Douglas Murray blasts top bank's treatment of Nigel Farage 

annoying to say the least

Some would probably call her a really dumb, mouthy bitch but I personally would defend her right to speak to the end !

It's called hate watching. Enrage the viewer/listener and they stay engaged. Howard stern pioneered it 40 years ago. That's why Morgan doesn't stop her interrupting.

That's what socialists do

@@Dogtagnan Literally everyone did it in this segment lol

But people wont because the British public are spineless sheep that would rather moan than actually do anything. Then the few people that do actually get up and stand for what's right have their jobs taken away, or micky mouse charges brought against them.

The only trouble with that is there is nowhere else to go because all of the banks are doing it. It is not the same situation with Bud Light in simply going to a competitor who isn't woke and discriminatory.

Calling all millionaires & billionaires… You do know that there is a rather high deposit requirement 🤔

How much has Douglas got tied up in crypto I wonder?

because doenst have proper manners and brain to say something sensible but interrup with a smirk

Typical female

It's not a monologue. Let all of them speak one at a time.

You sad man. Are you a racist then?

That is why I font watch his show Mr Morgan might as well have no guests he never let's any one answer his questions.

100%

organisations get points for being anti russia etc

100%👏👏👏👏 The institution that has brought the country to its knees. I would prefer ethics lesson from a snake oil salesmen over a bank.

@@hassyg4083not sure that aligning themselves with a fascist country would be good for business anyway

@@fanfeck2844 its ok Sunak's wife has business in russia. its free market

this wouldn't happen under islam. she would shut the hell up and let the men speak.

​@@waldopepper4069 pretty sure she wouldn't even be allowed on camera unless vigorously agreeing 😂

It doesn't really matter even if it was fully private it provides essential service (or even more important you can survive if your water is turned off but not if you have no mens to pay for everything) and like with all essential services it should be illegal to not provide them without at least a court order.

@@johndoe-vy4bt It should be considered an essential utility as it's almost impossible to exist without a bank account. I wonder if anyone who thinks that Coutts can just ditch customers because they don't like their politics thinks the same should apply to electricity and water companies?

@@froufroufeatherstone6291 They'd be crying foul if it was them being cancelled for their opinions.

Nope….a vile despicable customer, who they refuse to do business with !!!

@@trevaudio well we hear now that they are considering reversing their decision.

@@trevaudio Oh dear. Are you still upset ? Haha

@@trevaudio You know how a lot of people like to believe they would have been a good person and not gone along with the Nazis or Soviet pogroms? Well, you've just demonstrated that you would have gone along with it happily. You can't ignore fundamental deontological principles because it suits your immediate political interest!

​@@kelvincasing5265Very well said 🖖

You're just being stupid now. Get a grip.

This is why they want everyone on "smart" gadgets and convenience items.

Exactly where this is going. Total control of people and their money A social credit system....we've been warned .

After bail outs Coutts is not only regulated by the government but almost 40% owned by the government and by extension the tax payer. I have read the dossier they provided to explain their decision and I can't see a single valid reason to withdraw their services in there. In fact it seemed half of it was based on nothing but unsubstantiated allegation and rumour.

@@lonalxaia You understand, bet hardly any of your friends do.

Since they got rewarded for it and since it became trendy in this culture. Since they're apparently allowed to do it.

Political contacts. Since they realised they could be fined for helping money laundering. And in Coutts case, a posh bank, for they're own reputation. They did offer Farage a NatWest account - bank for the plebs - but obviously he thinks he is part of the elite.

Since they are chasing after ESG score

Since woke taken over

@@myaopanBe careful your bigotry is showing.

Agreed. When they say nothing she is silent however as soon as the other two speak she overtalks.

Funny, her irrational behaviour proves she has no valid arguments, hence the text book diversion tactics.

This just shows that she has no manners .One sentence dragged up not brought up this woman has no respect

Womansplaining.

Yet another classic!!!

the ONLY resort of Socialists

Cancelling the Left! What a novel and mischievous notion. A more constructive way forward may be to cancel all cancel culture , treat each other with respect and let people finish what they have to say before responding.

Farraige is an amateur broadcaster though, just like he was an amateur politician

It's a joke mate. They are professional friends.

@@trevaudio Farage got the job done. I take it you are still a little salty about it Haha (Morgan's claim to fame is having a newspaper shutdown) !

@@trevaudio Gets paid so not really.

@@noelward8047 Doesn’t bother me….I’m a long way from farraige and little England !!!! Just how I like it !!

Agreed but that's true for everyone.

The cokehead?

@@utv5490 Better than being a member of the traitor class

​@@peterhellier4977Only a racist baghead would say that.

Priceless!!!

Yes, and her plummy accent. No doubt went to a good, fee paying school.

Nigel is opposition to the UniParty though

@@user-ug8wx5er1w Yes, diversity and inclusion only if you agree with them.

We, the people own 39% of that bank not the government. Without the people they are gone. Then We the people take it over.

Exactly !😂😂😂😂

Better than being a racist.

Nice vocab.

Agree he slagged Trump off not Farage if he brought it to his attention tough titty.

​​@@SpookyDjinnou cant infer what he meant. Really?

@@SpookyDjinn Oh dear. Everyone else understood.

I don't know. I will have to ask my wife. She will be able to tell me.

Douglas Murray? It would be like being married to a cross between Kenneth Williams and Tommy Robinson.

Great comment. Love it!

Quite literally the best comment I've seen in ages. Thanks!

There's an oxymoron here somewhere. Found it - the bank!

Why would the media let the truth get in the way of a good story? In any case the BBC were duped were they not?

I've seen various figures for the state ownership of Nat West in the comments posted. I conclude that the inflationary nature of our economy is responsible and far worse than has been reported.

In a socialist society money is virtually worthless.

Na she's just a lefty.

@@jodawson5268 it's a rich person thing actually I was wrong, google her defending banker's bonus and her multi-million-pound bonus from a 38% publically owned bank...

many are like here :S

I knew i'd spotted an oxymoron, it's the bank.

The Bank of England cannot offer commercial banking services as they set interest rates, this would be a huge conflict of interest. Also it sets a precedent for government controlled banking which needs to be avoided at all cost. Regulation of the banks similar to utilities would solve all of these problems. The banks shouldn't be able to refuse services unless fraud is suspected and even then due process and a court order should be required to close an account in such circumstances.

The banks see a chance to increase their prophits if they meddle in politics and support the political system that would mean most gain. In the long run they will demoslih everything. When all is destroyed they will lift their shoulder and say: How could this have happened?

Which is all well and good but when their reasoning for dropping Farage is because of Brexit, his views on illegal immigration, being a PEP and the Russia lies told by that Labour Weasel, using parliamentary privilige so he wouldn't get sued back to the stone henge, have nothing to do with Fraud.

@@schrodingerscat1863 Good knowledge.

Plank of the Week perhaps.

I think the public would get behind a rapid induction to the "Hall of Shame" or at the very least an award for "best foot in mouth performance since Brown left his microphone on during an election campaign".

Not really. The WEF belongs to the banks. The WEF is actually quite low down in the pyramid power structure.

@@seansmith445Then why are they absorbing ESG?

@@user-ug8wx5er1w Because companies no longer GAS about esg and it gets buried somewhere

@@seansmith445 They might be more equal footing. The banks are the enablers and WEF is the stick to hit with. We End Fun hopefully overplayed their hand.

The baghead?

Doubtful, he's probably already switched by now. That would be the sensible thing to do if he can find an establishment offering the same stellar service.

Well they (banks) have lost tons of personal data in the past so I guess publicly naming a customer is par for the course. Wrong but predictable behaviour. Perhaps this particular "wrong" will have significant reputational and financial repercussions. A double whammy as the public owns a fair chunk of this bank.

I can't imagine her in a paddy field picking rice in her communistic utopia.

Not a worry, just the usual apathy.

Don't be a total see you next Tuesday.