BrokinLaw33 i do also, if the character model doesnt look like the fighter, it takes away from the experience. Glad Eddie & McGregor got a model update.
2 DentZ he's not blind man there's no denying that their "much appreciated" attempt at making the game more realistic has made it look retarded. Some things just cant be made realistic UFC 2 done it right. The mechanics of the game were much smoother and more satisfying too watch even though parts of it where unrealistic.
tman4life01 well yes they do move more realistic but that makes it look retarded at times like when some kicks clash and guys fall over. My point was that you cant make a game fully realistic without some retarded shit in it and it's up to the player if they are willing to put up with that. Can I ask what age you are?
Stephen Nee thats true. No game will be perfect but it is just the beta. I think a lot of stuff will be smoothed out by the time it drops. Im 19 by the way
Edan Alexander no I bet you regret buying Ufc 3 and have to forcefully defend it because of not getting ur money back, ufc 2 is way better 70% other people agree lmaoo
Meh, I play the UFC games because I like mma but this series has been average at best. 6.5-7.5 range out of 10. EA should go back to making fight night, a game that was actually pretty fucking good in what tried to represent (boxing). Let 2K take over the UFC series and have them make a kick ass career mode. Imagine a 2k style career mode but in the UFC. Weighns, press conferences, shit talking , etc lol. Would be awesome
Jorge lopez EA's UFC has microtransactions revolve around Ultimate Team only, you can play story mode, solo fights and online multiplayer (Ranked or unranked) just fine without microtransactions at any momment. If 2K took over UFC it would become a microtransaction shitfest like NBA 2K18 where microtransactions are needed for every single bit from story mode to pay to win online...
A T Brother which according to you is more enjoyable and a little easy to play UFC 2 or UFC 3..?? I am not strictly into mechanics and stuff... just a casual fighting games fan... So which one out of both ull recommend it to me.. Really confused.. Kindly help pls.
Everything about UFC 2 is better then 3. 3 feels clunky, fake and looks like the characters are made out of clay or something. Don’t even get me started on UFC 4.
This is the Best Video I've ever seen!!! I was on the fence about UFC 2 vs 3 and I'm So happy I watched this video and Totally made my mind up thank You
Whats funny is all three UFC games have been totally different from each other. It's pretty obvious that you don't know what you are talking about, because all of the EA UFC games play completely different.
ea ufc 3’s striking reminds me of when you’re having a dream where you’re trying to punch someone, but you can never quite connect in a real way. You know those deeams? You try and you try to get a good connection on a punch, but theres this invisible type of force that just will NOT allow your punches to land? Theres like a reverse magnetic thing aspect to the punches. Well, thats how ufc 3 feels. Its pure frustration. And on top of that, the KOs are gay and repetitive and unrealistic and animation based instead of physics based, and the grappling is untouched and unimproved on. The game is a disappointment. Its either 2 things....(A), is the developers are bad and uncreative at their jobs, or (B), is the developers were advised by their superiors to minimal effort into the game, so they can have a new feature for the next years release. In other words, they’re sandbagging their customers. Both (A) and (B) are equally as bad. I think rockstar would make a better mma game. Ya the graphics wouldn’t be as good, but it would be waaaay more fun cuz it would have realistic physics ! Rockstar needs to come out with a game thats like the warriors in the sense of, its a game based purely on street brawls, and the streets brawls can be selected to battle on different turfs, and you can fully customize your gang! how many members are in your gang, and where they’re from! And in this game, they can have one on one battles, and full brawls! Just like the warriors but way modernized, and only now it would have the beautiful euphoria physics! But imagine if rockstar took it seriously and made the striking dynamics as real as any pure mma game? and imagine they had bjj moves, judo throws, wrestling techniques, and all forms or striking! this game would be a MASSIVE fucking hit! And it would be called something like “TURF” or “BRAWL” ! And people would play online and have massive battles! This game would be a cult classic! PLEASE ROCKSTAR! MALE THIS GAME!!!!
Im not sure how to feel about UFC3. It looks good but it doesn’t at the same time. I feel like a mix between UFC & UFC2 wouldve been good. Im not a big fan of the camera angle while fighting (youd probably be able to change it). The ref animations should change too, no one would just stand there while a fighter is ko’d and they keep punching them. Movement looks good but idk. I hope im not the only one who thinks this way. Im by no means hating on the game, im most likely gonna buy it, but i feel as though they couldve polished it a bit more.
It's amazing how UFC 1 and 2 look better in animation, knock out and physics wise than 3 & 4. How do you managed to go BACKWARDS in tech with these games?
Nothing beats the stiff guy after knockout !!! Its difficult to decide between the 1st and the 2nd. Ufc 2 looks better for shore ( and has Mike Tyson ) but if you look into details i think that the 1st is the one to go for,if you looking for an all around experience. For example the knockout replays in Ufc 2 are kinda robotic where in the 1st they fluid like the actual KO. Also in the 2nd ( on ps4 ) if you knock down a guy sometimes you cant jump on him because you actually knocked him out but the game takes 2-3 seconds to play the celebration video...Til then you have no idea whats happening. Commentators are better in the 1st because in the 2nd you can hear that they cut the commentary from different fights. I dont even mention Ufc 3 because it is a sack of shit.
Read the comments first before seeing IFC 3 in action. Some of you guys must lack attention to detail... it looks waaay better than 1&2. Fighters footwork moves more realistically. The camera is a little far back, and perhaps lower. The lighting looks more muted, and not as Arcady. Looks good to me...
I own both UFC 3 & UFC 2 & tbf UFC 2 feels like an arcade game compared to the new game The entire mechanics in UFC 2 feel like a rock em,sock em video game I can't believe I actually believed UFC 2 was a simulator back when I played it UFC 3 is stiff but the mechanics of the game are realistic & fluid TO ME I'm used to playing technical games so that might be the reason why UFC 3 intrigues me
@@amnahaleem607 I know i'm late but if you prefer Arcady style, pick UFC 2. But if you like realism, pick UFC 3. Imo I think UFC 2 is the best one cuz the knockouts felt more impactful with its ridiculous ragdolls physics.
Being worse than Nate on the ground when you were already rocked doesn't mean you have a poor ground game. He manhandled Max Holloway on the ground and swept Nate in the first round of the first fight.
+BrokinLaw33 Like 8 years ago pal. People can go from beginner to black belt in 8 years (not saying Conor has obviously, just saying there's been a lot of development).
UFC was simple easy and fun. They had the actual fighters giving you tips on your career the game made you less worried about your fight. In UFC two no tips and complements from UFC fighters and you could get your career fighter hurt by the training camps you do but damn the knock outs in 2 we're badass and still are the animations we're fucking funny and fun when you fought and Mike Tyson made it a must buy game with alot of fighters added as well. Hopefully UFC 3 will be good once we play that's im saying.
I prefer UFC 2 but I've seen that career mode in UFC 3 are better, so I don't know what UFC game i should buy, what's your opinion guys? (Im from Portugal, just in case had some mistake you already know why, I miss some english classes 😂)
Ufc 3 is good but it takes a lot of time to get used the mechanics and is hard as hell on the other hand ufc 2 is easier to get used to and the game looks better imo I'd buy ufc 2
EA UFC 3 where all fights are in slow motion. Like holy shit, you'd think after two games they could get it right the third time but no. The movement in 3 is solid however the punching and kicking is slow af. Also UFC 4 is already in the works so that's a wtf moment too considering 3 isn't even finished yet (roster update, bug fixes, balancing issues)
It would be cool if ufcs next game made fighters look different in different weight classes like featherweight Conor is really lean and ripped, lightweight has abs but not as defined muscles and welterweight he’s really bulky without abs
If mcgregor had his moves in ea sports ufc and his hairstyle in ea sports ufc 2 and his correct tattoos in ea sports ufc 3 they should add this in ea sports ufc 4 and Conor will be perfect
Tomnisien don't worry man the confusion is shared by most people the game looks retarded in general I'm not saying it's bad I just don't know what the fuck is going on it looks goofy as shit
It's not you. They've also removed parrying apparently. Everything about this screams EA UFC 1, in that it'll take half a year of updates to bring it up to launch day quality.
@@giraffeneck1519 Making the fighters throw less explosive hooks and uppercuts that look like half assed shit is in no way more realistic. It's just not, period. I came here because I was thinking I'd get UFC 3 now while it's $29.99 but after watching this and other more recent videos idk.....standup just looks like complete shit. Distance looks hard to achieve and when your too close the punches just look awful. Why on Earth would ea make a less realistic game like UFC 3? I don't get it. It's easy to see in this video how much more realistic the punches look in UFC 2.
In ufc 3 They’ve made Connor from the Mayweather or Diaz fight. His face is on point the tattoos actually look real in ufc 3 just saying. In ufc 2 they’ve made him from the mendes fight but his hair looks like from the Aldo press conference. In ufc they’ve not even made an effort to make him look like from the real fights
Chris Getchell dont listen to this moron, ea mma sucked, ufc undisputed was ok and ea ufc 3 isnt out yet. Id say just wait for ufc 3 tbh cause the games hella different then the 2nd one
two2gunsrobbig its got decent all around gameplay a great roster and the second best career mode next to the undisputed games ps ive been playing the ufc 3 beta
Ufc 1 is obviously the best for one reason.....the fact you could knock a guy out without stunning him once, in 3 specifically you have to daze him like 3 times before a cold knock out. Its like they made the game worse every year
the UFC 3 footwork and striking is incredible BUT they ruined it with having TOO MANY ANIMATIONS!! Every time you get caught with a punch it puts your player in this animation that takes half a second and although its half a second, it feels like longer! Do almost every time you get popped, your player does an animation that totally freezes him up. Its toooooooo much, and it gives the game a molasses feel to it. The KOs fucking suck and even though UFC 2 had better KOs, those fucking sucked too, This game needed a totally new movement system and a totally new ragdoll KO system. The movement system they worked on and did a good job, but the KO system looks like you're playing TEKKEN or something. Why have that great footwork if the KOs are that stupid??? Oh, and everything about the grappling is the same as before.
I think they should have made more body shapes for people like McGregor because ufc 3 McGregor is gonna look silly fighting in the featherweight division. He will look huge compared to other featherweights
I loved the physics for ufc 2 but they totally took it out for ufc 3 for no reason, i hate when ko them they have the same reaction but in ufc 2 that never happened