Dr. Don Lincoln - Peeking Through the Impenetrable Veil: The Hidden Scaffold of Reality 

😂

How did he manage to escape fermilab? 🤣🤣

​@@JohnDoe-rm1kw easy, The two Dons just spin in the opposite direction and no one notices the Don at Fermilab is spinning the other direction than normal. Simple particle physics 😊

Let fools believe what they want. They learn in their own time. I found out an interesting fact recently. Stalin believed all atoms were conscious and they had a program that was declassified after the collapse , where they had an organization doing remote viewing and the US also had success seeing secret weapons the soviets were trying to develop. One was found after the best American remote viewer was dead two years. I'm extremely skeptical myself but I see auras lol. It bothers me cos they behave in a way that don't make sense. I could tell you lots of stories that show I'm not hallucinating. I'll tell the most convincing. My friend who worked with me also saw them so one day the lightning in this house where we worked was good and his aura was very visible. The walls were pure white so I told him stand still and tried to see as much color as I could. A Brazilian who worked with us and used to call us crazy when he saw us looking at each others hair lol, he started gazing as well and exclaims.......Pink. Then the owners of the house drove in and the Brazilian came out of his trance in amazement of what he just saw. My friend was a class clown type of guy and had a large area of lavender/pink at one side of his head. We read from a guy who used to claim to see them accurately that it meant childish. That was a perfect description of my friend .

i've never bothered to discern the colors but halos are seen around things if i stare at their boundaries.

@jocr1971 ever seen one light up?

@@wesstone7571 Ever seen one *what* light up?

@@richardoldfield6714 a halo or a glowing ball of light around a person's head.

An extraordinary lecture, and such a fitting comment!

Minds need simplicity, Nature does not. The verbal brain thinks thinking is enough to generate

Rephrase please, that was kind of obscure.

​@@TheBeatle49 i never metanoia I didn't like ❤

The creator of that universe is who gave that gift.. he made us in his image so that his creation would listen to us as well. We're just too arrogant and self centered to accept it. We call our creator God, but most don't want to hear that.

I guess you disagree with the speaker. Correct me if I am wrong.

I do not believe he disagrees. I believe the statement is that science is coming full circle to what the ancients already knew or at least practiced. Correct me if I'm wrong

I'm always saying your first sentence but no one understands lol. We use the expression. I am.....for example, I am depressed, I am fat, I am in New York. It's lazy. Thats why Americans are almost at war with each other over transvestites ( they don't even understand what transgenders are). Anyway I am.....I am John. I forgot about that one. We use the words I am for a few different things and not many people even question that. When you think about those expressions, are they really true? I am depressed, no you're feeling depressed. I have ran out of time but really I am mostly empty space and fields

Science will always hover on the edge of superstition, because it has always been on the fringe of the unknown. This doesn’t mean you can’t be a believer, but it’s easy to misinterpret what we perceive. As eloquently put by this scientist, the reality of the universe defies our perception of reality.

When we are dead they will be too,no use for anyone...in time. Wait and see.can be faster as AI said but also your demise.

Patterns of energy excitation in 17 quantum fields make up all matter. Matter itself has no standalone identity. .

Yeah we still can't form a consensus on that one, either.

Colloquial language that predates the science that proves it 😂

It only confusing if you refuse to accept it.

The difference between physics and metaphysics comes down to your mistaken use of the word, "invisible". It is true, for example, that our eyes cannot see radio waves, but every middling physics department in the world has a device that will give out precisely the same answer for the frequency of a given source of radio waves. The apparatus makes the invisible, visible. Metaphysical investigations do not work this way. In fact, when a metaphysical method starts giving repeatable, consistent, and observable results, we just call it science.

@@erichodge567 Measuring frequency does not, contrary to your claim, make "the invisible, visible". It merely makes some aspects of some field-vibrations measurable .. big difference. The plain fact is that philosophical physicalism leads to a never ending series of logical causation questions: what caused the cause of the cause? And then, what caused the cause of that cause? ... etc etc. It's thus an approach that can never realistically hope to uncover ultimate truths about reality.

I don't believe physicists are claiming anything like that. Remember Son himself said that 100 years from now there will likely be another iteration of physics, and in 200 another, . .

@@TheBeatle49 It's what Dr. Lincoln claims in the video (i.e. that metaphysics has nothing to do with fact that everything which exists stems from vibrating and invisible fields) - and that's what my comment refers to.

It's difficult to wrap the mind around the idea.... it's incredibly complex and we understand the tiniest fraction of these concepts. We should not dismiss the "woo" as ridiculous. There is a lot of science backing up many of the so-called woo ideas. See PEAR labs at Princeton for some really good examples.

A world without religion woul behave just fine actually. Just look around the north Pole or deep in a jungle, or the subterranean ocean of Jupiter's moons, not a sandel in site, yet everything's working fine

@seanmcdonough8815 Hold on lemme read my comment and yours again........yep, definitely, you debating with yourself about a point that has nothing to do with what I said but the usage of the word religion....so here's my point again....."how long before we as a people realize science, religion, and the esoteric go hand and hand"...but go ahead and continue with your rant about the world's behavior and religion 😉 maybe the highlight worthiness off it will make it worth $0.02 ✊️😎

Superfluous and harmonic phase wave pressurized, superchilled neutrino permiable field set - essentially a QCD bifurcate, relative in phase reordering, neutrino ocean in strange attractions via pulsation casting, resonant, electromagnetic, dual wave to particle point electron pairs in convergence - skirting, tunneling in Vortexing frequencies, assimilate to navier stokes actions, producing refractional spaces and eddy to neutrino phase flow - engulfing, and vertexing turbulence to slipstreaming magnetosphere concentrations, with evolutions inverse in perception to entropic wave sets, and making inertial gains in Von Karman Vortex streets with orbital exchanges in oppositely oriented electron pairs helixing needlecasting pulsation streams/beams as they collide resonant transversals at neutrino phase pressure points of superpositional synaptic weaves, imparting through quarks as they flip in magnetic momentum around atomic nuclei and carry out phase states in quantum tunneling current paths of frequency evolutions... maybe 🤷‍♂️ A neutrino ocean fluid dynamic qcd imparted phase wave congruence as a dual mechanical relative spacetime system.. both sides resonant, but basically inverse to eachother.. evolving in spight of one another, reinforcing eachother as a closed field reaction, whether the boundary is the end of mass and energy phases or simply encasing or universe and parallel planes, or entire dimensional sets.. a simple solution allowing special and general theories of relativity and gravity as displacement

@@craigstiferbig Best descriptions ever. No explanations in the lot of it. I wish this was on paper so I could throw it away.

Albert Einstein said, "The more I study science, the more I am amazed by the complexity of the universe and the more I believe in the existence of a creator." If a scientist doesn't believe in God, does it mean s/he didn't study science enough? ❤️‍🔥

What is the connected universe theory? "This idea suggests that everything in the universe is interconnected in a way that is beyond the physical and that we are all connected on a deeper level. In conclusion, the interconnectedness of all things is a principle that suggests that everything in the universe is interconnected and interdependent."

Nassim Haramein completed Einstein's lifelong work of attempting to unify the universe in a unified theory. "protons are black holes." Nassim is a master of understanding the unified universe, in its entirety.

Because even though science is proving that light creates sound and sound creates light, that at the center of every atom is merely a frequency that tells it what to be or how to behave and bond, that it's not empty, but contains light, which even explains how manifestation works, they just cannot bring themselves to accept it. I, however, understand it as fact and know that it is true. Does that make this world a hologram? Absolutely not. This is the physical material realm where matter ≈ mass. A hologram is only light... there is no matter, and that's where we come from, and where we go back to, an earth made only and completely of light. That place by definition is a hologram. What should really get you thinking is, does an led bulb create artificial light? What would we call the light if it did? False light?

My understanding is that space itself is expanding. That there is no region outside of space.

@@TheBeatle49 Yes the current theory is Universe expansion. But I am not aware of any claims to know what might exist outside the bounds of our universe that we are "expanding into". Expansion would either require the field(s) exists we are expanding into or the field is stretching with the expansion (which would weaken the local field energy as it stretched), or new field of same density is being created with the expansion.

Excellent question! Made my brain hurt 😁 ....love it!

It seems that the fields are a property of spacetime.

- Ric Flair approaches - The words are the same the concepts are the same but in practice anything on the other side of the metaphysical tracks is to be ridiculed into oblivion and forever known as “Woo”.

That's what pseudoscience is. It's something non-scientific that appears to be scientific, purposely or not.

@@twonumber22yeah, that’s right. Like black holes and dark matter. ;)

@@raycar1165 yikes

So our fields are electromagnetic and repulsing other fields. I figure insects can see when things are dead because the dead thing's field is down. I have observed my own field. I did this in a pool on a sunny day I looked carefully and could see its shadow. It even has a flower of life like pattern.

I think they are imparting photons. Photon is the gauge boson of the electromagnetic force.

@@lucascritchi so,what is it carrying, if it isn't mass?(photons are massless,yes?)and how does it deliver it's payload? what mechanism does that payload trigger that causes movement in the object?

@@InterdimensionalWiz that’s correct, photons are massless. Photons are the force carrier particles that transmit the electromagnetic force. Electrons interchange photons each other. Particles also has a property called spin which I believe it make them a little magnet. Photon is a elementary particle of the standard model, a force carrier particle. (One of the 4 gauge bosons known) If you are asking what is a photon or where it came from, well, in that case I don’t know. I think nobody knows that. 😆

@@lucascritchi Best answer yet! Tesla was into Radient Energy coming from spark gaps... then of course 'the Aether'so is a photon a waving particle,or a particulating wave? an interdimentional bump thing that lights up in the dark... ?

@@lucascritchi what is a magnetic field made of?what mechanism causes attraction and repulsion?

You may have read “The Science Delusion” by research biologist Dr Rupert Sheldrake, which is his reply to “The God delusion” by, of course, the biologist/geneticist Dr Richard Dawkins. Consciousness is the other side of the coin 🪙 that is life. No one knows how chemistry 🧪 became conscious 🧬 🐸 . biology… Google it. No one. Dr Dawkins assumes that the Universe is and was, a dead unconscious mechanical entity. However any physicist will tell you that there are no particles only fields .. and that there is ultimately only one field of energy .. The unified quantum field .. which IS what the Uni-verse .. IS. What no physicist (if he/she is also a materialist) will tell you, is that you can show that Life and consciousness are intrinsic qualities of this field … which IS everything. Ask yourself if you are alive and conscious. As you are continuous with this field .. this means that life and consciousness must be qualities of this field .. which you are inseparable from. The Universe is a nested holon just like the human body m, which it is continuous with. (nested atoms, cells, molecules, organs, body-organism - nested in the environment… The Earth 🌍 … The Universe ) Atom/energy .. to molecule, to Cell to 🥚 to 🐣 to 🐓 Big Bang 💥 .. to super hot expanding plasma .. to 💨 gas to stars ✨ to black holes 🕳️ galaxies, planets 🪐 🌍 … seas 🌊 cells 🦠 and animals 🐸 💃🏽 Einstein, Dali, Disney and Mickey 🐭 Same process … growth .. AND .. evolution. Scientists deny that the Universe has GROWN in that common sense sense … because it can’t be organismic .. can’t be alive. That is just the assumption part of the guiding dogma that is … materialism. the Universe appears to be eternally cyclic (living and dying and living being born again .. like us) Sir Roger Penrose (Nobel Laureate) has a theory regarding cyclic cosmology and a theory of how the brain may mediate consciousness via quantum processes in the brain 🧠. He does not have any theory as to what consciousness IS (No one does) .. adding “Perhaps in 500 years time, we will be able to make a start on that” Evolutionary theory has nothing to say about the only real mysteries .. outlined above. Materialism - “Give us one free “miracle” and we’ll explain the rest”? If interested please read “The Science Delusion” by research biologist Dr Rupert Sheldrake … this was his reply to Dr Dawkins book .. “The God Delusion” Also .. The Tao of Physics by particle physicist Dr Fritjof Capra. Deep Physics/deep perennial philosophy. (Materialism would just say deep woo .. of course)

he did say meter, however picture shows mm

It would take 3 million to make a millimeter, and 3 billion to make a meter

@@phaseencode4911 I believe he meant 3*10^-7 m which is the same as 3*10^-4 mm. So if u multiply that with 3000 it equals approx. 1mm. It is not correct but it is an honest mistake.

Its easy to make stupid mistakes like that when you are speaking in front of an entire room like that. Its also much harder to correct yourself on the fly. Obviously, he knows because he is correctly rattling off other large numbers.

Srimad Bhagavatam ki jai

No.

@@cottawalla Consciousness IS reality, there is no other kind!

@@Pegasus4213 consciousness is our mental model of reality. It's not reality itself.

@@cottawalla The fundamental basis of all reality, is an expression from one source which manifests as a multidimensional creative expression of consciousness. Language and symbolic representation cannot do it justice, but consciousness is the causative basis of reality. We may all view this in our own way!.

@@Pegasus4213 what you claim as the fundamental one consciousness is better explained as an effect generated by the combined effect of many individual consciousnesses, because the latter doesn't require magic. A true perception of reality requires the corroboration from many independent perceptions. Alone and isolated our models become limited and weak. That can also happen in groups that enforce dogma, because they exclude access to other perspectives. And when that is intentional it's called a cult.

Read “The Science Delusion” by research biologist Dr Rupert Sheldrake, which is his reply to “The God delusion” by, of course, the biologist/geneticist Dr Richard Dawkins. Consciousness is the other side of the coin 🪙 that is life. No one knows how chemistry 🧪 became conscious 🧬 🐸 . biology… Google it. No one. Dr Dawkins assumes that the Universe is and was, a dead unconscious mechanical entity. However any physicist will tell you that there are no particles only fields .. and that there is ultimately only one field of energy .. The unified quantum field .. which IS what the Uni-verse .. IS. What no physicist (if he/she is also a materialist) will tell you, is that you can show that Life and consciousness are intrinsic qualities of this field … which IS everything. Ask yourself if you are alive and conscious. As you are continuous with this field .. this means that life and consciousness must be qualities of this field .. which you are inseparable from. The Universe is a nested holon just like the human body m, which it is continuous with. (nested atoms, cells, molecules, organs, body-organism - nested in the environment… The Earth 🌍 … The Universe ) Atom/energy .. to molecule, to Cell to 🥚 to 🐣 to 🐓 Big Bang 💥 .. to super hot expanding plasma .. to 💨 gas to stars ✨ to black holes 🕳️ galaxies, planets 🪐 🌍 … seas 🌊 cells 🦠 and animals 🐸 💃🏽 Einstein, Dali, Disney and Mickey 🐭 Same process … growth .. AND .. evolution. Scientists deny that the Universe has GROWN in that common sense sense … because it can’t be organismic .. can’t be alive. That is just the assumption part of the guiding dogma that is … materialism. the Universe appears to be eternally cyclic (living and dying and living being born again .. like us) Sir Roger Penrose (Nobel Laureate) has a theory regarding cyclic cosmology and a theory of how the brain may mediate consciousness via quantum processes in the brain 🧠. He does not have any theory as to what consciousness IS (No one does) .. adding “Perhaps in 500 years time, we will be able to make a start on that” Evolutionary theory has nothing to say about the only real mysteries .. outlined above. Materialism - “Give us one free “miracle” and we’ll explain the rest”? If interested please read “The Science Delusion” by research biologist Dr Rupert Sheldrake … this was his reply to Dr Dawkins book .. “The God Delusion” Also .. The Tao of Physics by particle physicist Dr Fritjof Capra. Deep Physics/deep perennial philosophy. (Materialism would just say deep woo .. of course)

I've been saying almost exactly the same thing for years. It's nearly self-explanatory once you learn some basic physics and a little maths, but nobody will listen to me😢

@marcariotto1709 because they still think neutrinos are created by nuclear fusion... instead of merely excited out of phase harmony with ourselves locally (relative) ..most of our conceptualization with space-time as a fluidity is confused because we essentially evolved in spaces over curved 2 dimensional assimilate planes - if we were water based intelligent lifeforms, and the oxygen never rose from the oceans, leaving a water world almost completely to orbit, and there wasn't miles of ice separating us from space in such an occasion.. we would likely have understood this concept long before Feynman created probability sets that don't involve direct determinism ( by using passive observations ), and wouldn't be hanging onto a theory, Einstein knew was incomplete and suffered over this - constant - until his passing, in being reinforced locally through many technical processes testing the mathematics successfully approximate } as facts { instead of the highly repeated assumptions of close approximation around ^ and uncertainty principles shrouded in "dark" terminology, which allows the short ordered historically local repetition in successful real world applications

Rubbish 😂

@herrweiss2580 you must mean how you communicate with strangers. Maybe take a time out and try again. We can be better. You can too. Then we'll be better together... try some banana pancakes, maybe. Unless there's a college freshmen physics student that you need to stifle somewhere ( before they prove your next publishing wrong) (better hurry)

Like he said Craig, You’re on your own! I Sincerely Hope you seek some Professional help, be it Psychological or for Drug dependence or Both.👍

I think physicists have gone a little overboard in some of their naming. But he is right in that "quantum" has been mis-usued by the new age crowd. By the way, "quantum*" was not borrowed from mysticism. Also that the words of the scientists and the same words by the mystics do not mean the same thing. And also, mystics are uncritical in assuming that the words that physicists use must correspond to their own use of the word.

No it's because their existence is detectable and falsifiable. BTW, if you buy a GPS based on religious doctrine it will not work.

not "scientists say so" but that the theory is fantastically accurate, ubiquitous and very predictive of reality.

Ur, uh. What? You own particle physics somehow?

Science can always be reconstructed entirely from scratch. Burn all the books? Forced global amnesia with an "alien" EMP? Science can be resurrected. Given enough time, intelligence and freedom of thought. Science is not invented. It merely waits patiently and completely indifferently to be described. While a faith dies [forever!] The microsecond there is a break in transmission of corrupted information.

🤣🤣

Life is strange and it reveals itself sometimes as woo an all is fields in reality.

Glad to see you qualify your statement with ‘speculate’…😂

Some woo is like some myths and legends in that science is indeed proving them to be facts. There are reasons so many great minds also follow a spiritual path and not simple reductionist materialism.

😂

@@christopherhamilton3621 GOD