taşımayanlara bir şey demiyorum onlara Türk diyemem ama onlar kendini Türk hissediyorsa onlara da pek bir sözüm kalmıyor.
@@botanikkis Kazaklar da Türk+Moğol karışımı. Onlarda da gayrıtürk karışım var, ama Doğu Avrasyalı bir halk ile karışmışlar, biz ise Batı Avrasyalı bir halkla karışmışız. O yüzden bizim Doğu Avrasyalı eşkalimiz kaybolurken, onlarınki korunmuş ve hatta artmış. Karıştığımız unsurlar farklı olduğu için böyle, yoksa onlar karışmamış oldukları için değil, onlarda da %40 oranında gayrıtürk bir etki olan Moğol etkisi var, bizde ise Yerli Anadolu etkisi var.
@@fromturkiye8672 evet doğru diyorsunuz. Yine de Moğollar Türklerle akraba milletler olduğu için öyle aman aman bir karışım değil onlarınki fakat yine de evet, karıştılar.
@@fromturkiye8672 Türklerin çağdaş Moğolistan'dan geldiğini ve bu proto adamların karıştığını unutmayın. Yine de birçok kültürel yönü paylaşıyorlar. Dolayısıyla Türklerin Moğol DNA'sına sahip olduğunu görmek normaldir, ancak Anadolu Türkünde yoktur. Gerçekten alakasız insanlarla karışıyorlar, bu yüzden insanlar senden hala nefret ediyor, bunda yanlış bir şey görmüyorum.
@@orton4357 Moğol istilasından önce Altayların batısında yer alan Türk topluluklarının Doğu Avrasya genetik mirası çoğunlukla %50'nin altındaydı. Moğol istilasından sonra Kazakistan'da bu miras %50'nin üzerine çıkmıştır. Bu da Orta Çağ Türklerinin Moğollarla karışmasıyla modern Kazak popülasyonunun ortaya çıktığını ispat ediyor. Moğollar ve Türkler ayrı 2 popülasyondur. Dilleri aynı kökenden gelmiyor. Tamamen farklı 2 dil.
@@orton4357 Turkey is a country like America. Many ethnic people live in Turkey. That is why everyone looks different in Turkey. Real Turk population is around %30 in Turkey. They looks like asian/turanid. I am Tatar and I meet many Tatars in Turkey. According to known data, 500.000 Tatars live in Turkey. That is what i mean. U can't say all Turkish people not Turkic.
@@voidconsumer this is not scientific sources the book is from a Turkish nationalist, everybody can tell a story . A scientific Evidence doesnt work like that. Show me dna results of old turkic bones show me mtdna of the ancient turkic bodies. Show me dna results of 17th century Turkish anatolians and compare with arabs Persians greeks and kurds. You people are not objective you are subjective
@@voidconsumer happlogroups don't identify ethnicity. You can have happlogroupe E and being german... And look German. You are mixed race of Greek European and persian deal with it
@@tonuykok577 Тюрки пришли с Алтая и Монголии. Они всегда были монголоидами. На территории ЦА исконно жили Скифо-сарматы, они имели протоиранские гены. Большая часть из них перекочевала и от них пошли современные персы и близкие им народы по генам. Какая то часть осталась и оставила след в казахских генах. Отсюда и проявляется европеоидность некоторых казахов. У узбеков это сильнее прослеживается. Гугли Нью йоркский музей метрополитен - статуи тюрков сельджуков и посмотри как они выглядели. Кюль тегина посмотри.
@@incognitoincognitov8349 тогда как так случилось, что ген скифов обнаружили у казахов, причем ген скифской женщины 100 % совпал с геном девочки казашки и её матери... Прородители казахов - это скифы, сарматы..., и они населяли земли сов.Монголии, Алтая, ЦА... Поэтому попредержи коней, чокай..., в вас тоже не виден европ.ген... 🤣🤣🤣
They are falsely calling themselves Mongols because they came under the rule of the Mongol Empire and borrowed the name of the Mongolian tribal region. It's like Genghis Khan is Kazakh. Good liars🤣🤣
@@darkness514 Genghis Khan doesn't like you because you are such a bandit and looter, just like he sympathizes with your shameless lying. Pitiful Seljuk and Ottamaan remains🤣🤣
