Dyson Powered Cyclone Separator Vacuum 

(Loved the video) Do some research on microwaves and their affect on food. Speaking of “affect”, ever wonder what word to use?? “Effect” or “Affects”. ?? We can help remember it like this: “A” is for “Anti”. So use “Affect” when speaking of a negative influence on something. Use Effect for all other stuff and things such as special effects. I could have said the above like this: “A” is for “Anti”. So use “Affect” when speaking of a negative *effect* on something. Notice how with”effect” i needed to designate the negative or Anti attribute Soo just remember “A anti. Affect.” And now we will all always member the correct one to use…. Member? Re-member?? Whats up with that? Re-cover Dis-close Un-cover Confusing? Odd? Inverted? “I re-covered the submarine…” Re-covered indeed, as the pieces pictured portrayed quite the pickle. How on earth did they recover the vessel as shown to us (appearing like it had been in an automobile accident…or ok maybe went off a cliff or something); rather than how it should have looked….. which is completely unrecognizable. ripped/shredded/into pieces by the immense pressure of the ocean…. Many mysteries abound. What lies beneath DC of lies, Entrenched way under ground.

#ViktorSchauberger natural implosion based technology of nature. Natured isn’t about Xplosions.

Engineering drawings from one of the largest dust collection systems manufacturers in the US. Try using their designs to find ratio for V3 of yours. Both of your designs are much much too wide and short. www.kice.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/CYC1003.pdf

Is it possible to design something that would disperse the static electricity and make the foam dust fall out of the bucket?

The fine dust goes in...? That’s right! It goes into the square holes. 13:13

The way he said it made it even better :D

Smooth criminal, this guy 😂

😎

Gottem! LOL

Children, come out of the closet, stop measuring each other...

i can imagine the agony of changing filters every week and why it was invented hahahhaha

Except the entire concept had existed for decades and was already in widespread use.

@@rubiconnn the cyclone separator had been in use for industrial applications like chaff separation. Dyson was the first to apply that technology to household vacuums. The reason they caught on was the fact that you didn't have to change a filter!

Uh there's no filters on an injection molding machine. unless it's in the electronics bay.. I know a ton about injection molding.

"invented" that's a very loose use of that word. Everything about it existed before. What you meant to say is that the cut&run brexiteer "adapted" an existing, used and fully understood concept to use in a vacuum cleaner. Nothing particularly spectacular about that, would've happened eventually, with or without him and as with a lot of other things, quite possibly had happened, but just got lucky.

Or Flex Seal!

The adhesion of that stuff isn't very good unfortunately. So while film thickness would be good, it may not be very durable.

Nope, that stuff never sticks very long.

1. Rubbery stuff ain't bueno, print ABS and vapor smooth it. 2. plasti-dip never sticks good. Good for making handles, where you keep adding it until it becomes a thick part, but even on handles it comes undone.

@@aserta could SuspendaSlurry work? abs prints awfully at large scale

Is it save to make things like that yourself

@@free_kids_in_bio uhm... nope but i did it anyway. there is a video you can see the first flight

​@@cloudpandarism2627hahaha, that's the spirit!

@@stasi0238 🤪

Same. I thought it was all for show

No, it’s form following function. It’s a beautiful design, and high tech motors.

Dyson stuff is genuinely high quality, and work very well. The problem with it, is it's horrendously expensive. If you can afford it, they're worth it.

​@@octane613They use to be high quality but not anymore, they suffer from cost cutting to make higher profits.

Can you clarify what you mean here? Seems like a very interesting design.

I can tell you actually understand this, because your explanation was 100% in your head, not ours. I'm no fluid dynamicist, but I think he's saying the reason the radial velocity drops off so fast is that all the air is rushing up the middle. Now, if you place some kind of layer in between the suction chamber and the vacuum, that has less holes in the middle and more towards the outside, it should even-out the total pressure pulling up on the air into the vacuum, which will reduce local eddies and turbulence, increasing efficiency and dust collection.

An interesting solution to compensate for uneven pressure. I'm interested in what you may say about my separator design. SL_ST CYCLONE;)

@@sl_st That seems to be closer to a modern vacuum cleaner design. I am thinking more of like... having a quasi-cylinder mesh over the out-take, and then a seasnail shell shaped baffle between it and the in-take. With 1-3 walls of the seasnail between the two. This seasnail shaped baffle should have a grid of holes that progress in size starting at the in-take, being very small and infrequent to being larger and more frequent. The holes must have pre-obstacles to act as wind-screens to help prevent particulate from entering them. The holes themselves should be shaped such that particles would have to do a 180 to go through them. Ideally, this will allow particulate from other levels to attempt to go into these and be stopped dead by the higher pressure air. The depth of the seasnail shaped baffle's walls into the bucket should vary as well, they need to be large enough to seperate the areas of differing pressure such that that pressure does not choose to go down rather than through our baffles. This depth can be decreased as it gets closer to the intake. The idea is to chop away at the air-pressure propelling the particulate, while introducing as many physical obstacles as possible. Adding wind-cages to various parts would help too, but would likely get overloaded easily near the in-take. Those wind-cages would have to be shaped such that particulate would want to deflect towards the barrel rather than the air-stream.

@@altus1226 Thank you for laying that out. Very interesting. I think it would only do well with smaller dust particles, so you might need another stage before it.

It might be static electricity generated on the plexiglas attracting the dust as well.

I like the idea of vertical walls, but I feel like the center hole into the bucket is a cleaner design. I wonder if extending the vertical-walled section of the cyclone separator would improve the performance without needing such a large hole in the bucket

Or baffles

Check Mathias wandel design. He did exactly this

@@camifracelli631 ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-z-xhYnWDCd0.html is probably what you meant. I would have made the hole between the cyclone chamber and the bucket smaller, about a quarter of the circumference. That way the air in the bucket would get stirred up less.

So the outer wall is a cylinder with vertical sides? And is the opening to drop the dust down a ring around the base of the cone?

@@MaxNippard correct, in water treatment also often combined with an inner perforated tube that follows most of the height of the housing, to act as a baffle and force flow down a larger height:diameter ratio.

Did you notice it's actually bouncing back and forth, as each particle swaps charges?

@@jercos Yeah! It's crazy how charge can make non ferrous materials behave like this.

😂

this comment wasn’t even 10 minutes after the video released

Industrial applications use metal cones with grounded surfaces (by default and nature).

Not sure about how all the complex air flow works, but I think having a taller cylinder section would help with keeping the particles moving fast. Maybe? Idk. Also if you can measure the mass and/or volumetric flow rate, there are equations for how to properly size your separator. I think that might be a reason for the number of smaller ones in the Dyson. For peak performance of those smaller diameter cyclones, they want a lower flow rate.