Do you REALLY Understand Common Law? 

I love it when you go back to basics, demystifies the processes somewhat.

Hi, as a recent new follower of your channel, I have to say it's absolutely brilliant. The way you explain things is brilliant.Keep up the awesome work your doing by day and what you do for this channel, and allowing us mortals to tap into your font of knowledge. 🥇👍🏻

again excellent explanation. Could you do one that explains the differences between - high court/supreme court/county court/appeal court/small claims court etc, their hierarchy and purposes?

Another superb video Daniel. Really good overview of the differences and similarities of Common and Civil Law. And I'm guessing it was court day today. 😀

Please can you do a video to explain why all courts make decisions on proven facts, yet the family court’s do it on opinion and balance of probabilities which is extremely unfair as family court judge’s are scared to rule against social services

More great content.. id love to have a video on the strength of 'context'...omission of context, or type of evidence that should be put forward as context, and of course is context hard or mitigation evidence?

Most informative. Thank you.

the roudabout thing, I thought it was to say avoid going round the roundabout more than one full circle, make sure you know your exit and aim to get in first time.

Thank you for this useful insight . Although I know you are a Barrister of E&W , I presume there are broad parallels with Scotland; also important differences. I provided technical support to the Faculty of Advocates in Edinburgh over a number of years , and although not legally qualified , came to feel that I ought to have pursued a career in either law or linguistics, rather than engineering , both of which I felt drawn to and an aptitude for later in life . Now academic , given my age of 63 , but I was exposed to a lot of legal process so do have a lot of respect for and interest in law ; with perhaps a healthy smattering of disrespect for instances where the law can very occasionally be an ass !

The trouble is we have to much malfacience in our judiciary. To much personal involvement . Favouritism cronyism.

Thank you!! 👏👏👏

What happens if a test case is presented and a precedent is set due to a decision made by the judge. Then a year later that case is reheard and they win the appeal. Is that precedent then repealed? If so, what happens to others convicted of the same offence and the precedent has been applied in their case on a subsequent date? Love the show as always.

👍 Cheers for the insight

Can you please explain by laws inside Port inside of entire

I think you should do a lawyer reacts type video to a UK "Freeman of the land"

To be honest I found this extremely confusing especially the use of 'civil', feel free to correct me if i'm wrong Common law is set of precedents by judges which can be civil or criminal Civil law created by parliament to deal with interactions between individuals or businesses Criminal law created by parliament to deal with interactions between the individual/business and the state. Murder is a common law crime (against the state not the individual) but the sentencing is covered by criminal (ie parliamentary law). Parliament can pass or change laws that overrule everything including the supreme court (unlike in the US)

Yet filming in a court is illegal, but what about the building inside.

Blackbelt B...thank you.

I JUST IT AND HOW CAN HAVE ONE AND MAY GOD BLESS YOU 🙏

Yeah

Could you expand on this, please: MANDATE meaning according to Black's Dictionary - a written command given by an authority to an agent (member of the public) / contract by which one person requests other people to agree voluntarily to a service. It only becomes effective when the mandatory agrees. On mandatory once you agree to do it, if you do not consent to the request, you are not obligated under the mandate to comply. Is there a difference between a mandate and a law?

I know that in America you have "personal injury" lawyers, "copyright" lawyers etc - is it common to have lawyers specialising that much into one specific area?

Why are all karl lentz comments being blocked?

How can one judge let someone off for paedophilia or rape yet put someone in jail for what they say thats bad law Instead off looking at the crime they look at the criminal

I find this an interesting philosophical discussion. Is it possible to add to the potential defences of an Act but the Judge? Does a Statue have any depth until a Judge has made a finding on it etc. Thanks Daniel, another interesting video.

So in a way civil law is the bare bones of the legal system and common law flesh' it out. For a simple example civil law says that punching someone is generally illegal which gives the basis for the charge and common law tells the judge how to apply that law fairly given the specific circumstances of the case so whilst that punch may have been illegal, common law may suggest that given the facts it wouldn't be fair to give the guilty party the harshest punishment available under that specific civil law and instead suggest a more appropriate sentence based on the ruling of similar cases in the past. If that makes sense? Sort of like civil law says yes it's illegal or no it's not and common law tells the judge how to deal with the specific nuances of the case.

Where does parliament get it's authority from?

So! The answer always begins “it depends”! The true answer by any lawyer or consultant! If the response does not start with this phrase they must be lying!

Video suggestion High speed tailgating on motorways

Civil law equals contract law !

I had someone a week or two back, trying to tell me statutes were not law. County court decisions being extremely persuasive was the reason for the banks doing their best not to let an unfair charges case get into court.

@blackbeltbarrister any idea why murder is still a common law offence? Surely by now Parliament ought to have passed a law codifying the common law?

No victim = no crime everything else is just ADMINISTRATION

#skill

Explain legalese

I need help I’m foreign and not good English. Also I’m a modern slavery victim. I’m not getting the appropriate support. How can I get in touch with you? Writing will be very difficult or even impossible. Please help. I’m being harass, stalk, spy and, even hacked by the police. I do have videos and phone calls recording. Please help.

You talk about common versus civil law, whilst mentioning that there is also criminal law. You say that common law applies to the interpretation of both civil and criminal law. As a non lawyer, I would understand the term "statute law" to be a generic term that encompasses both branches; is this correct? If so, why did you talk about civil, as opposed to statute law in this video?

if acts are given the force of law by consent how do we give or take consent away?

law they just make it up as they going along ,it not what you do it who you are , you may have a very good case but you still lose. law is social engineering thats all .unless you have alot of money -pay to win !

Hi could you look into educating your subs on taking back owner ship of their legal fiction and showing them how as living men and women can't be punished for code act and mandate violations that would be helpful info for them

What's your thoughts on this ; Statutes must be in harmony with the common laws to be enforceable. If unfair statutes are pursued by the authorities a defendant can nominate to be tried by jury - which in seeing the injustice of the statute (and the potential of themselves being its victim) would find the defendant not guilty and thus strike down the statute. This is the power of a jury. Power belongs to the people.

How can one man make a law over another man when all are equal under the law?

Did you swear an oath to the Bar ? If so, is your loyalty to the Bar or to the client and justice ?

Ask yourself in your lifetimes how much GOVERNING do you really need when you wake up every morning (you had a governess when you were a baby but that wasn't a lifetime position, was it🤔?) who do you call up to ask what you should or should not do everyday? i the man who donated several times before

Re- philosophy

Regarding the "court" authority question, it comes from the monarch. Our Monarch represents the power of the people (not the government) in our courts. The courts do not get their authority from the government. Magistrates and judges give allegiance to Her Majesty - they are in effect submitting to the power and authority of the people - don’t forget that.

Well you're entitled to you view. Act's, Statutes and Legislation are not 'laws'; they are man made instruments put in place through our Parliament, often with political or commercial self-interests at the heart of them. Common Law is supreme and one wonders what people used to do before all this 'legalise' came into being ie before Parliament was formed in the 13th century. In simple terms, Common Law or our inalienable rights cannot be changed though - Parliament often try to remove our rights and freedoms by invoking Acts, Statutes and Legislation and demanding we follow their new rules. Slavery is an example - how on earth did Parliament ever ignore this abomination for centuries until they finally passed an Act in 1833. It has always been unlawful and the courts could have acted at any time.

The Common Law. Cause No harm, No loss, No breach of peace, No deceit within contract. Together with our Constitution, Magna Carts 1215. That covers any legislation, acts, or statutes.

Is the ultimate objective of the legal society to have man BE(gin) self-governance or ÄaÑ ONE WORLD ORDER in which results in ASSIMILATION, of man(kind) (in)voluntarily entering into the COLLECTIVE?

Injury harm loss

I always say if you don't cause anybody any arm injury or loss everything should be ok.. Which would be part of common law wouldn't it? All the rest are just at acts and statues... Which we need to make society work.. There's way too many though...

No mention about the UK gov being a corporation and this is important, common law is for sovereign beings , and corporation law applies to citizens, people, persons,and is by consent only,corporation policies are by our consent only, the UK government is as we speak a bankrupt corporation listed on companies house. Governments world wide went bankrupt in 1933, and set up unlawfully corporations to extract monies to pay themselves back from the chattel........cattle.....us.....its population.... via taxation. ...Birth certification bonds,.....marriage certification,...fines....taxation ....parking tickets turned into bonds and traded on the stock exchange.....we are a commodity.....but corporation policies are just that.,..nothing more than recommendations only that need the peoples consent........ever noticed through this plandemic how governments put the emphasis on businesses to promote their policies of mask mandates and lock downs and the jabs....they cannot enforce it because we need to consent to it in admiralty law......which sadly we have actually done since this lot started....fear...coercion and bullying business has been there weapons, there so called laws do not exist......sorry.......we from birth have been duped....... Your children belong to the government corporation via you handing them over to the state and registering them at birth.....this certificate is bonded and traded on the stock exchange,.......get a copy of your cert and ask any broker what your birth cert fund is worth.....Mort..gages are securities and sold on to investment funds by the banks and traded on the stock exchange, leaving the banks with no I.Owe.You and no liability...... But a pay cheque for securitising your bank mortgage I.o.u.....taxes are unlawful and temporary every year they start again on the 5th of April....by our consent only...don't be fooled......The UK corporation is a scam in itself, we have more power as sovereign beings than we have been told.....courts work from corporations that allow corrupt judges token act decisions that are by an interpretation of what they see as a fit ruling in there opinion....... Legalese was a vocabulary designed by corporations to confuse all judges of common law origion into being confused, its a corporation language.........basically corruption in a so called legal binding rule book, but corporation policies are no more than bluffing the populations into believing its actual law..........

THIS WILL BE FUNNY. SO YOUR THINK IT WAS LEGAL FOR FATHERHOOD TO BE ACTIVATED THROUGH CIVIL LAW WITH NO COMMON LAW PROTECTION. LETS WATCH THE BANTER!!! LOL LOL

There is no ‘law’ in Civil Law, it should be called contract & agreements. No man or corporate legal entity can buy Authentic Common Law, unlike Civil Law, plus there is no incentive for barristers to work in Common Law.

Think that you should talk to William Keyte and Ruth Skolmli, then you might be qualified to talk about common law.

Codified law!!! Don’t you mean maritime

“Lawful” and “Legal” are entirely different realms. Omnes Homines Aut Liberi Sunt Aut Servi

notice Rules of Court in the smith court 1. Only a man or woman can appear 2. Man or woman must swear in under oath or affirmation first . 3. only verifiable answers. 4. if a superior claim comes before said court a copy to be handed. to the clerk and to i . 5. if another claim that creates controversy then move to trial by jury as soon requires no later than 2 weeks. 6. if no man or woman appears before said court. Then i order the case be discharge in it entirety 7. No legal person or legal language to be spoken. Only plain common english to be spoken man on man. 8. No defendants are allowed in said court only man or woman allowed to appear in said court 9. Only man or woman with firsthand knowledge of the wrong and be sworn in under oath or affirmation first 10. No plaintiff; solicitor; attorney; Mr; Mrs or any other tilts can appear in said court only man or woman can appear And so on.

shill

Kind of a moot point since we subscribed to the Holy Roman EU.