+SouthHemiTV2 Yeah you're right, the Asian guy definitely has a pure australian accent. My bad, I'm so much more used to listening to chinese voices than australian ones XD
Its a good video, my only comment would be if you are going to do tuning fork tests, don't talk at the same time, do the explanation do the test then ask the question. If you talk throughout they can't discriminate the different sounds, this is better for an FRCS point of view, shows you have thought about the exam technique. BTW, we can cure hearing loss, its called a hearing aid, and also we have things called BAHA and cochlear implant now so not sure what Chuck Norris is on about
hmmmm.....I am not an ENT, but have studied and worked in neuroscience. Many of these tests seem highly subjective in interpretation and repeatability. Consistency of test metrics are imperative in medicine, so as to reliably track changes over time, as in progression of disease. I would imagine there is much scope to computerize external stimuli, so that they are consistent from assessment to assessment.
you pretty much answered yourself with the first sentence. you're not an ENT surgeon and you don't seem to have any medical background... and u come to an OSCE FRCS video and decide to suddenly enlighten the whole surgical world with ur "test-restest reliability of physical examinations" and how its "imperative in medicine" ... oh my days.. : )) if you had any actual neuroscience field experience, you would've known that have audiometry for the "computerised external stimuli" : ))) mate u're so full of yourself - reading ur comment was such a cringe: ))
