Eastern Roman Empire Vs Muslims: The Battle of Yarmouk 636 | Islam's Greatest Victory - 4K Cinematic 

General Khalid didn't faced any defeat as a military commander. And he fought around 30 to 35 Battles as commander and over 100 battles as a soldier.

Literally nothing

Literally nothing

خالد بن الوليد بن المغيرة بن شعبة تربى على يد والده تحت ضلال السيوف و ظهر الخيول فكان من المحاربين القلة الذين كانوا يقاتلون بسيفين أسلم بعد معركة أحد بعد فترة ليست بكثيرة بعد شقيقه شارك مع النبي في غزوات كثيرة منها غزوة حنين التي أصيب بها و بصفتي من سوريا انا ممتن له كثيرا هو و كل قادة المسلمين الذين أدخلوا الإسلام إلى بلادي قبره في حمص و هي مسقط رأسي الكل بتذكر جملته الشهيرة التي قالها قبل وفاته (فلا نامت اعين الجبناء) يقصد بالجبناء الروم و الفرس

Could you please add to the description what mods you use and music?

The GOAT when it comes to strategies in battles

That´s why westerners want to develop AI and drones, because they do love life and want machines to engage with those who love death.

Love from India

@mohamedakrammohamedakram7112 Thanks brother.

سیف اللہ ❤

680 years of fighting one another .

Nomadic armies uniting under 1 rule was the bane of all Sedentary Empires during the era of pre gunpowder. The Mongols fought a 3 front war against China, several Islamic Empires and sultanates during the golden age of Islam, as well as the Kieven Rus and they still conquered these nations. The Huns displaced many Germanic tribes out of their homeland and brought both the Eastern and Western Roman Empire to its knees extorting massive tribute from both while devastating their territories, The Seljuks within ~60 years conquered much of the Islamic world from the Levant all the way to the Hindu Kush while also inflicting a devastating defeat against the Byzantines opening up Anatolia for conquest, the same Anatolia that stood like a bulwark for hundreds of years against the armies of the Umayyads and Abbasids.

Not the same China and America are superpowers, Persian was no superpower, the probable was about 4 thousands of years ago the other whatever don,t matter

If Islam was that powerful they would be the rulers of planet earth, the muslem could not fight Great Briton ,France, Spain kick out the muslems in 1492 and up to today the muslem cannot retake Spain, the muslem cannot even enter Italy like how they run up on other European countries

One of the most important factors in the rapid success of the Islamic conquests was the humanity with which they treated the vanquished. Contrast this with the Roman Julius Caesar who knew how cruelly he treated those he defeated he exclaimed Vae Victis (woe to the vanquished).

فلا نامت اعين الجبناء....هكدا قال

Rhe odds were lile ALWAYS against him. Tell him when they werent?

What happened in Khyber he could not conquer

​@@rafatmerchant9625 At that time he was Kaffir( Not Muslim yet). He was in Makkah and the battle was fought against Jews of Khyber.

He didn't break the nine swords, his own swords were broken at Mu'ta. I too had this misconception for many years. It only shows how skilled he was, being able to survive even with swords being broken.

Love the sahabas and sahabiats,such honorable men & women to have been with our beloved prophet SAW.

😂😂😂زن هایی بودن که میکرده صیغه ای های جهاد نکاحی😂😂😂

Is this the historical evidence for Mohammad, pbuh?

​@@wolfthequarrelsome504obviously

Yes, this is also one of the proofs of the existence of prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), because if his companions existed( the ones who saw him, sat with him), then obviously, prophet Muhammad(peace be upon him) also existed . ​@@wolfthequarrelsome504

"you will face men who love death as you love life" -khaled ibn al walid

Khalid Ibn Walid: “then, it is an even fight.”

khaled ibn Walid desired martyrdom so much that he wouldve engaged 60k byzantines with few hundred soldiers so he could secure his wish .........But caliphs of Islam wouldnt allow that !

"That's a shame. You're at least 3 short".

Actually it was 6:1...240000 Romans vs 40000 Muslims....

That battle only killed a fraction of Hulegu's army under one of his lieutenants, most of the army that destroyed Baghdad (the greatest Muslim city at the time) and laid the Ayyubids to waste went back to Mongol territory with the main general Hulegu due to the death of the Great Khan. In fact Hulegu himself was planning another invasion but Berke, the leader of the Golden Horde faction of the Mongols and an Islam convert, chose to attack Hulegu as retribution for the destruction Hulegu cost in Baghdad, the sacking of which ended what had been the golden age of Islam. These Mongol civil war was what led to the weakening of Mongol power in the area and halted a potential European invasion thru Anatolia.

@@ronb7189 I do not agree with your opinion, my friend. The Mongols were a powerful force for which the world reckoned a thousand times, and the propaganda of terror that they spread in the world at that time alone was sufficient for their victory over all their enemies. Did you know that some countries that knew that the Mongols would attack them would surrender directly to them before the battle? and Many European historians acknowledged the fact that Muslims protected Europe from the Mongol encroachment

@@Daniel_77_ Berke was a technically a Muslim convert so you can say a Muslim general help break the Mongol Jaggernaut by attacking Hulagu and inciting a devastating Mongol civil war, but the battle of Ain Jalut was not what broke the Mongols, Hulegu and most of the army that just bulldoze Baghdad, Syria and much of the Levant was still there and who knows how the Mamluks would have fare against the full might of the Ill Khanate under the talented Hulegu. We know that Baybars made a lot of effort to ally himself with the leaders of Golden Horde and incited them into attacking Hulegu's Ill Khanate, which just proves how great of a leader Baybars was, knowing his facing an enemy with more resources than he has, he used dirty diplomacy to greatly weaken his enemies while he strengthen his own position.

Right

Agreed With You Main Reason Was not Ayen ul Jalout Battle Main Reason Was When A Mongol Newly Muslim King Turned Against Halgu khan And Halgu khan Wounded Badly and Died Latter with Wounds is The Main Reason ​@@ronb7189

Alhamdullah ♥️

You absolutely right buddy

Alhamdulillah allahu akbar❤

This is typical dschihadist thinking which you show here, khabibali. In less swollen words, this was a djihadist war of aggression. As a Westerner I can only condemn this and praise all efforts to win Palestine back beginning with the crusades. Deus vult! In hoc signum vinces!

@@heinzfischer2710 Crusaders killed everyone, including christians.They were more like savages terrorists. Westeners who came to africa to enslave people were also terrorists. Until now, people are suffering from their deeds. Are you good with that ?

Allah stands with Israel

Israhell 💩💩💩💩​@@mayer14474

​@@mayer14474 tapi ALLAH melaknat israel sbg pecundang😂

​​​@@mayer14474Allah doesn't recognise Is reli's. Research😂

​@@mayer14474 - it seems you have no clue about Islam. Without America, Israel goes bye-bye

Your grammar needs a kick too.

that's why he's called Sword of Allah

@@Sultan_Of_Rum very interesting. Thank youu Is it Sultanat of Rum are based on Seldjuk people?

@@SportDirector941 Sultanate of Rûm were Seljuks

@@Sultan_Of_Rum thank you very nice

Didn't y'all god say not to kill each other ?

Tolerant🤡🤡

😂😂😂

@@ARYAN_WARRIOR. Aryan ? Dark skinned p*jeet thinks his white aryan

Hahahahhahaha...tolerant lol...

Not arguably.he is the best.and salahdin ayubi is not better then Baybars.

Verno

It's an Arab lie obviously

Always part of the heroic story.

👳‍♂️❤👧

For its time, yes probably. But i dont think he was greater/better than Hannibal Barca or Alexander the great. He just fits into this list of the greatest commanders of all time. There is not really a best of all history. Alexander the great and Hannibal Barca, both lived in a different time. So each had their advantages and disadvantages. Also each great commander had their fair amount of luck, so yeah a 'Best commander in all of history ' does not really exist, that might just be more of a personal thing. But sure he belongs in the list of the greatest and best commanders in history.

only an Arab believes this lmao.

@@ShadowGearFive if you measure a commander by his achievements and tactical mind and how they lead a attack and counter another one, and how they manage to overcome the traps and the deadly situations, keeping in mind the number of the army men and the land they fight in.. and the expansion of territory under their leadership.. you'd fit all of that into Khalid Waleed. Honest opinion. The best of all time.

@@Zlav963 Yeah for sure, im not denying that. But i think Khalid is not the only one who was capable of doing so. What you just named is all part of a great commander. and Khalid belongs to one of the greatest commanders of all time. But he is not the only one, take at Hannibal Barca, leading and fighting his way through the alps with a huge army. And losing half in the process, but still be capable of defeating every roman army in his way to Rome. Or Alexander, leading his men through extreme conditions towards babylon and capturing all of the persian Empire. Napoleon defeating every single oponent, often outnumbered and outsmarted his enemies. Admiral Michiel de Ruyter, defeated both the french and English fleet in once while he was outnumbered. Saladin, was great leader with many skills. He had great military, political and chivalry skills. He was a generous and humble man, often respected by his enemies. And ofcourse Khalid also belongs to the same category. You cannot really say who is better, think all of these commanders were the best of their time until they lost momentum, got too old, lost 1 battle etc. A new supreme commander somewhere else would show his amazing abilities. So once again i think it is a personal preference, wich is absolutely fine. But calling one of them 'the best of all history' is very unfair towards the other great commanders. There is just a small selection of the greatest commanders of all time and sure Khalid belongs into that selection. :)

@@ShadowGearFive that's exactly the point my friend: "until they lost momentum, lost one battle".. that's exactly my "personal and humble" take, that i agreed with those (scholars in their craft) who said Khalid is and will never be matched historically by any army commander, because he didnt lose a battle as a army commander nor as a soldier nor even as a man to man fight in the heart of the desert. It's strange, in our human nature there is the defeat, loss, failure etc.. his goal (as they said) was to die as a Martyr, he even was crying so sad on the death bed mocking himself dying of illness and old age fatigue, and not in the battlefield. Believe me if Khalid was in Hannibal's place, he would have won the besiege of Rome, or would have fought to death and not poisoning himself.

Even after leading from front,and engaging in countless duels....

Yes but they were 150 k vs 30 pr 36 k

Levant = Bidyat Asy Syams consisted Syria, Jordan, Lebanon, Palestine nowadays.

Evet

Because it is muslims who have written these nonsense accounts

​@@huseyineren1830na'am

thanks!

@@WarAndHistory. I really enjoy watching your form of content and your videos, and try to watch them when I have time. Thank you for making the videos you do!

LETS GOO

ونعم

.

Muslims only won because both rome and sasannians were weak from decades of war. Its only natural.

Arab sources jakakakak

SalAllahu Alayhi Wasalam 🤲

@@luzdani11 عليه أفضل الصلاة والسلام

Ikrimah Ibn Amr RA,,😎💪👊🤲🤲🤲

وہ چار سو موت پر بیعت کر ‏‪چکے تھے۔۔۔۔وہ سب شہید ہوگئے سوائے ضرار ابن الازور رضی اللہ عنہ کے،جو زخمی ہوئے۔۔۔۔ ضرار نے اجنادین کی جنگ میں،مبارزہ کے دوران اکیلے تین درجن رومیوں کو قتل کیا۔۔۔۔اسکے بعد البھانسا کی فتح میں ایک سو ساٹھ کو قتل کیا اور جنگ کے آخر میں مکمل خون میں بھیگ گیا۔۔۔

@@user-on3ie9ru5m إذا لماذا سماه الروم الشيطان عاري الصدر خوفا منه

.

.

And Nehavend /"Battle of Nawahand".

Did you know when someone die, if he go to heaven in heaven he is not flesh and blood anymore, all heavenly creature is spirit for ,now you know that please explain to me when muslems who die for the cause do with 72 virgins ,when you die your penis turn to dust please explain this phinonnom for me

Check the description

I appreciate that

Description

There is nothing showed in description on other videos yes but not this one nothing mention the game

don't have enough time unfortunately

@@WarAndHistory. No problem, my friend.

Thanks brother