@@kimeccleston5586This time, physics trumped science fiction. You can have a pill and it can be a pure macronutrient, but it can only have 9 calories/ gram (density of fat). Anyone with a modicum of biology understanding realized that. 😂
@29:21 Doomberg is incorrect. The equivalent price of natgas is about $20 of equivalent barrel of oil, not $10 as he notes, and historically has been (on average) about $40. One can easily do these comparisons by knowing the energy content of a barrel of a (crude) oil (around 10GJ) and equate it to the needed energy content-price points of natgas to reach the same energy ( around 10M BTU or 10GJ) content as in a barrel of oil. @ 39:45 he is also glossing over the thorium reactors, which honestly is quite surprising considering his expertise. The main 3 points of a Liquid Fluoride Thorium Reactor are its efficiency of the fission process ( Thorium->Protactinium-Urianium ) which is about 90%, vs 1% for the CANDO reactors (he noted). That is 90x more fuel efficiency of using a resource from the ground without any expensive enrichment process, as with uranium. The second point is about inherited safety of the reactor, which does not require any pressurized fluid. And the third, very overlooked feature, is that the reactor material is a fluid, which is inherently easier to manipulate, and render itself to design for an uninterrupted fuel cycle, through pipe and valves, vs any solid fuel nuclear roads. The 4-th (bonus) point is derivative of the above 3 and is about the modularity of the designs such a nuclear fuel cycle allows.
Because, no one else has commented, yet; I just wanted to thank you for your detailed 'Comment,' here. Educational/Informative (for me, at least). For the past year or so, I've been steadily/regularly buying Shares of TICKER:UNG (U.S. Natural Gas Fund) thinking that [eventually] it's got to reverse w/ higher pricing... not really any luck, yet. I look at NatGas mmBTU [right now, at USD ~$1.97] as exceptionally 'cheap.' While that may be true historically, your reply above leads me to think NatGas is going to stay very 'cheap' for a long time... As to your point, my personal Portfolio is heavily-weighted towards the development/production of Uranium Mines, as well as, companies which conduct the enrichment from U238 to U235. For some years now, I've been looking at [the threat of?] the development and potential proliferation of Thorium Molten Salt Reactors (vs. Uranium-fueled Reactors) as a possible threat to my investment thesis. Any comments you might offer in reply would be welcomed. Thanks, Ted
@@jasonneugebauer5310 First electricity is never "produced" it is only transformed, and that is an extremely well established industrial process, in all of the power plants from steam. 50 years ago, in the ORNL ( Tennessee ) the first prototype reactor was develop, and successfully operated. The issue is not the tech is the regulatory burden, this i why nowadays, this type of nuclear is mostly developed out of US. China has been developing now for a decade and has a working pilot 2MW reactor with plans of expanding it to a nuclear fleet.
Incredibly Great podcast Doomberg you’ve realised sadly that Green Energy is not the Whole solution as We Must try to work a Way of Recycling these Huge Waste on our Deteriorating Biosystems Professor Simon Michaux is trying to work out a solution to this called The Purple Transistion Simon is fully knowledgeable in the Oil Minerals and Metals sector and is having a meeting as we speak with Australian Energy resource centres There needs to be reality Investments and a very Wide Diversity of people from All fields to make this Grow with open discussions 🕊🌏😇💖
And so in History All Empires Collapse as this is a energy Absorb Econythat doesn’t consider sustainable Recycling future As some Indigenous Tribes use the whole animals that they hunted for Did not Waste the whole animal 🌏😇💖
The reason we have so much natural gas is because we are getting our oil out of the ground faster..fract and horizonal drilling.Not finding new fields. Easy oil is gone. Tight oil is now the norm. Nobody would drill for a natural gas well at $2 MCF. It's all about oil over drilling and Nat gas as a byproduct.. we will run out. Suddenly.
If climate change (reducing carbon footprints) is TRULY an existential threat, why don’t we use hydrogen? Inefficient, yes, but the exhaust is water! What are they going to do with used up lithium batteries?
Don't you understand. The goal isn't to "solve" anything, as their entire power system is predicated on constantly finding new "problems" that "must" be solved. Today's solution is guaranteed to become tomorrow's focus of the next crusade.
The problem is WHERE do you get the hydrogen ? Also, storage has to be very high pressure which makes for large technical problems. The fact that it is possible, does not make it practical.
Hydrogen is about as clean as the air in China. Are you going to crack methane to get hydrogen? Kinda defeats the cost and carbon savings.😢 Using electricity to crack water for hydrogen is 72% efficient, liqufing hydrogen is 30% efficient, and a hydrogen powered power plant is 40% efficient.😢 Total energy efficiency of electrolysis hydrogen powering an electric generator is 8.64% before you add in the cost of infrastructure, maintenance, and labor. 😢
Storage. As a gas it will leak out of virtually any container and if you thought EV batteries are a hazard, pop a few cm3 in a jar and witness the explosion and you’ll not want any sizeable quantity of it near you. I’d rather sleep on a mattress of tnt.
I agree the EV market is not what it was hyped up to be. I will disagree on the SUV & EV in the garage necessity. From our own experience owning two different brands of ev. I would say tesla with the super charger network and autopilot for us is a game changer. We prefer to travel in this car and originally kept an SUV out of concern and other brand EV experience. But Tesla is a more expensive car and I am surprised how much market penetration they have gotten.
Undercutting their competitors, driving them out of business, become a monopoly, charge what you want. Buy Chinese, but realize you harm the USA. I know , our own politicians have sold /destroyed our manufacturing base, but citizens decisions matter. Don't complain when our economy and standard of living goes way down. They win we lose.
The idea that consumers should be denied a competitive product or have to pay huge tariffs just because local industries didn't become more efficient or fund their pension plans is very weak
Look up the word "dumping". It's a legal term. There are laws against it. Not knowing this fact about domestic AND international treaty laws is what's "very weak". Educate yourself beyond your lackluster "conventional wisdom" or "gut feeling", please.
his presentation is brilliant... if he's right he's considered "brilliant" if he's wrong he'll just be like: "but i'm just a talking chicken hehe... why would you listen to me? lol"
If Russia wins this war, then we face the destruction of nato... is that what he said? I respect this fella, but that ain't gonna happen. As for the energy supply yes. Russia has the clear advantage. But still 7 to 1 casualties in favor of Ukraine with poor supply chain dynamics. What do you think would happen if nato started taking the war seriously? The donbass would be demined and taken back immediately.if it walks like a hen, and clucks like a hen...
The green ducky is always neg on asia and China. Some questionable comments in there. Like the ‘west recycle their plastics’ well if you call exporting the plastic waste to asia as recycling.. Also how about the carbon foot print and waste and human cost of America’s forever war policy or fuelling the military industrial complex….. flying bombs around the clock to Israel. The green ducky kind of conveniently forgets these issues with his rose tinted USA specs on…..
I don't buy into carbon as a huge contributor to 'climate change'. What I have read is carbon is an after effect of a warmer climate. The sun is the main contributor to climate change as it has been since it was formed.
Approx 300-500 year long&large colding-warming oscillations go back with excellent data to over 500 yrs before The Great Pyramid. Caused some crazy stuff when coldings were set off by immense volcanic activity (can't link it, but an exc doc is Was 536AD The Worst Year In History?) Those who have experience in solar conclude basically what you do: solar cycles and activity. And high variability: Spock ie Leonard Nemoy warned after the huge Buffalo snows in the 70's of a planet covering ice age by now (can't link that either)
Your making excuses for the U S. and it's automakers because China is kicking their ass in electric vehicles. It seems to me that the U S. Is just not trying hard enough to compete. By placing Tariffs on Chinese goods it tells U S. Corporations that no innovation is needed, we have you covered and get to keep your monopoly.
You have no idea what you’re talking about brother! Please provide a complete example of one of Doombergs articles or podcasts that is inaccurate? Haters gotta hate! 😂
!I recently sold some of my long-term position and currently sitting on about 250k, do you think Nvidia is a good buy right now or I have I missed out on a crucial buy period, any good stock recommendation on great performing stocks will be appreciated.
I managed to grow a nest egg of around 120k to over a Million. I'm especially grateful to Adviser Bruce Murdock, for his expertise and exposure to different areas of the market.
Without a doubt! Bruce Murdock is a trader who goes above and beyond. he has an exceptional skill for analyzing market movements and spotting profitable opportunities. His strategies are meticulously crafted based on thorough research and years of practical experience.
