Dr Michael Shermer | God does NOT exist 

***** Well someone's emotional.

+DZStudios1 If the whole universe has no meaning, we should never have been able to find out it has no meaning; it would be as if there was no light in the universe and no humans with eyes to perceive light, we would never know it was dark. Dark would be a word without meaning. If God does not exist in the universe, we should have never been able to know God didn’t exist. It should be as if our brain never had a perceptive thought about God. The word God would be a word without meaning. Respectfully, if God has no existence in the universe how could the brain of an atheist perceive God enough to ever deny God’s existence? If God exists in the universe, we should expect our brains to have perceptive thoughts about God - and we do - even when denying God exists we are expressing a perceptive thought about God that would not exist if atheism were true.

+rontee24 So in your argument anything you can perceive is true or must exist? Try it! I perceive flying purple whales so they must exist. Sure I could draw what I think this may be or look like but it holds no truth to it's existence. Poor argument my friend!!!

Well, when you are done putting words in my mouth that I didn't say, how about writing a counter-argument to prove my statement wrong?

***** Well, when you are done putting words in my mouth that I didn't say, how about writing a counter-argument to prove my statement wrong?

A/JACKSON-----All planets, suns, stars, the universe ARE CREATED BY A. Jackson ! ! !

Albert Jackson True 👍👍

That's patently untrue. Although religion is made by man, God is not. In fact, God made us, along with everything else in the universe, and He also made the universe.

Spot on. It’s hard to understand why so many people believe there is a god .

@@debunkerofatheism6874 That's what you claim. Why exactly is your believe in God right and Not the muslims? Any evidence?

Indeed, a lonely sadistic psychopath in the sky is not my idea of fun. Phil.

​@@user-jt8dh4qy8d*The rtrded psychopath think that their creator is that way, Correction: u are Andrew, not Phil.*

@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703It's either "psychopath thinks" or "psychopaths think" please learn English. Correction: I am Andrew, user-jt8 is not. Maybe the psychopath you keep projecting is yourself.

JOHN, WHY USE SUCH VULGAR LANGUAGE?

Augustine Hourigan ya I guess I could have kept it clean but something about religion just angers me. It causes so much trouble around the world

This is true description of a fool. Someone who doesn’t believe something only because they cannot see it. You want to know a secret. God is real because he speaks to us. Speaking to us counts as evidence you think we just talk to our head. No

ForeverEdits. Well your 'It's true for me' fallacy is all you have talked about. You have a personal incredulity fallacy, a special pleading fallacy, an ignorance fallacy and a strawman fallacy which are all contrary to the evidence. You have a fallacious belief system and sound ridiculous to the rest of us that go by the evidence. Yes you are a fool when the natural evidence in reality is against you. Edit: It appears as if you have changed your name to 'White Wolf' instead. Don't worry because I can still keep track of you even when you do show your dishonesty.

John all you did was publically admit you were born stupid and youre determined to die the same way.

Yeah, so absurd. :D

@@hmgrraarrpffrzz9763 God in His Word says yes I exist and I have given you sufficient evidence. You have rejected Him because you love your sin more than God. And twisted the evidence in light of that.

_"I have given you sufficient evidence"_ I've not once in my entire life heard of evidence supporting the supposed existence of one or more deity. And that is why I don't believe in God. It simply makes no sense. And sinning? If religion would make people stop sinning, why is christians priests raping children a constant subject? And to sin means to violate the will of a deity. Without evidence that a deity exists, there is no evidence that anybody can sin. Or in other words: as an Atheist I can not sin because no deity exists.

@@hmgrraarrpffrzz9763 hey mate :) Many people demand evidence for God. But God says people already have enough to show He exists. And, the thing is with evidence, it is subject to our interpolation. And how we interpret evidence has nothing to do with the evidence. The way we interpret the evidence is based on our foundational beliefs- the beliefs we bring to the evidence. Therefore all evidence is subject to what we already believe. As a Christian My foundation, ultimate authority, is God. And because in these sort of discussions on worldviews we need to start there - with your foundational beliefs. And whether they can provide a coherent justification for a worldview. So let's start there. As an atheist, what is truth in your worldview? This is am important question because it will show what your ultimate authority is and whether it is justifiable or not. I don't want the convo to get too convoluted so we can come back to your other points later :) Hope your having a good day

To Hm Grrr...Then I do hope you do not consider your attacker who stabs you in the back in the street a sinner and expect him to be jailed, but rather help him push the blade deeper inside you as he is also a victim of bad family circumstances....and after your recovery you go and visit him just to be stabbed again...

That's a thought.

Francis v yeah ok buddy

@@shawnsiya4132 😁

@@armandoesponda6110 😅

🤭 This fool 👆 is still crying because Aron-Ra, Konstantin and ergonomover humiliated him.

+Edward Azar >> " _If God exists there would be no need for any debates_ "

I think I am as sane as the next man, not sure about my IQ, reasoning generally come with accumulated knowledge. Is there a point?

+Edward Azar >> " _I think I am as sane as the next man, not sure about my IQ,.... etc._ "

There is no such thing as God. Man created God in his own image and likeness. We all talk about vampires, santa Claus, and many other superstitions that do not exist, all created by human ignorance and fear. Thiest often like to use the question "something from nothing" as their criteria for disproving the scientific expalnation of the universe but it also applies to the creation of GOD himself. Something from nothing is the response of someone who knows nothing about science or the universe and is simple minded. The onus of proof lies with the believer!

Edward Azar. >> " _There is no such thing as God._ " *Great ! If that IS true, how do you explain your need to deny......something/someone who does not exist ? :-))) Does it makes sense to you ? Can it be that you base your assumption on what you've been "intellectually fed" all your life ? :-))* *As I read again your post , I noticed that you assess the world from the point of view of "your five senses". Am I correct ? :-))*

lol

And he allowed a spacecraft with a pagan name (Apollo) to land on the moon several times)

lol, funny how you don't know the difference purpose between tower of babel and satellites. human build tower of babel because they want to denies God, like you did but satellites float in space for knowledge and understanding.. funny to read dumb people comment on what they don't understand

Funny how your pea-sized brain cannot even recognize an analogy. You need to take a remedial English class too

lol

Who's "one" Mr QUACK parrot? 🦆🦜

Advaita.

I'm not a ballet dancer darling, never was nor could I ever have been, as I have flat feet. This must be incredibly hard for you to understand and your unaddressed mental health issues don't help. I suggest you seek professional help from a counsellor or therapist.

@@FlandiddlyandersFRS *Hi, Eldridge. It seems you got your "PhD". Congrats!*

Facepalm

@@WeanerBeaner69 He never will quite get it.

So what? Who cleaned up the mess from his overflowing cup?

😂😂somebody else wrote that..and guess what the world believes it😭😭😭😭😭😭😭

Tell us what you are doing here every minute of every day of your miserable failed life? Tell us what motivates you to be here 24/7/365 for two decades?

@@FlandiddlyandersFRS 'Neddy' want a cracker?? 🦜💨 👈😆🖕

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-59mRZ1Vj8ZU.html

Yeah you will one-day be embarrassed when you meet GOD all will bow before GOD

I feel embarrased for those who believe nothing created something. Simply stupid logic.

@@ryan8040 it depends on what nothing is

It is strange that many people are theists and others atheists . I am impartial , i listen to everybody .

Muslims already believe in Jesus, so that's just a lie.

@@DocReasonable *Ur dense rtrdtion and evilness impede you from understanding this post.*

Total nonsense from people who understand nothing about science and biology.

@@maylingng4107 Do you mean, "people" like 'you'??? 👈😆

​@@jimhappnin1425 When are you going to stop humiliating yourself.

@@FlandiddlyandersFRS 'Neddy' want a cracker??? 🦜💨 👈😆🖕

@@FlandiddlyandersFRS 'Neddy' want a cracker?? 🦜💨 👈😆🖕

👆 ⚠️ *Troll Alert!* ⚠️ 👆

_"Our strategy has been to change the subject so that we can get the issue of intelligent design - which really means the reality of God's creation - before the academic world and into the schools. This isn't really, and never has been a debate about science or the truth. It's about winning at any cost, and affirming the reality of the God of The Christian Bible, by challenging the domination of materialism and naturalism in the academic arena. With the assistance of many friends I have developed a strategy for doing this which we call "The wedge". But remember, we must avoid debating the Bible and the Book of Genesis at all costs because we do not want to raise the obvious Bible-science dichotomy. Our goal is, "how to win". Phrase the __-pseudoscience-__ argument in such a way that you can get it heard in secular academia and in a way that tends to unify __-other science illiterates-__ religious fence-sitters. You must also avoid getting sidetracked onto other issues (like empirical evidence) which __-our intellectual superiors-__ people are always trying to do."_ - Phillip E Johnson - the father of the ID/creation-science movement Conclusion: Creationists/ID fans are dishonest cowards

*You still can't handle the undeniable fact of intelligent design, poor ballerina.*@@FlandiddlyandersFRS

​@@atheism-themoststupidrelig8802 🤭 ID was destroyed 19 years ago, dummy. 😄😆😂🤣

So-called Darwin theory of evolution and another Nonsense so-called big bang theory is 🚫 not Science Not even close Not even science fiction Simply human Fantasy Blind faith

​@@atheism-themoststupidrelig8802man how do you believe in creationism without cringing? 😂 couldn't be me

You are lying --- You never corresponded with Dr. Shermer. Show one of his replies! ---- or apologize you liar.

Pot calling the kettle black?

If you're an atheist certainly you must believe in LOVE.

@@wooddoc5956 What do you think "pot calling the kettle black" means, because you don't seem to know.

@@johnphillips1144 Your post makes no sense.

*"so upset about his inability to explain vestigial wings in flightless birds (and eyes of blind cave fish - both explained by evolution"* So what? Evolution does NOT explain the origin of life on earth. So even 'IF' I give you evolution as a fact... you still can NOT explain the origin of life on earth. Claiming that our genetic code, 'evolved'... 'mindlessly', from pre-existing, 'less' complex codes that 'somehow' learned how it increase their own complexity... WITHOUT 'intelligent' thought... is NOT an 'explanation'. It's a lousy 'excuse'! And anyone attempting to use this lousy excuse, is going to end up looking 'stupid'. Do you 'see' 👆 what I mean?? 😆

*Ur rtrdtion makes u think that any real thing that is inconvenient for ur doctrine is "vestigial", but of course u have NO PROOF for that.. The only vestigial thing is ur quasi-void skull.*

​@@jimhappnin1425 You must enjoy being continuously humiliated by us.

@@jimhappnin1425"you still cannot explain..." Already did that. I gave you 3 chemical steps to nucleotides, the precursors of RNA, which could do the job of DNA. I have presented some of the hypotheses that attempt to explain the origin of life. Humans have recently evolved the following beneficial genetic mutations (the 'code' evolves): increased bone density, malaria resistance, cholesterol-busting protein, tetrachromatic vision. Natural selection non-randomly shaped life. Prebiotic constraint operated on RNA world, not totally by chance, but there were no "minds" before neurons and nervous systems evolved. This origin of life god-gap might close at some point, where will you move the goal-posts to next? Evolution is a fact btw, thanks for the concession. Life changes over time = fact.

@@FlandiddlyandersFRS Who's 'us'??? It can NOT be 'you'! 👈🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Charles Darwin the founder of evolution yes he does actually

Big green bowel movements with corn in it

Grow up.

@@thomasanderson6879 the cheddar cheese guy is here, folks

Thank you for offering your acumen, you really contributed to the debate

👆 ⚠️ *Troll Alert!* ⚠️ 👆

Good. I'd go further: 'don't know' is the ONLY sane response.

Saying "I don't know" is an admission of ignorance, yet you say, "Don't be ignorant". Still, your message is pretty good. Sometimes we know, sometimes we don't know.

​​​@@ergonomover Exactly you don't know who you are No clue Therefore you are Ignorant So, learn who you are and do something Valuable Tangible Not simply parroting 🦜 some Nonsense and fighting like cats and dogs - you talking to yourself Mr yehwa 🦜 🦆

@@evolutionofconsciousness8059 Did you know you are an animal, a eukaryote, a deuterostome, a chordate, a craniate, a bilaterian, a synapsid, a mammal, a primate, a hominid and a great ape - just like like the rest of us? Or maybe you are ignorant of reality.

"Yet in the whole of the universe there is no force that is either intelligent or eternal, and we must therefore assume..." No, we don't therefore have to assume. Your monumental assumption is founded on nothing but your opinion.

@@mtambov2351 *Since there are only 2 options, we must assume that one which is not proven false, so we have to discount a-theism.*

Honestly...as a medical student,even if it's not God then there is some greater intelligence out there... I know what I'm saying.

@Don don lol...very funny,do you know how complex the human body is?.. I don't think that's concidence bro🙂

@Don don cool... How about you drop your FB handle,let's really exchange some ideas...I think that would be nice...what do you think?

@Don don aiit.. It's cool.... Always remember,there won't be an Amazon without Jeff Bezos 🙂

That is the dumbest argument I have ever heard.

Sure, lets talk. In the post right below this, I laid out seven concrete examples of hard, scientific evidence for abiogenesis. So, you want to talk? lets talk about that, The undeniable, scientific evidence for abiogenesis that you keep dodging and refusing to even acknowledge, let alone address. Is that what you want to talk about? No, of course not, you are a coward. You wont talk about the scientific evidence that you are wrong, you prefer just ignoring it and hoping nobody notices your humiliation, right little jimmy inceI? Oh, and by the way, the Britannica article, which you parse a single WORD from the first line of? It is many pages long and goes into some detail about some of the hard evidence for abiogenesis. But you ignored all that, like that coward you ALWAYS are. You want to talk? Talk about some of those facts. The facts people keep laying out for you and you keep squirming away from like a dickIess coward because you are too ashamed to talk.

@@johngaunt2806 *Sure. let's talk, ballet dancer ergonomover. But after you search in a dictionary for the word "IDEA" and make sure you understand that ideas are anything but scientific evidence or facts or anything alike*

@@atheism-themoststupidrelig8802 I don't give a shlt about you parsing a single WORD from an extensive encyclopaedia definition which you didn't read, and which proves you wrong. I knew you didn't want to talk. I predicted you would (as always) dodge and evade like a coward. And you did exactly as everyone knew you would. As a coward like you always does. So, still want to talk? In the post right below this, I laid out seven concrete examples of hard, scientific evidence for abiogenesis. So, you want to talk? lets talk about that, The undeniable, scientific evidence for abiogenesis that you keep dodging and refusing to even acknowledge, let alone address. Is that what you want to talk about? No, of course not, you are a coward. You wont talk about the scientific evidence that you are wrong, you prefer just ignoring it and hoping nobody notices your humiliation, right little jimmy inceI? Oh, and by the way, the Britannica article, which you parse a single WORD from the first line of? It is many pages long and goes into some detail about some of the hard evidence for abiogenesis. But you ignored all that, like that coward you ALWAYS are. You want to talk? Talk about some of those facts. The facts people keep laying out for you and you keep squirming away from like a dickIess coward because you are too ashamed to talk.

@@johngaunt2806 *This word is essential, because it destroys your myth. What about math? It does the same thing. What about your education? You didn't give a sht on it.*

@@atheism-themoststupidrelig8802 You are such an obvious Iiar. The encyclopaedia entry YOU cited, which you parse ONE WORD from, goes into great detail about the EVIDENCE for abiogenesis, just as I have done. Math does NO SUCH thing, you Iiar. And each time you squirm away like a coward, too ashamed to even acknowledge it, let alone address it. Yopu Iose, and you know you Iose, little jimmy inceI.

It could be that Newton was covering his arse. He wasn't a Christian.

*Really beautiful, quoting the b-allet dancer A. Eldridge aka "ergonomover"/"FlandiddlyandersPhD"/"docreasonable":* _Dropped from 250,000 to 237,000. That's a drop of -23,000. Or an increase of 23,000 if you want to be pedantic._ 😂😂😂😂😂

No one ever said that, please stop lying.@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703

Serious question, what good has your god done for people on earth?

Atheism is not a religion dude

Still waiting for an answer,,,,,

@@Heygoodlooking-lk9kg *My mom taught me not to answer rtrdd questions.*

true my friend- when all the athesist are on their last breaths they all cry out-god help me etc=why if they dont believe in god?

@@charleslytle7529 says who

@@charleslytle7529 lmao making assumptions like that makes you look foolish

@@charleslytle7529 Please do remember, all of you who decry atheists, what the good doctor said right at the start of his discourse: that everybody is an atheist!

@@charleslytle7529 An unproven assumption on your part, darling. Even when I was full of tubes with doctors and nurses running around, with tubes and various procedures being performed on me without anesthetic (there wasn't enough time), I didn't cry out to any god and that includes the one you picked, or the one that was picked you. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

Wait, this is pretty clever! I never noticed that before 😂

Then those are false pictures.

It didn’t say Adam had a belly button in the Bible, so any belly button in pictures is artist interpretation.

@@ohboy1113 My bad. I didn't realize I think he was being funny.

josiah fickinger yeah he was, I was just saying it in case anyone for some reason actually doubted their faith for that comment. For some reason:/

"...while too much science leads back to Him" Reminds me of C.S. Lewis's reminder, “A young man who wishes to remain a sound atheist cannot be too careful of his reading.” ― C.S. Lewis, Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life

How though

Yet, reality shows as we discover more about the universe, the god of the gaps diminishes further. Science can give numerous possible logical answers to questions and eliminates the need to adhere to supernatural illogical answers such as god. Btw, we aren't even certain about the existence of god, but you seem to be very sure that it's a "he". It says much who is spreading fallacies in the name of science.

@@sankalp2520 we’ve seen this comment a million times when will you put it to rest. You’re not saying anything special. Say that to any modern respected philosopher and they will laugh in your face.

@@Hi-cu2vx See, i dont even need to say anything special. 😂. Simple logical reasoning is enough to refute their argument based on illogic. Doesn't matter if said a million times if they can't reason even once.

Aren't you embarrassed by your ultra low IQ?

@@FlandiddlyandersFRS 'Neddy' want a cracker?? 🦜💨 👈😆🖕

atheism-themoststupidreligion .. Even your fellow believers have had enough of your boring repeated posts..

@@evolutionofconsciousness8059 Was it beneficial for you when you criticised your fellow believer in atheism-themoststupidreligion with a post that ironically has disappeared from my screen..

@@evolutionofconsciousness8059 Lenin stalin marx are my idols? Since when? I've never idolized, nor claimed to idolize any of these three people. So why would you make this accusation.. You also claim that they are my authority.. 3 men who have been dead for decades are my authority?

*One of your many issues is captured by Pasteur, ballet dancer Eldridge:* "Too little science leads away from God, while too much science leads back to Him"@@captainatheist555

*S-ht up, cc-r-tt in!* @@evolutionofconsciousness8059

What do you expect as "sign"? That the heavens open and you see an old white guy sitting on some chair in the clouds? If you want a sign from God then look no further than at his son Jesus Christ. His whole life is proof of God's existence.

@@friedrichrubinstein2346 "If you want a sign from God then look no further than at his son Jesus Christ. His whole life is proof of God's existence." How do you know? Just because of a story in an old book? Do you believe in Sherlock Holmes as well?

@@Steven-ff4wl Nope, but because Roman, Greek, Pagan, Jewish as well as Christian historians of that time confirm it. Read some history books.

@@friedrichrubinstein2346 Those historians did not witness jesus. So they can't conform anything. Read some history books.

@@Steven-ff4wl Lol, your ignorance XD Historians are called historians because they research and cite reliable sources. These historians didn't witness anything they write about, yet they are considered the most reliable source of history for us today because their descriptions match with all other sources. It was their job as historians to be accurate. What do you think where we got all the information about the Roman Empire and Alexander the Great and all that? Exactly. Those same historians.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-ChTYOtVBws4.htmlsi=qiPBHgswEI2zBsfC

How Allah asnwet theses atheist in Quran

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-h8KgLCsMxCc.htmlsi=UZH2pPYF1F5gT0eB

@@MamaMama-sv3b *Don't bet on that.*

You just committed an argumentum ad populum fallacy.

@@litclassico *That's not a fallacy, just the truth that hurts, your fellows boast all day long about how your cult gains traction, giving us figures from imaginary censuses. My post is an answer to that.*

​@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 Your data is out of date information. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter.

The same Pew Research said decline of Christianity continues at rapid pace down to 65% from 77% over a decade (2019).

@@sleptiq *aronra's disciples 4%* 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

This troll 👆 is obviously misinformed and lying

@@FlandiddlyandersFRS *Only s-at-a-n l-ies more than the ballet dancer Eldridge "PhD"*

​​@@FlandiddlyandersFRSIt is just one of Joseph's old sock puppet accounts.

@@hammyhog4748 You tell him... 'Hammy'!! 🦮💨 👈🤣🤣🤣🤣 Good dog Hammy!! Goood dog! 😆

​@@FlandiddlyandersFRS And regressing as well.

Yes,pray Constantly and Make Sure you Follow,Obey Laws Given By GOD and Instructions Given By GOD Through Jesus Christ 🙏 Empty words/human emotion won't help you Spiritual or Transcendental Science of GOD Realization is not ordinary material science that you can study at school for few years and speak Nonsense You have to Give up your False ego and Surrender to GOD Under Bonafide spiritual master Sheppard Sheppard Means guru or Saintly Teacher Person who knows GOD

I did that over 50 years ago, still no divine answer. Since it was not my cross or my fruit, there was no need of human sacrifice. If he died and rose again remind where the sacrifice is? What makes you believe that the bible was divinely inspired out of all the holy writs we have? Humans are not born sinful, that is cultish nonsense, sorry to say. Born sick and in need of a cure, that's the basis of totalitarianism.

​@@ergonomover Yes, Because you prayed not Properly and waiting for answer? What answer? That is not how prayers works 🙏

@@ergonomover *YHWH doesn't answer to the sons of s-tn.*

@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 Sons of Stan Lee don't answer to demonizers who invade privacy. Good thing that YHWH won't answer as if he doesn't exist, just like your imaginary bogeyman.

Facepalm

Beautiful. He's been fooled twice.

@@Aziz_Abdullayev_uz *....said the d-mon.*

@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703The life of Muhammad is 85% fabricated, while the life of Jesus is 90% so. Now imagine……

@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 you stoopid

If you enjoyed this you should read The God Delusion by Richard Dawkins, or catch the audiobook version here on youtube.

@@grantm6514 Dawkins is a fuckwit. He is far below this guy on well reasoned atheism. Dawkins is a fucking angry, bigoted troll. Appeals to like minded idiots.

@@thedolphin5428 Name calling/insults? At best this portrays an emotionally immature individual and many people who recognize you as such will deal with you accordingly.

@@hammyhog4748 Lol. Ooooo. So mature, so much smarter you are. Ha ha. Insults ... name calling!. Have you never listened to Dawkins? He is THE MOST insulting of all the celebrity atheists, who never misses an opportunity to name-call those upon whom he chooses to condescend! Go away, you mirror to your own hypocrisy.

@@thedolphin5428 Your request for censorship is rejected. You are still circling around the ideas of ad hominem insults.

And then he explained why that is a wrong impression. What you are doing is called quote mining. Instead of defending your position you prefer to find holes in the arguments of some famous people you do not agree with by putting their quotes out of context.

ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-h8KgLCsMxCc.htmlsi=UZH2pPYF1F5gT0eB

Seriously what's the big deal with writting all in bold????

@@enomiellanidrac9137 *Think about it.*

Arlando Beler what do you believe

@@moralesvlogs549 MYSELF

What are those 10 questions? I can atleast try to answer them

Arlando Beler That's the most 'deceitful' demon in existence! "Self"!! It will surly lead you to destruction!

I'm actually reaching the point of not being so respectful nowadays. Stupidity is still stupidity even when spoken by otherwise intelligent men and women . And that's OK, except when these intelligent men and women are task with teaching our children want is fact and correct in the world. Religion is a weakness that effects millions, and it should be viewed by all of us as just that.. Maybe its time we finally realize that these "otherwise intelligent people" are not quit as intelligent as we once thought they were.

"I'm an Fing idiot"- Ricky Gervais

It's strangely how the world would rather listen to something that has no reason or merit. Instead fix the real problems, now

Kelvin also claimed the earth was no more than 400-million years old.

I hope U 'made a snapshot of the whole scenery'??

​@@DocReasonable He couldn't. He was walking on his fours. 😂

@@FlandiddlyandersFRS

Good Point Good Scientific Question Unfortunately Mr Doctor Shermer did not presented any Solid Tangible Evidences to back his claim that GOD does not exist Just talking...about hospital and statistics he said she said And All Speculative Nonsense

Scientific evidence says all species are biologically related, not "each (created) according to its kind", it says the universe existed for nearly 9 billion years before Earth existed, life on Earth was single cells for about 3 billion years, no holy writ reflects these timescales. The Earth moves. About 4 billion species went extinct before humans appeared. There was much death before the "fall", any illusion of divine 'design' can be explained by natural processes. God remains 'divinely hidden' exactly as if he doesn't exist. That said, some interpretations of "God" are less credible than others.

​​@@ergonomover That is not scientific Evidences and that is not Science Simply human imagination Fantasy - QUACK 🦆 Big Hodge Podge he said she said That's All That is your science

@@evolutionofconsciousness8059 Your ignorance of what science is and how it works, is not an argument against science. Fruits of the scientific method allow us to chat, why not get off the internet, go live in a cave to avoid being a hypocrite?

​​@@ergonomover We not talking about me We talking about you and your Ignorance QUACK 🦆 that is your science Seek Alternative Education and learn who you are Then we can talk science with you Mr Uneducated yehwa 🦜🦆

Please tell us how and why.

@@thejils1669 *If u ask this question, it's a waste of time to give u an explanation.*

@biglongfish9253 Oh, OK, that explains it...I got it, thanx...

DNA is one of the strongest point to expose the lies of creation.. 6000 years mmmg maybe 4000 to 5000 ago considering the Noah's flood. If all people on earth were related it would show, The DNA of the Bush men in Namibia, is the oldest in the world.. DNA variety refuses the creation lie. How do you explain a banana having 40% of human DNA Letuse is more than that Mushrooms even closer Of course chimpanzee shares 98% We didn't evolve from chimps but primates evolved from a common ancestor

@@thejils1669 *I am glad. Only the gullible one believes that nature can create codes, information and laptops.*

The idea that the Bible should be taken as historical fact and not just moral philosophy is absolutely ludicrous. I was a Christian my whole life until recently because I realized how brainwashed I was. It’s likely something created our universe from an alternate universe or higher dimension. But to believe that a 2700 year old book and a sky wizard philosopher are responsible for creation, is just so illogical and unbelievable.

@@jaweel6205 *One question, does my post mention the word "Bible"*

@@jaweel6205 Idiot.

Yes, and we should all be suspicious concerning the dangers of 'aspects of religious fundamentalism', good point.

​​@@ergonomover No that is not good point It may be a point But not good one The Point is that Seek Alternative Education and learn who you are Before death/changing the body

​@@evolutionofconsciousness8059 Who told you that, Mr Quackington Parrot? 🦆🦜

@@evolutionofconsciousness8059 Did you know you are an animal, a eukaryote, a deuterostome, a chordate, a craniate, a bilaterian, a synapsid, a mammal, a primate, a hominid and a great ape - just like the rest of us? Or maybe you are ignorant of reality.

​@@ergonomover Yes you are an animal Because you don't know who you are So? Learn who you are and Don't remain animal

*God is indeed beyond religions. Be blessed in the name of the one who died for us on the cross!*

If religion is commonly defined as belief in and worship of a superpowerful entity such a deity or god, then you are practising it. In reality, there were never as few as 2 human beings, 'original sin' is but a concept, there was no need for a (temporary) human sacrifice.

@@ergonomover *U are the real proof that d-mons are real.*

Would you be so kind as to re-type that in proper English?@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703

All Gods are imaginary and Jesus is a fictional character.

ignorance is the best way to believe only what we see.

@@trafficjon400 and yet YHWH was build on centuries of syncretism

@@ParadiseLordRyu And yet let me see Y H Y H WHAT THE F

there is only one God...the worship of different gods only solidifies the fact that we were created. if evolution did happen we wouldnt be such calculated beings..the world wouldnt be calculated..ha the world wouldnt even be here ...if evolution really happened thered be no concept of right and wrong and thered be more atheists and less theists in the world..that alone shpws me as solid evidence that ther is a God..to me its even better you say gods than to say THERE is no God..in which to this day not 1 scientists have disproven Gods existence and nt one has come up with the definite answer to our existence....seeing and knowing this fact....i should ask ..why dont scientists explore the possibility of Gods existence rather than trying to disprove His existence.....many scientists have found solid evidence in the world supporting things mentioned and said in the Bible..(considered fictional to you atheists). Why cant focus be divided....equally to prove Gods existence and 'prove' the evolution theory rather than most attention geared to the evolution theory..why is there instant rejection at the mention of Gods existence rather than an open mind to ponder His existence...the Bible gives an answer even to this....this is rejection of God(who we all know exist) than just a coincidence.

@@alexrattray8807 dude, there is no logic in your arguments.

RNA is self replicating and self assembling chemicals. Do this all the time you clearly have no understanding of science biology etc. The absolute vast majority of all top tier scientists in the American Academy of scientists. Are all atheists. The your education the more religious people tend to be funny that.

The Vedas is a monument to human stupidity. It understands nothing about biology or science, so it make up the BS it preaches.

@@maylingng4107 *"It understands nothing about biology or science"* Neither does 'evolution'!! 👈🤣🤣🤣🤣

@@jimhappnin1425 You are an uneducated troll who just craps all over the comment section. Evolution was observed in nature and duplicated in the laboratory. Can you name a single science organization anywhere on the face of the earth that rejects evolution? But you think that you know better than a million+ biologists with a PhD? That is not only the height of stupidity, but also the height of arrogance, and you excel in both.

@@maylingng4107 *"You are an uneducated troll who just craps all over the comment section"* WRONG! I am just a man who fears almighty God who created this earth with all it's life. I 'see' you going 'directly' to hell, 'exactly' the same way I was. So I thought I would 'warn' you of the danger! *"Evolution was observed in nature and duplicated in the laboratory."* WRONG! Genetic variation, sometimes referred to as: "Micro-evolution", which is achieved thru "selective breading" has been observed in nature. But NEVER "macro-evolution". *"Can you name a single science organization anywhere on the face of the earth that rejects evolution?"* I 'reject' it with 'cause'! I couldn't care less as to what some "organization" has to say! No organization, anywhere on earth, can explain how 'inanimate' matter can move chemicals into a highly complex set of 'instructions' to build a living, 'intelligent' human being (the genetic code) WITHOUT the advantage of 'intelligent' thought. And neither can 'you'! But you get all 'upset' when I reveal just how utterly 'foolish' your argument actually is. QUESTION: Why is that?? Why wouldn't you make me 'eat' my own words, by providing a 'logical' explanation as to how it is 'possible' for inanimate matter to become... 'alive'!! 'Spontaneously'!! I don't care about your "evolution" belief. It does NOT explain the 'origin' of life, and is therefore nothing more than a "side" excuse! And it is the 'origin' of life, that 'proves' the existence of 'God', because the genetic code, by which ALL life on earth is made possible, is 'evidence' of a superior 'intelligence'! (God) *"But you think that you know better than a million+ biologists with a PhD?"* I 'KNOW' that the genetic code did NOT create 'itself'... all BY 'itself', absent an 'intelligent' mind! So if 'that' is what your "organizations" are telling you... then YEP! I KNOW better than them! 👌😁👍

I believe you will be surprised at how much resistance you receive for making such a simple and logical remark! Matthew 10:22 "And ye shall be hated of all men for my name's sake: but he that endureth to the end shall be saved." Amen brother!!

When you know , its easy to guide and not waver. Remember with the knowledge , there is no death

The correct form is "thou shalt" except it should be "wilt" if it's a prediction rather than a command.

I have been seeking for the past 20 years ..and have came up with, not 1 good reason to suggest that's it's literal...I read scripture daily ..and one thing is for sure .. it a loving God exists ...it's not the one from that story...

​@@lloydrobbinsdrumcoverstoil1202you know u got follow the commandments right its a waste of time Jesus said if you love me follow my comments what sins r u doing r u lukewarm because if you lukewarm he going spit u out.

Who gave you that answer? Were you able to verify this with an independent 3rd party?

@@hammyhog4748 🤣🤣👆🤣🤣 What a 'DOLT'!!

@@jimhappnin1425 Name calling won't help you darling

​@@hammyhog4748 Sadly, it's all they have.

@@hammyhog4748 It's not "name calling". It's simply a descriptive term!!! Good dog 'Hammy'!!! Goood dog!! 🦮💨 👈🤣🤣🤣🤣

QUACK 🦆 Nonsense Trash 🗑️

So you 'deny' the existence of God... but even IF God did exist... He's 'evil'?? Is this👆 the message you're trying to send??? And you think this is "smart" and "scientific"? The truth is... this makes you look VERY ignorant.

@@jimhappnin1425 The Lord needed his levy of 32 Midianite female virgins after the entire tribe including thousands of innocent little boys was massacred at the Lord's command? What did those babies do wrong to deserve to be massacred? (Numbers 25-31) I don't make claims like I'm 'smart' and 'scientific', thanks for doing it for me. I like to get things right, too bad you have taught me zilch in the last 2 months. Dr Dennett demanding accountability for bad things that happen seems to make you fellows angry. You've made plenty of grandiose claims, but have nothing to back them up, there is nothing of substance for me to deny. I just lack belief.

@@ergonomover *"The Lord needed his levy of 32 Midianite female virgins after the entire tribe including thousands of innocent little boys was massacred at the Lord's command?"* Nope! Where are you getting this BULLSH!T from?? You site Numbers 25:31, which does NOT exist! THEREFORE: It is safe to conclude that your simply a 'LIAR'! *"I don't make claims like I'm 'smart' and 'scientific"* I agree!! You make claims like your 'uneducated' and 'ignorant' of science!! 😢 👈😆 *"too bad you have taught me zilch in the last 2 months"* I taught you 'plenty'!! You just 'pissed' it all away!! And you're going to 'regret' that action shortly! *"You've made plenty of grandiose claims, but have nothing to back them up"* HA HA HA👆HA HA HA!! I make ONLY one claim! That the genetic code is physical 'evidence' for the existence of our 'intelligent' God!! And 'you'... can NOT 'refute' my evidence! That is the very reason you MUST 'run' away from my questions, or attempt to change the subject! It's the ONLY path I have left open to you!! ☺ *"there is nothing of substance for me to deny"* Yes there is!! You 'deny' that the genetic code "REQUIRES" an 'intelligent' mind, but have nothing to back it up! Without an 'intelligent' God... you have absolutely NO possible explanation for the existence of the genetic code! *"I just lack belief."* WRONG! What you 'lack'... is 'knowledge'! Hence: You're 'ignorance'!!!

@@jimhappnin1425 I cited Numbers 25-31 not 25:31, there is a difference but it seems too complicated for you. You called several pages of the bible "BULLSH!T just because because they are morally atrocious? It looks like you don't even know the story of the Midianites. To claim someone lies you need to show both falsehood and intent to deceive. You've done neither which means if there is a liar here, it must be you. Please stop lying.

*"humans, chimpanzees, and bonobos are more closely related to one another than either is to gorillas or any other primate."* Yet that very same genetic code is different enough to forbid the construction of 'offspring'! THEREFORE: The 'similarity' is ONLY an 'illusion'. If one of these species 'evolved' from another... there would be 'evidence' of offspring! The genetic code is evidence of 'intelligent' design... which is 'evidence' for the existence of our 'intelligent' God! Just as the bible told us from the very beginning!!

@@jimhappnin1425 According to the Smithsonian Institute, we have well over 6000 skeletons of pre-human individuals. 98.5% of our genes are identical to those of bonobos and chimps. Your ignorance of science is not an argument against science. The genetic code came from a simpler one, it is full of non-functional relics that often malfunction and cause cancer in babies, and you think that is 'intelligent'. Are you a sadist?

​@@jimhappnin1425 Why didn't you get properly educated? Kindergarten too hard for you?

@@ergonomover *"According to the Smithsonian Institute, we have well over 6000 skeletons of pre-human individuals."* Absolute bullsh!t! You can NOT provide a single example! *"98.5% of our genes are identical to those of bonobos and chimps."* And this is 'bullsh!t' remark number two!! The overall human-chimp DNA similarity was likely no more than 85%.6 Based on the most recent research, the difference between the human and chimp genomes is estimated to be a maximum of 15%-a number that does not include the regions that are too different to even compare, according to JEFFREY P. TOMKINS, PH.D. So get your 'facts' straight!! Your ignorance of science is not an argument 'FOR' science!! *"The genetic code came from a simpler one"* And my simple question to you, which you keep 'running' away from, is this: Where did the "simpler code" come from, and HOW did the code become MORE complex in the absence of any 'intelligent' thought? And you 'DON'T KNOW'! And you don't know because you just pulled that out of your uneducated @ss!! Why can't you simply admit that my evidence for the existence of our 'intelligent' God, is 'irrefutable'?? And the answer it too 'obvious'!! Atheism is your chosen "religious" belief, and you are NOT going to give up your "religious" belief, no matter what the evidence proves! But I can't think of anything 'stupider' than to "believe" in something PROVEN to be 'false'!! But I guess you're just... 'stupid' like that!! Maybe this 'stupidity' of yours comes from your 'identical' bonobos genes! 🐒 👈🤣🤣🤣

@@FlandiddlyandersFRS 🦜💨 👈Pretty girl! 😆

Uh...... pee pee?

*Andrew, is this all you can do now that u turned 66? Have u checked it with ur doctors?*

@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 My f*cking name is Phil. I have one account Full stop.

@@user-jt8dh4qy8d *Did u change ur name, Andrew?*

F*** off, no I did not and since you obviously have a mod in your pocket or are a mod now yourself it shows your sheer cowardice at removing every comment I make. Pathetic.

​​@user-jt8dh4qy8d he's just trying to wind you up.

You definitely have problems if you believe in a magical sky fairy. 😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅😅

@@unkaumanguy1439 *Sure, my problem is just stated above, Eldridge.*

I adore Lord Kelvin as the only scientist worthy of respect for his opinion that our planet was not old enough for Evolution by Natural Selection. He was mistaken. He demolished the idea that this planet was less than 20 million years old, and found no reason to account for more than a hundred million. It turns out that a hundred million years is indeed far too short, but that Kelvin, who was Sir William Thomson at the time he did those thermodynamic estimations, was also blamelessly unaware of the inordinate stored energy of uranium, thorium, and radioactive potassium 40.

I confess I don't see how any intelligent being can accept an invisible unseen divinely hidden god as being real.

According to google, 117 billion people lived in total. Its entirely possible that tens of billions of people in the period between humans emerged and 2024 years ago lived in total.

​@@stanwaltz55 You are correct, sir.

You...if you know who you are

Why do you think they are "engineered", fool.

Whoever it was took the day off when YOU popped out!! HAW HAW HAW!!! @ermasale4618

The genetic code proves all life on earth was created by an intelligent God. The bible tells us that God created all life on earth by means of His immense intelligence, and we can all 'see' the evidence of Gods immense intelligence in the complexity of the genetic code found within the DNA of every living thing on earth. For the atheist to even 'attempt' to argue that life can just create 'itself', with all the 'complexities' we see... is absolutely 'impossible'. But the atheist believes it anyway. Even the 'atheist' can never explain it.

@@jimhappnin1425 U are NOT the product of anything 'intelligent', d0g tyrd.

_DNA can't make itself_ Why not? _There has to be a creator_ Who created the creator then?

No one made God. God created time meaning he is outside of time. In order to be created you have to be within time. Since God is outside of time he not only doesn't have to have a creator, but he can't have one. Also, a book cannot write itself. I hope you can agree with that at least. DNA is coherent information, like a book. But it is far more complex than a book. Just like a book can't write itself DNA can't make itself, and nothing can only create nothing.

​@@samnewton3358 Special pleading fallacy. 🚮

​@@samnewton3358 DNA is a biochemical molecule. The genetic code did not exist until scientists created it.

​@@FlandiddlyandersFRS *Tell us how you know so much about DNA, after you insisted that there is only one single instance of the genome in the whole human body. You were quite close, there are trillions of copies actually.* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

That'll work... o.0

Amen and the message of the Cross is foolishness to those who are perishing

Counter with facts and logic, not bible verses.

@Tim H your have a eternity of regret. Your foolishness condems you

Oh you got me. Now I believe in god. That was so fckin wise. I am overwhelmed. I cannot take this, please stop. This is too much wisdom at once. Aaaaaaah

Hell is a closed system. Cry more.

@@FlandiddlyandersFRS *One question. ballet dancer and-rew "ergonomover" e-ldridge, why did you add "PhD" to the username of your trolling account "FlandiddlyandersPhD" and then you changed it to "scientist flanders", c-rrree-ttt in?* 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

​@@atheism-themoststupidrelig5703 Jealous because you never went to school at all? I guess because your father spent the tuition money on a donkey instead.