Too bad this composer is not very well known! It really deserves to be listened to! Dommage que ce compositeur ne soit pas bien connu ! Il mérite vraiment d'être écouté !
Post modernism can be quite good in architectecture; it is quite bad in plastic arts... ...but worse still in music ! Quite interesting to ask oneself why this is the case.
@@mislavhilc What case does this music have? Abandoning climaxes and emotion? Serious development? Simple Rhythm? Reversing years of progress we have made in music for an artistic statement that shouldn't be considered music itself.
The base of postmodernism is mostly abandoning rules, and thus creating something unique. However, in the case of music, rules aree what make it good to listen to. Repetition, nice interval, etc. that's why postmodern music is so hard to listen
its 40 years later----whats the new cutting edge music of 2016---u there--u alive--u a person---STOLA---can folk people write it off as a movie soundtrack fs
This is bad because it doesn't make me happy. Why isn't all music just in 4/4? All movies should just be comedy too, those make me feel good. PROTIP: Make sure the synth and vocals are in the same key!
just surfing---musically--at --just musically---wunderba--u are who u claim to be---mister frank stola--i will be back--cant stand imitations--u da rel thing--fs google me molto molto bene--dont know --but just the music---
The One True Thinker What's more astonishing are the people who actively listen to atonal, freestyle postmodern music and enjoy it. More often than not, these are the same people who pursue graduate degrees in fringe musical genres and have..."eccentric" personalities. Their defense is typically "Well, modern [insert mainstream genre here] is just as awful!"...but at least I can understand why people would like [mainstream genre] due to the [insert endearing tonal, timbre, meter, etc.]. Postmodern music, however, appears to be literal random noise. I'll never understand the genre. Ever.
bobipineman That's true. The only way one would listen to this drivel, however, is if it were simply ambient. Some people (usually "music theory" academics) claim to enjoy postmodern music exclusively...that just seems odd to me.
+Jonathan Biohoo If you want to know why people like listening to noise music like this song, consider this ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-zxWSJnYd18c.html imo its an acquired taste. When you listening to atonal weird music your brain is trying hard to look for patterns and familiar things, and when you realize that there isn't any of that, that generally provokes two kinds of responses from people - disgust or curiosity (maybe even enjoyment). some people are just bored of predictable patterns and familiar things and reach for new stuff and find songs like this, which is sooo far removed from what they are used to, its imprinted onto them (that's what happened to me). literally hearing some of the things in this song made me physically flinch because I was caught off guard, its easy to understand how there is at least some guy out there that enjoys feeling that. I couldn't even listen to the whole song. Yet I love songs almost as 'bad' as this that I listen to every day and it feels like heaven, example: soundcloud. com/vaaes. and to break the streak im not any kind of music/art degree pursuer.
maybe also hindemith's and busoni's music would have been termed "noise" by haydn, yet hindemith and busoni are neoclassical in moder. music and its aesthetics evolve. imposing or accepting only a special style or set of rules is reactionary. btw noise can be music.
@@dzedong What case does this music have? Abandoning climaxes and emotion? Serious development? Simple Rhythm? Reversing years of progress we have made in music for an artistic statement that shouldn't be considered music itself. Lets not talk philosophy. We are talking music. Of course noise can be music. There is a reason why people don't listen to nails on a chalkboard in their free time :D
@@vZZenn you are just reasoning using standard arguments that postmodernism tries to re-elaborate. BTW I'm not sure you can really appreciate that the rhythm is not that simple, and that this music has enough emotional power. In conclusion you are criticising the music without any effort to understand the project of the artist. Your message is just reactionary. In any case, a detailed discussion of postmodern music, or culture in general, should be that complex that cannot be undertaken within RU-vid comments. There are other means, like long and reasoned papers or discussions with people able to refer to technical elements of the music.
