DUE PROCESS and the Right to PRIVACY [AP Gov Review, Unit 3 Topic 9 (3.9)]

Подписаться 774 тыс.

Просмотров 94 тыс.

50% 1

GET FOLLOW-ALONG NOTEGUIDES for this video: bit.ly/3XMSawp
AP HEIMLER REVIEW GUIDE (formerly known as the Ultimate Review Packet):
+AP Gov Heimler Review Guide: bit.ly/3rfXr2Y
Additional HEIMLER REVIEW GUIDES (formerly known as Ultimate Review Packet):
+AP US History: bit.ly/44p4pRL
+AP World History: bit.ly/46rfHH1
+AP European History: bit.ly/3PCPyiw
+AP Essay CRAM Course (DBQ, LEQ, SAQ Help): bit.ly/3XuwaWN
HEIMLER’S HISTORY MERCH! / @heimlershistory
Tiktok: @steveheimler
Instagram: @heimlers_history
Heimler's History DISCORD Server: / discord
In this video Heimler walks you through Unit 3 Topic 9 of the AP Government curriculum which is all about the Constitution's provision for the right to privacy. If you're scratching your head because you don't remember a right to privacy included in the Bill of Rights, you're not wrong.
However, through a series of cases, the Supreme Court established the right to privacy as an implicit right, a shadow of the explicit rights enumerated in the first ten amendments.
The most controversial application of this right to privacy was in the landmark case Roe v. Wade which relied on this precedent to rule on a woman's right to abortion.

Опубликовано:

14 июл 2024

Ссылка:

Скачать:

Готовим ссылку...

Добавить в:

Мой плейлист

Посмотреть позже

Комментарии : 8

@generalgrievous3731 2 года назад

In selective incorporation, do they apply the Bill of Rights to the states through the DUE PROCESS clause or the EQUAL PROTECTION clause of the 14th amendment? I keep on hearing different answers. Can you please clarify?

@heimlershistory 2 года назад

Selective incorporation can happen through either clause. Not necessarily one or the other…

@narenmani07 Год назад

@@heimlershistory So in the case of Gideon v. Wainwright, the Due Process clause was incorporated right? Doesn't the Equal Protection clause also make sense in this case?

@coolkcroyale Год назад

@@narenmani07 for Gideon v Wainwright it is the due process clause (NOT equal protection clause) DP clause prevents states from denying “life, liberty, and property without due process of law.” So Gideon’s case used DP because the state was denying him his right to attorney. Equal protection clause deals with preventing discrimination like denying a black person of rights just because they’re black

@narenmani07 Год назад

@@coolkcroyale Oh ok I understand. Thank you and good luck today!

@thestifmyster1 2 года назад

So we need an amendment that says we have a right to privacy or not?

@brandonharmony7490 Год назад

Yes to prevent against precedent being overturned however it would have little effect on current society besides abortion which would change the precedent form Jackson v Mississippi back to Roe v Wade