And we should consider applying a thixotropic fluid rather than a perfect fluid in the Friedmann matrix. Give it the same tweak that relativity gave Newtonian gravity. I sort of think that thixotropy of space is the fundamental cause of gravity. If singular membrane as density increases AND viscosity goes down then the local surface is drawn towards high density regions, rather than dragged along. And gravity is that, movement towards energy density.
If Einstein was"right the first time around" then we should be living in a "closed, static, eternal universe" instead of an accelerating expanding one...
@@alansilverman8500 The gas pressure of 14.7psi at sea level would instantly escape into the lower pressure of "the deep vacuum of space" if it were an open system. Are you familiar with the Second Law of Thermodynamics? Entropy will ALWAYS increase? Think of a bottle of pop/soda. After a few hours, it will go flat if the cap id not put back on. The earth is the bottle and the gas inside is the air we breathe. If earth was an open system, the gas would always escape. Same with acceleration. If the earth were orbiting, we would be able to measure it with FOG's and RLG's rather than make excuses for why we dont. The fact is, as the sun rises each day, our direction of orbit varies over the whole day and this is an acceleration. We do not see this acceleration. It isnt an idea, its based on the evidence available....and the missing evidence.
@@alansilverman8500 erm....I thi k that there can be no violations of the second law of thermodynamics. If that's what constitutes a nut job then yes, I'm a nut job. Arthur Eddington put it best in 1919; “If your theory is found to be against the second law of thermodynamics I can give you no hope; there is nothing for it but to collapse in deepest humiliation,” he wrote. The second law of thermodynamics is perhaps the most profound of the three laws of thermodynamics." The pressure at sea level will always press into the greatest pressure disequilibrium known on earth if we lived in an open system. If you accept there is a crush depth to a submarine (caused by pressure) and pop/soda goes flat without the lid on....then to believe the earth can be any different is,as Eddington states, hopeless. There is no science for the earth being am open system. If you think there is, explain how the Free Expansion of Gas law exists. It would have to be Directionality of Gas Law and have supporting experiment and given that we do have vacuum chambers......and live in a gravitational field...there should be an abundance of Directionality to Gas tests....yet there are none. So if that's what you mean when you use that word, I'm guilty. I prefer to use to adjective "informed". Nut job relates to people lacking in cognitive competence. I am not lacking.
His diction is nigh on perfect for a non-native English speaker. Perhaps it is you who needs to brush up on your English comprehension skills in order to understand him better.
