Wow. I tear up at the end. Beautiful sermon. Jesus is full of truth and grace. We all are hypocrites and We all need a savior. Thank you Jesus for your sacrificial love. What a great reminder of the gospel. Thank you 🙏🏿💯
Jesus is the only way to salvation. You can believe and live forever or disbelieve and reject salvation for yourself. You choose that you are unwilling to receive eternal life, then I guess you're FREE to reject life and choose death.
@@charleshenderson913 Not being convinced of religious claims from the Bronze Age is not a choice, nor does it mean you desire punishment for all eternity. Enough with the ignorant gaslighting tactics already.
For all those thats saying you’ll only believe God or Jesus unless you him, I say, even if he showed up in front of you and doing miracles in front of your face you will still not believe. It is ok to admit the truth.
This is a classic tactic of those who can't present credible evidence but still want to claim that they are right. The truth is demonstrable, so go ahead and demonstrate.
You’re right. Thomas didn’t till he stuck his fingers on His wounds. Aaron (Moses’ brother) who was top priest during Exodus lost his control when Moses was getting his instructions up in the mountain for 40 days. Aaron himself help get the gold and make that stupid golden calf. I’m talking about Moses brother here. So even Aaron messed up after all that what God did right in front of him and still made an idol. He knew better. So we are no better than the people who saw Gods work and miracles that won’t believe. So yes, you’re so right. It’s like they don’t want to look into it because they know there are consequences to bad lifestyle behavior if they decide to acknowledge it.
That's true. The same thing about evidence. You can give evidence after evidence about something and people will still ignore it. That's because they don't want it to be true. But it's still true.
Frank really is doing something for the Kingdom of Jesus. He is really show how bad of an argument and how little evidence Christians really have for the god they believe in. I feel Frank has done a ton to move the younger generation away from religion and Christianity.
A faith based "objective" standard???? Please.... All Turek has done is murdered the meaning of objective. What is the difference between your individual personal faith and your individual personal opinion? Not a thing, nada, zip. At the end of the day, your individual personal choice of faith is exercising your individual personal opinion. Are you surprised at the internal contradiction, the hypocrisy? Why? Isn't that what Turek opened his little talk with? Then why are you surprised that is exactly what he served up with his faith based "objective" standard?
I like listening to you frank it helps me a lot and I show my kids also to help them thank u for all you do for telling the truth about God and also how to treat others in this society a lot of issues I’m struggling with
Thank you for this wonderful video. I had nothing to do today , and this video came out. I think God wanted me to Watch it. All my asnwer have been answered. Keep Going. Amen❤😢
The only way to show you know truth is by evidence. Turek's arguments here all commit well-known logical errors (and bad logic isn't evidence). For example the Moral argument is two baseless claims: that (A) objective moral values exist and (B) if they do, they're best explained by a god. No evidence of those claims is ever presented (in fact when theists try, _usually_ they're appealing to the feelings/opinions/tastes of people. But it's those things -- feelings, opinions, and tastes -- _that make something subjective!_ )
@@majm4606 Hold on why do yo as an atheist, believe in morality, and morality doesn't have any scientific evidence, and yet you believe that morals exist
@@majm4606 How can morality be subjective ? It's nonsensical to believe that. Morality is objective because we have a moral law giver. That's not a logical fallacy at all.
@@Theloneyat 1. Morality is defined as, _"principles concerning the distinction between right and wrong or good and bad behavior."_ So because I think it's wrong to behead apostates and a particular Muslim disagrees, that demonstrates subjective moral values exist. 2. By contrast you haven't demonstrated a single objective moral value. Instead you repeated the same exact logical fallacy that Turek just made twice: you said _without evidence_ that "we have a moral lawgiver"). 3. We have evidence of everything we actually know. It sounds like you're confusing (A) real things we say exist vs. (B) abstract things which are only ideas (and so if we say they exist, we're only saying _they exist as ideas in a mind, and that's it._ )
Thank you Dr. Turek for your discussion on morality. I was blessed to attend this particular discussion. Thanks for making this happen Dr. Chip Bennett.
@@Demopans5990 Repent and turn to Jesus Christ he is the way, the truth, and the Life. Allah is false. In the Koran, it says in Sura 5 verse 67 to 69," O people of the book, you have no ground to stand on (No argument) until you follow the Torah and the Gospel and what has been revealed to you by your Lord." if the Koran is saying that the Gospel and Torah is from God then that means the Koran is false because the bible never mentions the Koran. Allahs word can never be changed also so if he's saying that the Bible is a revelation from him then it cannot be corrupted. Jesus' name in the koran is al-Masih meaning the Messiah. Jesus is also sinless in the koran and Muhammed was sinful.
If this doesn't give an example of innate goodness and morality that is by design put into us by God I don't know what does. This can't be taught at this age it is in us because someone designed us to be loving in this way. God! If you are hurt by something in life and are mad at God talk to him he can't make it right if you don't give him the chance! I challenge all of you atheists. There is pain at the heart of your disregard for HIM. But he loves you just the same!
If morality was put into us by a god, parents wouldn’t have to teach children right from wrong, they would know it from birth, and serial killers and psychopaths wouldn’t exist.
I am a being of light, & a humble hearted individual, & so I take this opportunity to share. The conception of a God has puzzled me since I was a child. I know what I feel, & I know what is wrong. What comes from my heart is true, what comes from my head is misconstrued as selfish & immoral, judged by “true God believers”. So there in lies the crux of how a religion can condemn, damn, subjugate, deify, scorn, misunderstand, & alienate the true believers, of Love. Belief in oneself is Love, not believing in a construct of omnipotence, by other humans that act to control in the name if “the One”. We are the “One”, every concentration of light & energy regardless of form that shares space between our consciousness. We sacrifice our True selves by misconstruing the outer God to our original experience. Be a Being of Light from the Heart. Heads & Religion may guide You, yet no One can make it real for You. Only You, by You, for You. Think for You & no longer be a sheep, asleep. Being of Light, Love, & Laughter. If God is watching, how laughable are we to subjectify our True reason for being. Even the concept of reason is relative to our just being here. We are here for eachother. My best friend grew up in church, had a concept of relation to God, found that we are all smarter than we are & ascended to knowing that before we exist there is nothing, & when we cease to exist we are nothing. No-thing. Quite simple & never misconstrued with ideology of control outside of our own making. I find a connection to Other’s through resonance. Every One’s energy is how we relate. It’s all relative. Find Your Heart, what Relates & Gravitate to. I am, always, Love.
Cosmological Argument: Fails to actually reach the conclusion that a god exists, and relies on logic, which is derived from our local reality; therefore, using it to make inferences about pre-reality doesn't make sense. Teleological: Defines everything as designed, making it impossible to distinguish between design and non-designed. To conclude there's a designer is equivalent to saying there is no designer. Also, there's just no evidence backing the claim that nature or the cosmos or reality as a whole is designed. Moral: Morality, though held as important to humanity, is really rather vague. But if we're just referring to determining what actions we should or should not be allowed to do, we can objectively determine that via proper reasoning. To present a being (deity) as the cause of existence, capable of bending reality to its will, is to undermine any objective basis for morality; as morality (and logic as a whole) would just be the whim of said deity. But even setting aside proper reasoning, there are obvious, 'common sense' moral principles that are just necessary for any social creature. If everyone is a rampaging lunatic, then there wouldn't be anyone left to ponder morality in the first place: the moral version of the sentient puddle analogy.
You said nothing is designed do you realize the endless possibilities of how if the world was just a little different in any way we could all be dead Ex metors , if air was toxic to us the amount of conscience it would have to be its im the billions its not luck that you are here right now God made you
@@Zofitness_4 The world could easily be different and support life. Not only can it be different, it has been. The air has been toxic to a lot of current life. Arguably, Earth isn't even as optimal as it could be. Honestly, why would an all powerful, all knowing being even put us on a planet at all?
Dr. Frank I was asked this in class today..... If the Garden of Eden was only good and perfect how did the serpent get in ? Im stuck with for an answer..
I have a thought on this although I don't know if this is the correct answer but consider this, when did sin enter Satan's heart? We know he is a fallen Angel so at some point he has to be made good but lose his way. If he was in the garden to begin with he was probably there as some type of Guardian Angel. Have a read of Ezekial 28:11-19. There is a bit of debate if this verse is referencing Satan or not but if it is then it hints that Satan would be in the garden as a Guardian Cherub who while being away from the Throne of God became infatuated with his own beauty and became obsessed with splendor which led to sin taking over his heart. Perhaps convincing Eve to take the fruit was Satan's first act of Sin, the first time anyone ever dared to test God's boundaries.
The fatal flaw in Turek's argument is that there is nothing "objectively moral" about God. The notion that God is the ultimate "good" is just a subjective human definition of what we would like or hope God to be, if he existed. Turek says morality is the "best" argument for the existence of God, but it is no argument at all. We don't get our sense of moral right and wrong from God. If we did, we would still believe slavery was perfectly fine.
@@araenasanchez That is indeed true. But most of western culture has moved beyond it due to some moral instinct against it that cannot be attributed to God.
Is it subjective? Kind of funny how the things we describe as ‘good’ tend to lead to greater survivability for the whole of humanity. It’s as if things that are good lead to life that flourishes. When you align with the design of reality, things tend to be better for you and those around you. That’s not really debatable and refutes that it’s just ‘wishful thinking’.
The inference is not only that morality provides the existence of God, but that morality is despatched to us by God alone. If you follow that logic then the desire or choice to hate, kill, murder and rape is in that consignment too. Why does it have to be that way? Because God is omnipotent, and that means anything is possible. That can mean a moral person acts only by way of divine instruction, regardless of his absence or unrevealed state to some of us. Morality isn't a divine operating traders contract...it is simply an Idea that you treat others as you would like to be treated yourself.
My biggest problem is that people who are prideful and ignorant think that are beyond God. I promise you this you will see the truth in this life God has given you or the afterlife. I choose to follow the truth now I’m not going to wait till my death bed where I was at several times but Jesus told me my work is not done. Thank you Frank! Keep telling the truth. Jesus is God end of discussion no debate.
. "Truth" is demonstrated dear not asserted, its that which best conforms with the FACTS and EVIDENCE and has nothing whatsoever to do with "faith" Knowledge of FACTS, also called "propositional knowledge", is defined as true belief that is distinct from opinion or guesswork by virtue of justification. A "FACT" is a point of data that is objectively verifiable ( demonstrable ) Absent "Facts" one has only the opinion or guesswork and no justification to claim such knowledge. Science has all the FACTS yet claims nothing as "absolute" truth. Christianity conversely claims absolute truth in everything yet has no FACTS 😜 Perhaps it would be best if you just go back to your colouring book and leave these discussions to the adults dear.
There is a verse if I remember right it's in thessalonians talking about the antichrist opposing and exalting himself above all that is called God and worshipped sitting in a temple claiming that he is God..they do reject God alot of them are lukewarm and God is not lying about anything especially judgement day so unbelievers or lukewarm believers will definitely see then but it will be too late...There are plenty of verses I think of for people that want to debate against the christian faith the bible Jesus etc I don't want to be these people come judgement day as Jesus said whoever rejects me and doesn't receive my words has one that judges him the words that I have spoken the same will judge them in the last day( judgement day)...When Jesus get the angel to throw them in the lake of fire forever it's gonna be too late as the word of God tells us there will be weeping and gnashing of teeth...
@@DomskiOKKK I think yes. And you? Frank says there's no moral without god, but tell me: is there any non-circular reason for why you ought to follow god's dictated morals? And what happens if you don't? And what happens if god's morals is to kill inonocents?
@@kregorovillupo3625are you serious right now?😂 Would you go out right now and kill someone because they you mad? Is that moral? You atheist are wild man.😂
@kregorovillupo3625 Without God there not only is no morals, also no truth, no logic, etc. Like he said in the beginning Without God it's just man's opinion vs man's opinion. There is no truth or morality without an all knowing, perfect, fair ,and just God to set those standards.
If a band is performing a song from your favorite band and they are doing a good job. You aren’t going to blame your favorite artist. You are going to blame the band that is representing you’re favorite artist by playing that song. So it’s the same as Martin Luther and God don’t blame Christians because we are all hypocrites and don’t live up to Christ Standard you have to follow Christ.
@@dannyreborn like I said, how do you know what’s “God’s opinion”. We are not actually talking about hearing something directly from “God” himself, now are we? We are reading stories about stories. So how to know what’s the truth. And the problem is: you believe one thing, Martin Luther the next, Pope Urban VI something else. So not exactly comparable to your story about a band we can actually hear and it coverband. However, you did touch on an analogy there: like with a band and it’s cover songs, different people will like different versions.
You don’t actually regard cover bands to the highest standard as your favorite artist. I meant to say if they play the song bad and they do a bad representation. You’re not going to blame you’re favorite band. Also, that is Roman Catholicism and I don’t believe in that. The pope does not actually say or do what the Bible says as far as what I’ve seen or any priest. They operate off of hierarchy and nowhere is that found in the Bible to run a church. And we know Gods opinion because to create a highly designed universe you need a person who is intelligent and can make personable decisions. If you have a immaterial, personable, space less, timeless, being then he would obviously want to communicate with his creation. Therefore alligns best with his nature then that’s how we know his opinion. Robert jastrow a very famous cosmologist (an agnostic ) who doesn’t even believe in God said that scientifically the Bible aligns with scientific creation. Then we know Gods opinion through his word.
@@dannyreborn good to know you are one of very few people who has the correct interpretation of “Gods word”. Obviously, I have no idea how, as the word salad was hardly an answer. “Therefore aligns best with his nature”? What’s that supposed to mean? Just to be sure, you state you have a better understanding of what “God” wants, than for example the popes (church leaders) and people like Martin Luther, one of the founders of Protestantism? So if they’ve got it wrong, what is correct? Do you hear voices?
@@hamster4618 no we know Gods opinion through scripture. In John it says,”In the beginning was the word, and the word was with God and the word was God. He was God in the beginning. So through his word we know his opinion. I don’t know every action Martin Luther took but if it aligns with Gods word and his commandments. Then that’s how we know Gods opinion. Because God will not contradict himself if he is all powerful.
@@carlloggins9297 Most people can agree murder, theft, sexual violence is bad......but notice I said MOST people, not EVERYONE. Some people will disagree and say those things are good or not actually bad. That's subjective.
@@carlloggins9297 That's a strawman argument, but no. Those people think it's ok for them to do it, or they don't care if other people do those things. Not for those things to happen to them. Either way, what's moral or not comes down to each individual, so yes, morality is totally subjective.
@@greenapple9477 if the person believed it is ok for them to rob and rape but it is not okay for them to be robbed or rapped then where does that come from? That’s the point I’m trying to make
@@JackgarPrime which ones are bad agreements that’s a very broad statement to make. All his other videos have a lot of views and people love it. What’s your point exactly ? Just seems biased.
@@dannyreborn Videos having a lot of views and likes doesn't necessarily mean they're showing good arguments. A lot of those could be going in already agreeing with what's in the video and just happy to get their beliefs affirmed. It's been over a month since I saw this video so I don't remember exactly what he said here, so why don't you pick an argument he made, you can timestamp it if you want to make sure we get his exact words, and I can tell you what I think of it specifically?
"If God doesn't exist, then right and wrong are just matters of opinion!" ...Yes, and? So...God doesn't exist then, by his own words, because that's... literally the world we live in. Thanks for describing reality I guess, Frank?
The issue is that atheists do not live out their “beliefs”. A true atheist is an anarchist. Everything is meaningless and relative so they shouldn’t obey any laws or boundaries of any kind. But many still do… that’s the issue. Logically inconsistent and intellectually dishonest. And if one atheist chooses to live a “good” life (even tho they can’t define good) they can’t object to another person, atheist or not, for doing “evil”.
That’s not the world we live in there’s a right and wrong. If right and wrong was just about opinions then murders, rapist shouldn’t get arrest because they have decided it’s not wrong to kill or force someone.
Though with the Gospel-the power of God we can be perfect: Jude 1:24 Now unto him that is able to keep you from falling, and to present you faultless before the presence of his glory with exceeding joy, See, Jesus can keep you from falling:>
Praise GOD for those like Frank Turek. As GOD says, "the fool says there is NO God." It truly shows, that anyone that believes, we did not have a creator, who made us who we are and created all things, is very blind. Anyone who turns away from someone who needs help if being hurt or murdered, you are definitley not of God. Thats not Opinion, thats FACT!...AND theres mans opinions and then theres GODs Holy Word...The wise choose the latter...if a child takes a candy bar from the store, do you ignor your child or tell them it's wrong? Most would say it's stealing....and it is, according to who? GOD, "THOU SHALT NOT STEAL" ..when you take your last breath, YOU WILL stand before Almight GOD...why would anyone forfiet their soul for this world? I never saw a UHAUL behind a hearst. You will leave this world the same way you came in, Naked and destitute. Your Soul will live on, either in Glory with Christ or in Hell which is eternal seperation from GOD. "BIBLE = BASIC INSTRUCTIONS BEFORE LEAVING EARTH"...It tells you "where you came from", "how to live" and "where your going when you die".. when I die, if the Bible isn't true, what have I lost? NOTHING...but if it is true (which it is) what have I lost? EVERYTHING, MY SOUL...My soul means to much to me, so I'll take my chances. God help those that don't have any hope. JESUS IS THE WAY, THE TRUTH & THE LIFE. JOHN 14:6
( ｀ー´) This is the artistic proof that the universe was created. When you paint a shadow its the opposite color of the object that made the shadow. Nobody knew what the opposite color of white is so the artists avoided painting white on white. The opposite color of white is baby blue and baby pink. The first artist to figure it out was Norman Rockwell. I was the second artist to figure it out. I saw it in the corner of a white room. The lighting was perfect to see it.
I've heard this argument so many times, and he nailed the correct answer quite a few times but brushed past it. Yes, there is no purpose to life, and yes, morality is just an opinion. We create our own purpose, just as we create our own morality.
@@lae3418 There is no objective truth when it comes to morality. Why do you think there's still a debate over abortion? Some people are ok with it, and some believe it's immoral. There's loads we haven't worked out yet.
@bennettdeneghuedoeshits2950 if there is no objective truth when it comes to morality, then who is to say that murder, rape, theft, etc., are wrong? You? Me? Where do you get your truth from and why is your truth better than mine? If you say theft is wrong, but I say it's right and I can take what I want, just because I can, who are you to day it's not?? See, if there is no truth, there is no morality. Period.
Morality is the result of human behaviour evolving over time when people come together to live in groups and tribes. Very simply good behaviour that benefits the group is rewarded. Bad behaviour disrupt group cohesion is punished. For god sake it’s as simple and as logical as that. You don’t need a god send genius to interprete that on behalf of an MIA omnipotent being.
It´s weird, because Jesus behaviour is considered to be "good", but yet he was killed by the "group". And not only him...millions of people behaved "good" and yet were punished by "the "Group"...In fact....in todays world behaving "good" is punished equally, if not worse, than behaving "bad". Your argument is one dimensional.
@@realtalkwithphil Are you distracting off topic (to fixate on common sayings like "god's sake") because you agree with all the other points the others were making? If you don't agree, do you find it weird you didn't address _the main points they were actually making?_ After all, when someone is wrong you can address their post and explain why they're wrong.
@@majm4606 If I’m not interested in addressing the other points or choose to address only one, it doesn’t make me half right. It’s my choice to answer what i want to answer. I’d be intellectually dishonest to think that i have the answers to every single question.
@@realtalkwithphil Well you're the one acting like they're right by ignoring the main points and distracting to something irrelevant. Worse, your point isn't even good because (for example) nobody who says "god damn" seriously thinks they're asking an actual god to damn something when they say that. It's just a saying. The most common reason people distract off topic is when they want to simply _ignore what other other side said,_ especially when when they made good points you can't address. After all, if you focus on an irrelevant detail you don't have to actually face the truth of what they're saying, right? But the only reason to act like that is if they're right and you're trying to protect a deeply-held belief that's wrong.
Why on earth should I care about the subjective opinion of an unproven god over my own thoughts and sense of empathy? I’m sorry you aren’t able to think for yourself without imagining a god character pointing at something and condescendingly stating “this good!” Or “this bad!”. This doesn’t demonstrate any gods exists at all, let alone the specific branch of christain monotheism. You’ve given no rational justification for your god belief, let alone why we should care what he/she/it has to say regarding a matter. If it were that important, this god wouldn’t rely on flawed and vague text to get a point across.
Where does your ability to think, your consciousness, come from? Science has given "no rational justification for your" ability to think for yourself... You've given no "rational justification" for you belief either.
frank turek has given many rational justifications for his beliefs in this video and others if you actually watch him. Second you’re just saying things without any actual evidence behind you’re claims.
You don't need anyone's opinion that the most high exist. Your existence is the only proof that you need. People search for proof of the most high when you can just go look in the mirror.
I used to think that Frank was just ignorant about all of his talking points but it's been long enough for him to look into it all. At this point it has become obvious that he is just a used car salesman who doesn't care at all about his followers as long as they buy his nonsense and give him money.
Hmm. You are sure entitled to your opinion but what blows me away is when one does an open minded investigation into the things he talks about, there's a mountain of evidence and logic to back up what he says and believes. The scientific, literary, historical, archeological and even logic itself are massively in favor of what he purports. Scientist know that the universe had a beginning and that it is finely tuned to operate properly. Scientists know that it had to take a superior supernatural intelligence to write our 5 billion character DNA code which is part of the building blocks for life. Scientist know that the many components of our 60 trillion cells had to be in place at the same time for the cell to function and reproduce. And they also know that the chances of this happening by chance or evolution is pretty much zero know matter how long it could have taken to happen. Many of these scientists know it was God who did this this. And many scientists will not admit it is God who did this. The only logical explanation is they know if they admit the God of the Bible did it, they then have to be accountable to Him. And there lies the rub. We want to live independently of God and do our own thing. But if God is real and the Bible is Truth, then it also talks about the one called Satan whose whose only agenda is to kill, steal and destroy. He and his minions does this by working incognIto through deception to use our God given freewill against us. The Bible also tells us that due to the fall of Genesis 3, we are all born by default under his control. So where does that leave us. That's why Jesus, the God/man, The Creator came to make a way to escape Satan's control and come under God's control Who gives us abundant eternal life. It's a totally free gift. So please don't be like the scientist who won't believe in spite of all the evidence. Because in that state you are already toast. Just ask Jesus to show you the Truth. I promise He answers that prayer 100% of the time.
@@ksjohnson8197 WOW! You must buy in to all of Frank's bullsh*t because you obviously haven't looked into any of the science outside of your christian bubble. You are too far gone down the brainwashing trail to ever make it back to reality. Look around you for christ's sake, nothing in this world points to a creator let alone the absolutely stupid jesus story. Get out of your bubble for a while and let the fog clear
@@JT-ht6fk I actually really appreciate the sentiment no matter how worthless it is in real life. And I hope you figure out that all religions are the same man made nonsense. Sincerely
@Lucase Than Yeah I agree. god actually can't do anything at all because things that are imaginary can't affect reality. But worship it anyway, no one will stop you
Can anyone answer-- there is no shadow without light. But Isn't shadow just darkness... and you cant have light without darkness. Trying to wrap my mind around this. Light has no meaning if there is no darkness.
Light is not created... Space is created where God has limited His Light... Darkness is limited but Light is infinite... We see that Light is limited because we live in the same space where God has limited His Light... Therefore, in our point of view we feel that darkness is what it is and Light is created... God created The Heaven or in our word The Space... And in The Space He limited His Light which resulted in darkness... But in out space where God is... it's full of Light 😂 I know I am not able to explain properly because I am a limited human being
We only categorize a lack of, or negation of, something when the actual thing we’re lacking or negating exists. If we never experienced the heat summer we wouldn’t know that the cold of winter exists. Without the dark of night we would have no conception of the light of daytime.
@@arpitapps5327 The Connection I see that Frank was making is that while a shadow proves the light it cannot produce light. On the other hand, light can produce a shadow.
3:25 it mentions the moral argument. there is no evidence to show that morals come from a singular source. none. All the evidence shows that morality is only ever derived from what a person values and is therefore derived from subjectivity.
This is an absolute bold assertion that morality proves a god. No, this becomes a huge fallacy when faced with the claims of morals within his own book. The bible never condemns slavery or genocide. In fact it even goes as far as to give instructions for the proper way to own other humans as property. Is this seen as morally good today? Certainly not. In fact at no point in time should it have been considered as morally good. So how do you justify the teachings that condoned it in this book?
It's sorta like how we're looking at slavery? You realize there's a estimated 27 million people today in some form of slavery right (sex trafficking, labour forced work) heck I might be even a slave today by some standards I have a boss lol And yes these are all wrong but back in the day slavery was around before the mosaic law was even made... we get that its more regulating slavery but it does say no genocide "thou shall not murder" lol and in exodus it says "whoever steals a man and sells him and anyone found in possession of him shall be put to death" like back then its sorta just how it was people took high honor in family and they literally would just give daughters away to go off and get married... was truly a different way of living back then. The point is jesus came and did set all these crazy religious ideologies man had twisted and set a standard.. look into the actual teachings of jesus
He has a PhD and a doctorate degree and has written many books… I’m not trying to be rude but i think he spent over 8 years in a top university with scholars I think he knows the difference between claim and evidence and also he has provided evidence and his other videos provide evidence so don’t judge a book by it’s cover. God bless you repent from your sins and Turn to Christ.
@@dannyreborn Still, he keeps mixing up claims with evidence. What evidence did he present? You need to demonstrate that christianity is real first, and then you need to explain why you condone slavery, genocide, rape, torture and collective infinite punishment for finite individual crimes, as the bible does.
@@pelgrim8640 Exodus 21:16 “whoever seals a man and sells him and anyone found in possession of him shall be put to death.” The people who fought to abolish slavery were mostly Christian and also when people were sacrificing and burning new born babies to a God they made up. Isnt right either so there’s actually context behind what you’re talking about. Before you make a claim; do research and know the context. Instead of just bandwagoning what everyone else says. Also he provided a lot of evidence. That’s why he’s a best selling author and people watch him. Also he didn’t mix up claim and evidence you’re just disagreeing because you don’t like Christianity.
@@dannyreborn Please name one single piece of evidence that Turek has provided? That he is a bestseller is no argument whatsoever, because other religions have their bestsellers too. Charles Darwin was also a bestseller. Before you make a claim; do research and know the context.
@@pelgrim8640 you’re saying he got claim and evidence wrong. I’m saying he’s not and very knowledgeable and he’s very credible him being a best selling author. You’re disagreeing with that but I’m going to go with the guy that has more credibility. God bless you have a good rest of your day.
Morality is not developed and given to each human by god, or pre-existing divine developed standard. Morality is developed in each human at early age by social norms, unwritten and written laws that exist at certain time in certain cultures. That is why morality is fluid and developing through the human history and morality of cavemen is different or morality nowadays.
The moral argument for god fails because it only asserts that morals come from a god. And even if there was a god, the morality of that god would be nothing more than that god's opinion.
I think franks usual response to that is that good comes from gods nature, not gods opinion. God is unable to have opinions and unable to change what is good. So morality can exist without god, because god does not decide what is good.
@@TheAndnor An other way to put it: if God has a nature which he can't change then he is limited by that nature, so there is a force beyond God that limits God. What would that force be?
A quote from the "Holy Bible": 1 Samuel 15:3: " Saul, king of the Israelites, (Gods Chosen People), is told by Sky God Yahuvah via a "prophet" named Samuel, >>> “Now go, attack Amalek, and destroy, and kill all that belongs to them. Spare no one, but kill alike men and women, infants and sucklings, oxen and sheep, camels and asses!”
@@heavnxbound than enlighten me what are objective morals? To kill gays as “God” supposedly ordered in the OT, or not to do so because Jesus said something vague on the order of stoning? How about blasphemers? Is it moral to kill them as instructed by the “Lord” or not? One of the founders of Protestantism, the original Martin Luther thought it was right to kill Jws (believing them blasphemers for not believing in Jesus). Luther pretty much wrote the blue print for Kristalnach. Not surprisingly the Nazis awarded him Kristalnach on his birthday. Meanwhile pretty much all people (with the apparent exception of Turek) that morality changes. Turek might be enjoying the stonings of adulterers by the Taliban because god said that is the appropriate punishment; most sane people think stoning is brutal and immoral. Most people (with the apparent exception of Turek) do not think a women showing her ankle or calf think she’s a whore, while the moral prudish views in Elizabethan times certainly believed only loose women did that. Also good to hear Frank’s wife never wears a bikini or swimsuit, but in a burqini just to hold on to those old never changing moral views he seems to hold. But fine, he holds the same moral views as Moses, so thinks it’s fine to own people as property. To kill his enemies and keep the young girls as sex slaves. If that’s his position. Fine. The. He’s not lying. In all other cases he is and knows it. We live in a society. The society as a whole determines what’s moral or not. It’s how laws come about or are dropped.
@@hamster4618 exodus 21:16- whoever steals a man and sells him, and anyone found in possession of him, shall be put to death.” The Bible does not endorse slavery or rape. God commands to love your neighbor as your self and that is a commandment. Anyone in the Old Testament who broke these laws was to be put to death. Also, in Hebrew the word slave has a different meaning when translated it’s translated to foreigner. Also slave didn’t mean the same thing it did at the time. Gay means something completely different now then it did 50 years ago. Before people used it as a term of being happy. Now it means feeling attraction for the same sex. Also you read the Old Testament out of context then because those so “called” slaves are actually working off means of debt and are to be treated with respect ; According to Leviticus " When a foreigner resides among you in your land, do not mistreat them. The foreigner residing among you must be treated as your native-born. Love them as yourself, for you were foreigners in Egypt. I am the Lord your God."- Leviticus 19:33-34 also What you are referring to in the old testament was voluntary means of working off debt. All men were created in the image of God and everyone is equal. The Hebrew for what you are referring to and the people that are mentioned in the passage are called the Toshab (Sojourners) and the Gar (Foreigners) .
@@hamster4618 you are provided with all the evidence in the world. What you are saying is effectively wrong, you just don’t like the fact that Frank Turek has a different point of view from you and he provides evidence.
Morality comes from humanity, empathy, and evolves as we do, there is no requirement for a god, humans determine that we have rights, it is the opinion of the whole. Religion is no solution for the requirements of humanity in the 21st century.
I don’t have enough imagination to believe in gods, demons, zombies or angels, garden gnomes coming to life at night, pixies or werewolves. Not to mention the first part of the bible isn’t exactly inspiring when it comes to morality, as the practices are heinous.
Think of it this way... just because you don't believe in the Sun, doesn't make it any less real. You've never seen the planet Pluto in person, but that doesn't mean it's not still out there. Stephen C Meyer, PHD stated it this way, "If it's true there's a beginning to the universe, as modern cosmologists now agree, then this implies a cause that transcends the universe. If the laws of physics are fine-tuned to permit life, as contemporary physicists are discovering, then perhaps there's a designer who fine-tuned them. If there's information in the cell, as molecular biology shows, then this suggests intelligent design. To get life going in the first place would have required biological information; the implications point beyond the material realm to a prior intelligent cause."
@@jesuslovesyou37 but I sure can see the sun. Unlike any supposed god, let alone your specific “God”. As for the “fine tuning” argument, I would say it’s evidence for no god. If a supposed God who supposedly created the earth for humans, created the whole universe with it, it did a poor job of over-dimensioning the universe. A vast space utterly useless for human habitation, while creating a speck of a planet in which humans, of which, once more most surface area is not habitable. In addition, that area that is habitable is already used up for 50% for agricultural purposes; and that in (according to the bible) just a couple of generations. An earth that is overcrowded by humans who are rapidly going through all recourses, degrading top soil, leaving their plastics all over the place and toxins in quantities harmful for humans. Not to mention it is utterly weird and kinda sick he would have created the whole vast, limitless universe, with an uncountable number of stars, yet he managed no more than 2 humans. Created in his pottery class with some dirt. Heck, even Emperor Quinshihuang managed to have a Terracotta Army of 8000 made. Yet the supposed God, creator of all, could only manage 1 or 2? Nah, I don’t buy it. Not to mention the fact that by creating only 2 people, or actually 1 and then cloning it (transgender? What’s that deal?) and then ordering them to procreate to fill earth, he in effect ordered them to incestueus inbreeding. That to rings untrue. Nah, us being here all flawed and all, are here as a matter of chance, luck and development over billions of years. And at one point, in billions of years it all will likely collapse or explode or whatever, and then change again over billions of years.
what exactly are you talking about bro? You know there’s context behind every atrocities you’re claiming let me guess slavery ? The Canaanites and genocide? All debunked and actually have context behind it. Before you make your assumptions on something actually read it. There is reasons behind all of it. You believe that nothing created something out of nothing. That’s like me believing a Tesla model x is just gonna pop up in my room one day. Well guess what it’s never gonna happen and it never will. But God because he’s intelligent made us and we’re intelligent and make decisions. You know God is real.
@@dannyreborn well, personally I think stoning people to death is pretty much the vilest of things one can do to another. Or, burning someone alive, pretty depraved in fact. Yet, according to your bible, ordered by “God” for things that really don’t warrant capital punishments. Unfortunately I started reading the Old Testament in 2014, when some folk of the Abrahamistic persuasion re-enacted the book of Moses in that same area. It was the sickest society I have ever seen and made me realise just how deprave the supposed orders of the supposed “God” were. No excuse, no context can ever justify a rule based on those types of laws for 2000 years. It’s ghastly.
- The cosmological and teleological arguments are word games. There's no "there" there. - The moral argument is the Christians claiming ownership of something that does not belong to them. All cultures have criminal & civil law and the golden rule. The Christians did not invent criminal and civil law; it comes to us from Mesopotamia, Greece and Rome. - The claim that a supernatural being wrote something on your heart is meaningless because there's no way to test it. - The core mission of all spiritual teaching is to help people understand their capacity for love and compassion, and to make it a major theme in their lives. - Multiple spiritual traditions help people find the peace and happiness that comes with this understanding. Some people call it living in the light. - If you are claiming they will be punished for eternity if they do not join your particular religion then you are living in darkness.
I love how people who pretend to eat the flesh and drink the blood of a human sacrifice find themselves in a position to claim moral high ground. It would be laughable if it wasn't so repulsive.
We don't claim a moral high ground. We claim a moral standard that no one can reach. Romans 3:23 "for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God"
An objective moral standard that includes good and evil. Without a lawgiver there is no law. Without someone to create a moral code there would be no way to justify good vs evil. I have a God that is truth, justice, mercy, patience, forgiveness, and grace in His nature.@@bibleburner8426
Thank you so much for standing up for the truth know the truth and the truth will set you free Jesus died for our sins and lives and asks us to come live with him if you accept them in your heart you will be in heaven when you pass away on this life praise God thank you for giving us the truth keep up the good work on the videos
The moral argument is incredibly weak, I do not know why Frank thinks is is one of the very best. Oh wait, yes I do, it is because all arguments for the existence of "God" are bunk. The moral argument hinges on the premise that you can't have "objective morals", "absolute morals", or "universal morals" if Frank's "God" doesn't objectively exist. The problem is that no one has ever shown that any of those types of morals exist, so the foundational premise, and therefore the entire argument ,fails. It also suffers from the universal problem of "who is this god person anyway?" My personal, subjective morals are far better than those of the Christian gods. I see no reason to lower my standards to their level.
Incorrect, sorry but even Richard Dawkins a very famous athiest. Admits the fine tuning of the universe is one of the best arguments for the existence for God.
@@dannyreborn That doesn't mean that he thinks it is either good or valid, only that he thinks it is one of the best from a heap of garbage. Further, Dawkins is not an astrophysicist, a cosmologist, or even an astronomer, he is an evolutionary biologist.
@@letstrytouserealscienceoka3564 I know that he’s not physicists and he’s an evolutionary biologist. I’m saying HE said with his own words that’s the fine tuning of the universe is the best argument for God and he’s an atheist. You’re just making excuses because you know God is real brother. You can’t be mad at something that doesn’t exist. Repent and turn to God.
@@dannyreborn I am not making excuses. I am pointing out that Dawkins has no experience in astrophysics whatsoever, and that saying that fine-tuning is your best argument is not the same as saying that it is a good argument. No argument is enough to show that deities, or anything "supernatural", is a part of objective reality. You need evidence, direct objective empirical evidence of your specific deity. If you really want me to believe that your deity is objectively real then present it for examination, testing, and questioning to see if it can live to any, and all, of your claims for it. I have never been anything other than an atheist in my 67+ years and I don't secretly believe that any deities are objectively real, let alone your specific one. I am not mad at deities, they are fictional characters. I am disappointed that any adult in this day and age needs to rely on a fiction of their own making to cope with reality. I feel sorry for you and anyone else who has been so deluded that you actually think that we all need such a wobbly crutch to walk through the one and only life we will ever have. Show me, with real verified direct objective empirical evidence that your deity is objectively real. If it is, and it is the deity or deities of the Christian bible then I do hope you will join me in locking it away for crimes against humanity. The gods described in the bible are horrific creatures. You might want to check that other Dawkins quote on that issue.
@@letstrytouserealscienceoka3564 you cannot put God inside of a test tube and test him. Your human thinking is way beyond Gods capacity and what you could imagine. Your insulting people for believing in God which clearly shows your emotional and you devote this much time to prove that what God doesn’t exist ? It seems like you’re obsessed him. God bless you brother I will pray you. I know you are struggling.
Is this real? This must be satire because I've watched Frank being corrected on all these points years ago and he keeps saying them as if he doesn't know better now.
Brother you know frank is right. I know in your heart that you are seeking for the truth and deep down in your heart you’re trying to fill that empty heart with stuff that can’t fill it. Sex, alcohol, money and relationships but you’re longing for the most important relationship and that’s with Jesus Christ. I’m going to be praying for you bro.
@@dannyreborn How did you determine this to be true? After all, anyone can say the same thing about anything. "Islam filled the hole in my heart" "My new job has filled the hole in my heart" See what I mean? There are lots of things that make us feel good. Believing in a god can do that too. So how can we figure out if your god is actually real?
@@lostfan5054 because it’s objectively True. God is real and deep down you know. Through creation you know. If there’s a creation there needs to be creator. Look around wherever you are. Everything you see around you had a creator to it. Even buildings you don’t just walk past a building and say oh there’s no creator. Even if the builder died 300 years ago you know there was. So yes there is a God and you feel empty with God and you’re trying to fill it with all these other things but really deep down you’re longing for God and a relationship with him. If everything else filled it would’ve by now.
@@dannyreborn I don't have any such hole and I don't believe you do either. You were lacking something and you found a near story that made you feel good. You have a God-shaped hole in the same way that kids have a Santa-shaped hole Also, I don't have any reason to think the world is a building. Yes, buildings have builders. Universes don't seem to have universe makers, as far as I can tell. The universe is not a building.
@@dannyreborn If it is objectively true then you should be able to produce your deity so that we can examine, test, and question it to see if it lives up to the claims made for it. Objectively true means that it must be a part of objective reality, the reality that we all share. We do not share minds, and that is the only place your deity resides, in your mind. That is called subjective reality. Your deity is only subjectively real. That is why no one has ever been able to show that their deity is objectively real, something that should be easy if it is true. I think that it is you who have a big empty that you have been unable to fill even with the deities that you have created specifically for that purpose. I have never had a need, or even a desire, for such fantasies. I find them superfluous, utterly unnecessary, a waste of my time. If the make believe of deities and their magic helps you cope that is OK, but it does not make them objectively real. It does not make them capable of doing anything in objective reality, the reality that we all share. Either produce your specific deity or admit that it is all in your mind. Go ahead, prove me wrong.
C.S Lewis puts it nicely. "Men became scientific because they believed in the law of nature, and they believed the law of nature, because they believed in the law giver. Now, to even begin to unfold the chapters of knowledge and make astounding discoveries requires a sheer level of faith. What's the physical guarantee that inventions are possible? I see atheists trying to separate faith and science like they also are not creatures of faith. It always takes faith. Plus Evolution is utterly based on Faith. I studied Archaeology in school, and believe me when I tell you it takes a massive level of faith to begin to objectively label some findings after exploring different theories and possibilities of what had happened or the story behind the artefact discovered. Its voodoo science, discovering bones in situ and calling it australophiticus, ramaphiticus, homo hablis when the skeletal frame in fact isn't comprehensive enough. Stephen Gould an American scientist believed it was very misleading to fleshen up the discovered bones in biology textbooks, when only broken, fragmeted and deformed skulls were found. It could have been in that SHAPE for a long period of time due to the pressure released on the skull by the density of the soil. But then Scientist in the name of practicing science proceed to give the discovery a 'full blown' body based on their speculations and variants of possibilities. How is that science?!! It takes FAITH to do that. Faith! That's what it takes. Also, there's been an immense skepticism about the creative power of mutation in regards to the natural selection mechanism. How can random changes acting on a living organism, this time, a coherent information in software programme for example result to a new form of life without degenerating what has been there, or this time, including more biological details that are not mindful of an organism's need for survival? In a nutshell, how is a baseline accuracy achieved such that it is consistent with the coherent string of DNA characters that is already existing in an organism that is being carried through the mutation process? Evolution is very FALSE, and I don't know how else to over emphasize this. Believe in Jesus Christ and Be Saved Today. He Loves You even if you hate him, and He wants you. To see for yourself, ask Jesus that if He is real, He should reveal himself to you, and you watch what happens.❤ And please guyss...Thinking is a personal thing, don't let some physicist, scientist all in the name of professional or authority appeal force you into thinking a certain way, even me, that's why I said to ask Jesus yourself. So many things in fact I have seen in Stephen Hawking's book Philosophy of Science that fulls beneath the scoreline of undiluted and dexterous science, highly misleading intelligent nonsense. Most of them are a bit of science rubbed with subjective views, coupled with his ability to market them with his authority appeal.
Everything frank is saying is base and the assumption that a god is real and exists. God has never been demonstrated to be real, and until someone can show that god is real then everything frank is saying is completely false!!
So you don’t believe In love ? You can act out love but you can’t physically see it. You don’t believe in WiFi ? And electro magnetic waves? what about the laws of logic can you see that ? You see you have so much faith in other things but discredit faith in God because you wanna live however you wanna live. But at the end of the day you will face God at the end of your life and brother I advise you to accept Christ and turn from your sin. I know you know deep down every excuse you make; you know God is real.
@@dannyreborn You can't see love but you can very much demonstrate it's real, you said it yourself, you can act it out. Love is an emotion like happiness, sadness, and frustration. Those are byproducts of the brain which affect behaviors in people (reason falls in this category as well, it's a mental tool). Electromagnetic waves, well visible light is included in this so you CAN see it, it's literally the only thing we can see. And wifi is an electromagnetic wave that we can send packets of data over. All of these you can demonstrate easily, no faith needed! And don't push your presuppositional garbage on me. How do you know what is in my head better than me? Can you show that your god is real?
@@dannyreborn Out of the things you mentioned, I have to concede that the laws of logic aren't set in stone, but agreed upon for the sake of discourse, but love is as far as we know just chemicals in the brain, and you can see effects of wifi and electromagnetic waves, so please don't be dishonest about those
@@kajetantatara2327 you can’t see them with the naked eye. Did you see the Big Bang happen ? can you see gravity? You see the effects of it but you can’t see it. Have you ever seen a black whole ? Can you see the molecular structure of a dog ? Not with the naked human eye.
@@dannyreborn Love is an EMOTIONAL reaction sheesh. You think YOUR god has love ? How about reading your iron age myth. Count up the murders by YOUR loving god ! 2.5 MILLION THAT is your loving god
The way people talk about this guy I was expecting wwwaaayyy more. Good public speaker and he has charisma but he just dragged out the same old tired arguments I've heard a billion times before. Still not convinced
I told this to my atheist husband and his answer to morality was self preservation and the advancement of humanity. If one doesn't have morals, it isn't a productive way to live and humanity wouldn't last long if it was immoral. It makes sense to me. I'm trying to convince him but my husband has great answers to everything.
We can all look at the same evidence and draw different conclusions…it happens all the time. When one is in a state I’d denial and argument will do. I assume you believe that Christ is your risen savior. If that is true here is the “end of the day answer” for me. One day we will both pass away. If you are right neither of us will know the difference. If I am right I will spend eternity with my maker. My prayer is that you will be there too.
@@charliegarnett9757 Let me ask you do you lose any sleep at night worrying "what If the Buddhist god is the real one" ? No, how about islam or hinduism ? Maybe those that believed in Thor, Zeus mithrah, or any of the thousands of other gods got it right 🤔🤔 But hey let's just assume that the god with the talking snake is indeed the correct one. There are thousands of denominations of christianity and each one has its own particular interpretation of gods wishes and morality and thinks that all the other denominations and interpretations have got it wrong. Many believe that unless you are in their specific denomination you are doomed to hell ( that means you ) You see you and me both are atheists to all these thousands of other gods, I just go one god further 😜
Too late for that the world is far too corrupted and ungodly..You can look all around for that Good is evil and evil is good Ain't gonna be no earth of righteousness here on earth it's only gonna get more corrupt..The saved live for God and try not to be conformed to this world while we are here..Then you leave this wicked world and go and be with the lord..
The wicked been creating society they aren't getting rid of the wickedness on earth..That's why there are gun stores porn stores strip clubs brothels and whorehouses etc etc they aren't gonna get rid of or outlaw or make these things illegal on earth marijuana shops you can forget building a righteous world
2:38 If the universe had a beginning, that just means it had a beginning, not that there was or is a beginner. The cosmological argument only shows that the universe had to have a start point, not that any being caused the start.
If it had to have a start it had to have a beginner. I’m a computer programmer and you can’t write code without a coder. Someone has to write the code. The cosmological argument also goes in with the teleological argument which one of the top physicist in the world Stephen Hawking affirms that the universe is highly designed well we know that only persons can make decisions and so we know that through evidence there is many things that are highly designed.
@@dannyreborn Things happen without a mind interfering all the time. DNA is not a code, it is a chemical construct. As far as I am aware, Stephen Hawking never stated he thought the universe was actually designed.
He affirms the fine tuning of the universe,” if the expansion rate of the Big Bang was one part in thousand, million, million. A second after the Big Bang, the universe would have collapsed or never developed galaxies.” He said the expansion rate started at that point and didn’t evolve to a particular point. So the universe he affirms it to be highly designed
@@dannyreborn We do not actually know if it could have happened any different, We just have a rough Idea of what happened.Even if it could have gone differently, It did not. Neither case, it being able to have gone different or not, shows any evidence of a guiding intelligence.
@@dannyreborn That is not affirming the fine tuning of the universe. The only thing it does is saying that there is a very small window of optimal expansion rate. He is NOT saying it was in any way set, tinkered with or had any outside influence. And most definitely, NOTHING TO DO WITH DESIGN
Moral truth is not dependent on the existence of God. There is no added difficulty in explaining morality on a secular worldview, in fact, I think it's actually MORE coherent than the theist model.
If GOD doesn't exist then neither does good and evil or right and wrong because it is all then reduced to personal or majority opinion and if we are all entitled to our own opinion then who decides which one is right?
'God can kiII whoever he chooses.' - Frank Turek. 'We get our morals from God.' - also Frank Turek. ... Awkward! If you're going to be an apologist for a genocidal monster, at least try to be good at it.
And we know the dog, btw right & wrong bc of Jn. 1:9-11 & that’s why Rom1:21,22 is true & man is accountable & responsible for his actions… contrary to catholic calvinism❤
Go to the foot of your bed, get on your knees, let your mind rest, and say to God, “if you are who you say you are as it is written in the Bible, please reveal yourself to me, show me your love, and save me from my sin.” Do that and watch what happens. If you are sincere, your old self will die and your new existence as a child of God will begin.
@@exaucemayunga22 A few different things happened. I heard the gospel message presented in a way I never heard it that struck my heart and soul. That was when I was a teenager. I then drifted from my faith until I had a combination of experiences that led me back to God. I then made the choice to accept the Bible as the absolute truth, and God slowly started revealing more and more of who he was and what my identity was in him. Prayer throughout the way also played a big role. It wasn’t a one time thing. It was over time. He started a work in me when I asked him to. When I drifted from him, he brought me back to him. He is now finishing the work he started in me which will continue until I pass away. I still sin every day and fight the same battles we all fight, just in a much different way than I used to. Did that help? Do you have anymore questions? Also, as a disclaimer to anyone who might read this, I don’t argue and debate. I just share my experience and path to those who ask.
Morality is a code of values accepted by choice. If there is no choice, there is no morality. If you accept a moral code from your favorite deity because you are afraid of what he will do to you if you don’t, that is the morality of a very young child. Such behavior has nothing to do with goodness. If you accept a moral code from your favorite deity because of what it buys for you in some afterlife, you are a fool in this life and probably open to objectively criminal behavior as well. Moral statements are guideposts to good living in this life. Morality only matters to the living. What is morality without God? Worthwhile.
@@brianh2212 I debate this everyday on this platform.Mostly 'God' endorsing slavery. So this is nothing new to me ? Humans had morality long before Judaism or Christianity was a thing. Civilizations that have never heard the word of God have moral and ethical systems. And the reason is much simpler than a God: we need morality to have social cohesiveness if the group is big enough. So every time the tribe becomes bigger than the “monkey sphere” aka Dunbar’s number - the number of people with whom one can maintain stable social relationships - it invents some form of morality.
@@DomskiOKKK Did you miss Leviticus 25:44-46 Seems so. Here let us take a look at what a loving and caring God wishes ok ? ‘Your male and female slaves are to come from the nations around you; from them you may buy slaves. 45 You may also buy some of the temporary residents living among you and members of their clans born in your country, and they will become your property. 46 You can bequeath them to your children as inherited property and can make them slaves for life, but you must not rule over your fellow Israelites ruthlessly.
Morality does not prove a god's existence. I don't know if there is a god or not. It's not something that I really care that much about. However, to those who say they know there is a god, I have to say that the only proof I would accept that there is such a thing as a god, is if that god appeared before me and convinced me itself that it actually existed.
Yep it’s your choice to believe or to not believe. All Hope dies at death, But if God exist? (I personally believe in God ) , then you / I will be accountable for the sin’s we committed. As you may already know, there are two things we can’t change , The Truth and The Past #1. Truth- you were presented with the chance to accept Jesus as your savior and have Eternal Life with God. #2. Past- you rejected Jesus Christ as your savior, therefore now you will consciously exist for all eternity away from the presence of God regretting not accepting the Gift of salvation. But again if you truly believe Death is the end of everything then that is your Truth.
@@GOD1SF1RST first of all, I didn't say I believed anything. I simply said I do not know if there is a god. Also, you have strange definitions for the word truth. The only thing I know is that people say there is such a thing as salvation from such a thing as a Jesus christ. I do not know those are true. You do not know those are true. Those are simply beliefs. I choose to base my life on what I can actually confirm. Take care.😀
@@bentriderI understand your reply , but I have what’s called Faith in God . Just like when someone tells us they love us, we believe by faith that they do. We cannot prove they love us we just believe. Anyways, have a great day yourself. I will pray for you.
@@GOD1SF1RST yep beliefs are one thing and knowledge is a completely different thing. I'm glad you are not one of those who says that they know there is a god. Take care.
@@ahope4u2 lol we are not talking about what mere mortal "MEN" did dear but rather what a supposed PERFECT omnipotent omniscient omnibenevolent loving God *TOLD* them to do 🤢🤮
Hypocrisy is at least number six or seven to me. Legislating biblical nonsense is my first. Lying about science would be my second. THEN COMES BEING CALLED SATANIC FOR EXPRESSING MY OPINION. Then i have a few personal pet peeves, and then yeah the hypocrisy after that.
True Christian’s aren’t hypocrites! The ones that call themselves Christian’s but are actually lukewarm are! God will spew him out of his mouth! He would rather u be hot or cold anything but lukewarm! And God does exist! It’s a given! U don’t even have to question it!Yes! Don’t judge in unrighteousness! But if u c someone is in error and needs to repent u need to counsel them but in the spirit of love and charity and true Christians have that! But if ur sinning especially committing that same sin u aren’t the right person to counsel them Becuz that makes u a hypocrite!
Christian apologists sharpen their rhetoric regarding these arguments for the existence of god. But it isn't ground breaking folks. Look at the empty pews. Belief in god peaked in the 50's in America. You're not winning.
I've lost interest in the first few seconds. Why have his name in huge letters behind him? Is he a rock star? IS IT ALL ABOUT HIM? I'm inclined to say yes and I have no interest in what a self-aggrandized man in a polo t-shirt has to say.
@@janetlauck1042 So the designer (He) has a masculine gender? How interesting. "Whatever we cannot easily understand we call God; this saves much wear and tear on the brain tissues." Edward Abby
@@TheNatedouble8 Actually, no. There's a clear answer to the eternity question if one believes in the hypothesis. Who designed the designer is entirely another question.
@@bisbeekid you’re assuming everything needs to be designed. Also the only things that do need design are material things. If something is immaterial it cannot be designed. We Christian’s say the universe needs designer because the universe is not eternal & began to exist based off the evidence therefore it needs a designer since it began to exist. We also know that there must be something that eternally exists because if something cannot come from nothing, and something does exist, then there must’ve always been a something. Otherwise you’d have to believe that out the blue something can just appear from nothing.
Mr. Turek has said in essence, that because God loves us, He will not “force” us to love Him and if we do not want Him, He loves us enough to leave us alone. I reject this view outright BECAUSE Mr. Turek evidently either forgets, ignores or fails to grasp the obvious- God COMMANDS us to love Him! Mr. Turek has used the illustration of a man pursuing a woman who only likes him “as a friend”, but who will not take “No” for an answer. Mr. Turek suggests that IF that man said to the woman “I’m going to force you to love Me”, what would that make the man? Or if the man said to the woman “I command you to love me or else!” But Mr. Turek obviously does not grasp the significance of the “First and greatest COMMANDMENT!” His analogy is thereby obliterated BECAUSE God DOES command us to love Him first and foremost and threatens every person who does not with eternal, conscious torment if they do not! This in NO way makes God capricious, unjust or cruel. It makes Him GOD and right and wrong are what HE says they are! So, Mr. Turek, perhaps your imaginary god does not command people to love him “or else”. But GOD - the living, true, GOD does! So your analogy which I have heard you say to some asking questions, is hereby factually obliterated by the obvious. Priding yourself of your supposed wisdom and knowledge, you have in this regard at least, missed the forrest for the trees!
I think you’re missing something as well. God can not force us to love Him. It’s simply not true love. You only follow the commandments once you’ve accepted Jesus as your savior. You can’t follow anything unless you have a sense of love for it. God calls us to love Him and as well as other. But how can that be if He forces us? I think the analogy that Dr. Turek uses is perfect. God is God but because of His justness and all knowingness He knows true love has to come with free will. Hence why Hell is a place without God. A place you put your self in.
God isn’t threatening you with hell, He’s warning you that hell is the alternative if you reject God. Where should God put you for eternity? You only have two choices: be with Him or be away from Him. If you reject Him, you’re telling Him you want to be away from Him, and God grants that desire. The reason hell is so bad is because God is not there, and God is good, so there’s no good in hell. Heaven is paradise because it is full of God’s goodness and joy. You’re not understanding that there’s no other good and pleasant place to go that’s also away from God. It’s like being given the option to live on the moon or on Earth, and you choose the moon because you want to be away from Earth. You can’t, then, complain that the moon doesn’t have oxygen and demand that it be a more sustainable place for you to live. You literally REJECTED the place that had the desirable stuff because you wanted to be away from Earth. It’s the same with God and hell. When you want to be away from God, you are rejecting everything that’s good and accepting the place that lacks the desirable stuff. God is not threatening you with hell, as you assert. God is telling you hell has nothing good in it and you’d be better in heaven.
@@StruttinStrayCatBELIEF is NOT *"CHOICE"* or a mere act of volition. Sure someone can pretend to believe anything but the things one actually believe are not something you choose they are an involuntary response to one's level of information and understanding of their environment. You are either convinced or you are unconvinced and its EVIDENCE that convinces. I could not just make myself believe in pixies no matter how much I closed my eyes and stamped my feet. Anymore than you could right now "choose" to be convinced that God is not real or that the laws of gravity don't apply to you if you step off that cliff. Tell me could you genuinely "choose" to believe the internet does not exist and we are not having this discourse now ?? I'm talking about being CONVINCED of it bud not just pretending!! Give me an honest answer , could you right now "Choose" to believe in Thor or Zeus ??? 🤔 No of course not, for exactly the same reason I can't choose to believe in Yahweh. Now if I recieved some irrefutable knowledge or evidence then I would have no "choice" but to believe, I would have to deny my own reasoning and senses. That what changes beliefs, not "choice" If you came home and found your spouse in bed with the neighbour, could you just "CHOOSE" to believe in her fidelity and go back downstairs to make her a nice cup of tea ?? 🤣😅🤣
@@trumpbellend6717 Evidence doesn’t always convince in the way you assert. People nowadays can be convinced they are the opposite gender, or no gender at all, or some kind of human-animal hybrid, yet all the evidence proves the contrary. People choose to believe they’re healthy when they’re fat, oppressed when they’re privileged, or victims when they’re the victimizers all despite the evidence, and this is proof that people regularly deny reasoning and senses. Look at all the bad choices people make such as smoking, drinking, sleeping around, overeating… all things we just choose to believe are going to make us feel better even though our senses and reasoning tell us otherwise. How many times have you told yourself before doing something unwise, “I know I’m going to regret this later,” and done it anyway? If you haven’t, you know someone who has. The reason you can’t make yourself believe in pixies is because you have no reason to, same with not believing in gravity, the internet, or an unfaithful wife. The evidence for the Bible has been enough for countless people (many very intelligent and wise people, I might add) to choose to believe in God, despite not having the kind of irrefutable, tangible proof of God that skeptics tend to demand. I think you assume that evidence just automatically makes you believe in something all the time, but people regularly look at the same evidence and come to different conclusions, often based on prior beliefs or preferences. I mean, there are actually still flat earthers out there, my guy…
A perfect holy and just God has set up existence an all was good. God doesn’t allow evil into the world. Humanity has however. The more evil happens the more we’re distancing ourselves from God. The more wicked you do the further from him you are. He designed the way it works and he won’t compromise for any man. It’s Mans job to compromise for God. What high seat it is we think we sit. If you do not choose Jesus you’re making your own bed. Those who live a life of servitude, self sacrifice and genuine relationship with your CREATOR will do what’s right just because it’s whats meant to be. In the Name of the son, Jesus. Think of the people who are having the hardest time of it in this life. Jesus would heal him in body spirit and mind. That’s what we have to do. I could go deeper because the Lord has revealed many things to me. I’m no better than anyone I have started my best to live in this way and I have seen the Lord in all things. I watch in real time him working all around me because I bring my issues to Jesus and try to live His way. That’s why dying for a friend is a High honor. I love you all genuinely. Humanity is special but don’t think the Words in the Bible aren’t the Truth and he won’t start a new because he can do anything he chooses to. The stories of the profits are the result of this and you can literally have visions and know things to come. They’re puzzle pieces they all come together. In the case of science also if we were to use technology in conjunction with God instead of to try and oppose The Almighty. To uplift all Humanity to come together as He wants we would all be fulfilled. We would be so much further. I try to humble myself always and knowing these things it hearts your heart and soul seeing all the suffering and destruction. An still I pray the ones working for their own desctruction to turn from their wickedness and repent. With humility and ask the Lord for forgiveness, otherwise the day of the Lord they will immediately know their own eternal demise. All knees will fall before The Lord. All knees will drop before Yeshua. He is the Way the Truth and the Life. Fully Man and fully God. He set the example forever and will reign forever. Ahmen.
If your God needs this video to give arguments for its existence is self-evident that you are making up your god. I want a god who does not need a person like Frank to demonstrate itself
You “want” is different from “It is” Expecting God to reveal Himself to you based on how you “want” only decreases the value of God in your expectations. Even a President won’t come to your house to prove he is President in physical just because you want him to.
@@realtalkwithphil so, “it is” means the god you worship actually doesn’t reveal himself to anyone but relies on humans to make arguments. This means you don’t actually know the god you worship but merely understand how others have taught you to think about the god you worship.
What about our tongue? How is it that we can taste sweet, bitter, sour, salty spicy etc.! I mean we can have 10 tongues one is for sweet, one is for sour and all 😅but we have only one and it’s amazing, and it is connected to the brain that says ohhh it’s so delicious or it’s not delicious! Isn’t it that our God is an awesome God?! Olwhats the purpose of our nails? We can have just fingers without it? Well there’s a lot more…
I'm not sure if this describes it accurately. But are any of us when taking a shower more capable of fully cleaning ourselves when we do it ourselves as compared to when we have someone else with us?
Neither subjective morals nor the ignorant assumption of design demonstrates any gods, let alone your favorite god. I’ve heard people of other faiths use these same arguments for their gods and they fit just as well because they’re so poorly thought out and don’t actually get you to a specific god claim. I remain unconvinced.
3:45 Take out the "babies" and the "For fun" bit and you will have my view on torture. Why do you have the qualifier of "For Fun?" for torturing babies Turek? Do you think there are legitimate reasons to torture babies? Do you think there is legitimate reasons to torture?
Yes, “right” and “wrong” are absolutely a matter of “personal opinion,” but that’s the point…the OTHER who had the opinion on the matter. It’s ALWAYS your job from “God” to respect their right to exist, as a conscious being who is just as important as you are. It doesn’t mean that there is an all-powerful conscious being that we have to suck up to. In fact, I think Jesus would be offended, if not downright pissed off about what you think he’d appreciate and what you actually mean when you say “God.” …but yeah, it’s been 2,000 years, and no one seems to get what he was saying, and instead, they make it about worshiping the idea of power above everything else…which is was exactly what Abraham did when he was gonna brutally murder his kid because he thought “The Almighty” was telling him to do so. It’s gross. These power worshipers are not just “praying” in the spirit world, but they’re definitely on their knees. 🤘🤮
The purpose to the game, for YOU, is to learn to love something more than yourself. If you can’t do that, you can’t get out, Mr. Tired, “God” SAYS SO!!!
. Tell me dear is your OPINION regarding the "correct" God who's allegedly the basis for morality a "SUBJECTIVE" one or a "OBJECTIVE" one ?? 🙄 Can we use *ANY* "God" as the basis for this "objective" moral standard you speak of or just the SPECIFIC SUBJECTIVE invisible being *YOU* determined to be the "correct" one out of the many thousands man has preposed.? 🙄 🤔 If its the latter then in actuality its *YOU* and YOUR SUBJECTIVE OPINION that is determining morality dear. if its the former, then asserting objectivity to any moral claim based upon a "God" becomes a completely vacuous useless concept 👍 The claim that theistic morality is somehow "objective" is ridiculous. Theists are merely substituting their own subjective moral standards with the morals standards of the god they subjectively determine represents the "correct objective" morality. 🙄🤔 Is killing "just" if it's carried out by people believing it is instructed by a subjective invisible God or only if its the specific subjective invisible God *YOU* determined to be the "correct" one ?? 🤔
