Тёмный

Do Leaders Make History, Or is it Beyond Their Control? with Fredrik Logevall 

Kinder Institute on Constitutional Democracy
Просмотров 336
50% 1

On March 2, the Kinder Institute, in partnership with Mizzou’s Novak Leadership Institute, hosted Fredrik Logevall, Laurence D. Belfer Professor of International Affairs in Harvard University’s John F. Kennedy School of Government and Professor of History in Harvard’s Faculty of Arts & Sciences, for a Zoom lecture entitled, “Do Leaders Make History, Or Is It Beyond Their Control?”
“Men make their own history,” Karl Marx famously said, “but they do not make it as they please.” Was Marx right? How should we consider the role of the individual in human affairs versus that of deeper, impersonal forces? This talk, by Harvard historian Fredrik Logevall, examines this profound question anew in the context of contemporary American and world politics, taking into account the agency of human action and the degree to which the even the most powerful leaders are constricted by time, space, and conditions, and by what went before.
Fredrik Logevall is the Laurence D. Belfer Professor of International Affairs at the John F. Kennedy School of Government and Professor of History, Harvard University. A specialist on U.S. foreign relations history and modern international history, he was previously the Anbinder Professor of History at Cornell University, where he also served as vice provost and as the director of the Mario Einaudi Center for International Studies. Logevall is the author or editor of ten books, most recently JFK: Coming of Age in the American Century, 1917-1956 (Random House, 2020). His book Embers of War: The Fall of an Empire and the Making of America’s Vietnam (Random House, 2012), won the 2013 Pulitzer Prize for History and the 2013 Francis Parkman Prize, as well as the 2013 American Library in Paris Book Award and the 2013 Arthur Ross Book Award from the Council on Foreign Relations. His other recent works include America’s Cold War: The Politics of Insecurity (with Campbell Craig; 2nd ed., Belknap/Harvard, 2020), and the college-level textbook A People and A Nation: A History of the United States (with Jane Kamensky et al; 11th ed., Cengage, 2018). A native of Stockholm, Sweden, Logevall holds a PhD in History from Yale University. He is a past president of the Society for Historians of American Foreign Relations.

Опубликовано:

 

2 мар 2021

Поделиться:

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист
Посмотреть позже
Комментарии : 2   
@michaels4255
@michaels4255 3 года назад
LBJ may have made a huge influence on domestic policy -- it is hard to judge how events would have unfolded without him, but we know very similar trends were sweeping the whole western world -- but I think it is easier to say that if LBJ had made a very different decision re: Vietnam, the world today would hardly look any different than the one we know. The course of the conflict in Vietnam turned out hardly to matter at all for the general course of world history. Most men, no matter how powerful, only shape the details of history, but they do not change the course of the river. Of course, there are occasional exceptions. JFK could have made a very different decision in 1962 and I might not have lived to type these words. If Abe Lincoln had not been elected president in 1860, there might never have been an American "Civil War," Reconstruction, a century of bitterness, or 3 reconstruction amendments, one of which is very radical and has reshaped the US Constitution profoundly. However, slavery would still have died out, as Lincoln himself recognized, but without firing a shot. Without Napoleon, it is very unlikely that France would have conquered most of Europe, and thus probably not have had to raise funds by selling the Louisiana territory/colony to the young United States, and selling Louisiana was probably the most important single decision of Napoleon's rule. Hitler probably changed the political, cultural and academic discourse of the entire civilized world, but in the opposite way from what he intended. But sometimes the most profound effects on the world are set in motion by men who wield no worldly power whatever--Jesus, Buddha, and Confucius are the most eminent examples.
@michaels4255
@michaels4255 3 года назад
No one else wanted war in 1940? Disagree. Churchill certainly was looking for a pretext for war against Germany, and perhaps France was too (at the very least, France was willing to join the UK in the war against Germany). Churchill admitted this publicly. The British foreign ministry was plotting a war to overthrow Hitler for years before the War began, and Hitler's invasion of Poland (which Britain and France could probably have avoided by prodding Poland toward a diplomatic settlement) just gave them the opening they sought. And Stalin was planning his own eventual conquest of Germany. He was only surprised in 1941 when Germany struck first because he thought Germany would need another year or two to prepare. Churchill, Hitler, and Stalin were all planning to initiate war, Hitler just happened to be the one to act first.
Далее
Condoleezza Rice: Why Democracy Matters
1:23:45
Просмотров 89 тыс.
Panel 1: France || Siting Julia || Radcliffe Institute
1:36:59
The moment we stopped understanding AI [AlexNet]
17:38
Просмотров 823 тыс.
$25,000 vs. $25,000,000
29:58
Просмотров 1,6 млн
CrossFit as Church?!
1:20:56
Просмотров 49 тыс.
What Makes a Great Leader?
6:24
Просмотров 312 тыс.
Permaculture and the Sacred: A Conversation with Starhawk
1:24:02
Black Magic Matters: Hoodoo as Ancestral Religion
56:03