Does FARFA Know BURNING ABYSS Rulings? | Yu-Gi-Oh Ruling Quiz 

Should have named him Dante or, better yet, Beatrice

Shooting Star specials itself not return.

It's not like every person gets equally hard rulings though.

Ye its crazy. Bit dissappointed

I mean he's a judge though

SwagKage's questions were low-hanging fruits though. People should treat his result and that of actual players like they do in Top Gear's Celebrity in a Reasonably-Priced Car: have 2 different leaderboards, one for usual celebrities and another for actual F1 drivers.

Are you referring to the yugituber roobindale?

Cards remember but players don't

@@AhPuchOnTren Add a what in front of that and you've got a killer clickbait title

@@snowboundwhale6860 Hahsjags most def

It is interesting too that the fact say, Farfa banished Reincarnated Sunlight Wolf, it is no longer considered as being Reincarnated anymore when it returns

Yup, a core conceit thats needed for the ruling that you can't SS monsters sent to the GY without being properly summoned, if a GY/Banished monster can't retain the fact it was summoned by its own rules, you can't make a rule about not being allowed to if you didn't

Damage step centric archetype when konami

@@keinkanal7382 only for the biggest of brains archetype

@@keinkanal7382 looks at War rocks

@@keinkanal7382 this has aged well with Tenpai

@@SpyderByte2099 I mean it is a battlephase centric archetype, but not specifically t he damage step. same with warrocks not being damage step centric

only said student's answer for everything is "normal tour guide, activate?"

i mean, you are partially true, if you're playing meta you basically learn all the interactions just by playing or talking to other players. also, when i play a deck, i try to understand and learn every interactions with the meta, even if i'm not playing a meta deck.

This also shows why Yugioh isn't really a children's card game

@@ag4640 no one ever said its a childrens game? Atleast konami never said that

@@幽霊船-o4h Bro, literally everyone say that

The quote"easy to learn, hard to master" definitely checks out.

Are you calling Mr. Farfa "knowledgeable"?

Why not dragon link?

@@florianfercsak5186 Well, I believe N3sh is more widely known for VW ever since he made those combo spreadsheets. Coder could have other names for DLink anyways, like Gabriel Netz

@@dragospaul-andrei6264 Fair enaugh. I personally know him for his dlink stuff pre and post elpy ban.

N3sh wouldn’t get views and growth distant coder is trying to get from this series

@@mohammedhussain6749 How so? I thought he's well enough known from DB Grinder's channel, so it would help to bring his viewers around.

Cimo is ghosting coder apparently

@@nigamnation i did not know that,why is he ghosted?

Cimo ignored most other yugituber except the one he work together with i hear, even mbt isn't that close outside of their duel video discussion

@@thanatosxmesiah What are you talking about, they met in rl several times and went to events together

@@Rypio_39 first time i hear that, what event did they went together? As far as i hear cimo haven't even played rl yugioh for quite a while

No one should be surprised by that either lol

Farfa should have 2 points but CODER cheated his rules so WHATEV

Not really. The questions were easy. Farfa is a smoothbrain so this result was to be expected.

@@Tony-hn8qy Nah, these were definitely harder than most of the other videos.

@@Tony-hn8qy when the judge expects a program to get a ruling wrong I’d assume it is a difficult ruling

Agreed. And I think it’s because a lot of people hold a Farfa to a high standard when it comes to dueling and rulings. I did appreciate Farfa thinking out loud and walking us through his thought process before answering.

Cause Konami said so :)

@@hivestalker bro it's a funny, not that deep

There is ruling with Beatrice and BA so basically I wanna conclude that continuous effect of monster stop to check during start of damage calculation until it ends then it checks again or delayed continuous effect checking, that applies to say, flipped BA monsters

Id love to see Robbie period

nah gadget rulings for robbie

Gadget rulings for Robbie

Gadgets for robert

Gadgets

Farfa in a nutshell

That's how Farfa is. We all know he's an absolute idiot with a room temperature IQ, but we still tolerate him regardless.

@@Tony-hn8qy i was talking about coder but ok xd

What about Six Samurais?

It def mentions it. Scarm is a more relevant ruling.

It literally mentions them in the Scarm ruling?

@@_luc1d1ty_ I meant exactly the Graph Cir End Phase interaction. If Graph is discarded and summons Cir while you control a non-BA and Cir is destroyed, Cir cannot activate.

@@deshtom why not?

It's possible that in one of their streams farfa was told that exact ruling by coder.

Most likely never or even it ever happen most likely Book of Eclipse

that would be marvelous

I love that duel links resolves things for you. I’m pretty sure Master Duel will have all of that too.

@@JohnnyVasquez8 tbh I try to predict the result before it happens but sure. :-) Let us choose chain links in Master Duel plz. :D

Cimooooo is Blackwing

Fiendish rhino has a continuous effect to protect fiends from destruction via card effect.

@@bloodarcher7841 you missed that joke sooooo hard…

It was a question involving whether Dante is still considered to be summoned from the Extra Deck when temporarily banished, so it's completely relevant.

Which is something that was relevant during 2014 meta when both shaddoll and BA were widely played. The question is about the interaction with dante and farfa.

Yes, it will go back to your field as that's where the materials were used.

@@overthemoon34 thanks!

@@renesandoval4028 It is NO, cause 2 DARK monster on the field is not longer consider same monster in GY Yugioh Fandom - De-Fusion Ruling Suppose "Starving Venom Fusion Dragon" was Fusion Summoned using "Predaplant Drosophyllum Hydra" and "Predaplant Chlamydosundew" as Fusion Materials. If you activate "De-Fusion" by targeting "Starving Venom Fusion Dragon", "Starving Venom Fusion Dragon" is returned to the Extra Deck. In that case, even if the "Predaplant Drosophyllum Hydra" and "Predaplant Chlamydosundew" that were used as Fusion Materials are in your Graveyard, since the monsters in the Graveyard are not treated as monsters on the field, the Fusion Materials of "Starving Venom Fusion Dragon" (2 DARK monsters on the field, except Tokens) are not considered to be in your Graveyard. Therefore, the resolution of "then, if all the Fusion Materials that were used for its Fusion Summon are in your Graveyard, you can Special Summon all of them." cannot be applied.

@@jofx4051 This is the stupidest goddamn clause and I fucking hate it, but its technically accurate, it just makes me grumpy that thats a valid fucking reason that a material stops being qualified as the material used, like I know that shit applies for say, Fusion Summons involving a Hex Sealed or E Hero Prisma, but this one is the silliest thing that feels like someone messed up the conditions and it shoulda been written like "Two DARK monsters, the Fusion Material for this card's Fusion summon must be on the Field"

Hell yeah, back in the days of DAD, Gladiator Beast and Lightsworn, Honest was best reserved for Damage Calculation, a sub step of Damage Step, even cards like Shrink and Forbidden Chalice/Lance could not be used. There were genuine "Honest" wars, if a defender intentionally had an Honest, you could Counter them by playing your Honest before they'd play theirs, but you'd have to wait until the Damage Calculation rather than Damage Step; If you didn't wait they would simply use theirs during Damage Calculation and gain all the ATK, but if you waited you'd have turn player priority to activate your copy first in the Damage Calculation, and because there is only one Damage Calculation chain, they could only react, which means the chain would resolve backwards, they would gain your Monster's ATK first, but yours would gain the Total of that! Of course Honest is now only reserved for the Damage Step like it reads on the card, only Injection Fairy Lily and cards that read Damage Calculation can activate as such. I honestly don't know when that occured, or perhaps everyone simply cheated on me with Honest, I mean a guy even tried using a DEF position Necro Gardna with Honest before I caught him when I was new. Start Step and Battle Step were not as important then, but sometimes you had stuff like Mirror Force and Magic Cylinder resolving in conjunction.

@@Goblin_Hands I think it was probably during MR1, Konami probably put out more clear rulings on damage step during that, the PSCT wave, or just importing OCG rulings on Damage Step Its still made of 4 parts, its just significantly less crowded on Damage Calc because "damage step" no longer legalizes Damage Calc for whatever reasoning fixed that

Most of the rulings here where about game mechanics not the archetype self

@@darkcrow125 precisely. And those are ones you can only know by literally looking them up, not through a logical analysis of the situation

Someone say in other comment that there are similar ruling to Koaki monster back then; it may be applied to this one too It is also BKSS, there is BA ruling with Beatrice too that says it checks its continuous effect again, say, after being flipped face-up, after damage calculation instead of entire time

I think It has to be like that, Dante's effects triggers when It battles succesfully and Mighty Slugger's effect because is continuous protects you during the whole proccess of "attacking".

@@NovatoEx Oh thanks, this makes sense

@@owenscott4206 Your welcome

@@owenscott4206 By the way, do you know how Slugger and Hayate would interact with a raye en the GY when i destroy the Hayate by Battle? Because know I am not sure when does the raye acticatd

Am I missing something about lyrilusc, coz this question has been asked 3 times in the last week. If you battle with Recital Starling and Assembled Nightingale has activated its effect this turn, then both Starling and Nightingale apply. Your opponent takes the damage you would've taken here, and the damage you would take is reduced to zero.

@@midjenko Seen contradictory answers and wanted to make sure this is how they interacted as it will be relevant after the release of legendary duelist synchro storm. Appreciate it duelist

@@zeppelin9776 Fair enough, well this is definitely the right answer. There's a database entry on a similar interaction between the Sanctuary in the Sky and Majesty Hyperion you can reference which effectively solidifies it.

I think your opponent wins the duel. Using Performapal Popperup killing you when you complete Exodia as a reference, Exodia's victory condition can not happen until you have resolved all effects that would complete Exodia.

@@Sasajiro it is a draw. Exodia cannot resolve in the middle of a chain link, but neither effect startsa chain. Both players’ victory conditions have been met like if both players had exodia.

No, your opponent wins the duel. Relay Soul's condition is met immediately when Exodia leaves the field.

@@xatuyou8045 Relay Soul kills you the moment Exodia leaves the board, which is slightly before you would win for possessing all of Exodia, travel time exists in the rules insofar as things leave a place before they arrive at their new destination, rather then it existing in your hand simultaneous with it leaving the board

@@syrelian there’s an official ruling saying it’s a draw.

Why? The questions appeared in the video are very convoluted and the scenario's evenly rare. Farfa plays BA since many years and he hadn't even heard of those rulings. I think most judges wouldn't know all the answers to the quiz - the would probably end up even worse than Farfa because he actually plays Burning Abyss.