I'm not enamored by Bill Clinton's "charm" OR Hillary's "intelligence." They're both ruthlessly ambitious, not for America, but for their own political power and riches.
Give me a break. Trump made his money in the free enterprise system. Hillary ran a racket out of the state department with "pay to play." Punch up "Clinton Cash" here on YT, and you'll be horrified.
Dennis Cassley Really??not so sure about that my friend!!!!You need to do your homework before you give judgment!!!The man is nothing but a scam artist who has left nothing but unpaid vendors and broken dreams!!!Did you ever wonder why he didn't release his tax returns???hum..🤔🤔🤔 You are one of many who has been suckered!!!!😆😆😆Do you know how many lawsuits that have been leveled against him???Trump school =scam,Trump casino=scam,ect...Smh..Now I know how Jim Jones had people drinking poisoned Koolaid down in South America !!!!😆😆Wakeup!!
I for one am looking forward to her being indicted for treason. Father God, root out all evil and expose it for what it is. We pray your Will be done and that honor and integrity be restored to American politics.
Definitely the most thought provoking 1 hr & 41 min on the 2016 election. Both speakers were unknown to me. It did not take long to realize they are BRILLIANT. Their analysis/commentary on the who, what, where & why of Clinton's campaign strategy is magnificent. ☆☆☆☆☆ Cruzer In Ct
I didn't think T would win....The last poll I seen Nov 7th 2016 had Hillary at 98.2% for the win. I'm an agnostic, but I prayed ti God that cold Nov night like I've never prayed before.
BRILLIANT Analysis Of 2016 Election! 100% correct regarding American's opinion of HRC & WJC. Higher education is desperate for Professor's such as Fred Siegel. Cruzer In CT
These guys REALLY know what they are talking about. They have their "fingers" on the pulse of America. They should be "listened to" by the politicians.
Thank-You for having a mic in the audience, it helps to hear the all comments and questions for the engaged listener. Great forum.Too bad the location. I love seeing the young ones be involved.
Hillary Was A Terrible Candidate and run an awful campaign?......And all this time I thought she lost because of the russians,comey,media,sanders,sexism,misogyny and many other factors.......I hope she watches this.
WHO IS THE GUY THAT STARTS TALKING AT AROUND 9 MINUTES AND GOES ON FOR GOSH--DARN EVER?!?!?!?! 10 MINUTES LONG, this guy's rambling speech & -- FINALLY -- a question... Goodness gracious...
With all due respect, seems to be yet ANOTHER example of emcees/meeting leaders, etc., thinking THEY are the attraction, and not the featured guest, and LOVING the fact that they have the microphone...like "open mic" at a karaoke bar or wedding. Like watching someone do intro's at the Richard Nixon Library...on, and on, and on, and on. Just do the intro, and beat it!!
Florida isn't upper midwest. Though educated with a b.s. in economics, it was her crimes that removed her as a choice. That's god given choice of right over wrong.
Brilliant Professor The student's enrolled in this Professor's class are fortunate. A fair opened mind College Professor is rare these days. Similar to a Big Foot sighting every decade or so a reported sighting of one. Magnificent Lecture facts the Main Stream Propaganda Media conveniently left out in their reporting. Mr. Klein, answers the Who, What, Where, Why of HRC campaign. ☆☆☆☆☆ Cruzer In CT
According to Wikipedia: The conservative columnist John Podhoretz criticized the book in the New York Post, "Thirty pages into it, I wanted to take a shower. Sixty pages into it, I wanted to be decontaminated. And 200 pages into it, I wanted someone to drive stakes through my eyes so I wouldn't have to suffer through another word."[10] In the National Review, conservative columnist James Geraghty wrote, "Folks, there are plenty of arguments against Hillary Clinton, her policies, her views, her proposals, and her philosophies. This stuff ain't it. Nobody on the right, left, or center ought to stoop to this level."[11]
Hindsight's 20/20, now 3 years down the road and he's one of the greatest presidents we've ever had. Because he actually works, he actually tries to do what's right not politically correct. If you want political correctness and a mediocre government keep voting for the Democrats. I would hate to be the next president after Trump. A lot will be expected of them, Trump loves his country and we love Trump
Here he says he wrote his first book on hillary in 2005 But I just saw in another video he wrote his first book on hillary in 1996. Wtf?? Small beans i onow, but now I’m confused.
Michael Krüger that's just ridiculous. That sort of stuff has been dealt with before and is not even close to being the kind of threat that requires removal.
Michael Kruger No, he was removed because Hillary wanted a success story for her future Presidential campaign. Instead she let that region of the world degenerate from unstable to outright anarchic.
MrJamberee Actually Michael Kruger is correct. Gaddafi was working with a variety of Middle Eastern countries as well as China to develop an alternative to the U.S. dollar as the world standard for trade. Had he succeeded, the adverse impact to our economy would have been tremendous. But murder is murder and nothing new for Hillary Clintoon. Her feckless so-called foreign policy resulted in removing the single largest constraint to uncontrolled immigration from Africa to Western Europe: Libya 🇱🇾. Such a waste and such an unforgivable atrocity by Obama and Clintoon.
Klein received extensive criticism for his 2005 biography of Hillary Clinton, The Truth About Hillary. Politico criticized the book for "serious factual errors, truncated and distorted quotes and overall themes [that] don't gibe with any other serious accounts of Clinton's life."[9] The conservative columnist John Podhoretz criticized the book in the New York Post, "Thirty pages into it, I wanted to take a shower. Sixty pages into it, I wanted to be decontaminated. And 200 pages into it, I wanted someone to drive stakes through my eyes so I wouldn't have to suffer through another word."[10] In the National Review, conservative columnist James Geraghty wrote, "Folks, there are plenty of arguments against Hillary Clinton, her policies, her views, her proposals, and her philosophies. This stuff ain't it. Nobody on the right, left, or center ought to stoop to this level."[11] Kathryn Jean Lopez of National Review asked Klein in a June 20, 2005 interview, "Why on earth would you put such a terrible story in your book ... that looks to be flimsily sourced at that?," regarding his suggestion that Chelsea Clinton was conceived in an act of marital rape.[12] Facing criticism from both the left and right for making the claim, Klein eventually backed away from the insinuation
I don't disagree with any of these criticisms of Hilary. But where I think more nauced analysis is needed in understanding why criticisms of her managed to stick, whereas very similar criticisms of Trump (i.e. they are both interested in money, they're both arrogant, they're both vicious to their opponents) don't stick.
@Rob DeAbreu Within the rules? Except when he was sued by the Nixon admin. He also declared bankruptcy 6 times. He is singly the most embarrassing American ever to face the rest of the world. Private or public sector, i don't care where he gets that experience from. Point is - it's worthless.
@@georgeevans-jones4365 "He also declared bankruptcy 6 times" - exactly he operated within the rules (in this case Bankruptcy Law) set up by the political class...
@@georgeevans-jones4365 Come to think of it, where I live in Australia, if you declare bankruptcy you are banned from being an officer of a company for something like 7 years, doesn't sound that that is the case in your country, why would this be?
White privilege I say Eb(ur) Hebrew Israelite blessed. We earned it. We as the Sons of Isaac were blessed by the Lord as We are humantarians and that's all. The Saxons are awakening and the bad guys know it now bring it. United We Stand Divided We fall.
fidobarks gerrymandering has nothing to do with statewide elections. As you know the Presidential race is a full state count of votes. Gerrymandering has to do with how the state is carved up for congressional or state legislative elections.
