You're being far too kind. Sure, there are many that just blindly believe the so-called experts. However, many more choose the myopia as an excuse to deny God's existence...
The bible teaches a flat earth, yet 400 years ago people chose to believe the "intellectuals". Instead of believing our senses and proof in front of our face. People refuse to comprehend that the deception is indeed STRONG. God warned us about the changing of laws and times by the beast.
In "Already Gone", Ken Ham claims that (at Christian colleges) Theology majors are More likely to believe in old earth than Science majors. Strrong evidence that is kept suppressed
As former devout Christian, Noah's flood is just one of the reasons I no longer believe. In so much that this story is based on earlier regional stories, it also would have resulted in the destruction of the planet given what apologists claim. Ask yourself simple questions. Like, how could they possibly have known that the ENTIRE world was covered in water? Doesn't it make more sense that their ENTIRE world was the immediate geographic location in which they lived flooded? Taking all the animals, that they owned, onto a boat to save them from a flood in an area prone to flooding makes more sense, yes? Given the physical world, the logistics of such a story are untenable. Do yourself a favor. Go look into why this story is parable and not factual. Doesn't mean you lose your faith. Doesn't mean you shouldn't believe in God. It means you look at God's world with your eyes open.
How about theological myopia. Everything has to agree with a man made Iron Age book. Science is ignored in favour of rehashed ancient Middle East myths.
@@jamgill9054 You say it doesn't mean you lose your faith or you shouldn't believe in God. Is it ok to believe God created the world and universe? Or that a virgin conceived? Or that Jesus was raised from the dead? If we can believe these things, why can we not believe in a global flood?
I share everything I can find that Dr. Wise puts out with my family. He’s an excellent source of knowledge and he’s usually animated when speaking about how you can see God in his wonderful creation.
The proliferation of confirmation bias amongst the geological community has been as disaster for science for so very long, especially with all that dating methods that base their initial values on suppositions based on their original biases. Thank you for fighting against it.
@@chadamongmen5223Confirmation bias doesn't require any outward conspiracy. It is simply seeing only what you expect to see and NOT being open to (at least, certain kinds of) skepticism that would let you self-correct.
I grew up on the Beaches of Washington State, playing in the sands as the tides drained out, and flooded in. I have done many many experiments in my childhood, which "experts" don't do until they've already wasted many years of their lives, and then they do very narrow experiments in their artificial world of labs ... also fun, but missing the other things which happen when water floods, surges, and drains away. As one flies out of Albuquerque NM Westward bound in the morning from the airliner, one can look down, as ascending and see that all of the terrain below was created on a gigantic scale using the same water effects of quick flooding and erosion, creating the same features which I created many times as a child with buckets of water, or trapped dams of tide water on sandy beaches. When driving from Zion NP, UT to Las Vegas, again, the features are massive flood effects, and likewise from Las Vegas to Barstow, CA. Across the earth, at the base of dormant past volcanic mountains which reach the seas and oceans, one can see how the water has carved away their sides and even under-cut them, as evidence of how shortly ago these mountains were formed and eroded. There is much evidence of rock continuing to be formed in only decades, with man-made objects entombed in recent rock, such as the pick-axe. On a mining cave tour in South Dakota, we were told how stalactites took immense quantities of time to be formed, yet I could see on the wooden roof supports growing stalactites which were inches long, grown in just 50 years, rather than the millions of years the experts declare. Since cement requires only hours to become rock, is there any wonder that making rocks without human help takes only a few decades, instead of millions of years. Nearly everywhere across the world, human eyes can see the signs of catastrophic floods, greater than any regional flood that mankind has ever seen, and for centuries after Noah's flood, before the land became covered over in places by great forests, Noah's flood results were easily seeable by every human, but not so strangely, humans prefer to live where plants cover-over the obvious signs of Noah's flood, since plants provide food for humans, but barren rock does not. We, in our myopic, near-sighted, survival level mindset, don't naturally look at the "big-picture", until we reach adulthood, when we seek education, which is just brain-washing by Darwinian geologists, biologists, and social scientists. As a small child, I thought that everyone older knew more then me, which was true; but only after many decades of study, and far later than I should have been told, I learned that most teachers and professors had just average intelligence, and that what they taught as truth was being taught by them as a parrot repeats words that he has heard, or a monkey can be trained to repeat the many steps of basic brain-surgery which a human taught him, but neither has the knowledge and discernment needed to prove what the parrot says or recreate from nothing the advanced steps of brain-surgery. Likewise is true of most professors at universities, these days; they have nothing but "wrote" words mimicked from someone else, with the exceptions of those of the so called "hard" sciences such as mathematics and chemistry; this is not to say that the persons don't have the ability to use discernment, but rather that they don't as a rule.
Geological Myopia, the same as Biological Myopia (faith in Common Descent) is due to these: "He hath blinded their eyes, and hardened their heart; that they should not see with their eyes, nor understand with their heart, and be converted, and I should heal them." --John 12:40 "In whom the god of this world [Satan] hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them. For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord;" --2 Corinthians 4:4
dr wise hello and thank you for another wonderful video great stuff ! and very well done ! i enjoy a lot ! being very much a believer myself i really appreciate all your work and effort and videos
I don't buy there was any rapid decay. You ever see the Proton Labs Z-pinch experiments? They were working on fusion and when they made the isotopes like they use for dating methods. The parent daughter elements ratio was like what we see today.
@@jeffbybee5207 off topic. But also covered in the video. If you examine the sedimentation rates for the major Land masses and the large river deltas, if they had been doing that for billions of years, they would have filled up the oceans long ago. The earth can't be more than several thousand years old.
@@sammcrae8892Zirkon probes withvUranium Lead tell you something different and there are multiple different materials that allow you to determine the conditions and verify your age.
I love your content, but you pretty much ruined my experience with most of the other geologists... And that's perfectly fine with me!! As a believer, I find it hard to listen to many of those in your profession. I didn't realize that geology was such a young science.
I always find it highly amusing when people tend to believe in science until it contradicts their extreme religious beliefs. Then attempting to cherry pick parts of scientific evidence only to come up with a hypothesis that none of the world experts in the field agree with.
The consensus of world experts in geology and geography say a flood of the entire planet to the depth quoted in the Bible is totally impossible. Biologists have said that Noah's Arc would only be big enough for the food of 2 junior elephants for a year. Also expert boat builders made a large scale replica Arc and tried to sail it, but they couldn't stop it leaking. Apparently wooden ships can only be built up to a certain size because wood flexes and causes them to sink. There are of course a huge list of other problems, but I think you get my point.
Like cherry picking parts of the bible to believe or not believe. Whatever the current consesus is on the bible, that is what is preached. And you want to be taken seriously?
"Find the facts that agree with your feelings. There can NOT be a God because then I would have to obey Him." If He created everything, then He owns everything, and He can make the rules, not me.
I simply obey him because the mess I made was an earth shaking disaster. I had no problem believing I was a sinner. It was a little hard to think Jesus would love such a rebel.
To have everlasting life you absolutely must trust in the person and finished work of Christ alone for salvation ❤️ this means that saving repentance is turning from unbelief to belief. You either believe that Jesus paid your sin debt in full or you don't.
How does one believe in something with zero evidence. Ancient writings by ancient men copied numerous times and compiled into the Bible and called the word of God.
Wow! so, it seems the ancient prophets meant exactly what they said about the cyclical dotl when earth shifts to line up with ''the Master when He returns from His long journey!''
Oooookay. New Earth Creationism is back on my radar. I’ve been giving the old earthers the benefit of the doubt for decades and every time I turn around they’re scrambling to explain something weird. *No amount of scrambling’s getting them out of this.*
@@wkrapek Of course there was a flood. Floods are routine events. What is less likely is covering the entire earth to a depth of Mount Everest, with the single exception that an olive tree appears to have been unharmed. Global warmists assert that if all the ice melted, the sea would rise about 100 meters. That would certainly flood some lowlands. Baghdad is 35 meters above sea level. But of course, a magical God can do anything, including creating enough water to cover mount everest, and protect an olive tree, and then vanish all that water. but if that's going to be the argument, then what is to say we haven't actually been created yet? This is some sort of practice run? Or maybe we were created five minutes ago complete with implanted memories of having viewed this youtube channel?
Dr. Wise is my favorite flood scientist. I have a geologist as an older brother. I've heard the old earth, long process evolutionary model all my life. It's great to see the well thought out counter to that argument as food for thought and debate. Thank you.
I'm not certain, but I don't think Noah took insects, at least not intentionally. Some surely hitched a ride. Others could have survived on floating mats of vegetation and debris, of which there were surely many.
@@adamrspears1981 Then how do you explain the continent-scale fossil-bearing miles-deep hydraulically-sorted layers (strata) of sediment that cover the whole earth if not from the worldwide flood? (Did you watch this video?)
@@KenJackson_US How do I explain fossils scattered through out the globe? Oh boy, you picked a toughy.......hmmm, let me see......oh I know! There's fossils everywhere because life's been on this planet for millions upon millions of years! Next question...
Okay but now please tell us where in the Bible it says "and then God made a 4 km thick glacier cover a large part of the earth"? Or is there another reasonable explanation for the striations on bedrock and the giant boulders scattered around like somebody dropped them from the sky? And was the ice age sometime in the last 6000 years?
Excellent video and I likd in the comments how some people say this could have been aI local flood? Well God would have just told Noah and his family to go to higher ground. Or a different area. Also many different countries and native peope in all areas of the globe have a great flood story in there traditions and stories of eight people on a boat. Which is why I starting studying more into Gods word.
Richard Dawkins said Kurt Wise destroyed his career because religion, i am watching a great man of God teaching LIFE, teaching WORD OF GOD, a souls's fisher, what is a medíocre career compared to this?
How did you miss this? The WA Ice Age flood wasn't a single event. They estimate it was somewhere between a dozen to thirty plus foods over several hundred to thousands of years. The ice dam formed somewhere in the Cabinet Gorge where the present day Clark Fork river flows from Missoula, to lake pend Oreille, and on to the mighty Columbia river and eventually the Pacific Ocean. This should be sufficient evidence to explain the differentiated radiometric dating in the rhythmic layering.
Even the Hawaiian people have a flood myth and long before they came in contact with the outside world. The ruins here on Kauai Hawaii could be pre flood. Thousands of acres of terracing and massive pyramid shaped structures. It looks much older than they say it is.
Doug Vogt's interpretation vis a vis this aspect of the Nova event is strengthened by this evidence. Diehold Foundation, series 4; watch them all, your government has. Then consider S4488, and why they amended it a couple of weeks after Vogt contacted them to inform them of certain aspects they had overlooked. From that, you may surmise that he knew that they knew that he knew that they knew that he knew more than they did. RIP Doug Vogt
I e often wondered if there was not as much water on the planet before the flood. What if it was a moon size ice comet that dissipated in the atmosphere and greatly and suddenly increased the amount of water on the planet.
Ancient books as the Mahabharata from India and the Popol Vuh from the Maya tell us that our planet suffers from a cycle of seven natural disasters. Those disasters are best known as the Great Flood or the End of Days. After such a disaster, where many living beings die, a new civilization arises slowly. The survivors tell their new born children about this disaster and how it occurred. There was a serpent in the sky or a red dragon. There were floods and fires, earthquakes and volcanic eruptions. And a bombardment of fiery meteorites, hailstones. The sun, moon and stars were not visible for a long time. The survivors also knew that sooner or later this could happen again. But when? The fear for this most dramatic event in the history of mankind was and is exploited by priests. They told the people that the disasters were an act of God. And the people did not worship HIM well enough. This is how religion originated. For creationists the last flood that occurred in the year 3,644 BCE is THE flood. In fact there have been hundreds and more will come. And we know when. We explain much more about the cycle of recurring floods, the rebirth of civilizations and its timeline, ancient high technology and alien deities in the eBook: "what I know about Nibiru". This book shows abundant and convincing evidence in text and many depictions. You can read it on every computer, tablet or smartphone. Search: about nibiru roest
Many things wrong with noahs flood ,chinese calender is older , no records of flood in aisia or europe on bibles timeline , caves and caverns around the world showing ancient drawings thousands of years old , massive caverns as big as towns under volcanos , all would be filled up with debris and skeletons but there not 👍
Why does this matter? There are well known examples of rapid change eg when Great Britain became an island, but rapid change does not account for many observations
Even if there was a great flood it does nothing to prove the noahs ark story. Also there is some debate about the epic of gilgamesh story which although not exactly the same bears some resemblance to the noahs ark story and may even predate it or at least parts of the gilgamesh. There are even theories that both stories had their roots in even older stories. Regardless of which predated which i dont believe any of the two . I dont have any problems there may have been a global flood if there is enough evidence or even the noahs ark story.
Mr wise describes the rythmites of being downstream of the walawa gap when they were up stream of the gap that created iirc lake grace that would take a few weeks to drain
Any alternative explanation to explain the teaching that 100+ million years of radioactive carbon dating can only be scientifically accomplished through means other than waiting 100+ million years?
@JoeC There are some important facts about Carbon14 to consider. It has a very short half life, so it can only produce dates of up to about 80,000 years. Coal tends to produce dates of 40,000 to 60,000 years. But this assumes that the levels of Carbon14 in the atmosphere at the time the trees grew was the same then as now. But Dr. Russell Humphreys has determined that the earth's magnetic field has a half life of about 1400 years. A stronger magnetic field would have deflected more cosmic rays away 5,000 years ago. This would result in a lower Carbon14 starting point and give us an age that is much older than the Coal really is.
Do not give up hope. Nuclear decay is govern by the weak force. The city interaction of the weak force particle is the nutrino, one of the least understood particle in phyics. A break through in physic could change the radioactive decay factor. The natural uranium reactor in Africa hints that radioactive decay properties could have changed over time
Day is not the same as 24 hours, not in the past and not today. The earth is not about 6,000 years old and the Bible does not teach this. Hebrews 4:9-10: "There remains, then, a Sabbath-rest for the people of God; for anyone who enters God’s rest also rests from their works, just as God did from his." This tells us that the 7th day Each believer are to enter into day 7. Also there no "evening and morning" for the 7th day. As day 7 as not ended. Biblical Hebrew has a limited vocabulary, with fewer words compared to other languages, such as English or Spanish. This means words often have multiple meanings determined by context. Day - yom is commonly rendered as day in English translations, but the word yom can be used in different ways to refer to different time spans thus literally is: Sunrise to sunset Sunset to next sunset Time period of unspecified length. (long time span ). We use the word day the same today: In my grandfather’s day cars did not go very fast. I work the day shift. (Both are not 24 hours) Deuteronomy 33:15 and Habakkuk 3:6 "ancient mountains". Gen. 2:4 “in the day that the Lord God made the earth and the heavens” The events of day 6 can not have happened in 24 hours. Creationism does not equal young Earth. There are many Old Earth creationists.
Any creationist who wants to be taken seriously needs to demonstrate all the geologic formations shown in this video and all the sediments deposits worldwide *were formed at the same time by the same event* only 4400 years ago. Not that they were formed by many separate local events over the last several hundred million years as the evidence indicates.
I wonder how Iceland and Hawaii formed so fast after the flood? Aren't they mostly igneous rock, where's all the flood sediment? Lol Noah's flood is nuts people please stop lying to children about history and science
@@steventhompson399 the continents rose as water drained off… and mountains grew. You need to watch the entire Flood series, and Mountains After the Flood. TMI for one short lecture.
@@steventhompson399A great deal of volcanic activity happened after the flood. It generated the aerosols needed to keep the earth cool so snow could last after it fell from hypercanes. When the oceans cooled down, the needed evaporation dropped off, leading to the glaciers melting.
Is the "Heat Problem" reflected in the research going on at Mt St Helens? What evidence, if any speaks to rapid cooling OR contrary to it, in the new rocks formed at the eruption sight and affected areas? It's the radio active decay affected significantly?
I did the soil and water in a mason jar experiment with my second son who is now 25 years old, back when he was about nine. Formed quite a few layers within a week. 😊
Denying the evidence against a global flood just to keep a book accurate, is an insult to humanity. It happening or not also have no affect what so ever on your god existing. It's just utter ignorance that people continue to follow this path.
The data and methodology is not in dispute. It's the interpretation of the data. And, Gould was a pretty open minded evolutionist often challenging some of its sacred assumptions.
He studied and completed the work and knows a lot about fossils about geology. Rather then trying to attack his credentials, why not study his arguments?
@@truthisbeautiful7492 Have studied creationist arguments, from flat-earth to Intelligent Design, for two decades now. Have done a thesis on it. I can assure you that creationists do a good job of turning Christian believers into atheists, more effective than Richards Dawkins.
@@mugdiller2124 My point is that a PhD is a very serious piece of academic work, which you sign with your name. You lay out your sincere work of a couple of years, and you 100% agree with and affirm what you have written. His PhD thesis deals with some specific forms of dinosaurs which lived more than 100 million years ago. And of course, it deals with the process of evolution. Wise basically lied, because he didn't believe what he has written in his thesis. His PhD from Harvard gives him credibility, and he is happy to use it. He shouldn't call himself a Christian.
Because maybe God didn’t send adults, or maybe no carnivorous types at all. Remember He destroyed the earth and animals because of the violence( sin). Maybe God didn’t create dragons/ dinosaurs, maybe they were creatures corrupted by aliens/fallen angels?
Most were vegetarian to start with the nat I re ov the flood conditions caused them to also go into a hibernation type mode even meat eaters can survive either vege dieg been proved
Genesis 9:3 Every moving thing that liveth shall be meat for you; even as the green herb have I given you all things. - King James Bible Before the flood, the animals and mankind were herbivores. Genesis 1:29 And God said, Behold, I have given you every herb bearing seed, which is upon the face of all the earth, and every tree, in the which is the fruit of a tree yielding seed; to you it shall be for meat. Genesis 1:30 And to every beast of the earth, and to every fowl of the air, and to every thing that creepeth upon the earth, wherein there is life, I have given every green herb for meat: and it was so.
I believe in the Noah flood however.....not sure there would be that much sediment laid down due to the short period the flood covered the Earth. Did Pangea occur during the Noah flood? Or did it occur at a much earlier date? I feel there is evidence of a pre Adam flood or destruction that may answer some of the questions of Geology better.
@Joedaven He is not lying. Get a copy of the RATE (Radioactive and the Age of The Earth) study that was completed about 2005. It will provide many insights into the problems with radiometric dating.
@@roblangsdorf8758 The RATE study has gone down in history as being one of the worst pieces of pseudoscience garbage ever produced. As an example, their claimed Accelerated Nuclear Decay (AND) would not only produce enough heat to melt the planet it would also produce enough radiation to kill all life on the Ark 1000X over.
@yibaibashimu At the bottom of the Grand Canyon there is the great unconformity. It shows up in other places around the world. It generally thought to be a level that was cleared by the start of the flood. Stuff below this unconformity would predate the flood.
The things that make me believe in the flood that i can see is all around the world there is sand on the coast lines when the water retreated into the depths of the land ,and in my garden and many places i find rounded rocks stones but if you were to smash rocks you would not get a rounded one and i know when i was a builder i use to clean the mixer out with rocks and after a time there would go rounded. If the animals died millions of years ago then where did the soil come from that buried them.
_If the animals died millions of years ago then where did the soil come from that buried them._ Please go read up on the *geologic rock cycle.* New soil is being continuously created from the erosion of mountains and land surfaces while old sediment is being continuously recycled by tectonic plate subduction.
That is a really good question and is related to the rock cycle as stated in the other comment. There is universally accepted evidence (except by creationists) that there have been many generations of mountain belts that have formed and been eroded flat and this is the ultimate source of sediment that fills the sedimentary basins.
Excellent! Five sequences of conglomerate, sandstone, shale and limestone. If not from the worldwide flood, what caused the sudden flat transitions? That wasn't any "local" flood.
_what caused the sudden flat transitions?_ The surface layer was made flat by erosion then another sea ingressed and deposited sediment over the flat surface. Same as the last 20 times you asked the same clueless question.
@@roblangsdorf8758 The Temple Butte formation in the GC does have water courses carved into it. They were just later infilled by sediment from the overlaying Redwall limestone but are still easily discernable. Go do a bit of research on the Temple Butte Formation.
All the atomic bombs of Men in front! Shared clay Feet mixed with iron resting upon my Footstool! Fowl of the Air Lord and heaven above! Gratitude and Honor!
You can carbon date coal and fossils found in the rock. Because old age geologists believe that the rocks are millions of years old, they haven't considered using Carbon14 dating. As long as they refuse to do real science because of their beliefs, they will continue to come up with millions of imaginary years.
It never dawned on this guy that maybe *HE* is the one with geologic myopia and the other 99.999% of all professional geologists are actually correct. Talk about a lack of self-awareness.
So in other words if it can be shown that radio dating is highly inaccurate and untrustworthy then evidence like this would greatly threaten evolutionary assumptions.
@@GSpotter63 Perhaps. I only fairly recently decided to reject the old earth even though I learned enough molecular biology over a decade ago to know beyond doubt that life couldn't have evolved from a microbe. Radiometric dating is still perplexing. But I finally realized that everything about the starting conditions of the sample, the creation of the sample and most events in the existence of the sample can only be assumed. That makes for sketchy science. Also, the labs that measure it surely all have faith in an old earth, so they can't help but introduce bias. So I reject the old earth. But radiometric dating remains one last unresolved annoying detail.
@@KenJackson_US Here is what I have learned over the years... Here is the most often used equation for getting the age of an igneous rock from the results of an AMS (Accelerator Mass Spectrometry) data set. D = D0 + N(t) (eλt − 1) t is age of the sample, D is number of atoms of the daughter isotope in the sample, D0 is number of atoms of the daughter isotope in the original composition, N is number of atoms of the parent isotope in the sample at time t (the present), given by N(t) = Noe-λt, λ is the decay constant of the parent isotope, equal to the inverse of the radioactive half-life of the parent isotope times the natural logarithm of 2. Tell me how can anyone know D0 "The number of the daughter isotopes in the original composition", when the origin of the original composition supposedly took place millions or even billions of years before there was anybody around to confirm this assumption? I must also point out that the D0 in this equation is not a product of the equation but a requirement of the equation. Without it, it won’t work. When testing modern rocks; rocks whose formation was observed, the daughter isotope percentages at formation vary wildly and are in fact never zero. The level of mother to daughter isotopes very because the time it takes to solidify varies. The longer it takes the more of the present daughter isotope can leak out. If it does not all boil out before solidification or it they boil out at different rates it can drastically affecting the results of the tests. If the daughter isotope levels at rock formation in modern observed samples vary then one must accept that rocks from the past acted in like manner. Making the assumption that there are no daughter isotopes at formation for older samples when this is clearly not supported by modern samples is disingenuous at best and an outright lie at worst. If the starting ratios are not known then there is no math that can find the date. The dates used and accepted by supporters of evolution are in fact nothing but guesses based off of unproven assumptions. If two trains on parallel tracks were observed traveling in the same direction. One traveling faster and is 3 miles farther down the track then the other one. One could use simple math to calculate backwards to find at what point the two trains would be next to each other, sitting side by side on the parallel tracks. You could even find how long the trip took from the point that they were next to each other to where they are observed now. But none of the math would give you the starting point of either of the two trains. Assuming that they started in the same place and at the same time together cannot be confirmed. Yes one could look how far back the tracks go and calculate the maximum time they could have been traveling. But that would be the maximum possible time, not the time they actually started. In fact, in every case when the trains starting position was observed, they never started together. Such is the case for observed solidifying igneous rock. If the solidifying rocks observed today have varying starting ratios for the isotopes then one must maintain that the rocks in the past would act exactly the same; Resulting in the same problem that was encountered with the trains in the above example. Without knowing the starting ratios of the parent and daughter isotopes at solicitation the math is useless. Thereby making the dates arrived at with this math irrelevant. Isochron methods use the same data from the equation above to make their plots and as such suffer from the same dilemma... *The goal of the isochronic method is to identify and eliminate samples with possible contamination in situ or during handling and does nothing to eliminate the mathematical errors inherent in math in first place.* All that has been achieved by Isochron methods is a plot made of even more errors. There is no mathematical way one can determine the level of a coefficient without knowing the starting values of the variables used. The only reliable constants in the equations used are the decay rate of the isotopes (see Appendices A. at the bottom of this paper) and the rate of the passage of time. Without the starting ratios of parent and daughter isotopes math cannot determine an accurate date. You can find the oldest and youngest possible date that a sample could be by plugging in starting ratios at both of the extremes. But the dates obtained would give such a wide spread as to be useless. In fact you can obtain just about any date by simply plugging in whatever starting ratios will give you the date you want. Assuming that the ratios are zero for older unknown samples when every modern sample shows this to be wrong is..... Self induced ignorance. The level of self dilution displayed by those promoting the accuracy of radio dating is absurd. Again the train analogy was about the time and the distance traveled. Running the trains backward at the speed observed can tell you at what point the trains would meet each other. In another words, sit side by side on the parallel tracks. But this does not tell you that this is where either of the trains started. Show me an equation that can give an accurate date from the results of an AMS without relying on the unverifiable parent and daughter isotopes at solidification. If you cannot then your belief in the dates it provides is called faith. All of (macro) evolutionary theory rests on the billions of years. If you cannot verify those billions of years then any construct built upon its findings are no more reliable then the AMS suspicious unproven data. Perhaps if one looked for evidence in some place other than the authorized scientific dogma, they might find the errors that that dogma chooses to ignore. Appendices A... Apparently researchers at Stanford and Cornell have shown that some radio isotope decay rates can be affected by magnetic fields and ray interaction... The results of this research add even more question to the accuracy of the standard radio dating equations. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- It was explained to me that the reason the lava domes in Mt. Saint Helens date very old despite being very young is because the dating method tolerance is + or - several million years. So even if a sample is only 30 years old the dating method could still return millions of years. Even if the true date is 500 years old that would still be outside of the dating tolerances. In fact even 10,000 year old rocks would be way outside the dating tolerances and return millions of years in error. But wait..... What if all of the rocks on the entire earth were all younger than 10,000 years old? If that was the case then would not all of the rocks suffer the same error when subjected to the same testing method? How could one possibly know that the rocks whose dates are unknown from historical records are in fact any older than the rocks of known dates? Because of the dating methods massive wide open tolerances all rocks could in fact be less than 10,000 years old and still return dates of millions of years. The dating methods and those who interpret its findings simply do not take this into account.
@@GSpotter63 Nice Gish Gallop of the standard creationist misunderstandings and outright lies about radiometric dating. Did you write all that garbage or just blindly copy it from some other creationist garbage site?
