Edifier S1000MKII vs Edifier R1700BTs || Sound & Frequency Response Comparison 

@Learn Something i agree, both speakers are awesome

You are absolutely right, but believe me in that case you must really buy edifier R2000db

because test done on low volume. In higher volume 1700Bts will be too flat

It is not the same to see these comparisons on RU-vid than to have the speakers in front of you. I have had both speakers and the difference in performance is not small. There really is a noticeable difference between the two speakers.

I think I am buying the sub with my R1700BT's The mids and highs are good and better, ony the bass is not much and sometimes really unclear.

Yes, I'm using the 1700 and t5 combination for my TV. Tuned properly , the sound is fantastic for the money paid. The S1000 sits in my other room purely for music, partnered with an Ifi Zen Blue DAC which brings the sound more forward and alive.

HS8 vs T8V is on the way

@@DSAUDIOreview awesome !

but a100 cost 3-5 times more, why make you wish to get A100 ? I was thinking to get A80 too .

@@nemoegg the Airpulses are on a totally different level when it comes to mids and highs and the soundstage, imaging and airiness are so far away from the R series its not even funny. They cost a lot of money though.

They do look interesting...

S360DB

No it wont.

How?

@@oliviu11119 The BT's' have a sub connector, thats what the "S" stands for, so you can add a sub to them, which you cant on the normal BT.

you i.diot...you just saw camparison video..so why asking stupid questions? Wanna smaller speakers with less bass -buy 1700BTS...wanna bigger better fuller sound - s1000

Models with sub outs generally have less of mid bass thump you mentioned. So if you find the midbass is too strong, lower the bass knob, that will decrease the 75hz - 90hz region. The 1700BTs, 1850DB and 1855DB generally have less midbass.

Nothing

@@DSAUDIOreview )) really bad )

If you live in USA i would recommend Klipsch RP 600M, but if you live in Venezuela Edifier R1280DB

@@isaidstream4547 thanks for the recommendation! Are the Alesis Elevate 5 MKll good for that? I ordered them because they have a bass boost and I think it would be good for playing some sessions too in my room, also I own a Sennheiser HD600 with a DAC/AMP that I would use mostly for produce

They are same T version lacks bluetooth I think. I have 1700BT it lacks subwoofer jack.

Which one do you recommend?

@@martinregana5548 personally, I'd rather get a passive pair of speakers and a separate class AB amp. You can really hear the Class D in these " all in 1" systems. I think the edifier 1850 and 3000db wireless are probably edifier's best two systems. But you can still hear the Class D in the 3000 as well.

@@jamesk7433 Check this comparison with a rather cheap class D amp. Another con about a passive setup, there is no DSP or speaker correction. A passive system, depending on the sensitivity of the speakers, will always have a limited sweet spot on the volume dial (can be low, can be high) while active DSP speakers have the same sound character at low, mid and high volumes. ru-vid.com/video/%D0%B2%D0%B8%D0%B4%D0%B5%D0%BE-dInmeup-c_o.html&ab_channel=DigitalStereophony

@@rdolle990 IMO the only sound manipulation u should use is treble and bass. All that DSP makes it worse. You can time correct, distance correct, phase correct, enhance this, boost that, dynamic this, dynamic that. The original producer already put all the effort to mix down the original track, why would u want to run DSP all over it again ?

Get the one with the biggest cabinet and largest woofer.

@@sergeysmelnik thanks, i bought dt770 pros lol

If you care about the sound fidelity than S1000MKII beats S350DB by a good margin

@@DSAUDIOreview Thanks tons!! One last query... I am not bass head (window rattling level) But I do love enough bass to enjoy movies (with action offcouse) With that in mind can you comment if my take on s1000mkii won’t go wrong?

@@ashishupadhyay6305 S1000MKII is great for movies as well. Lots of power down low

Nahh upgrade to airpulse

Is there a problem with the 1700bt without a sub-out interface, used with a subwoofer like T5?

@@user-wd2qi4lg1j No not really, you just cant connect the sub directly then and need another output for it, either via 3.5mm jack or RCA to RCA to drive it, but they aswell as the BTs dont need a sub, as the bass is ok for their size and price, its purely optional with the BTs making it easier to connect one to them..

@@wolfwilkopter2231 can i ask a question sir? what do you think between s1000mk2(~200usd) or 1700bts+t5 sub(~230usd) for desktop pc and small room?

@@lawlewful ofc you can. :) I'd say, it depends on your available space and the need of bass as deep as possible and not to forget, the taste of design. if you have the space and need bass as much and as deep as possible, the 1700bts+t5 are your choice as the t5 can deliver down to 38Hz and the 1700bts sound as good as then non sub brothers. the S1000mk2 look a little nicer and can get down to 45Hz (and deliver even down to 40 with a slight dip) and save some space (while beeing alittle bigger themselfs) and sound amazing as you can hear here. so the difference in the bass department is marginal and if you dont need every little bit of bass, which in a added sub variant, would probably overwhelm a small room and kick more outside than inside, so that your neighbors have more of it than you might have...i'd go with the S1000mk2, not to mention that it saves you a few bucks in your region.

@@wolfwilkopter2231 wow thank your sir, appreciate it. about the design, it's irrelevant to me. I really prefer price/performance much more. for the area, Actually my house is so big(maybe too big, cos I live alone) but the room is so small (about 10x20 ft) so no neighbors problem. the problem is... i don't know if I need a deep bass or not :/ Now I have 3 choices, -first s1000mk2 (~200usd) -second 1700bts+t5(~230usd) -and third, only 1700bts(~110usd, 1700bt and bts are same price, idk why) and save for upgrade something beyond later. my english is not that good, I'm really sorry for that.

hi-res logo means nothing, even the shitty qualcomm dac on most phones can get it.

Hi Res is not worth it IMO. Couldn't hear any noticeable difference with and without it.

Быть такого не может, клянусь директором эдифаера, разница в линейке р и с, имеется не маленькая!!!

I would go for S1000MKII

@@DSAUDIOreview thanks for your reply .. can you please elaborate the difference between the two set up .. actually I have already ordered r1700bts and was thinking of attaching t5 later .. thanks again .. you are really doing a great work

S1000MKII will sound better top to bottom. R1700BTs + T5 is a good combo but not on the same level as S1000MKII IMO. The only advantage would be a bit more reach down low, but the intergration between the sub and sats is always an issue. S1000MKII will go almost as low but the bass will sound more natural and detailed, plus S1000MKII has better mids and treble as well.

@@DSAUDIOreview hello! I'm looking to buy t5 for my r1700 is it worth it or would it make the bass to muddy?

@@DSAUDIOreview how about add a T5 to a S1000MKII? is that a good idea?

Yep, S1000MKII has better, more musical and detailed bass response

@@DSAUDIOreview I was using the klipsch promedia 2.1, so comparing bass to that. It was amazing for metal, and movies and pop music. The edifier were great for classical and vocal but the s350 greatly disappointed me with the bass. Please let me know if this can satisfy me with the bass compared to promedia

@@cyndinn cant tell, never teted Promedia 2.1

@@DSAUDIOreview its very similar to z603 from logitech, almost the same

Edifier S1000MKII still good to invest 150€more for it?

What if your headphones aren’t that great? Surely the the only way to truly know is to be stood in front of them?

Especially in terms of sound performance？

R1700BTs is the same except for new bluetooth version (5.0) and subwoofer output. They sound the same via analog input and the "s" version sounds better via bluetooth

@@DSAUDIOreview It seems that this is not a necessary upgrade.I found a very cheap R1700BT in the local second-hand market, which only cost $40. It has only been used for less than two years, that's seems great. I have to buy it

@@user-wd2qi4lg1j yeah, if you do not need those new features then save the money

@@DSAUDIOreview Thank you for these comparison videos. I’m very curious about adding HomePod to the comparison. How about HP vs Edifier or Hivi？

Question though, can you not just split them into a powered subwoofer? Like the Edifier T5? They show that this seems to be possible on their website. Only downside to this I can think of is that it wouldnt work on a bluetooth, but you could always get a different bluetooth adapter and split it from there?

@@trentk5743 I think its possible, just too much hassle to make it work with all types of connections. Also, the speakers would still keep playing the lower frequencies if connected this way due to the lack of high pass filter.

@@-MarkWinston- Just did a bit of reading on it, you just feed it into the sub first, then into the speakers, and there is a high pass filter on the subs themselves.

@@trentk5743 having a filter on the sub is different than having a filter on the speaker. The filter on the speaker stops it from playing low frequencies when there is a sub attached, the filter on the sub does not help in this aspect.

@@-MarkWinston- Isnt the filter on the sub low pass, stopping the signals lower than a certian Hz from going out the output? Thus the speakers arent trying to play that sound anyways? The signal is fed to the subs first, stripped of the very low signals which the sub handles, then the speakers just handle the rest?

Where do you notice the most differences speking about the sound? Is IT like that s1000mkii sounds better on low volume in large room? Thank you for the feedback in advance!

Love the video, hate both pairs of speakers

мб потому что свен это нишевая акустика и находится гдето возле параши или даже ниже? ИМХО даже вонючие микролабы лучше

@@Andrew_Nekrasov у меня дома стоят два свена, тех что написал выше) и был р2800, я бы не сказал, что они както лучше в звуке))) р2800 просто масштабнее хвучит.. Но зато в силу своей , как вы сказали "мусорности", не гудят в тишине на всю комнату как р2800 , и не пишят как говно от defender или f&d

@@back_to_life0 я тебе уже, по моему говорил, что 2800 уже без малого 10 лет. без импульсного бп и пр новых комплектующих. Те же 2750 не шипят и не гудят. Возьми те же маленькие эдифаеры из обзора к сравнению со свеном и убедишься, уже раз и на всегда в том, как маленькие эдики будут хорошо играть. Тема закрыта и хватит срать свою чушь под каждым видео

Роялы простоваты по звуку, забудьте про них. Мега по басам хороша, плотнее и мясистее звучит, чем даже Edifier R1900/R2000 модели, не говоря уж об R1700, но нет в Меге той прозрачности звука и глубины, как у Эдифаеров. Да и дизайн у Свенов морально устаревший, даже современная неплохая модель MC30 выпускается в корпусе от Меги, и с древним с виду пультом ДУ. Поэтому и деньги за Эдифаеры на вторичке просят поболее, чем за Свены, у них по всем параметрам качество повыше

@@user-vn2er8lr6y и свенами и эдарасами пользуюсь. Все унылые... Все кроме р2800 хоть что то в них есть... Р2800 это как сиськи 5 ого размера радуют только этим