Donations Don't Add Up: FEC Data Shows Top WinRed Donor in NJ Gave $154k. She says 'impossible.' 

Amen

Something tells me if anything gets investigated by the alphabet agencies, it will be WinRed...

A Man of The People!

​@@FrightNight47I noticed his mouth moving to one side also. His eyes look tired too

Just a herpe

I second that motion!

he always was, which is why the claims of him being a "far right extremist" were always so absurd

1000%

It's the Dems and the RINO's. Both communist globalist Swamp. Matt Gaetz and others like him take no PAC money.

easily

That is the way with ALL NON PROFITS. Did you know as a non profit, you only have to give 5% of what you get to the charity. Allegedly of course....

@keepingthefaith9041 I think you're right about 5%. I know the Clinton Foundation only gives 10% and some of their "volunteers" make 6 figures a year. The worst part is seeing her twist words and brag to everyone, "We spend 90% of what we raise on the people we help." and most people aren't smart enough to know that she's actually saying that their overhead is 90% and only 10% makes it to Haiti and the others they "help".

UNiPaRtY refuses to support a flat tax for a very apparent reason. O'keefe is mentally stable. He better not be arkancided.

@@keepingthefaith9041 There are a number of different types of “non-profits”. Some actually are-but those are small potatoes, & have limits set on how much they can bring-in, before getting pasted with financial problems. That includes groups like local Friends of Library groups. Then there are those that launder money for corporations, each glad-handing the others attending their big blow-out parties. There are covert ones, & public ones. Churches must 1st sign papers to incorporate-be a corporation-before they can sign papers to be a non-profit. Get that? Formal, accepted Religions, are FIRST & Foremost, Corporations. Corporations’ main goal is to make profits,, & commit to Social & Consumer Engineering-brainwashing the population to do as they are told. NOTE: “religion” is not always the same as Spirituality. It’s very like the math concept of: “all squares are rectangles, but not all rectangles are squares”.

Both sides don't do it. Details matter. It's the Dems and the RINO's. Both communist globalist Swamp. Matt Gaetz and others like him take no PAC money.

Herschel Walker received a penny for every dollar donated to his campaign through WinRed. Total grifters. There's another way to donate. I forget the name. Look up Caroline Wren. She's on Bannon's War Room fairly regularly.

Ted Cruz, Trump, etc all get their donations from winred.

Is the FEC going to look into Kamala getting all of Joe's fundraising?

Exactly💯

Throw in the for-profits, too. These days, integrity is like a river in a desert.

@@MOORE4U2 That's true. I was more focusing on people who ask for donations when I posted.

Nope. Stop with the lazy thinking which allows the left to escape. Both sides don't do it. Details matter. It's the Dems and the RINO's. Both communist globalist Swamp. Matt Gaetz and others like him take no PAC money.

@@MOORE4U2 Christianity births integrity. Atheism and Islam focus on the self and lead to tyranny.

Act Blue is a democratic party organization. Can you name the organization doing this for republicans ? Or are you just saying both are corrupt to detract from the fact this is being done solely by the democrat party ?

That means, we need most voters to vote for a decent 3rd party….& NOT the “lesser of 2 evils”. Because, there is no “lesser” candidate, lining-up for the coming election-the Controllers make darn sure of that, every time. Each time it starts looking like a viable 3rd party might jump-up, Controllers back a 3rd party….that they control, & USE to gather disenfranchised voters, then at last minit before election, they bail & gift their voters to one of the main parties…. Ross Perot was run 3 times before most figured it out. Bernie Sanders has done it twice so far-yet, folks would still vote for that fossil. Common features included them telling candidates what they desperately wanted to hear, & voters failing to research candidate backgrounds & candidate funders. Who’s next?

I like how MsGeana let JO into her house to talk after finding out she'd been scammed by her "charity", but all the other BLUE donor's would only shout at him through the door though😆

There are no "sides", it's all just one big group.

Great point!

Like so large, it would be liable for taxable income😆😢😆😢😆😢😆😢😆😢😆😢

Political donations are not tax-deductible.

That's what I was thinking! Getting the IRS involved would really complicate everything quite deliciously!

put it into COGS! LILO!!

So actually becoming a politician is like winning the lottery (except without having to worry about IRS audits)

and its tax deductible for them too@@M-S_4321

Money laundering

I didn't know that Trump said that, but it only confirms the uneasy feeling I've had about WinRed for a while now. Thanks for that info. I just left a comment here describing an experience I had with a WR solicitor, right before reading your comments. 👍👍

Details matter. It's the Dems and the RINO's. Both communist globalist Swamp. Matt Gaetz and others like him take no PAC money.

Same here. Did not hear his statement, or any about Act Blue even. Message boards are useful!@@jefffoley6546

A whole lot of it, I'll wager, has been getting laundered through war spending, which is going to be no small part of the reason why both parties have never yet seen a war they didn't want to get us involved in or get us to start. I bet that it wouldn't take much digging to find that a lot of this money is coming out of Ukraine, for example - quick, let's spend a few billion dollars more in tax-payer money, "for Our Democracy!"....

Ya, how di I check if donations are being made in my name?

@@FactFindererI’ve tried several times to share here where to go- but it won’t let me ..

Just search for it .. it’s soo easy to find .. 😊

Here you go: The Commission maintains a database of individuals who have made contributions to federally registered political committees. Data on individual contributors includes the following: Search by individual contributor -VERY INTERESTING STUFF!: www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?two_year_transaction_period=2024&min_date=01%2F01%2F2023&max_date=12%2F31%2F2024

It is a confusing website. : www.fec.gov/data/receipts/individual-contributions/?two_year_transaction_period=2024&min_date=01%2F01%2F2023&max_date=12%2F31%2F2024

The WORLD wants you to have your country back! We all would benefit!

Nope. Stop with the lazy thinking which allows the left to escape. Both sides don't do it. Details matter. It's the Dems and the RINO's. Both communist globalist Swamp. Matt Gaetz and others like him take no PAC money.

More like who isn't?

Legit authorities 😂😂😂there are no legit authorities, everyone is dirty

With such disclosure in place, why would these wipes at Lose Red and Jerkoff Blue do this? Insiders need to come forward.

Yep, same here. WinRed has given me an uneasy feeling for awhile. When a WR "solicitor" called me about a year ago, it seemed weird. After a lot of back-n-forth, and alot of persistence by him, I told him that I'd be giving directly to the candidate he claimed to be calling for, instead of giving him my credit card. Funny, WinRed hasn't called me since.

She did not make the donations. Externally, specialized software (HAMMR? Developed by Dennis Montgomery?) manipulated her bank account; deposited $$ into her account then sent it out as a donation, without her knowledge.

@@samjubilee6593 I apologize for my last reply, I reread your comment and understand now. Even if the software spreads out her donation, wouldn’t she still be able to answer decisively if she made thirty different donations?

​@@oxyfee6486She wouldn’t know that she made the donations. Money gets deposited in her account; the same amount is then sent out of her account (hours? minutes?) later, without her being aware. This allows a rich donor to have their large $$ amount broken into many small donations, thus staying under the legal amount allowed per donation, as well as hiding the real source of the money.

Seconded, but we can get someone to prosecute. Remember most judges in Chicago ('were') corrupt in the time of Capone. Also there were moles in the Mob, we need the same in Act Blue and Win Red.

I want to know more about this! Good stuff!

Why do people make multiple tiny donations? Is it like a .25 cent tip left in a dirty glass to express displeasure with their server?

Very likely. Prove me wrong.

A lot from Chy-na😂😂😂

George soros

And others, on both sides evidently@@brenda02756

Sun Tzu @@jybrokenhearted

Yes sir! And thanks to her for speaking with James, inviting him in for trick or treat Win Red style! "Have you heard of me" "Do you know who I am?" Seriously, what would you do if he was at your door step?

There are no sides here Realise you may lean left or right But both parties are there to screw us all over

There are no sides here Realise you may lean left or right But both parties are there to screw us all over

I don't think either WinRed or ActBlue represent "our" side. These seem like deep state actors (actor?)

What side is that?

Did Sam really say that? source please?

@@SS-zg6of who is Sam?

Imagine donating a few bucks a month and you are the TOP donater in your state!

Agreed. This has to end!! Thank you OMG!!!!!!!

Yeah but people have mud goggles on

Imagine how this will end!

Exactly... The ones he shows act like they're hiding something... It's bizarre

Exactly. If you're a victim to credit card fraud, you would be mad af. She's way to calm.

There's also the possibility that she's getting taken advantage of because she doesn't know it was happening.

@@psylintzu6036 Absolutely correct. I really hate "mind readers" like this.

@@Arphemius it’s not mind reading it’s basic body language. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, quacks like a duck, it’s most likely a duck. Not everyone is on the spectrum like you, we catch body language and tone.

Unibrow Party